, or conclusions within this paper are thoseof the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. The authors would alsolike to thank Xing Chen, Ryan MacCagnan, and Vitesh Sharma for their help in developing thegame.References[1] O. Ashour, A. Seamon, C. Lopez, S. Ozden, D. DiFrancesca, and C. Tucker, “A Study on the Effectiveness of Using Integrated Nonlinear Storytelling and Simulation-Based Learning Game in an Operations Research Course,” ASEE Annual Conference Expo., 2022.[2] J. F. Lee and K. W. Pruitt, “Homework assignments: Classroom games or teaching tools?,” The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 1979.[3] W. Doyle, “Work in
term' soft skills,'" J. Manag. Inq., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 225–227, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1056492618818023.[3] L. J. Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty, "The ABET' professional skills' — Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x.[4] F. Campi, V. Neal, R. Airoldi, and J. Nurmi, "Training communication skills in project- oriented microelectronics courses," presented at the 10th European Workshop on Microelectronics Education (EWME), Tallinn, Estonia: IEEE, 2014, pp. 16–20. doi: 10.1109/EWME.2014.6877387.[5] M. J. Riemer, "Communication skills for the 21st century engineer," Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp
, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 1415–1446, 2019, doi: 10.1111/acfi.12256.[6] N. Weliweriya, E. C. Sayre, and D. A. Zollman, “The Effectiveness of ‘Pencasts’ in Physics Courses,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 161–164, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1119/1.5025294.[7] J. Herold, T. Stahovich, H. Lin, and R. C. Calfee, “The Effectiveness of ‘Pencasts’ as an Instructional Medium,” presented at the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.1452.1-22.1452.19. Accessed: Dec. 22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-effectiveness-of-pencasts-as-an-instructional-mediumAppendix A: Screencast intervention, extra credit version (Fall 2022)Appendix B: Screencast peer review rubric (Winter 2023)Appendix C: Screen
point 30 to 2019, thepoint 31 to 2020, the point 32 to year 2021, and the point 33 to year 2022. There were 13 PhDdegrees awarded in year 2020, 11 PhD degrees in year 2021, and 12 PhD degrees in year 2022. UTA mathematics GR students UTA UG mathematics majors 113 total (83 PhD and 30 master’s students) 262 total 66% domestic, 34% int’l 89% domestic, 11% int’l 45% women, 55% men 49% women, 51% men URM: 27% of all math GR students URM: 29% of all UG math majors URM: 42% of all domestic math GR URM: 33% of domestic UG math Table 1. The fall 2020 data for UTA mathematics students
. [Accessed January 2023].[3] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023," 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2022-2023/. [Accessed December 2022].[4] R. Felder and R. Brent, "Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, pp. 7-25, 2003.[5] L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini and J. F. Volkwein, "Engineering Change - A Study of the Impact of EC2000," Baltimore, 2006.[6] I. Izenberg, S. Marra, T. Mackesey, L. Kendrick and J. Bernstein, "Industry Assessment of Multidisciplinary Teamwork Skills," in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
, experimental testing, and 3D printingthrough a 4-week project while providing students an opportunity to be creative through anengaging, open-ended project of appropriate level of challenge.The assessment of the lab aimed to answer the following research questions:(1) What resources and tools do students find helpful during the lab?(2) Which major attributes of the lab are perceived as educational by students?(3) Which major attributes of the lab posed a challenge for students?(4) Which major attributes of the lab were engaging for students?IV. MethodsSample: The DBT lab was assessed over a period of two years (2019, 2020). The students wereenrolled in the required junior-level lab that met once a week in-person. A total of 39 studentsparticipated
’ reflections over the longer term.5. AcknowledgementsThe EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Embedded Intelligence is co-sponsored by theEngineering & Physical Sciences Research Council in the United Kingdom (grant numberEP/L014998/1). The authors are grateful to Dr Poul Kyvsgaard Hansen at Aalborg University(Denmark) and to Dr Ade Mabogunje at Stanford University for insightful discussions aboutthe scoring method used on candidate’s approach and attitude to this exercise. All the CDT-EI researchers who participated in this study are gratefully acknowledged.References[1] C. Torres-Sánchez and P. P. Conway, "Transition Zone: A Training Ethos Designed to Scaffold a Ph.D. Degree," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa
Paper ID #38425Student Engagement with Interactive Engineering Textbook ReadingAssignments When Tied to the GradeChelsea Gordon, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand Chelsea Gordon received her PhD in Cognitive Science at University of California, Merced in 2019. Chelsea works as a research scientist for zyBooks, a Wiley company that creates and publishes interactive, web-native textbooks in STEM.Dr. Adrian Rodriguez, University of Texas at Austin Adrian Rodriguez is an Engineering Content Developer for zyBooks, a Wiley brand and a Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. His research interests include
,” 2015, [Online]. Available: https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/9814[4] O. Leifler and J.-E. Dahlin, “Curriculum integration of sustainability in engineering education – a national study of programme director perspectives,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 877–894, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-09-2019-0286.[5] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022 – 2023.” ABET. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria- for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2022-2023/[6] J. Taylor and R. Oulton, “Engineering for People and Planet: A Multidisciplinary Course Proposal for Engineers on the UN
2001 and teaching engineering courses since 2008. Renewable Energy Technologies, Electrical Circuits and Electronics, Introduction to Engi- neering, Electrical Substations, Introduction to AutoCAD, Digital Electronics and Systems and Controls are among the courses Dr Melendez-Norona has taught. She is committed to an engineering education of excellence and to service the community and has participated in a training for cybersecurity issues immersed in smart grids also funded by the NSF. Dr Melendez-Norona is currently a postdoctoral fellow at Florida Atlantic University (Florida, United States), with the support of the ASEE eFellows program, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF).Dr. Maria M. Larrondo
, “Undergraduate student experience with research facilitated by project management and self-regulated learning processes,” in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023[6] P. Rawlusyk, “Assessment in higher education and student learning.” Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, vol. 21, 2018.[7] C. B. Davison and G. Dustova, “A quantitative assessment of student performance and examination format.” Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, vol. 18, 2017.[8] Merriam-Webster.com, 2019. Definition of EXAMINATION. [online] Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/examination.[9] A. Ghaicha, “Theoretical framework for educational assessment: A synoptic review.” Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 7, no. 24, pp. 212
of Innovative Education 2.1 (2004): 11-26.[16] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, 2021.[17] S. A. Atwood and A. Singh. "Improved pedagogy enabled by assessment using gradescope." 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2018.[18] Electrical Technology, “Active, Reactive, Apparent and Complex Power,” https://www.electricaltechnology.org/2013/07/active-reactive-apparent-and-complex.html[19] M. Yen. S. Karayev, and E. Wang. "Analysis of grading times of short answer questions." Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. 2020.[20] J. L. Falconer and J. deGrazia. "Grading Exams and
= Average of all grades in this column in %References[1] Lee, John; Wickens, Christopher; Liu, Yili; Boyle, Linda., Designing for People: AnIntroduction to Human Factors Engineering. 2017.[2] D. E. Melton, “Stacking Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Alongside OtherPedagogies,” ASEE Prism, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 32–35, 2019.[3] C. D. Wickens, W. S. Helton, J. G
Case Study of zyLabs,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37887[2] “DOMjudge - Programming Contest Jury System.” https://www.domjudge.org/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[3] “Judge0 - Where code happens.” https://judge0.com/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[4] “Sphere Online Judge (SPOJ).” https://www.spoj.com/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[5] “zyBooks - Build Confidence and Save Time With Interactive Textbooks.” https://www.zybooks.com/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[6] “Runestone Academy.” https://runestone.academy/ (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[7] “Revel | Pearson.” https://www.pearsonhighered.com/revel/index.html (accessed Feb
results (particularly Figure 4) support thefinding that even partial implementation of ETT can result in an improved teamwork experiencefor the students in the context of this study, both in terms of their perception of psychologicalsafety and their perception of how well their team embodied good teamwork practices.References[1] K. K. Wobbe and E. A. Stoddard, Project-Based Learning in the First Year: Beyond All Expectations. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2019.[2] Folk-Williams, John, “How Diversity Improves Collaborative Problem-Solving – Cross Collaborate,” Sep. 01, 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20220901160838/http://www.crosscollaborate.com/2010/05/div ersity-improves-collaborative-problem-solving/ (accessed Sep. 01, 2022).[3] D
target and perceiver effects 𝜌𝑟 0.167 correlation between reciprocal ratings Next, we independently generate two sets of 1,000 datasets using equations (6)-(15) andthe parameter values in Table 1. The first set of 1,000 smaller datasets each has 15 student teamswith five students per team, and we observe ratings across four different time periods. The nextset of 1,000 larger datasets each has 30 student teams with other settings identical. Aftergenerating the simulated datasets, we estimated the modeling parameters in Table 1 separatelyusing our Bayesian method, the SR-SEM using the "srm" R package (Nestler et al., 2019), and astandard two-step model using the "TripleR" package (Schönbrodt et al., 2012). The
Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Education by Improving Teaching and Assessment,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–30, 2019.[28] National Research Council, How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2000.[29] H. W. Fennell, G. S. Coutinho, A. J. Magana, D. Restrepo, and P. D. Zavattieri, “Enhancing student meaning-making of threshold concepts via computation: The case of Mohr’s circle,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017, vol. 2017-June.[30] K. Smith, S. Sheppard, D. Johnson, and R. Johnson, “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no
-Life Balance Is a Myth. Do This Instead, TimeMagazine, June 6, 2019, https://time.com/5601671/work-life-balance-advice-love-loathe/Deenadayalan, Y., Grimmer‐Somers, K., Prior, M., & Kumar, S. (2008). “How to run an effectivejournal club: a systematic review.” Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 14(5), 898-911.Gehringer, Edward F., “Using independent-study projects in your research and teaching program,”2007 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education,Honolulu, HI, June 24–27, 2007.Gelman, Andrew, and Eric Loken. “The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be aproblem, even when there is no ‘fishing expedition’ or ‘p-hacking’ and the research hypothesis wasposited ahead of time
. Balapgol, “Employability skill matrix for engineering graduates of tier-II institutes,” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 30(3), 71-76, 2017.[2] A. Eggleston, A., R. Rabb, and R. Welch, “Employer and Student Mismatch in Early-Career Skill Development, Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/40895.[3] STEMNext. [Accessed Feb. 26, 2023]. [Online]. Available: https://stemnext.org/wp- content/uploads/2020/04/Engineering-mindset-brief_Final.pdf[4] KEEN. [accessed 26 February 2023]. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/mindset.[5] N. K. Schlossberg, “A Model for Analyzing Human Adaptation to Transition
career success: a pilot study,” in ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, paper # 11735, 2015.[2] A. Mohammadi, K. Grosskopf, and J. Killingsworth, “Workforce development throughonline experiential learning for STEM education,” Adult Learning, vol. 31. no. 1, 2019.[3] J. M. Nunley et al., “College major, internship experience, and employment opportunities:Estimates from a résumé audit,” Labour Economics, vol. 38, pp. 37-46, January 2016.[4] E. Townsley et al., “The impact of undergraduate internships on post-graduate outcomes forthe liberal arts,” NACE Center for Career Development and Talent Acquisition, TechnicalReport, 2017.[5] J. Gault, J. Redington, and T. Schlager, “Undergraduate business internships and careersuccess: Are they related
-33052007000100001.[2] R. E. Vásquez, F. Castrillón, S. Rúa, N. L. Posada, & C. A. Zuluaga, «Curriculum change for graduate-level control engineering education at the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana», IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, n.o 9, pp. 306-311, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.08.225.[3] M. E. Serna & J. A. Polo, «Logic and Abstraction in Engineering Education: A Necessary Relationship», Ingeniería Investigación y Tecnología, vol. XV, n.o 21, pp. 299-310, abr. 2013.[4] L. R. Vega-González, «La educación en ingeniería en el contexto global: propuesta para la formación de ingenieros en el primer cuarto del Siglo XXI», Ingeniería, Investigación y Tecnología, vol. 14, n.o 2, pp. 177-190, abr. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S1405
Interventions.” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 4, 2021, pp. 503–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1903835. 3. Claro, Susana, et al. “Growth Mindset Tempers the Effects of Poverty on Academic Achievement.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, vol. 113, no. 31, 2016, pp. 8664–68, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113. 4. Margo. L. Brewer, Gisela van Kessel, Brooke Sanderson, Fiona Naumann, Murray Lane, Alan Reubenson & Alice Carter (2019) Resilience in higher education students: a scoping review, Higher Education Research & Development, 38:6, 1105-1120, DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2019.1626810 5. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation
, and graduate schoolacceptance. Nonetheless, the desire to attain a competitive grade-point-average may lead tonegative psychosocial effects such as increased mental exertion, physical exhaustion, anxiety, andoverall lack of work-life balance. In this paper, the authors extend their prior study on the impactof grades in engineering education. The first study was conducted in the spring of 2019 at a tierone, small private research university in Texas with the intention of understanding the mindset ongrades before, during, and at the end of the semester. The study extended herein aims to explorethe emotional and academic impact grades have on engineering undergraduate students in aminority-serving institution, and further understand the issues
contribution to theliterature in this context.Table 1. Summary of prior literature that focuses on labor based grading methods. Author/Citation Year Class Context Summary Medina [10] 2018 English Social justice pedagogy and grading contracts. Inoue [3] 2019 English Equity and inclusion in the context of labor based grading. Gomes et al. [11] 2020 English Student and faculty narratives about grading contracts. Shubert [12
Interactive Timeline, last updated April 21, 2021, https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-evolution-interactive-timeline[4] J. Hamilton, “Myth Busting: The Truth About Animals And Tools,” National Public Radio, 2011. https://www.npr.org/2011/12/23/143833929/myth-busting-the-truth-about-animals-and-to ols (accessed Feb. 24, 2023).[5] D. Fraga, “The Manifesto of Ontological Design,” Medium, 2020. https://medium.datadriveninvestor.com/the-manifesto-of-ontological-design-7fdb191691 07 (accessed Feb. 24, 2023).[6] S. Fernandez, A. Kumar, and M. T. Alkattan, “Solidarity Engineering using a Pedagogy of Love,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2022.[7] D. Walls, “The
, “Levers for Change: An assessment of progress on changing STEM instruction,” American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Nov. 2019. Accessed: Aug. 28, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.aaas.org/resources/levers-change-assessment-progress-changing-stem-instr uction[3] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and N. D. Finkelstein, “Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 952–984, 2011, doi: 10.1002/tea.20439.[4] “POD Network,” POD Network: Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education, 2022. https://podnetwork.org/ (accessed Dec. 09, 2022).[5] ISSOTL, “International Society for the
Electrical and Computer Engineering from Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. He is a member of ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University Rebecca Thomas is the inaugural director for the Pathways Program at Bucknell University, where she oversees the rollout of Bucknell’s E-Portfolio initiative. She is also an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering since 2018 and currently instructs the first-year course for ECE majors. She holds a B.S. and M.Eng. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Louisville and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from North Carolina State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023