," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 205-210, 2004.[2] R. Taraban, "Information Fluency Growth Through Engineering Curricula: Analysis of Students' Text‐Processing Skills and Beliefs," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 397-416, 2011.[3] C. M. Campbell and A. F. Cabrera, "Making the mark: Are grades and deep learning related?," Research in Higher Education, vol. 55, pp. 494-507, 2014.[4] C. Habibi, A. S. R. Roti, and M. Alaei, "Are Solution Manuals Detrimental to Student Learning?," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.231. 1-26.231. 14.[5] I. Olwi, "An active learning fluid mechanics course based on outcomes assessment," in 2006 Annual
Press, 2017.[2] P. Nagy, R. Wylie, J. Eschrich, and E. Finn. “Facing the Pariah of Science: TheFrankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists,” Science and EngineeringEthics, vol. 26, pp. 737-759, 2020.[3] J. Canino and K. B. Teichert. (2019, June). A Frankenstein-inspired Engineering DesignProject. Presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-frankenstein-inspired-engineering-design-project[4] H. Markus and P. Nurius, “Possible Selves,” American Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 9, pp.954-969, Sep. 1986.[5] M. Shelley, Frankenstein: Or, the Modern Prometheus, M. Hindle, Notes, E. Kostova,Introduction, New York, NY, USA: Penguin Books, 2007.[6
successful implementation of ABET student outcomes 1-7,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021. [2] ABET, “Fundamentals of program assessment workshop,” ABET, Tech. Rep., 2019. [3] G. Watkins, “Incorporating new ABET outcomes into a two-semester capstone design course,” in Proceedings of the 2022 Capstone Design Conference, Dallas, Texas, 2022. [4] K. Meah, D. Hake, and S. D. Wilkerson, “A multidisciplinary capstone design project to satisfy ABET student outcomes,” Education Research International, vol. 2020, 2020. [5] D. C. Davis, K. L. Gentili, M. S. Trevisan, and D. E. Calkins, “Engineering design assessment processes and scoring scales for program improvement and accountability,” Journal of Engineering
Center, deputy director for research for the National Institute of Engineering Ethics, and past-division chair for the ASEE Liberal Education/Engineering and Society division.Dr. Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Andrew Katz is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He leads the Improving Decisions in Engineering Education Agents and Systems (IDEEAS) Lab, a group that uses multi-modal data to characterize, understand, aIsil Anakok, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Ms.Anakok is Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She has a Ms. degree in Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech, and Bs. in
. Williams, “OPINION: Why EM? The potential benefits of instilling an entrepreneurial mindset.,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2018.[7] M. Dyer, “STEAM without hot air: strategy for educating creative engineers,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 74–85, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2019.1693122.[8] N.-H. Kang, “A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea,” Asia-Pac. Sci. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y.[9] M. Mcauliffe, “The potential benefits of divergent thinking and metacognitive skills in STEAM learning: A discussion paper,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Change, vol. 2, no. 3, May
the process change/perspective but perspectives and o State Appreciation for process broadened perspective; some situates one’s own critical narrative reflection of process perspective; a lot of o Reflect on importance story for engineers reflection on process o Perspective change o Peer interaction/ Process o Score for how impactful was the processReferences1. ABET. (2022). ABET. (2022). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. Retrieved
. Sadler, P.M., et al., Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science education, 2012. 96(3): p. 411-427.3. Tai, R.H., et al., Planning early for careers in science. Science, 2006. 312(5777): p. 1143-1144.4. Falk, J.H., et al., Taking an ecosystem approach to STEM learning. Connected Science Learning, 2016. 1: p. 1-11.5. Falk, J.H., et al., Understanding youth STEM interest pathways within a single community: The Synergies project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2016. 6(4): p. 369-384.6. Clark, A. and R.L. Kajfez. Engineering Identity in Pre-College Students: A Literature Review. in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
, Teaching Engineering Students Freehand Sketching with an Intelligent Tutoring System. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 135–148. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17398-29[11] B. Williford, M. Runyon, and T. Hammond, “Recognizing perspective accuracy: an intelligent user interface for assisting novices,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2020, pp. 231–242.[12] T. Inadome, M. Soga, and H. Taki, “Development of sketch learning support environment using augmented reality and step-by-step drawing,” Workshop Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2012, pp. 482–490, 2012.[13] Y. S. Kim and E. Wang
infrastructure resilience, and engineering ed- ucation. She taught 11 courses at UConn, including Statics, Structural Analysis, Senior Capstone Project, and new Structural Health Monitoring and Sensors courses. Dr. Jang is the recipient of the 2018 Civil Engineering Educator of the Year award from the Connecticut Society of Civil Engineers, the 2021 Dis- tinguished Engineering Educator Award from the UConn School of Engineering, and the 2021 ASEE Emerging Leader Fellow Award from the Civil Engineering Division. She is the newsletter editor of the ASEE Civil Engineering Division and the treasurer of the ASEE Northeast Section. In addition, she is a faculty advisor of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) UConn Chapter
.[6] C. R. Østergaard, B. Timmermans and K. Kristinsson, "Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation," Elsevier, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 500-509, 2010.[7] S. A. R. Vakil, "The racial politics of STEM education in the USA: interrogations and explorations," Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 449-458, 2019.[8] L. L. Martins and F. J. Milliken, "Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups," The Academy of Management, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 402433, 1996.[9] Engineering, National Academy of, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering Education to the New Century, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press
graduates and institutional support at their post-graduation employer (typically auniversity or academic institution) are key to increasing the representation of minorities inSTEM faculty roles [4]. To increase the number of doctoral degrees earned, there must be anincrease in the number of Hispanic students entering graduate programs. According to theEngineering by the Numbers ASEE report, even though Hispanics represent 18.7% of the USpopulation, only 9.2% and 6.1% of master and doctoral degrees, respectively, are awarded toHispanic recipients [5]. Further, the numbers decrease again when faculty appointments areconsidered, where only 3.6% of faculty appointments in engineering are held by Hispanicprofessors.Convincingly, increasing Hispanic
course(s). The main objective of designing andteaching a hands-on and immersive cost estimating course is to get the students ready from day one, byexposing them to the fundamentals of cost estimating. A review of cost estimating syllabi indicate a lackof consistency or standardization in the content covered. The literature on cost estimating as published inASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) conference papers provide little or no examples ofthe typical cost estimating and bidding process. In addition, there are no samples from ASEE conferencepapers on the scope of work for quantity takeoff (QTO) and pricing assignments, or samples of thequantity takeoff templates, the pricing templates, and the criteria for grading students’ work
Program Manager working at the Center for Broadening Partici- pation in STEM at ASU. In her work at the Center, she works to develop culturally responsive practices and increase the intentionality with which institutions work with Latinx students in STEM. She has taught First-Year Success courses at ASU since 2019. She recently graduated with her Doctorate in Education from ASU’s Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College with an emphasis in Leadership and Innovation. Her research is centered on curriculum redesign, career decision-making self-efficacy, equity in education, social justice in education, and culturally responsive pedagogy. Through her research she has developed a Curriculum Interrogation Checklist through a
Paper ID #37319The Impact of Prototyping Strategies on Computer-Aided Design BehaviorDr. Alexander R. Murphy, University of Texas at Dallas Alexander R. Murphy is a Research Fellow in the mechanical engineering department at the University of Texas at Dallas. Alexander earned his Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology with a focus on design theory and engineering education. Alexander was a re- cipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program fellowship during his graduate studies and is currently part of the inaugural cohort of ASEE eFellows with funding through NSF. His
, USA, Jun.1997.[6] M. J. K. Chadia and A. Aji, ‘Virtual Reality in STEM Education During COVID-19’, inProceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual, Jul. 2021.[7] vFabLab. Available online: https://vfablab.org[8] R. Kamali-Sarvestani, P. Weber, M. Clayton, M. Meyers and S. Slade, "Virtual Reality toImprove Nanotechnology Education: Development Methods and Example Applications," in IEEENanotechnology Magazine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 29-38, Aug. 2020.[9] Reza Kamali Jonathan David Anderson and M. Meyers, ‘Comparison of Virtual Reality VersusReality: Effects on Student Learning Using Virtual Technology on Nanotechnology Education’,in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, USA, Jun. 2019.[10] F. Wang, X. Xu, W. Feng, J. A. Bueno-Vesga, Z
University, Mankato Dr. Darcie Christensen is a probationary Assistant Professor in the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University Mankato. She teaches for Iron Range Engineering, which is located at the Minnesota North Campus in Virginia, MN. Dr. Christensen received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University in the Summer of 2021. The title of her Dissertation is ”A Mixed-Method Approach to Explore Student Needs for Peer Mentoring in a College of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success
be difficult to prove, we assert that the majority of feminism’spresence in Engineering Education is not well-aligned with intersectional feminism or Blackfeminism. This notion is supported by the finding that of papers in the American Society forEngineering Education’s (ASEE) repository between 2011 and 2020 that mention the work“intersectionality”, only four of the Black feminist theorists foundational to the establishment ofthe term are mentioned [19]. Moreover, in an analysis of papers in three major EngineeringEducation journals across 14 years, Beddoes and Borrego [12] identified eighty-eight articlesthat mention feminist theory and assessed the articles within five branches of feminist theory.The authors found that a majority fell
inimplementing these standards, and recommendations for the development of state P-12 T&Estandards based on insight gained from this process in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania’s 2022 Science, Technology & Engineering, Environmental Literacy and Sustainability (STEELS) StandardsIn September of 2019, the Pennsylvania State Board of Education directed the PennsylvaniaDepartment of Education (PDE) to begin the process of updating Pennsylvania's AcademicStandards for Science and Technology Education to align them with current research and bestpractices. Between February and March 2020, 14 meetings were held in person and virtually toengage stakeholders from across Pennsylvania and gain input for developing new
) advancing engineering design research by integrating new theoretical or analytical frameworks (e.g., from data science or complexity science) and (3) conducting design-based research to develop scaffolding tools for supporting the learning of complex skills like design. He is the Division Chair Elect for the Design in Engineering Education Division for the 2023 ASEE conference.Dr. Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan. Her current
the effectiveness of these pedagogies in promoting students’comprehension of engineering principals and interpersonal skills. It presents qualitative datafrom interviews and surveys, along with retention rate data. Overall, the goal is to provideawareness into this pedagogical approach to engineering education and contribute to ongoingdiscussions on approaches that promote holistic, transdisciplinary learning through emotionalengagement of students.BackgroundRetention rates for students enrolled in postsecondary engineering programs have shownfluctuations between forty to sixty percent over the past several decades [1]. According to astudy conducted by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) in 2017, theretention rates for
role of hip-hop celebrities in constructing racial identity on Black Twitter," Information, Communication & Society, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 352-368, 2019.[3] M. Randle and S. Dolnicar, "Does Cultural Background Affect Volunteering Behavior?," Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 225-247, 2009.[4] S. A. Amponsah‐Afuwape, L. B. Myers and S. P. Newman, "Cognitive predictors of ethnic minorities' blood donation intention," Psychology, Health & Medicine, pp. 357-361, 2002.[5] J. A. Youngman and C. Egelhoff, "Best practices in recruiting and persistence of underrepresented minorities in engineering: a 2002 snapshot.," 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, vol. 2, pp. F2D-11, 2003.[6] E. R
manufacturing au- tomation. As a student, she worked at Kimberly-Clark, Motoman, and Intel and gained experience in the areas of industrial automation, manufacturing, and sensors. As a professor she has grown an international reputation for BID process and pedagogy research and has given invited talks/webinars/lectures to SWE, INCOSE, NASA, and at universities in Canada, France, and USA. As a consultant, she leads practicing engineers and organizations through the process of taking inspiration from nature to solve problems.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is the 2022-23 President of ASEE and one of the recipients of the 2022 NAE Bernard M
Suturin, Monash UniversityDr. Robert Lee Read, Public Invention Robert L. Read, PhD, founded Public Invention in 2019, 35 years after first being inspired to do so by Buckminster Fuller. He is a professional computer programmer and manager, an amateur scientist, physicist, mathematician, mechanical engineer and electrical engineer. He speaks Esperanto fluently. He hopes that 20 years from now you will be able to go to a party and say, ”I’m a Public Inventor” and have everyone know what that means. Email: . Twitter: @robertleereadNathaniel Bechard ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A democratized open-source platform for medical device troubleshootingIntroductionThe COVID pandemic
the survey items. In contrast, severalsurvey items were found to be correlated with second semester enrollment, specifically theWellness Composite score from the PWS, the overall wellness rating from the ICOPPE, and astudent’s confidence in graduating from WMU. Previous work by the authors found correlationsbetween second semester enrollment and confidence in graduating from WMU for first-yearstudents in Fall 2020 but not for students in Fall 2019 [17]. When survey responses werecompared to third semester enrollment (i.e., retention to the second year), confidence ingraduating from WMU was positively correlated with retention for both cohorts. Additionalwork is required to determine if the current wellness and self-efficacy correlations will