inclusion in engineering. Before coming to Stanford, she was a bilingual educator at low-income elementary schools in Texas. Prior to starting her career in education, Greses was an engineer project manager in the Caribbean. She holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Santo Domingo Technological Institute, a M.Eng. in Civil Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez, and a M.Ed. in School Leadership from Southern Methodist Uni- versity. Her work seeks to improve education for students who experience a cultural mismatch between the ways of knowing and speaking in their communities and those in STEM.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical
related to the outcomes of fluency and elaboration, but not reflection.IntroductionOne of the most timely and pressing goals of promoting early STEM education is to createeducational experiences that will both broaden enduring participation in the study of STEMtopics [1] and that will establish a long-term learning framework to encourage students to trainfor important STEM careers [2]. In the field of engineering education, this idea is bound up inmetaphors like those of “the pipeline”, “the ecosystem”, and “the pathways” [3,4], all of whichinclude a multitude of diverse trajectories in the course of study and skill development wherebystudents can access their opportunities to become expert engineers [5].There are many ways in which pre-college
unrecognized. The number of responses is small, and individuals who elected torespond to the survey may be those who placed greater value on ethics and/or had a greaterconnection to the instructor that emailed the survey invitation. Further, the survey instrumentwas not fully validated using rigorous methods [39, 44]. The majority of the survey respondentshad not worked very long as engineers after graduation. Those interviewed represented a broadrange of different career lengths post-graduation. Not all engineering disciplines and types ofengineering work are represented among the results.Results and DiscussionRQ1. Extent of impactThe survey results are summarized in Table 2. For all nine activity options listed on the survey,one or more individuals
then used these scenarios to identify “the ideal attributes ofthe engineer of 2020” and describe “ways to improve the training of engineers to prepare themfor addressing the complex technical, social, and ethical questions raised by emergingtechnologies.” The Engineer of 2020 casts engineers in the role of change agents and leaders in both theprivate and public sector and focuses on the opportunities that lay ahead: “The years between thepresent and 2020 offer engineering the opportunity to strengthen its leadership role in society andto define an engineering career as one of the most influential and valuable in society and one thatis attractive for the best and the brightest” (p. 48). Realizing these aspirations, the report’sauthors
produce scholarship linking their experiences to broader cultural phenomenaaround engineering and labor, further shaping a theory of change.PositionalityThe first and third authors, Valle and Bowen, are labor organizers with the American FederationFigure 1: Mapping of the components of this study to the liberatory engineering education modelproposed in [13].of Teachers (AFT) local GEO-3550, marginalized engineers, graduate student workers, childrenof union members, and participants within this study. As engineering graduate students whoseprimary fields of study are not engineering education, this work represents a departure from thetechnical scholarship of our fields. As early career scholars, we recognize forms of political riskinherent to
Equity, through games. He is the coauthor of books relating to gaming and energy and has published papers in international journals. He is an active participant in national and international conferences with papers and presentations. Before his teaching career, he had a very successful corporate management career working in R&D at Lucent Technologies and as the Director of Global Technology Management at Qualcomm. He had initiated and managed software development for both the companies in India. Prof. Radhakrishnan holds three graduate Degrees (M. Tech, M.S., M.B.A), and Sustainable Business Practices certification.Dr. James Jay Jaurez, National University Dr. Jaurez is a dedicated Academic Program Director and
on the country and the world sometimes.” The hydraulic fracturing activity helped thisstudent understand the potential implications of his future career and this was an importantoutcome since he planned to pursue employment in the oil industry.The narrow technical focus of individual courses in the engineering curriculum can obscureconnections between, and implications of, engineering concepts. One student described thatSustainable Energy as a whole course supported the broader integration of engineering conceptsand their practical applications. It helps put all the other classes into the wider focus and give more perspective… It helps us see the connections between everything, and Sustainable Energy definitely helps with that.An
En- gineering and STEM Education at the University of Texas at Austin. Dr. Borrego is Senior Associaate Editor for Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. She previously served as Deputy Editor for Journal of Engineering Education, a Program Director at the National Science Foundation, on the board of the American Society for Engineering Education, and as an associate dean and director of in- terdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstand- ing publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All
classroom, faculty encounterstudents through a narrow lens that can hide or spotlight particular identities while stereotypingor simplifying more nuanced experiences. Considering the compelling aspect of inclusion thatpromotes acceptance of people with all their uniqueness [18], we argue engineering cultures thatdo not allow students to bring their whole selves are fundamentally at odds with the idea ofcreating an inclusive environment.A student's well-being depends on a wide range of experiences, including many beyond thebounds of the classroom, such as career prospects, living conditions, financial stability, academicpreparation, social connections, and mentor relationships. Alice's story conveys a broad andcomplex story that intersects her
NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revo- lutionizing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program fo- cused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Susannah C. Davis, Oregon
• Polling In addition to what was listed for in- • Reminders about video lectures person, • Tracking time to ensure they are getting • keeping the camera ON while through activities presenting content and while • Whole class problem solving working through examples. • Draw connections to future careers • Ensure all members of the team are attending class (either in-person
Paper ID #32409Resilient Course Design for Teaching a Project-based Engineering CourseOnlineDr. Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University Dr. Xiaorong Zhang is an Associate Professor in Computer Engineering in the School of Engineering at San Francisco State University (SFSU). She is the Director of the Intelligent Computing and Embedded Systems Laboratory (ICE Lab) at SFSU. She has broad research experience in human-machine interfaces, neural-controlled artificial limbs, embedded systems, and intelligent computing technologies. She is a re- cipient of the NSF CAREER Award to develop the next-generation neural
competence effects among early career teachers in Germany,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., 2020, doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650.[5] Sabaruddin, Marzuki, and Khairunnisak, “Pandemic Covid-19: The Opportunities and Challenges to Using ICT in Mathematics Learning,” IJEBD Int. J. Entrep. Bus. Dev. eISSN 2597-4785 pISSN 2597-4750, 2020.[6] J. Naidoo, “Postgraduate mathematics education students’ experiences of using digital platforms for learning within the COVID-19 pandemic era,” Pythagoras, 2020, doi: 10.4102/PYTHAGORAS.V41I1.568.[7] R. Cassibba, D. Ferrarello, M. F. Mammana, P. Musso, M. Pennisi, and E. Taranto, “Teaching mathematics at distance: A challenge for universities,” Educ. Sci., 2021, doi
Management. The course istypically offered in fall and spring semesters with enrollment of approximately 90 students eachsemester. The course exists to introduce the management functions of planning, organizing,motivating, and controlling. Further, the course analyzes the application of these functions inresearch, design, production, technical marketing, and project management and studies theevolution of the engineering career and the transition to engineering management.The course was regularly delivered in a traditional format with two 75-minute classroomsessions each week, including lecture by the instructor with student response to questions usingclickers. Assessment typically involved individual assignments and several multiple-choiceexams each
83with the technology. As one commenter said, “This Arduino lab series has opened my horizon to Participation 67% Participation 76%new possibilities, which I thought to be more complex and less obtainable at this particular timein my academic career.” Survey Results: Comparing Seniors and First-Year Student responses on SDT and Peer learning. Results from the Fall 2020 Senior and first year AE student surveys indicate that both
shared [6]. An appropriate examplewould be a simple start-up procedure of an air-compressor or the numerous valves required for aboiler start-up procedure. It can be listed and distributed among unskilled workers and accuratelyconvey the information. This is most evident in training programs for new hires, where they aregiven facts and nominal operational statistics regarding the utility. Tacit knowledge is gainedthrough personal experience and is not readily articulated or codified as it more closelyresembles intuition [7]. It originates from Polanyi [8], where he describes it as how a personknows more than they can tell. The ‘know-how’ that is owned by seasoned employees wasgained by actively participating in operations throughout their career
established the Office of Digital Learning that created a unit focused on innovative delivery across the entire spectrum of technology enabled learning - from in-class to online. Over his career, he has helped a few hundred faculty from varied disciplines develop hybrid and online courses. He has also taught traditional, hybrid and online courses ranging in size from 28 to 250. He is also co-developer of a Digital Academy which was a finalist for the Innovation Award by the Professional and Organizational Development Network and an Innovation Award winner. He was also named as the Center for Digital Education’s Top 30 Technologists, Transformers and Trailblazers for 2016. His focus on the user experience and data, has led
proved to be more successful at project completion [4]. Whether inundergraduate studies or in future careers, there are obvious advantages to possessing goodwriting skills as they may actually improve design skills [5]. Given the profound importance andrequirement for demonstrated technical communication, ironically there is not a specific coursein the mechanical engineering curriculum dedicated to teaching technical writing. As a result,students may find themselves in their Capstone Program suddenly expected to write professionalengineering design reports and test procedures with only the experience of lower divisionlaboratory reports and English essays. To better prepare students for the workforce and facilitatea more cohesive writing
broader systems thinking approach to sustainable manuremanagement, projects were devised for both undergraduate and graduate students using twosystem visualization tools – the cognitive map and an analysis canvas.Cognitive maps are generally considered freeform visualizations of mental models that cancontain various structures including diagrams, graphs, and flowchart elements and identifyrelationships among those elements. Cognitive maps were introduced to the undergraduates witha class discussion about their college careers. Students volunteered several engineering coursesthey took. The instructor then asked them to identify which of these courses providedinformation or skills that were needed or useful in other courses and these relationships
characterizes this as an approach “intended todevelop ethical behavior over the course of an entire scientific or engineering career” [1]. Toachieve this objective, however, engineering ethics must more fully engage with the field ofempirical moral psychology.This paper is divided as follows: The first part outlines reasons for adopting ethical behaviors asthe ultimate goal of ethics education, that behaviors are what both professional organizations andthe public ultimately care about, moving on to consider why the adoption of ethical behaviors asan educational outcome would be contentious, that accurately assessing the effects of educationon ethical behaviors is difficult if not impossible. The second part of this paper considersresponses to these
their ability to perform engineering design and engineeringas a future career pathway. A pre and post-survey design was used for the larger study to comparethe students’ responses before and after the course; the current study only used the data from thepost-survey. The data were collected using a survey developed by the e4usa research teamconsisting of researchers in engineering education, psychology, and traditional engineeringdisciplines. The complete survey contains 56 items broken down into three sections, including sixdemographic items.Student self-efficacy to conduct engineering design activities was examined using the EDSE scale[5]. The scale prompts participants to rate their degree of confidence, i.e., self-efficacy, to
indicators of students’ experiences in and perspectives on systems thinkingfrom preliminal, liminal, and postliminal.Systems thinking (students)For both pre and post interview, students were asked:How do you define “systems thinking” as you understand it in your APSC 100 course? Were youfamiliar with the concept before your APSC 100 course? Are you comfortable applying systemsthinking during APSC 100 activities and/or outside of your APSC 100 course? What do you thinkis the value of systems thinking in your future career?Table 1 shows that while the environment outside the classroom or prior learning experiencemight provide opportunities for the students to understand systems thinking, course instructorsshould consider and maximize first-year
City School District Title II B Mathematics and Science Partnership grants, Building Learning Communities to Improve Student Achievement: Albany City School District, Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University and the University at Al- bany through the Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She holds an advance degree in Educational Theory and Practice from the University of New York/SUNY Albany, with experience in teaching educa- tional methods at the master’s level as well as an introduction to education courses designed to develop new interest in teaching careers. She has worked as an elementary classroom teacher developing specific curricula for gifted and talented students as well as
positive effect on studentlearning. In 5 of the 14 learning outcomes assessed, the effect of HOLD was equal to or greaterthan the effect of attending lecture and had a compensatory effect, allowing similar learning tothe average in-person, pre-pandemic learning environment.IntroductionActive learning in higher education has been shown to support the growth of transferable skillsthat are increasingly necessary in the rapidly evolving workforce [1]. Active learningmethodologies help develop skills needed by graduates in the 21st century including criticalthinking, problem solving, and life and career skills such as collaboration [2]. Firsthand learningexperiences, including hands-on learning, helps students figure things out for themselves
seen in thecharts and graphs of our data that have been included in this report. Along with our formula andExcel knowledge, our group also gained experience with communication, time management, andorganization. We have all personally grown in our engineering skills for our future endeavorsand I am sure we will use our newfound knowledge in our future careers”ConclusionsThis detailed project not only introduced the concepts of dynamics and propulsion, but alsoprovided a real life like calculations for these topics. Students learned and programmed manyengineering and science topics they are expected to encounter in their future studies soon. Conceptsof acceleration, speed, distance, Newton’s laws, impulse, thrust, and propulsion were
real-time DSPlaboratory course that aims to give students hands-on experience with real-time embeddedsystems using Android tablets at an early stage of their careers. The students broaden and deepentheir understanding of basic DSP theory and techniques and learn to relate this understanding toreal-world observations and applications. The students learn industrially relevant skills such asrapid design prototyping in Python and Android development of DSP applications in C++/Javafor computationally constrained mobile devices. The course advances in two phases: structuredlabs and team projects. In the first half of the course, a series of structured labs are provided toimplement and analyze real-time DSP systems that utilize fundamental DSP
allowedstudents to reflect on experimentation and interpretation of results. Future work will explorecurriculum planning and design at the departmental level to continuously improve technicalwriting for civil engineering undergraduate students from their first-year courses to their seniorcapstone design projects.IntroductionCompetent technical writing is an essential communication skill for civil engineering students toimprove in undergraduate programs. Engineering students with strong technical writing skills arecompetitive in engineering job searches and career promotion [1]. Engineering educators haverecognized the importance of technical writing for decades and various approaches have beenimplemented to redesign the writing curriculum and improve
, sustainability education, and psychological well-being. Particularly, he examines how possible future-self influences engineering students’ learning, academic motivation, and career trajectory. The major population he primarily focuses on is STEM undergraduate and graduate students. He has received extensive qualitative and quantitative methodological training in the area of educational psychology. He acquired a Bachelor’s of Science in Human Resources Management and a Masters of Educational Technology from California State University, Long Beach, and a Master’s of Program Evaluation and a Doctorate of Philosophy from the University of Texas at Austin. Prior to joining the Penn State University, he worked as a research fellow
to learn the ins and outs of handling VR equipment fast and use them as a learning toolfor their degree. The application of VR modeling contributes to improved communication betweenstakeholders in construction, which is often a source of scheduling issues. Allowing students toexperience this earlier in their education has the potential to encourage them to further use this toolin their career, which is why schools with construction studies in their curriculum may want toupdate their teaching methods with such available resources [20]. While interacting with the virtualenvironment, safety is one of the major factors to be kept in mind – a controlled ‘play area’ mustbe designated for the students to securely interrelate with the scene without
are associatedwith external entities, the institutional itself, department, and the individuals who are part of thechange (Table 1). Table 1. Factors that affect decision making in academic institutions (Adapted from [3], [4] External Institutional Departmental Individual Markets College mission Faculty Personal experiences Governments Resources Discipline Educational background Accreditation Governance Student characteristics Career stage Institution type Culture Professional development Institution cultureThese factors establish norms that