. Page 23.515.9References[1] D. Churchill. Educational applications of web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journalof Educational Technology 40(1), pp. 179-183. 2008.[2] L. M. Braender, C. M. Kapp and J. Yeras. Using web technology to teach students about their digitalworld. Journal of Information Systems Education 20(2), pp. 145-153. 2009.[3] S. Goyal. Blog and blogging. Journal of Science 1(1), pp. 1-2. 2012.[4] J. J. Heys. Group projects in chemical engineering using a wiki. Chemical Engineering Education 42(2), pp. 91.2008.[5] J. Chao. Student project collaboration using wikis. Presented at Software Engineering Education & Training,2007. CSEET'07. 20th Conference on. 2007.[6] D. Churchill. Educational
23.4.5Operating Philosophy:The most efficient way to operate an effective and efficient TCEP is with teamwork. Theprinciple players on the team are: 1. Technical Community Leadership 2. University Partner(s) 3. Human Resource Management 4. Employee University Partner 1. Tailored Curriculum 2. Application-Oriented Faculty 3. Technical Graduate DegreeHuman Relations Technical Community 1. Career Path Management 1. Champion the TCEP 2. Efficiency of Operations 2. Content
. Page 21.10.8[15] Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, JD (2009). Digital Habitats, stewarding technology for communities (FirstEdition., P. 250). CPsquare.[16] Streveler, R. and Smith K. (2006). Conducting Rigorous Research in Engineering Education. Journal ofEngineering Education.[17] Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., & Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIOApproach (p. 300). Springer. Page 21.10.9
are not only available to our local students but also available to everyone else who is interested in learning data warehousing and has internet access. In addition to many online resources available to global engineering students today, such as lecture notes presented on YouTube and KHAN Academy, we are glad that we did our part of contribution to the global engineering learning community.Bibliography[1] S. Aksenova, D. Zhang, and M. Lu, "Enrollment Prediction through Data Mining", the Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration, Waikoloa, Hawaii, September 2006[2] Claudia Imhoff, Nicholas Galemmo, Jonathan G. Geiger, "Mastering Data Warehouse Design: Relatio nal andDimensional
Dimeff), NASA grant NNX09AF65G (CDIO-NAAP (North America Aerospace Project)), Tigon EnerTec, Inc., Plandienst, the Erich-Becker-Foundation and the “Verein der Freunde der Luft- und Raumfahrttechnik der Universität Stuttgart e.V.” association.References:1. Michael Nielsen, Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science, (New York: Princeton Univ. Press: 2011)2. Kyle, Peterson, A Wing And A Prayer: Outsourcing At Boeing [Rep. Everett: Reuters, 2011. http://graphics.thomsonreuters.com/11/01/Boeing.pdf]3. P. Witte, W. Cann and H. Jiminez, “Capstone Design Project Challenges in Inter-Institutional, Geographically Dispersed Teams”, AIAA 2010-893, 2010.4. Xiaohua Lu, Yinghui Fan, S. Banzaert, J. Jacobs, “Multi
. S. Patent Awards so far. He received a masters degree in interdisciplinary engineering from Purdue University Calumet and graduated from Purdue University with a B.S.M.E.Prof. Gregory P. Neff, Purdue University, Calumet (Tech) Gregory Neff is professor of mechanical engineering technology at Purdue University Calumet. He is a Registered Professional Engineer, a Certified Manufacturing Engineer, and a Certified Manufacturing Technologist. Greg is active in ASEE where he won the Meryl K. Miller award in 1994 and in SME where he is education & certification chair and webmaster for chapter 112. He is faculty advisor and webmaster for SME student chapter 161 and advisor for Tau Alpha Pi. He is active in ASME
, 12(4), pp. 288–291.5. Elgamal, A., Fraser, M., and McMartin, F. (2005). On-line educational shake table experiments, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131 (1), pp. 41-49.6. Marc, S., Stefan, Z., Thomas, J., and Torsten, B. (2002). Global architecture and partial prototype implementation or enhanced remote courses, Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, Cancun, Mexico.7. Newson, T. A., Bransby, M. F., and Kainourgiaki, G. (2002). The use of small centrifuges for geotechnical education, In International Conference of Physical Modeling in Geotechnics, St. Johns, Canada, pp. 215–220.8. Romero, M. L. and Museros, P. (2002). Structural analysis education through model experiments and
Economics: • Interest rate formulas • Decision making using Net Present Value Probability and Statistics: • Random variables • Means, variances, and standard deviations • Addition and multiplication laws of probability • Random variables • Conditional probabilities • Distribution and density functions Operations Research: • Decision variables • Objective functions • Optimal solution(s) • Linear programs • Integer programs • Average wait in a queue • Average Length of a queue Production Planning and Control: • Forecasting • Economic Order Quantities and Newsboy Models
. Department of Education. (February, 2006). 7 Actions that Improve School District Performance. Washington, DC: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.2. Loucks-Horsley, S. (1995). Professional Development and the Learner-Centered School. Theory Into Practice, 34(4), 265-271.3. Todnem, G.R., & Warner, M.P. (1994). The QUILT program assesses teacher and student change: demonstrating the benefits of staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 15(4), 66-67.4. Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective: Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4): 915-945.5. National Board for Professional
engineering leadership learning outcomes were inspired and modified from the learningoutcomes in Cox et al.'s Engineering Professionals' Expectations of Undergraduate EngineeringStudents[9], to include aspects of the Gordon-MIT's Capabilities of Effective EngineeringLeaders[7] , the UCSD Gordon Center's Engineering Leadership Core Values[10], and Cox'sLeadership, Change, and Synthesis Survey[11]. These learning outcomes are not comprehensive.More learning outcomes will be added upon further research, particularly on how to effectivelyassess the new outcomes to be added. Page 23.1011.7 Student Learning
. Sci. Coll., 27(3):31–37, January 2012.[28] Mendeley Ltd. Mendeley: Reference Manager and Academic Social Network. http://www.mendeley.com/, September 2012.[29] Masoud Milani, S. Masoud Sadjadi, Raju Rangaswami, Peter J. Clarke, and Tao Li. Research experiences for undergraduates: autonomic computing research at fiu. In The Fifth Richard Tapia Celebration of Diversity in Computing Conference: Intellect, Initiatives, Insight, and Innovations, TAPIA ’09, pages 93–97, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.[30] Joan Peckham, Fatma Mili, Daniela Stan Raicu, and Ingrid Russell. Reus: undergraduate research experiences and funding. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., 23(5):208–211, May 2008
Kenya,” Biomass and Bioenergy, 8(3), pp. 175-179. 8. Wall, P., Hakansson, S., 2010, “Creating Commercial Community Enterprises through the Promotion of Fuel Efficient Stoves and Biomass Briquettes,” Concern Universal, Serrekunda, The Gambia. Page 23.1064.8Attachment: Peanut Shell Briquette Production – Visual GuideStep You do this Then you will get 1 2 3 4 5 Page 23.1064.9
is increasing, and administrators at both institutions have committed additional resourcesto assure the continued development and ongoing success of the program. Page 23.1067.8References 1. Agreement for Cooperation between Shanghai Normal University (PRC) and the University of Dayon (USA). Signed March 26, 2003. 2. Shanghai Normal University Web Site . [Retrieved 01/05/2013] 3. University of Dayton Web Site . [Retrieved 01/05/2013] 4. P. Kenna, S. Lacey. Business China: A practical guide to understanding Chinese Business culture. Passport Books. 1994. 5. Wikipedia < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guanxi>
smart grid technologies into an electrical and computer engineering curriculum," Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Asia (ISGT), 2011 IEEE PES , vol., no., pp.1-4, 13-16 Nov. 2011.[13] Sen, P.K, "Electric power and energy engineering education in USA: A status report, issues and challenges," Rural Electric Power Conference (REPC), 2011 IEEE , vol., no., pp.A1-1- A1-6, 10-13 April 2011.[14] Namboodiri, V.; Aravinthan, V.; Joseph, S.; Sawan, E.; Jewell, W., "Five Heads Are Better Than One: An Interdisciplinary Graduate Course on Smart Grids: Lessons, Challenges, and Opportunities," Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE , vol.11, no.1, pp.44,50, Jan. 2013VI. BibilographyRadhakrishnaKotti received his B.TECH degree from Jawaharlal
(DARPA Analog Spectral Processing Program, Phases I, II and III) and on 2) developing comprehensive characterization methods and models for understanding the vis- coelasticity/creep phenomena in high-power RF MEMS devices (DARPA M/NEMS S&T Fundamentals Program, Phases I and II). Furthermore, he is leading the experimental program on the Center for the Prediction of Reliability, Integrity and Survivability of Microsystems (PRISM) funded by the National Nuclear Security Administration. In addition, he led the development of the MEMS technology in a U.S. Navy project (Marines) funded under the Technology Insertion Program for Savings (TIPS) program focused on harsh-environment wireless micro-sensors for the health
other ideas to help move a classroom away from a directlecture format.References 1. Hake, R., “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses” American Journal of Physics, 66, 64 (1998); doi: 10.1119/1.18809 2. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T. (2005), “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices. Journal of Engineering Education:, 94: 87–101. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x 3. Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F., “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Higher Education,” American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, Vol. 39, 1987, pp. 3–7. 4. R.C. Hibbeler, Engineering
Schools of Construction Annual International ConferenceProceedings6. Young, N. W., Jones, S. A., Bernstein, H. M., & Gudgel, J. E. (2009). The Business Value of BIM: GettingBuilding Information Modeling to the Bottom Line. McGraw-Hill Construction SmartMarket Report, New York. Page 23.1089.11
, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, National Research Council (1996). From Analysisto Action. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.9 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. L., (1999), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.10 Committee on Undergraduate Science Education, (1999) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science,Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, NationalResearch Council.11 Kalabon, Amy E., Loescher, Eric S., Sommerville, Alice E., and Delatte, Norbert J. (2013), “Rise and Fall of theOhio and Erie Canal,” accepted for publication by the ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in EngineeringEducation and
effects ofcomputerization on drafting & design personnel”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 13, Issues 1–4,1987, Pages 406–410.2. Atharifar, H., Yildiz, F., and Knapp, J., “Learners’ Development of Spatial Visualization in a 2D versus 3D CADClass”, in the Proceedings of the ATMAE 2012 Conference, Nashville, TN, Nov. 14-17, 2012.3. Sorby, S. A., “Developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students”, Australasian Journal of EngineeringEducation, Volume 13, No. 1, 2007, Pages 1-11.4. Marunic, G., and Glazar, V., “Spatial ability through engineering graphics education”, Int. Journal of Technologyand Design Education, May 2012, Published online by Springer
DAN.4-2 DAN.4-3 Figure 1 – The Synthesis Step for Systems and Software Architecting: DA = DesignApproach; DAx.y-z = Design Approach for sub-function x.y for architecture zAfter the synthesis matrix has been developed, the (three) alternative architectures are evaluatedusing a ”standard” weighting and rating scheme6. This is the “analysis” step which producesmeasures of the cost and the effectiveness of each of the alternatives.We note that in the CE-AM approach we are explicitly defining and evaluating alternativearchitectures, with the ultimate goal of finding a cost-effective architecture (solution) for thecustomer(s) (stakeholders). The steps of the procedure are the same as the critical “views” in thateach step is defined by
. Page 23.1127.8Bibliography1. Nathan, M., Tran, N., Atwood, A., Prevost, A., and Phelps, L.A. “Beliefs and Expectationsabout Engineering Preparation Exhibited by High School STEM Teachers.” Journal ofEngineering Education, October, 2010. P. 409-426.2. Katehi, L., Pearson, G., Feder, M., editors. “Engineering in K-12 Education: Understandingthe Status and Improving the Prospects.” Committee on K-12 Engineering Education, NationalAcademy of Engineering and National Research Council. 2009.3. Virani, S. Burnham, I., “Innovative Curriculum for Engineering In High School (ICE-HS):Status Update.” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings,2012.4. Jain, R., Sheppard, K., McGrath, E., and Gallois, B. “Promoting Systems
based on those preferences.Figure 2 is a copy of the Learning Preference Assignment. Page 23.1137.5 Figure 2 Learning Preference Assignment Activity Assignment #1 LEARNING STYLESObjective: To determine your personal learning style(s) to help you get more out of this course and your other college coursework.Background: Every individual has a different learning style. Some students prefer to read the course material slowly instead of listening to a lecture. Some students can only understand lecture material when it is in their hands through a
cyclone resistanceEngineer’s name and signature: ___________________________________Date work completed: ___________________________________________ Page 23.1138.11Appendix B:BOS MASON TRAINING WORKSHOP EXIT QUIZLast Name: ______________________ First Name(s): _____________________NIF: __________________________ Telephone: _______________________Please answer all the questions to the best of your ability1. MaterialsSince attending the workshop from MCC what changes have you made in use of the followingmaterials? Sand Gravel Cement Water Blocks Steel reinforcement2. Column and beam steel
. Gan, S. Kuo, “Teaching DSP Software Development: From Design to Fixed-Point implementations,” IEEETrans. on Education, vol. 49, issue, 1, pp. 122-131, February 2006.4. L. Tan, J. Jiang, “Teaching Advanced Digital Signal Processing with Multimedia applications in EngineeringTechnology Programs,” ASEE Annual Conference, June 2009.5. Ifeachor, Emmanuel and Jervis, Barrie. Digital Signal Processing, A Practical Approach, Prentice-HallPublishing, 2002.6. de Vegte, Joyce Van. Fundamentals of Digital Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall Publishing, 2002.7. J. Essick, LabVIEW for Scientists and Engineers, Oxford University Press, 2009. Page
, and Research Bases." Journal of Engineering Education 25.123(2006)Prince, Michael J., Vigeant, M., and Nottis, K., “A Preliminary Study on the Effectiveness ofInquiry-Based Activities for Addressing Misconceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students”,Education for Chemical Engineers, 4:29 (2009)Schuck, S., Kearney, M., and Aubusson, P., “Education Opportunities and Challenges forGeneration OurSpace: Taming the beast?”, Proceedings of World Conference on EducationalMultimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, 5804, 2008Vigeant, M., Prince, M., and Nottis, K., “Creating of Reliable Instruments for Assessment ofConceptual Understanding in Heat Transfer and Thermodynamics”, AIChE Annual Meeting, 2009Vigeant, M., Prince, M., and Nottis, K
Administered Family STEM Nights. Paper presented atthe 118th Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE 2011),Vancouver, British Columbia. K-12 and Pre- College Engineering DivisionAlbers, L., Clark, S., Parry, E., & Smith, R. (2010). The Impact of Active Learning through Cooperation onScience Fair Projects on Elementary School Students. Paper presented at the 117th Annual Conference andExposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE 2010), Louisville, Kentucky. MinorityDivisionCunningham, Christine M. Engineering Is Elementary. The Museum Of Science Boston, 2013. Web. 2013
, WA.6. Brawner, C.E., M.W. Ohland, M.K. Orr, and X. Chen. Factors Influencing Engineering Student Major Selection. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference. 2013. Oklahoma City, OK.7. Cleveland, W.S., The Elements of Graphing Data, 1985, Wadsworth Advanced Books and Software.8. Ohland, M.W. and B.L. Sill. Communicating the impact of an introduction to engineering course to engineering departments. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference. 2002. Piscataway, NJ.9. Argrow, B.M., B. Louie, D.W. Knight, N.E. Canney, S. Brown, A.J. BLanford, C.L. Gibson, and E.D. Kenney. Introduction to Engineering: Preparing First-Year Students for an Informed Major Choice. In Proceedings of the American
Technology Teacher, 64(5), 23-268. Gattie, D.K. & Wicklein, R.C. (2007). Curricular value and instructional needs for infusing engineering designinto K-12 technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), 6-18. Page 23.1196.139. Dym, C.L, Agogino, A.M, Eris, O., Frey, D.D., and Leifer, L.J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching,and learning. Journal of Engineering Education 94(I), 103-120.10. Dorst, K. (2007). Creating design expertise. [Keynote] Proc. ConnectED Int. Conf. Design Education11. Tate, D., Chandler, J., Fontenot, A.D., and Talkmitt, S. (2009). Matching pedagogical intent with engineeringdesign
ofcontemporary leadership theory, The Leadership Quarterly, Volume 12, Issue 4, Winter 2001, Pages 419-450, ISSN1048-9843, 10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00090-X.3. Colleen Chesterman, Anne Ross-Smith, Margaret Peters, “Not doable jobs!” Exploring senior women's attitudesto academic leadership roles, Women's Studies International Forum, Volume 28, Issues 2–3, May–June 2005, Pages163-180, ISSN 0277-5395, 10.1016/j.wsif.2005.04.005.4. O’Bannon, D., Garavalia, L., Renz, D., and McCarther, S. (2010). Successful Leadership Development forWomen STEM Faculty, Leadership Manage. Eng. 10, SPECIAL ISSUE: Women in Civil Engineering, 167–173.doi:10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.00000805. Naomi Chesler, Peg Single, Borjana Mikic, On Belay: Peer-Mentoring and Adventure Education
. As the people who will fill theranks of engineering workers (and managers) in the future, our best hope for underminingexisting cultural structures of inequality such as depoliticization is to not socialize our studentsinto them in the first place.References1. Cech, Erin A. and Tom J. Waidzunas. 2011. “Navigating the Heteronormativity of Engineering: The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Students.” Engineering Studies 3(1): 1-24.2. Faulkner, Wendy. 2000. "Dualism, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering." Social Studies of Science 30:759-92.3. McIlwee, Judith S., and J. Gregg Robinson. 1992. Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.4