Paper ID #34883Pandemic! Influencing Girls’ Fear of Failure in a STEM + ComputationalThinking Program (Work in Progress)Dr. Henriette D. Burns, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Henriette is a STEM Fellow at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. She has worked at Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Labs, Baxter Labs, Tenneco, Monsanto, Frucon Construction, SC Johnson Wax and HP as a design engineer, a manufacturing engineer and a project manager. She holds an engineering degree from Northwestern University, an MBA from University of Oregon, an MiT and a Ph.D. in Math/Science Education from Washington State University
Paper ID #34463Visual Teaching Philosophy Empowering Inclusive Learning and ManagingExpectationsDr. Tawfik Elshehabi, University of Wyoming Dr. Tawfik Elshehabi is a Senior Academic Professional Lecturer at the University of Wyoming. He joined the College of Engineering and Applied Science in 2017 as an Associate Lecturer. Currently, he serves as the Program ABET Accreditation Coordinator. He also manages the simulation facility in the Engineering Education and Research Building. He is a registered Professional Engineer with the State of Wyoming. He received his Ph.D. degree in Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering from West
Practice at Work. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1999.[9] D. Riley, "Rigor/Us: Building boundaries and disciplining diversity with standards of merit," Engineering Studies, vol. 9, pp. 249-265, 2017.[10] W. Faulkner, "Gender in and of Technology," in Science, Technology and Society International Symposium, Istanbul, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences Publications, 1999.[11] J. Trevelyan, "Mind the gaps: engineering education and practice," in Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 2010, p. 383.[12] K. L. Tonso, On the outskirts of engineering: Learning identity, gender, and power via
Paper ID #30451Assessment of the Effects of Participation in a Summer Bridge Experiencefor WomenDr. Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University Dr. Laura Bottomley, Teaching Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Elementary Education, is also the Director of Women in Engineering and The Engineering Place at NC State University. She has been working in the field of engineering education for over 20 years. She is dedicated to conveying the joint messages that engineering is a set of fields that can use all types of minds and every person needs to be literate in engineering and technology. She is an ASEE and
Paper ID #26077Work In Progress: From Face-to-Face to Online Learning Environments: ATransition to a Learner-centered ApproachDr. John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida John Mendoza Garcia is a Lecturer at the Institute for Excellence in Engineering Education in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering in the University of Florida. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation at Purdue University, and he has a Master’s and a Bachelor’s in Systems and Computing Engineer- ing from Universidad de Los Andes, in Colombia, and Universidad Nacional de Colombia respectively. He teaches professional skills like
Paper ID #19498What is the Relationship between Mindset and Engineering Identity for FirstYear Male and Female Students? An Exploratory Longitudinal StudyMs. Heather Lysbeth Henderson, West Virginia University With a background in English, philosophy, science, and all levels of education, Heather is currently a doc- toral student in curriculum and instruction and educational psychology. She is interested in psychological barriers affecting retention and success for students. Having been raised by an engineer, this project is close to her heart.Dr. Karen E Rambo-Hernandez, West Virginia University Karen E. Rambo-Hernandez
conclusions based onthe data that emerged from the study.Rationale and Literature Review:A study conducted by three researchers with the Center for International Business Education andResearch found that almost 40% of U.S. companies surveyed missed international businessopportunities because of a lack of internationally competent personnel. Given that 95% ofconsumers live outside of the United States, it is important for students to gain internationalexperience (Daniel, Xie, & Kedia, 2014). With those numbers in mind, the National Academy ofEngineering states that a core need for engineers is to be able to work with a diverse,multinational, and multidisciplinary workforce. Therefore, engineering colleges must developstrategies that provide global
up and execute STEM outreach activities to encourage young women tobecome more involved in engineering/technology fields. By setting up STEM programs offeredspecifically to young women, young minds are given an opportunity to get hands on experienceas to some of the duties of what a career in engineering could entail, helping clear awayconfusion regarding the field. Programs like these would also offer a kind of support systembetween fellow students and the teacher, helping encourage young women to stay involved in thefield. This paper describes such a program implemented in a University in Louisiana. Theprogram employs female students currently attending an engineering technology program at auniversity to teach young women from neighboring
Paper ID #21252’Is Someone in Your Family an Entrepreneur?’: Examining the Influence ofFamily Role Models on Students’ Entrepreneurial Self-efficacy and its Varia-tion Across GenderDr. Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan Prateek Shekhar is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the University of Michigan. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research into practice and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineer- ing from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of
beendeemed necessary (Cook & Campbell, 1979). Therefore, the assessment of the research center-based mentoring program described above was designed with these considerations in mind.2.2. Assessment of the present mentoring studyFirst, both the initial 4-year duration of the program and the fact that data is being collected atmultiple and regular intervals ensures the availability of longitudinal data that may in turn helpdetermine the amount of time it takes for mentoring effects to emerge and the length of time thatthese effects persist (Jacobi, 1991). Moreover, data is being acquired for both a treatment group –URM engineering students participating in the research center-based mentoring program tobroaden participation in engineering (BPE
home.MethodsThe goal of our research is to shed some more light on the importance of some of the factorsdiscussed above for choosing engineering as a major and to examine their differential and uniqueeffects on the choice of women and men. With this in mind, we surveyed 806 freshmen andsophomore students at a public university, enrolled in biology, engineering and business classes,and asked them a series of questions about their choice of a major. Out of the 806 students whoparticipated, 752 provided complete responses to all survey questions and their demographics arereflected in Table 2. This institution is a public state university classified as R1(Highest researchactivity) by the Carnegie classification and offers a wide range of undergraduate
School of Mines Dr. Barbara Moskal is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics and the Director of the Trefny Institute for Educational Innovation at the Colorado School of Mines. She is also a senior associate editor of the Journal for Engineering Education. Her research interests include: measurement, assessment, outreach, and diversity.Dr. Jerry Dwyer, Texas Tech University Dr. Jerry Dwyer is a professor in the Department of Mathematics & Statistics and Director of the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Center for Outreach, Research & Education (STEM-CORE) at Texas Tech University. He worked for many years in computational mechanics related to fracture, composite materials and
Paper ID #14124A Scaffolding Case Study for Teaching Engineering Problem Solving to Un-derrepresented MinoritiesDr. Morris M. Girgis, Central State University Morris Girgis is a professor at Central State University. He teaches undergraduate courses in manufactur- ing engineering. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Hannover University, Germany. His current research in engineering education focuses on developing and implementing new educational tools and approaches to enhance teaching, learning and assessment at the course and curriculum levels
Paper ID #12899The Impact of Federally Funded Scholarship Programs on the Success ofTransfer Students at a Public Engineering CollegeDr. David M. Ford, University of Massachusetts, Amherst David M. Ford is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at UMass Amherst. He is also on the Faculty Advisory Board for the Diversity Programs Office (DPO) in the College. The DPO provides academic and non-academic support to increase enrollment, retention, and graduation among under-represented minorities and women.Dr. Paula Rees, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Paper ID #12820Tricks of the trade: Developing research fundingDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing. Page 26.1607.1
AbstractStatistics data show that there is a huge gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) workforces in the United States. In order to encourage more women to work in theSTEM fields, the first step is to attract women to pursue the STEM majors. Robotics provides aneasy, fun, and exciting environment for young minds, while exposing them to technologies at thesame time. This paper describes our collaboration with an all-girl high school in offering theirstudents a year-long robotics workshop. The motivation of this collaboration is two-folded. Onone side, the school administration is interested in bringing engineering and technologies to theircurriculum, which is currently missing. From our side, we would like to motivate and
students inSTEM fields, including those who changed majors within the STEM fields or out of the STEMfields, using anonymous surveys with a focus on gaining insight into why some female studentsleave STEM fields (particularly engineering). Data will be analyzed for recurring themes amongthe students in their experiences both positive and negative (e.g., moments they thought theywanted to quit, experiences that caused them to feel they could or could not achieve a STEMdegree, what changed their mind about staying, or what event caused them to switch to adifferent field). Though this research the authors’ hope to gain insight into why some femalestudents leave STEM fields and others stay. The goal of this paper is to correlate experiences ofthe
Paper ID #30712Successful Strategies for attracting more female students to EngineeringMajors in Emerging Economies: The case of Southern MexicoProf. Miguel X. Rodriguez-Paz, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM) Prof. Rodr´ıguez-Paz got his B.Sc. In Civil Engineering from Tecnologico de Oaxaca in 1993. He studied a M.Sc. In Structural Engineering at Tecnologico de Monterrey and got his Ph.D. from the University of Wales at Swansea in 2003 where he did research on Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics as a post-doc Research Officer. In August 2004 he joined Tecnologico de Monterrey at its Puebla Campus. He is a full professor of
majors and careers. Based on interviews with and surveys offourth- and fifth-grade girls participating in an engineering outreach program, we questionwhether youth are looking for career role models, and we challenge the assumption that youthwill take up an adult as a role model simply because the adult is presented as such. We questionwhat role these “models” play in the minds and lives of youth and argue that it may differ fromwhat we expect. To be clear, we are not arguing that engineering role models are not importantor not influential. Rather, we think it is important to gain a better understanding of how youth,particularly girls, view these potential engineering role models, which will allow us to optimizethe significance of these adults
Paper ID #16789Social Consciousness in Engineering Students: An Analysis of Freshmen De-sign Project AbstractsMaya Rucks, Louisiana Tech University Maya Rucks is an engineering education doctoral student at Louisiana Tech University. She received her bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of Louisiana at Monroe. Her areas of interest include, minorities in engineering, K-12 engineering, and engineering curriculum development.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and Associate Director of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC) at
which Hofstede [28] generallyrefers to as “the collective programming of the mind” (p. 1). These links between diversity, earlysocialization, and culture provide credible avenues for exploring attitudes in workplaces that maypositively or negatively efforts to increase organizational diversity.This paper, therefore, examines engineers’ acculturation attitudes about their workplace culture.We define acculturation attitudes as individuals’ preferences for what should happen whendifferent individuals or groups within a given culture interact [29]. Our research questions are:RQ1 What are the acculturation attitudes exhibited by working engineers?RQ2 How are engineers’ demographic characteristics related to these attitudes?We answered these
such a way as to mitigate or eliminate them. to me, there is nomiddle ground. I am either part of the problem or part of the solution. I can be an opponent ofwomen in engineering or I can be an ally. I choose to try to be an ally. I choose to try, inwhatever ways I can, to break down the systems of inequality that prevent all people fromattaining the fullness of their possibilities.Another moral take (it's the right thing to do, part 2): were the tables turned and engineering wasdominated by women, I would want women to be allies and advocates for me. there's plenty ofmoral philosophy that would generally agree that, if I would want women in engineering to bemy ally, then I should be an ally to women in engineering. several that come to mind
experiences, Kairys’ research interests lie in working to understand the systemic barriers, biases and insensitivities that underlie many racially and ethnically diverse people’s inability or general aversion to seeking mental health support.Ms. Shivani Sakri, Arizona State University Shivani Sakri (she/her/hers) is a first-year doctoral student in the Engineering Education Systems and Design Ph.D. program at Arizona State University. Prior to joining this program, Shivani pursued Me- chanical Engineering from the University of Pune in India and completed her Master’s in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Shivani’s research interests lie in engineering control systems, experiences of women in
challenges throughout the world, more research isneeded when it comes to understanding the role and presence of women in different contexts.The Middle East, in general, and the Gulf region, in particular, represent an exciting opportunityfrom this perspective. On the one hand, the scarcity of previously conducted research on thistopic has opened a niche for this type of work. On the other hand, studying the region’s rapidsocio-economic transformations may shed some light regarding the vital role of women in non-Western contexts, particularly when it comes to encouraging participation in traditionally male-dominated fields.Attracting “every young mind to engineering” is, for UNESCO, closely related to achieving theMillennium Development Goals
campus’ postsecondaryprogram. The course has many goals, chief among them to promote awareness of students withID on campus, dispel misconceptions about the abilities of these students, and to promote aninterest in STEM fields for all students involved. Persons with disabilities are vastlyunderrepresented in engineering disciplines and people with ID experience unemploymentgreater than 60% [8]. With this in mind, we designed this course to both promote an interest inSTEM for all students involved, and we also introduced the idea of self-employment by way ofentrepreneurship as another avenue toward employment and self-determination.Undergraduate students in this course came from several different STEM fields includinginformation systems, business
significant pieces of it are and what it all means. And being able to think through a problem very critically and they just retrained my mind on how to think about a problem. Whereas before I was less efficient on how I was solving problems.She continues to describe engineering items she learned including optimization and problemsolving on her own.In addition to the confidence statements, cohort two students responded to statements indicatingtheir plans to pursue a degree in rehabilitation engineering. At the beginning and end of theprogram Erica strongly agreed or agreed with the following statements: • I plan to continue to pursue opportunities to learn more about engineering and computing in rehabilitation and assistive
puts her mind to. The girls emphasized their need for moreSTEAM programs, summer camps, mentors, engineering courses, internships, engineeringgames, hard work, and women engineer networks to strengthen their persistence. Due to personalreasons attributed to learning difficulties and other preferred career interests, 14% of the girlswere hesitant about engineering and technology careers.This research experience program improved the knowledge, self-efficacy and persistence ofminority middle-school girls. It can be replicated successfully at other institutions, particularly atHBCUs. In the long term, effective research experiences in alternative learning environments canincrease minority middle-school girls’ self-efficacy, persistence and improve
engineeringeducation. It is a theory of learning founded on the premise that the reflection of our experienceswill construct our own understanding of future knowledge, much like the purposeful, deliberate,and systematic nature of engineering, which requires reflection on past knowledge to constructfuture creations. There are several guiding principles of constructivism30,41,47,63,74:1. Understanding comes from interactions with the environment. A learner’s knowledge comes from his/her pre-existing knowledge and experience, and new knowledge is formed when connecting previous experience to the new content and environment.2. Conflict in the mind or puzzlement is the stimulus for learning and determines the organization and
Paper ID #24668EML Indices to Assess Student Learning through Integrated e-Learning Mod-ulesDr. Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of four grants related to the development of an entrepreneurial mindset in students by utilizing integrated e-learning modules and experiential learning opportunities. Through these grant entrepreneurial thinking is being integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs, and 75 engineering and computer science faculty at 53 other
belonging in engineering and theuniversity community: • Q2: How useful do you feel the university resources have been for you this quarter? • Q3: How connected and supported do you feel by your peers and community? • Q4: How comfortable do you feel about seeking out your professors with questions and concerns?Data AnalysisQualitativeReflections were read and analyzed using a discourse analysis technique. Discourse analysis is aqualitative research method that aims at uncovering meaning from written and spoken language(10). For each reflection we kept in mind the study questions and took note of how the studentengaged with their engineering identity and sense of belonging. The depth and significance ofthe reflection was judged in part by