as evaluator of three NSF grants awarded to New York Institute of Technology (NYIT), College of Engineering and Computer Science. She is recently retired as Associate Professor and Chair of Instructional Technology and Ed- ucational Leadership graduate programs at NYIT School of Education. Dr. McPherson has experience in national and international projects, such Social Media in Education in Abu Dhabi, UAE; Develop- ing Learning Objectives and Assessment Strategies in Curriculum for Cleaner Production for a US State Department project in Latin America; Technology Enriched Instruction Microsoft Teacher Education Ini- tiative Faculty Workshop Series at several locations worldwide, UNESCO meeting in Thailand, S. Korea
Senate Resolution, ASEE Prism, and Voice of America.Dr. Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee Clark is Research Assistant Professor of Industrial Engineering and Director of Assessment for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. She conducts research on education projects that focus on active learning and engineering professional development. Current research includes the propagation of active learning throughout the Swanson School and the use of systematic reflection and metacognitive activities within coursework. She received the Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and the MS in Mechanical Engineering from
served as Division Chair of the Women in Engineering Division. She is the recipient of the 2011 New Jersey Section of ASCE Educator of the Year award as well as the 2013 Distinguished Engineering Award from the New Jersey Alliance for Action.Prof. Harriet Hartman, Rowan University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #30401 Professor of Sociology, Chair of Sociology and Anthropology Department, Rowan University. Co-p.i. of RED NSF RevED project at Rowan University. Editor-in-chief, Contemporary Jewry.Dr. Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University Dr. Ralph Dusseau is a
STEM. According to a2018 report [1], the percentage of 13-17 years old boys interested in stem declined from 36 in2017 to 24 in 2018. On the other end of the spectrum, the industry’s need for a STEM-educatedworkforce is burgeoning with an expected growth of almost 7% in the next five years with 3.5million STEM jobs to be filled by 2025 [2]. The gap between need and availability is increasingrapidly. The number of unfilled STEM jobs has been projected to be 2.4 million by the end of2019 [3].Sandwiched between these two challenges is the challenge of retention of undergraduate studentsin STEM fields. According to a Department of Education report [4], almost 50% ofundergraduate STEM majors do not continue in STEM. According to the 2012 report by
epistemic identities and vocational path- ways. Dr. Lande received his B.S. in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University. He was previously an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering programs and Tooker Professor for Effective STEM Education at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Learning Trajectories Through Undergraduate Engineering Curricula and ExperiencesThis NSF EEC EAGER research project
, faculty get more teaching credit for teaching larger classes. For example,the author’s department used to have a rule that a class of more than 100 students counted as 1.5classes. This allows the instructor to focus on fewer classes and do a better job on those, whilehaving more time for research.Large classes are a boon to recruitment. An instructor of a large class becomes known to a lotmore students, and these students are more likely to consider working with them later on. Youmay become their graduate advisor, or advisor for an undergraduate research project. A largeclass is also a great place to recruit for independent-study students who may assist one of yourresearch projects or generate resources for later offerings of the same course. The
Paper ID #30450Engagement in Practice: Exploring Boundary Spanning in aSchool-University PartnershipDr. Julee Farley, Montgomery County Public Schools and Virginia TechDr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include
, virtual methodsemploy computer-based techniques such as 3D animations and simulations, virtual reality andaugmented reality tools 11 .Project DescriptionIn this project, we employed a tangible training model using the augmented reality technology tosupport students in enhancing their spatial skills. Augmented reality is a technology that allowscomputer-generate imagery (text, images, 3D models etc.) to be overlaid onto a live video streamof a real-world environment 12 . In AR, the real environment is extended with information andimagery coming in real-time from the mobile phone or tablet. The AR application monitors thecamera stream constantly to detect and track the marker (or target) image. As soon as it detectsthe marker image in real-world
novel teaching and learning methods to power engineering education.Dr. Rustin Webster, Purdue University, New Albany Dr. Rustin Webster is an assistant professor in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University and specializes in mechanical engineering and computer graphics technology. Dr. Webster’s industry expe- rience includes time as a contractor for the Department of Defense as an engineer, project manager, and researcher. He holds a B.S. in Engineering Graphics and Design and a M.S. in Management of Technol- ogy from Murray State University, and a Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering from the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Dr. Webster has received various professional certifications from the
Math Education, First Year Engineering Education conference and American Society for Engineering Education conference.Mr. Bruce Wellman, Olathe Engineering Academy at Northwest High School Bruce Wellman is a National Board Certified Teacher (NBCT, Chemistry) who teaches Engineering Chemistry as part of Engineering Academy at Olathe Northwest High School in Olathe, KS and serves as a Co-Principal Investigator on an NSF funded (DR K-12) research project entitled ”Building Informed Designers”. Wellman is a member of ASEE’s Board of Directors’ Committee on P-12 Engineering Educa- tion. Wellman completed his B.S. degree in general science (focus in chemistry) at Penn State University and his M.S. in Education at the
tobusiness librarians.Howard, Zwicky, and Phillips [4] describe extensive collaboration among specialists in business,engineering, and patents at Purdue University Libraries. The business and engineering librariansprovide team consultations to students in engineering design courses and co-teach libraryinstruction sessions. Librarians also provide instruction and consultations for participants instudent innovation competitions and several outreach programs that support entrepreneurship inthe community. While these collaborative projects have been successful, Howard, Zwicky, andPhillips [4] call for better coordination of Libraries support for entrepreneurship activities.Feeney and Martin [5], a business librarian and a science librarian at the
of youths’ engineering-related workplacepractices by focusing on workplaces as a distinct resource for engineering-related funds ofknowledge. Ultimately, by better understanding how youths’ workplaces foster engineering-related funds of knowledge, the purpose of this study was to generate knowledge on how youths’assets, as derived from these places, might form the basis of assets-based engineering programsfor working youth in ways that recognize, amplify, and build from their workplace experiences. MethodsThis qualitative study draws from data generated from a prior ethnographic research project,designed to understand youths’ funds of knowledge in engineering, in which we studied thepractices of
Architecture and Engineering released in 2014 and her research has been published in engineering and architecture education journals, nationally and internationally. She has received awards for innova- tive teaching from Princeton University, Syracuse University, and the American Society for Engineering Education. She also engages in design and design-build projects as a collaborator with her architecture students and colleagues. This work has been recognized with awards from the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, the Architectural Institute of America and the City of New York.Ms. Anne E Rauh, Syracuse University Anne E. Rauh is the Head of Collections and Research Services at Syracuse University Libraries. She
continue, predicting thatmanufacturing employment will increase by another 230,000 jobs before year end. A recentKPMG International survey of manufacturing executives confirms this projection. Roughly 41%of US manufacturing executives plan to hire in the coming year. However, the required skill setshave shifted to be more software and high tech-oriented. There is great opportunity for peoplewilling to learn injection mold making and tool making.ObjectivesThe paper describes the process of retrofitting a manual injection molding machine to beautomated and remotely accessible, and assessing students’ response to the technology. Thesystem will serve multiple purposes. First, it can be used as part of a manufacturing processescourse to teach students
sizeof 45 students; typically requiring three sections. Teaching assistants are available in the labs toanswer students questions related to the use of the software; AutoCAD or Civil 3D.[2]Laboratory assignments were assigned as either projects or lab experiences depending on therequired effort expected from students. Labs consisted of drawings to complete where the CADsoftware features were demonstrated and video recorded in the lab session. The students wouldtypically have one week, with three hours of lab time in two 1.5-hour sessions, to complete theirdrawings. The projects would also have a laboratory demonstration (and recording) but theassignments were longer in duration and more laboratory sessions (typically four 1.5-hour labs)were
University of Puebla, Mexico. He has a M.Sc. in Digital Systems from Tecnologico de Monterrey. He has been a lecturer in the School of Engineering for over 18 years. His work especializes in attracting new stu- dents to STEM programs at University level. He has directed several teams in the Admissions Office at Tecnologico de Monterrey.Mr. Jorge A. Gonzalez, Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey Master in Sciences with an speciality in Quality Systems and Industrial and Systems Engineer by ITESM in Mexico, twenty years of experience in engineering education, several projects in innovation of engi- neering education such as the use of 3D virtual ambiences as a way of developing competences.Dr. J. Asuncion Zarate-Garcia, Tecnologico de
/removal from grants, peer review harassment program Institutional disciplinary actionsNIH Expectations, Policies, & Requirements https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/harassment.htm • NIH requires that every organization receiving NIH funds: • has systems, policies, and procedures in place to manage research activities in accordance with our standards and requirements (see Grants Policy Statement) • complies with federal laws, regulations, and policies protecting the rights and safety of individuals working on NIH-funded projects • NIH expects that institutions: • develop and implement policies and practices that foster a harassment-free environment; • maintain clear
set by the academic program inthe form of generic and/or discipline-specific graduate attributes. The process of achieving SLOsin a course or a research project can be viewed as a dynamic system. Just as in a dynamicsystem, the input is tracked well with feedbacks and controllers, it is conceptualized that thesame idea can be applied in assessing student learning outcomes in a course. The proposedmethod is comprised of identifying the SLOs for the course stated in the course outline as macro-SLOs and then developing lower level micro-SLOs, which contribute to individual macro-SLOs.These macro-SLOs and micro-SLOs constitute the inner and outer loops respectively of adynamic assessment system. Further, appropriate tracking of SLOs can be
Paper ID #28329The Effects of Mind Maps on Computational ThinkingMrs. Safia Malallah, Kansas State University Safia Malallah is a web developer, artist, and Ph.D. candidate at Kansas State University. She obtained her master’s degree in computer science from Montana State University in 2017. Her research is centered around metamorphic relations ranking for reducing testing costs in scientific software. Safia’s research interests expanded to include computer science education after observing the influence computer sci- ence has on her children. Her current research project is examining methods of teaching young children
funding agencies. He is a member of the editorial board for a number of professional journals as well as an Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Online Engineering. Dr. Azad is active with remote laboratory field and is the President of the Global Online Laboratory Consortium (GOLC) as well as the Vice-President of the International Association of Online Engineering (IAOE). Dr. Azad is also active with few other professional organizations like- IEEE, IET, ASEE, ISA, and CLAWAR Association and served as Chair and Co-Chairs of numerous conferences and workshops. He was a program evaluator for the ABET and is active in evaluating research and development projects for various national and international funding
projects, and can createcommunities for students. To ensure positive impacts to students, much more research is neededto improve these spaces making them effective for all students. Network analysis enablesproblem understanding and solution generation at a systems level. A systems-level analysis of anetwork of industries, for example, (as opposed to designing each industry individually) was ableto reduce the overall environmental impact of all industries in the network without increasing the © American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 2020 ASEE Conferencecost of the network (thereby maintaining profits) [1-3]. Similar system-analyses of waterdistribution networks and power grids
engineering students as they engage in communicating their ideas to a range of stakeholders. She studies teamwork and team-based peda- gogy, with a focus on inter-team communication and equity. She is one of the Faculty Innovators behind Tandem, a Center of Academic Innovation tool for supporting students working in teams. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Using Student-Faculty Collaborative Lectures to Teach High Level Hydrodynamics ConceptsAbstractIntroduction to engineering courses are increasingly team-based and project-based, with studentteams designing and building real-world things. A popular project for introductory
an engineering project is. i. Explain how to incorporate severe weather disaster prevention measures in urban development projects. j. Explain what life cycle assessment of an engineering design is. k. Explain what sustainable return of investment is. l. Explain what circular economy is.What has been done (literature review)T. Waas, J. Huge, T. Block, T. Wright, F. Benitez- Capistros, and A. Verbruggenin [2], indicatedthat since the 1990’s many substantial and often promising sustainability assessments andsustainability indicators efforts have been made. They demonstrated that sustainability assessmentand sustainability indicators could be powerful decision-supporting tools that foster
Paper ID #28862A Replicate Study: Adoption of a STEM Outreach Program in KuwaitMrs. Safia Malallah, Kansas State University Safia Malallah is a web developer, artist, and Ph.D. candidate at Kansas State University. She obtained her master’s degree in computer science from Montana State University in 2017. Her research is centered around metamorphic relations ranking for reducing testing costs in scientific software. Safia’s research interests expanded to include computer science education after observing the influence computer sci- ence has on her children. Her current research project is examining methods of teaching
Historically Black College/University (HBCU) and 2) a Predominantly WhiteInstitution (PWI). The study’s analysis examined microaggressions in the context ofundergraduate engineering programs at both sites, an HBCU and a PWI. The results suggestedthat a higher frequency of microaggressions took place at the PWI than the HBCU. The mostfrequently identified microaggressions included disjointed race and gender dialogue, hiddenlanguage, projected stereotypes, an ascription of intelligence, silence, and marginalization. Thepaper aims to increase awareness of the prevalence and varying types of microaggressionsexperienced between the sites. These results may influence policies and educational practices tomeet the needs of underrepresented minority students
undergraduate and graduate sections.The course content details are presented in Bakrania, et al. [16], but briefly described here forcontext. The original face-to-face course lectures were slide-based due to the highly visual natureof the content. Each lecture required students to read handouts and answer the providedquestions prior to lectures. The questions were collectively answered during the lectures andoften prompted discussions. The assignments relied heavily on students’ ability to reviewnanotechnology-related scientific journal papers and evaluate the outcomes. The assignmentsculminated into a term project where students selected an application area and presented theirresearch to the class. In the end, each student prepared a research proposal
designing and implementing technology-infused learning environments that provide youth an opportunity to learn about themselves, others, and to gain insight into interpersonal dynamics.Dr. Jessica Sperling, Duke University Dr. Sperling leads the Applied Research, Evaluation, & Engagement area of Duke University’s Social Science Research Institute.Megan Gray, Duke University Megan Gray is a Research Analyst in Evaluation and Engagement at Duke University’s Social Science Research Institute (SSRI). She serves as a project manager and researcher for both qualitative and quanti- tative evaluation and research efforts, in partnership with community-based programs as well as campus- based initiatives. Megan came to
for discussion prompts. The discussion prompts promoted repetition inlearning in that they allowed students to apply practical understanding for the second time. Toincrease a sense of community, discussion groups were limited to 30 students, which resulted in atotal of four discussion groups. In addition, in preparation for the team-based project (4 studentsper team), one person from each time was assigned to each discussion group. This modifiedapproach to the Jigsaw method [48] allowed students to gain a more wholistic perspective (of theentire class) in preparation for the team-based project.Third, this module culminated with a final team-based project. This final module project promotedrepetition in learning in that it allowed students to
SO2-1 1453 Ship Propulsion Design Propulson Plant Trade-off Submittal 7 3 7 0 2.00 13 10 0 0 2.57 4 2 10 0 1.63 0.188 environment, and vessel and crew/passenger safety. 1444 Ship Design/System Integration Crewing Submittal 10 7 0 0 2.59 4 19 0 0 2.17 0 0 16 0 1.00 0.794 1444 Ship Design/System Integration Final Project Report
studies at Georgia Tech, where he taught undergraduate courses for 7 years. His profes- sional activities have included projects in East Africa, Central America, the Middle East, Alaska’s North Slope, and throughout the ”lower 48 states.” His current activities at Texas A&M include a wide range of activities with particular emphasis on development of novel interdisciplinary curricula, courses, and experiences.Dr. Luciana R. Barroso, Texas A&M University Luciana R. Barroso, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Structural Engineering in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She currently also serves as the Director of Undergraduate