our students. Thispaper will present the process we took to initiate this program, the next steps we plan for it, and adescription of the changes made to the courses. More information about the projects will bepublished on Engineering Unleashed in the coming year.Introduction:Some mid-career faculty become “burned out” with low levels of motivation and resources toexplore new areas as they are simultaneously overwhelmed with their academic responsibilitiesin teaching, research, and service in their institution. This two-year subcontract of theMentorship 360 program at Arizona State University sought to instill a new level ofentrepreneurial mindset (EM) into their career journey. Previous schools who have adopted EMinto their curriculum have
subproblems and deciding how to approach each one. This topic is especially important because many engineers work on design teams, and themembers of a team need to work together to carry out the design process. An ad hoc approach toplanning the design process will create confusion and increase the risks of project failure (e.g.,poor product or system performance as well as cost and schedule overruns). Despite the growing need for design process planning skills, existing engineering educationprograms fail to provide opportunities for engineering students to learn these meta-reasoning skills.Many engineering students learn only standard product and systems development processes [2, 3].In a typical engineering design course, the students follow
years compared to earlier years as reflected in the sample data shownin Table 3, and we believe this is largely due to increased faculty engagement and positivityrelated to EML. Table 3 Average Student Ratings Related to E-learning Modules Question 2015* (n = 98) Fall 2020* (n = 133) The instructor reinforced what you learned in the e-learning 3.58 3.95 module through an assignment or a project The assignment or the project was effective in reinforcing 3.44 3.91 what you learned
students to learn,adopt and implement attributes of social innovation philosophies and servant leadership via case studiesand discussion during the class meeting times. Weekly modules were developed to include one socialinnovation case study (including presentation rubric) per week and leadership lessons. The classproceeded in the flipped classroom approach, where each student presented their perspective andanalysis of the assigned social innovation case study, followed by interactive discussion within thegroup. Throughout the class, students advanced their understanding of the attributes of socialinnovation and leadership and its context to globalization and social equity. Concurrently, students weredivided among two groups for the class project
—how we define it, how students perceive it, and how to measure it—an interest that continues to inform her work. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Measuring Changes in Students’ Engineering Practice Skills in a Project-Based LaboratoryIntroductionUndergraduate engineering curricula across the United States are largely designed to preparestudents to enter industry upon graduation, yet studies over the past decade have suggested a gapbetween what is emphasized in this curriculum and the competencies that are most useful inindustry [1-4]. These studies indicate that important competencies are often underdeveloped inthe
workforce development in academia and beyond. He is actively engaged in different projects at the department focusing on teamwork and leadership competencies in engineering. Tahsin’s long term goal is to bridge the engineering competency gap between industry demand and academic fulfillment.Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri, McGraw Hill Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Researcher. She currently heads Global People Research and Analytics at McGraw Hill, where she leads research leveraging employee data to generate data-driven insights for decisions impacting organizational Culture and Talent. Her research interests include assessing the impact and effectiveness of inclusion initiatives as well as employing in
these processes relate, specifically, to a software venture. This paperpresents the overall instructional plan of the course and discusses each of the course’scomponents. The implementation of the project component is discussed, in particular, in detail.The design and implementation challenges that were encountered are discussed.This course was run in Spring of 2020 and started as an in-classroom course, later transitioningto an online course due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The outcomes of the course are discussed.Possible future enhancements are considered.1. IntroductionSoftware businesses have been responsible for tremendous growth and changes in society. Oncesmall startups, names like Google, Microsoft, PayPal and Facebook now are among the
learning experiences designed to engage and support youth from populations traditionally underrepresented in science and engineering disciplines. Much of her work focuses on public participation in science and engineering with transparency and for the purpose of solving problems. She holds a master’s degree in anthropology and a doctorate in political science.Ms. Maia Werner-Avidon, MWA Insights Maia Werner-Avidon served as the primary evaluator for the TechHive project during its initial years. Prior to starting her evaluation firm, MWA Insights, Ms. Werner-Avidon served as a Research and Evaluation Specialist at the Lawrence Hall of Science (Berkeley, CA) for eight years, where she worked on the TechHive project
Making). For the 2002-2003 academic year the author was involved with acampus research program call the "Collaborative On-line Learning and Teaching" (COLT)Program. Twelve faculty members who submitted acceptable proposals were part of a campusresearch project to work collaboratively and explore how on-line teaching and learning could beused and whether there could be measurable benefit to the campus community. Results weredocumented and presented to the campus community and to ASEE in 2003. Since 2003 thecourse has been taught several times each year with efforts to incorporate student Page 12.1356.2recommendations and improve course management
intersection of engineering and medicine,and thus fail to witness how critical thinking, problem solving, and interprofessionalcollaboration can improve healthcare.With support from the National Institutes of Health, we have created a Clinical Peer Mentors(CPM) immersion program for BME undergraduates to provide unique opportunities for studentsto interface with clinicians in their native environment, conduct clinical needs identification andassessment, and generate well defined capstone design projects. Moreover, CPMs share theirnewfound clinical knowledge to the broader BME student body by creating informationalmaterials and services, refining their leadership and communication skills in the process. Thisallows increased awareness of the clinical
ATE) Center of Excellence from 1994-2017, leading initiatives and grant-funded projects to develop educational leadership and increase the quantity, quality and diversity of highly skilled technicians to support the American economy. Currently serving as Principal Investigator, Mentor-Connect: Leadership Development and Outreach for ATE-2 and -3; and Principal Investigator, Collaborative Research-HSI ATE Hub-Diversifying the ATE Program with His- panic Serving Institutions Using Culturally Inclusive Mentoring and ATE Resources. The SC ATE Center is widely known for innovative initiatives impacting advanced technological education as well as devel- oping and broadly sharing successful educational models and
invited toparticipate in the research. C+C:TT focused on providing hands-on lessons about thefundamentals of circuitry and basics of computer programming through the lens of music, taughtby four college-aged student researchers. The program commenced by encouraging students toutilize these newly-learned skills and tools in a collaborative final project, combining what theylearned from each of the prior sessions. Participants consisted of a diverse group of 7th-12thgrade girls who expressed an interest in exploring the STEAM fields and/or in furthering theirknowledge and confidence in computer programming. Major areas of this program includedcircuitry, coding, the combination of music and technology, and collaborative challenges. Theoverall goals
for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 1800 times and his publications have been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof
, Hampton University, Jackson State University, North Carolina A&T University, Prairie View A&M University and Tuskegee University. I. AbstractThis paper describes a project of cooperation among thirteen (13) Historically Black Collegesand Universities (HBCU) electrical and computer engineering programs. The intent is to developan HBCU Engineering Network (HBCU-EngNet) with focus on the development,implementation, and expansion of an Experimental Centric based instructional pedagogy (ECP)in engineering curricula used in these HBCUs. The ECP is being implemented at the variousHBCUs to allow students of varying learning styles the opportunity to learn at their own paceand in their own environments, by providing them an alternative way to
software, Distributor Sales and Branch Management, and Transportation Logistics. His research interests include improvement of supply chain efficiency through the application of technology and best practices for logistics and in- ventory management. Dr. Angolia is highly engaged with regional and national companies in recruiting students from ECU for both internships and full time positions. In addition to a PhD from Indiana State, he holds a Master of Engineering degree from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and professional certifica- tions of CPIM and CSCP from APICS, The Association for Operations Management, and a PMP from the Project Management Institute. Dr. Angolia also conducts consulting projects and
Paper ID #11797Teaching Innovation with Technology to Accelerate Engineering Students’LearningDr. Nasser I Alaeddine, Texas A&M University at Qatar Nasser I. Alaeddine is the Director of Enterprise Applications and Educational Technology at Texas A&M University at Qatar. Dr. Alaeddine served previously as an adjunct faculty at University of Phoenix and University of Maryland University College. He has more than 18 years of experience in managing, developing, and leading IT projects. Dr. Alaeddine has published a number of papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings.Dr. Hamid R. Parsaei, Texas A&M
Paper ID #14185An Integrated Curriculum Design for Teaching Flying Qualities Flight Test-ingDr. M. Christopher Cotting, United States Air Force Test Pilot School Dr. Chris Cotting is the Master Instructor of Flying Qualities at the United States Air Force Test Pilot School. During his professional career he has also worked for the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Lockheed Martin Skunkworks. He has worked on numerous experimental aircraft projects in- cluding the X-43A and X-43C, X-35, and X-33. He has a BS and MS in Aerospace Engineering from Mississippi State University, and a PhD in Aerospace Engineering from
should we learn about “X”? Insteadof traditional preaching that “X” would probably be useful in your profession, the answerbecomes: “Because it helps you do cool things with Arduino this week.”In the context of Engineering Education, at any level from high school to college, for ElectricalEngineering (EE) and non-EE majors alike, “X” may be any of the following: Sensors andcalibration; Ohm’s law and voltage division; Current and power; Sine and square waves;Transient responses; Analog and digital signals; Sampling rate, bits, and accuracy; Controltheory; Programming; Protocols for wireless communication; Test/measurement procedures;How motors work, etc.Use of Arduino-based projects as motivators for learning is beneficial to both the student and
. He has worked at other lead- ing research universities in a variety of administrator roles in graduate education, and presently serves as a co-investigator on the AGEP NC Alliance leadership team. His research interests and publication record include a focus on organizational effectiveness and diversity in higher education, administrator professional development, and faculty and graduate student socialization.Dr. Marcia Gumpertz, North Carolina State University Marcia Gumpertz is professor of statistics at North Carolina State University. She serves as PI of N.C. State’s AGEP North Carolina Alliance project: An Institutional Transformation Model to Increase Mi- nority STEM Doctoral Student and Faculty Success
. and at Bell Labs. He specialized in starting new projects, and in reviewing such projects. All of these software development projects involved some associated social change. At Rose-Hulman he has been involved in starting the bachelor’s and master’s programs in software engineering.Dr. Kay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C Dee received a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees in biomedical engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. After completing her graduate work, Kay C joined the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana, and later joined the faculty at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Paper ID #10496Creating Research Opportunities with Robotics across the UndergraduateSTEM CurriculaDr. Janusz Zalewski, Florida Gulf Coast University Janusz Zalewski, Ph.D., is a professor of computer science and software engineering at Florida Gulf Coast University. Prior to an academic appointment, he worked for various nuclear research institutions, including the Data Acquisition Group of Superconducting Super Collider and Computer Safety and Re- liability Center at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He also worked on projects and consulted for a number of private companies, including Lockheed Martin, Harris, and
Paper 2081 HUMOROUS ENGINEERING 101 Larry Cartwright Carnegie Mellon UniversityAbstractThe Senior Design course is taught to Carnegie Mellon students each fall. This capstonecourse is required for all Civil and Environmental Engineering majors. The courseconcentrates on teaching the three levels of the design process by using projects that relateto the core areas of the discipline. This paper will provide an overview of the course withemphasis on the final design/build project. This project is humorous in nature and iseagerly anticipated by the students. Five examples of past projects will be
powerful sets of instructional principles andillustrating how they can be mapped to educational practice, we will empower these educators totry out new ideas in their own teaching.ApproachWe first introduce the two teaching cases that we will be using. The first case, the squaresactivity, was a class exercise used at the beginning of the term with a class of just under 30undergraduate students. The second case, the journal landscape project, was one of threeprojects assigned in a graduate class of just under 30 students. These two cases arecomplementary in that they vary in the unit of teaching (class activity versus multi-week project)and in terms of student population (undergraduate versus graduate).We did not select these cases because of any
courses typically focus on different product realizationprocesses and manufacturing process analysis, which often involve a lot of design andmanufacturing issues and theoretical concepts. At Minnesota State University-Mankato manydesign and manufacturing projects attempt to provide the students opportunities to practice theirdesign for assembly knowledge and promote creativity and innovation. In recent years, almost 40students in our program are involved our DFA projects every year. All of the students are givenfoundational manufacturing and design concepts, principles, and methodologies of theengineering disciplines during their first two years. MET students have to finish their study ofMaterial Processing I (MET 177), Computer Aided Drafting
flows from defining requirements and exploringalternative concepts to turning the requirements into a model and testing it. There is a shift inmathematics education to encourage students to do mathematics the way that mathematicians doit. A Systems engineering project in the classroom is doing engineering the way engineers do it. Systems engineering is not only good for education in terms of the good it can do forstudents, but for education as a whole as well. Education is a system like many other types of Page 3.385.2systems, and needs to be designed with a systems approach. The questions that education reformefforts should be asking are
for several CEE undergraduate courses.James FieldLauren Stewart, Georgia Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work-in-Progress: Applying Aspects of Professional Settings to Student Teaming in an Engineering and Design CourseAbstractAs group-based learning and team projects continue their recent surge in engineering education,there is still significant debate on effective pedagogies associated with teaching project teams.How student teams are formed and evaluated are key decisions instructors must make, all thewhile balancing important aspects such as team diversity, alignment with learning outcomes, andthe quality of the team’s work. What is often missing from the literature
situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact ofengineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts" [1]. Separatefrom ABET accreditation requirements, we wish our graduates to make informed choices duringtheir professional activities, especially if they work in an environment in which they are asked bya direct supervisor to falsify data. Ideally, this ethics training is conducted within engineeringcourses.At Loyola University Chicago (LUC), four social justice case study projects are embedded in thecurriculum. In this study, we hypothesize that the U.S. Senate Hearing social justice case studiesare effective in teaching engineering professional responsibility for several reasons. First, the
in Communication Studies and a Ph.D. in Educational Technology. She supports faculty in their effort to improve pedagogy, course design, and interdisciplinary curricula.Dr. Doyle Dodd, University of Oklahoma Industrial & Systems Engineering Capstone Coordinator ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaming Tribulations: Using a Role-Playing Game to Improve Teaming OutcomesAbstract:This paper discusses the development and implementation of a board game intended to simulateconversations and debates or negotiations that may occur in design-based projects. One of thechallenging tasks for a design group is learning how to collaborate and debate in a
different undergraduate research projects. He then moved on to Michigan State University and took a position as a teaching specialist concentrating on undergraduate classroom instruction. Scott finally settled at York College of Pennsylvania. He has been at York College for over ten years and feels as if he has found a place where the focus on teaching and students aligns well with his background and interests.Dr. Stephen Andrew Wilkerson P.E., York College of Pennsylvania Stephen Wilkerson (swilkerson@ycp.edu) received his PhD from Johns Hopkins University in 1990 in Mechanical Engineering. His Thesis and initial work was on underwater explosion bubble dynamics and ship and submarine whipping. After graduation he took
communities keep and use such valuable inheritance. Inthis context, we do routinely witness events such: (i) the failure of aerospace projects, like TitanIV, whose explosion has been deemed the responsibility of a design defect; (ii) the losing ofvaluable aerospace specialists and their expertise, like at Boeing, “…more than half of theBoeing work force will be eligible for retirement within the next decade. That's roughly 80,000employees’ cumulative corporate wisdom walking out the door.”; (iii) the ostensibly well-keptbut not easily accessible knowledge has seldom shown its value and contributed to activities, likethe books and journals covered by dust in library.In order to efficiently use energy, time and money, and apply previous precious