Paper ID #35068Prototype Development for Adaptive Solar Tracking and Optimization ofData Communication ProtocolMr. James D. Kaul, Marshall University CCSE Graduated from Woodrow Wilson High School & Raleigh County Academy of Careers & Technology in 2003 with a concentration in Computer Networking and Electronics. Graduated with Honors from Mountwest Community & Technical College in Applied Engineering Design Technology in Spring 2014. Joined Marshall University Fall 2014, and graduated with a Bachelors of Electrical/Computer Engineering in Dec. 2020.Mr. Gregory Dovel WeedJared CunninghamImtiaz AhmedDr. Wook-Sung
, propulsion, structures, launch and recovery, mission planning, weapons and sensor payloads, materials, and ground and airborne system data links; introduction to and application of fundamentals of unmanned aerial vehicle design, construction, testing, and operation; application of numerical tools, computer-aided design tools, and common engineering planning tools (e.g. MATLAB®, SIMULINK®, SolidWorks®, Solid Edge®, MS Project®, and others); exposure to effective mathematical methodologies and computational techniques for solving technological problems; providing a knowledge basis from which students may identify academic pathways related to UAS; preparing students for personal research and/or career
of everyday job duties. Learning to code and mastering in any one of the widely-usedprogramming languages has become a key component in a student’s curriculum vitae. With thedrive towards this programming trend, recently kids as young as 7 years of age have started tolearn programming basics through several development tools that achieve the learning outcomesthrough Block-based programming2. In such tools, learners are taught about the data structures,loops and programming style by helping them arrange simple colored blocks one after another.In Undergraduate curriculum, most of the students who opt for engineering degrees, do not havethe programming background due to their career interests. But the increasing trend to learn to code,has made
the students were asked to rank the importance of each factor in the certificationprogram, the highest score was for “Learning more about 3D printing” with 4.22 points out of 5points. Other reasons and scores are as in Table 1.When the students were asked if the certification program had changed their career goals, twostudents stated that the certification program “made me change my current college and careerinterest,” and one student stated that certification program “supported my current college and careerinterest.” Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Baylor University, Waco, TX Copyright 2021, American Society for Engineering
registered professional engineer with APEGA (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta). Prior to her career at MacEwan, Shelley worked in industry as a research engineer and a consulting engineer for several years.Dr. Jeffrey A Davis P.Eng., Grant MacEwan University Dr. Davis’ research focuses on pedagogical topics such as student engagement, active learning, and cognitive development. Projects he is currently working on include ”Development of a risk assessment model for the retention of students”, ”Development of Student Assessment Software”, and ”Improving Student Engagement through Active Learning”. American c
recipient of numerous awards, including He is the recipient of multiple awards, including the NSF CAREER Award, IBM Faculty Partnership Award, National Semiconductor Faculty Development Award, and the General Motors Faculty Fellowship Award. He is currently a senior member of the IEEE and a member of Eta Kappa Nu and Tau Beta Pi engineering honor societies. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Introducing and Facilitating Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Research for Undergraduate Students and High School TeachersAbstractThe Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) is a rapidly growing community of intelligent medicaltechnologies dedicated to
chose a career path that emphasized quantitative processes (theengineer) over the qualitative processes (the artist) or vice versa (nurture vs. nature). Inany event, one characteristic of a good designer is the ability to generate manyalternatives (brainstorm) and then evaluate. (“One idea is a bad idea.”) Sometimes thegenerating and selecting process is interrupted by “fixation” as described next. Results for the Evaluation of Two Skills in Engineering StudentsFixationFixation or functional fixedness is associated with the premature commitment to thesolution to a problem. In the case of designers these early design decisions are usuallyrepresented by the adoption of an idea or form previously developed. This fixedness cantake two forms
– TMAC Gulf Coast Region at the University of Houston.AYMARA BOGGIANOShe received the BA in 1982 and MA in 1987 from The Ohio State University. Her career as a Spanish, French, andEnglish language teacher spans over 19 years. She has effectively applied the communicative, proficiency andinteractive-based teaching approaches in a variety of educational environments, including K-12, Community Colleges,Universities, and Industry, in the US and in Venezuela. She is currently at the University of Houston where she teachesSpanish Language and Spanish for Heritage Speakers courses. She is also the coordinator of The Spanish LanguageProgram. Her current interests include Training Teaching Assistants and Part-time faculty, and exploring innovative usesof
√ 1 C 29. Promote Engineering Careers to the American Public √ √ 2 D 30. Have a General BA in Engineering √ 1 C 31. Focus on Early Science and Math Course Improvements. √ √ 2 B 32. Include Communication and Multi-cultural Skills. √ 1 C 33. Modern Students Grew-Up in a “Video Gaming” Environment. √ 1 B 34. Increased Focus on Research
own chosen fieldof engineering4.Students too are voicing their desire to put their hands on real world equipment andprojects during their university education experience. At Wichita State University,students participate in a recently implemented program that provides hands-onmanufacturing skills to mechanical engineering students. The students revealed somevery positive feedback on their course evaluation documents after completing the course: • “provides an awareness to the practical areas of my career.” • “the practical application was by far the best part.” • “really enjoyed the welding, machining was also very useful and interesting.” • “the more focus on
that field for more than 2 years while studying. He plans to do graduate studies inrisk management.ROBIE CALONGRobie Calong is currently a senior pursuing a Bachelor of Science degree in Computer Engineering Technology atthe University of Houston. His interest, after graduating in Fall 2008, is to pursue a career in hardware developmentand plans to study in Audio Engineering. He is open-minded to learn many different ways and takes prior measures,for example, one of his major interests is to mainly research and develop different methods in problem solving. Hecurrently resides in Pearland, Texas, where he primarily focuses on his studies, while in his leisure time he playsbasketball, surf the interest for new technologies, etc.FARROKH
our conversation with you. Sincerely, Dr. Benjamin S. Kelley, P.E. Dean, School of Engineering and Computer ScienceThe planned purpose of the phone conversation was to gage the student’s motivation, interest, andpreparation to study engineering or computer science at Baylor. If it was judged that the studentwould be better served by selecting and studying in a non-ECS major, then the interviewer (the ECSStudent Success Specialist) would consider what other paths and Baylor resources might beappropriate for the student to investigate. Campus resources such as the Paul L. Foster SuccessCenter and the Career Services office would be made fully available to these students, so that theconversation would remain as positive and
TRNSYS would havebeen introduced sooner. (Undoubtedly, they quickly realized that it would have made certainearly assignments easier!) However, as argued above, the timing of its introduction in the classyielded some pedagogical advantage. Students were soon able to tackle quite sophisticated Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering Educationprojects, far beyond what could reasonably be expected using general-purpose computationalsoftware such as MATLAB or Excel in reasonable time. Furthermore, as more and more studentsproceed into careers in energy, it is
involveintense identity exploration and a period of planning for the transition to a career and adulthood[1]. When coupled with the demands of rigorous academic coursework and requirements, thisperiod of development can present significant psychological challenges. Indeed, mental healthconcerns have been increasing on college campuses, as students report more symptoms of stress,depression, and anxiety [2], [3]. This is concerning given the evidence of the link betweenmental health during college and students’ academic achievement, retention, work-ethic, andsocial well-being [1], [4]. Perhaps more alarming is the fact that suicide is the second-leadingcause of death on college campuses [1], [5].Seeking help from mental health professionals is one way
Ruby[13] are not addressed, as the projects have neither been completed, nor have they publiclyreported on the research outcomes. Future research should evaluate what worked and hadmeasurable effects on student educational outcomes and what did not work and how the contextinformed the results.Conclusion The primary goal of these programs from the onset was to make early computingeducation accessible to kids all across the nation in order to promote further CS learningthroughout student’s educational careers. The expectation for many of these RPP programs wasthat they could potentially serve as first contact initiatives for kids in rural and urban areas wherequality CS education is less accessible from a younger age, but that did not
same authors and others describethe importance of connecting with industry partners to align disciplines and industry to oneanother. However, it was found that both needs could be addressed by connecting to industrypartners more fruitfully. Specifically, both stakeholders can provide to each other’s needs in theform of funding, training, and provision of career pathways to students. Having described the broadscope of engineering education as it relates to NDM teaching and learning, I now move to a morein-depth discussion of ideas.6. Discussion of ThemesIn this section, I wish to take a step forward and dig deeper into the themes of the many works Iread and reviewed. Specifically, I hope to target the issues I have found out about NDM
is to bean expert in this area, rather than letting novices construct this knowledge independently. Byhelping students develop in real-time the tacit knowledge necessary to succeed in a skill, career,or position, an expert can cultivate the proper behaviors and skills. A trade-off withapprenticeship models is their commitment to a long-term relationship between the novice andexpert, rather than the shorter-term learning models described above.Course OverviewThe Oshman Engineering Design Kitchen (OEDK) facility at Rice University hosts courses aspart of the first credentialled engineering design minor in the United States. One of the requiredcourses in the minor is ENGI 210: Prototyping and Fabrication. This course introduces studentsto a
assignment would need to be amenable to social distancing, adaptableto a return to remote learning, while also being valuable for students learning and skill building.Moreover, the project should fulfill various course learning outcomes, including training studentsto thrive in 21st century careers that require ample digital collaboration.The InspirationThe course project was inspired by Wired Magazine’s video series called “5 Levels” [27]. Thetwelve episode series invites experts in a wide range of areas – from laser physics to musicalharmonies to sleep science – to explain an advanced topic to five audiences (a child, teenager,undergraduate, graduate student, and colleague). The videos include sequential discussions withan individual from each
of the topics. How well the instructor 6.67 7 7 6.47 7 7 6.64 7 7 promoted and meaningful learning experience. The positive attributes of AE 401 in the SRTE comments remained the ability to watch theshort segmented videos ahead of time and review the examples as often as needed with voice over.Students also commended the course organization (notes, topic flow, and Canvas website) in theirability to navigate it. While it was busy at times, the project put the context of the class intoperspective and connected students to content they are likely to see in their careers. In terms ofimprovements, one piece of advice was to keep writing out the variable form of the equationsbefore doing
multiple STEM disciplines. She enjoys observing the intellectual and professional growth in students as they prepare for engineering careers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Home-Based Cantilever Beam Experiment for Civil Engineering Undergraduate StudentsAbstractThere is a growing concern in engineering fields during the ongoing pandemic regarding howstudents will be able to achieve one of the major learning outcomes: an ability to conductappropriate experimentation (away from campus), analyze, interpret data, and useengineering/scientific judgement to draw conclusions. Experimental Centric Pedagogy (ECP) hasbeen shown to
NUStage, Northeastern’s student-run musical theater organization.Ms. Alexis Pathwick-Paszyc, Northeastern University Alexis is a third-year undergraduate student majoring in bioengineering at Northeastern University. This is her first year working with the Connections Chemistry Review Program. Additionally, she is working as a COE Undergraduate Program Assistant. She previously worked as a co-op student for the College of Engineering as the COE Undergraduate Upper-class Tutoring Coordinator and Supervisor.Dr. Paul DiMilla, Northeastern University During his academic career as a faculty member in engineering and the sciences at Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity, Olin College, and Northeastern University, Paul A. DiMilla has
ofreal-world experience as a factor in the ENGINE student experience is not surprising. Similarly,given the generally important role that faculty and teaching assistants (TAs) play in studentlearning as well as the importance of grades to undergraduates, the emergence of instructionalsupport and assessment as factors in the capstone design experience is also justified. Andfinally, the fourth factor, task value serves as an indication of students' motivation to participatein the ENGINE capstone experience. Task value draws from expectancy-value theory and hasbeen demonstrated to be a distinct contributor to academic engagement and effort [26, 27] aswell as educational and career aspirations [28].RQ2: Was there a difference in student perceptions
societies [18], and industry sectors [19]. Collaborations from thesestakeholders support the translation of novel DDS from laboratory or “benchtop” research through commercialization, clinical trials and regulatory bodies and onto the patient, or “bedside” [20]. As a multidisciplinary field, researchers have contributed to engineering curriculum by developing drug delivery courses to engage engineering students with varied interest in medicine and the desire to pursue biomedical careers in pharmaceutical industries, research intensive institutions, and medical schools [21]. Historically, students enter this course with prior knowledge of chemical engineering fundamentals, and are instructed by bioengineering and chemical engineering
Assistant Pro- fessor of psychology at Pennsylvania State University, Beaver, She has previously served as an assistant professor and program director, or psychologist and international student services and career coordinator at universities. She has had presentations in teaching and learning, prevention, and multicultural coun- seling and teaching. Clinically, she has provided individual, group, career, and couples therapy to clients age ranging from 3 to 74 at counseling centers, community mental health agencies, and group and private practices.Kris McLain, Pennsylvania State University Kris McLain is a dual-title PhD candidate in Philosophy and Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. Her research lies at the
leadership development, performance management, competency development and people analytics. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to develop STEM workforce both in universities and companies.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S
Washington State University (2013-2014) and George Mason University (2014-2017). Throughout his career, his primary responsibility as a faculty member has been teaching students, for which he aspires to provide them with a quality and enjoyable experience.Dr. William A. Kitch, Angelo State University Dr. Kitch is Professor and Chair of the David L. Hirschfeld Department of Engineering at Angelo State University. Before starting his academic career he spent 24 years as a practicing engineer in both the public and private sector. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado, California and Texas American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Make
, George had a distinguished 31-year career at Ford Motor Company, where he held numerous positions as Chief Engineer of multiple vehicle lines (Expedi- tion/Navigator, Crown Victoria, Grand Marquis, Town Car, and Ranger), several engineering leadership positions in automotive interiors and exteriors, and possesses operational experience in product design, manufacturing, and business & technology strategy. George has also been a very active mentor and coach, both in industry (serving on multiple personnel development committees and special projects to enhance organizational competency) and in academia (serving as the Ford Executive Champion for University of Michigan Student Teams, and Ford lead re- cruiter for
—creating space for both declared and undeclaredcomputer science majors and minors. This is important for early computing undergraduates whomay need to see computing in a less depoliticized context that is clearly connected to the socialjustice to persist in the field. From an institutional and curricular standpoint, an electivedesignation reduces any illusory competition with other subject areas of computing. While late-career academics may have the authority among their department peers to bring such a courseinto the core, the elective designation supports early career academics who may not be supportedto make such a proposition. Thus, the elective designation settles for not exclusion from “core”computing curricular knowledge to be more
collaboration was extended to include peer observations from contentspecific teachers outside their campus using a non-directive approach to observations [25].AMP! focuses on in-service 8th and 9th grade teachers while the goal of having them inspire,motivate, and encourage students. The impact of training teachers is amplified, as one teacherover a ten-year career can interact with thousands of students. Excellent teachers have studentswho perform better on tests, are more likely to attend college, enter jobs with higher salaries, aswell as have fewer social problems [26,27]. Among the multitude of school factors, teacherquality is the most influential in student outcomes extending beyond their academic years[28,29]. Yet, despite their vital
theirresponses to each of the questions below. Each response has been included in exactly the formthat each panelist provided, and then all responses are summarized for each question.Question #1 – For what reasons are you an ally or advocate for women in engineering-relatedfields?Panelist #1: For anyone who is underrepresented in their chosen career, it is very hard toovercome imposter syndrome and to advocate for oneself within existing and perceived powerand privilege structures. It has been shown that until there is a critical mass of thoseunderrepresented (around 1/3), these issues exist. This means that for women to not only advancein engineering (and ultimately achieve critical mass), they need allies and advocates to help themnavigate the