example, a paper last year provided results ofstudents’ attitudes towards ethics issues11. Sixteen questions from the paper (Table 1) were putinto the CPS software and 35 students were surveyed following a discussion of the Enron Page 12.1018.7scandal and its effects on the energy business. Using the responders, I was able to obtainresponses to the 16 questions in five or six minutes and the software provided me with a report of Table 1: Questions for Results Reported in Figure 4 1. It is important for me to receive some formal ethics training during my college career 2. It is important for engineers to be aware they may encouter ethical conflicts
student’s improvements reached by other engineeringprograms is explained and discussed as the jumping board for the development of the newcourse. The goals for initial professional awareness in student’s communication artifactswere related to specific Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)criteria. A new course called Writing Articles and Research Reports (RAII) taught withinthe student’s major department was created emphasizing effective communication and theneed for continuous learning with the understanding of ethics and professionalresponsibility. The constructivist approach was used to design the course and anexposition of the mapping between the design of the course and the skills that are intendedto achieve is outlined in
engineering from Van- derbilt, Georgia Institute of Technology and the University of Tennessee, respectively, and is a registered professional engineer in the state of Alabama. She is a member of I.E.E.E., Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, and Eta Kappa Nu. She is currently Professor and Founding Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the High Point University, and teaches courses in such areas as Engineering Ethics, Controls, and En- gineering Design. Dr. McCullough has over 30 years’ experience in engineering practice and education, including industrial experience at the Tennessee Valley Authority and the US Army Space and Missile Defense Command. Her research interests include Image and Data Fusion, Automatic Target
institutionalarrangements necessary to help students develop these skills have not yet settled into a widelyadopted standard. Many engineering programs have turned to STS to provide students withconceptual tool kits to think about engineering problems and solutions in more sophisticatedways. Some programs feature standalone courses on the sociocultural aspects of technology andengineering, often taught by faculty from outside the engineering school. Others incorporate STSmaterial into traditional engineering courses, e.g., by making ethical or societal impactassessments part of capstone projects. This work in progress paper draws on the research team’s personal experience to examinethe character of an atypical, but potentially very powerful, model: STS
Using Moral Theories to Help Engineers Make Ethical Decisions William Jordan, Bill Elmore and Stan Napper College of Engineering and Science Louisiana Tech University AbstractThere are a variety of ways engineering ethics can be taught in the university. One commonapproach is to use case studies. Engineers like to think of themselves as practical people, andexamining actual situations appeals to many engineers.In their popular book, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases1, Harris, Pritchard, and Rabinsuse many real world case studies to illustrate the issues that are faced by engineers. Texas A &M
andtechnical knowledge. For example, student outcomes specified by the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) and the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board(CEAB) include the following [4], [5]: generating engineering solutions that meet specified needs and with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors, communicating effectively to different audiences, recognizing ethical and professional responsibilities when faced with engineering situations and resolving any dilemmas while accounting for the impact of solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts, and functioning effectively in a multi-disciplinary team.A
Paper ID #40789Technology Students’ Recognition of Algorithmic Data Bias throughRole-Play Case StudiesMr. Ashish Hingle, George Mason University Ashish Hingle (he/him) is a Ph.D. student in the College of Engineering and Computing at George Ma- son University. His research interests include technology ethics, interactions and networking in online communities, and student efficacy challenges in higher education. He received his bachelor’s degree in Information Systems and master’s degree in Information Assurance (Cybersecurity – Forensics – Audit) from sunny Cal Poly Pomona.Dr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya
). Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics, biomechanics, engineer- ing ethics, and engineering education. He is PI of two NSF sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis. Papadopoulos is currently the Program Chair Elect of the ASEE Mechanics Division and serves on numerous committees at UPRM that relate to undergraduate and graduate education.Dr. William Joseph Frey, Univ. Puerto Rico - Mayaguez William J. Frey has taught research, business, engineering, and computer ethics at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez since 1990. He is a member and former director of that university’s Center for Ethics in the
Student to Scholar: A Professional Skills Focused Library and Student Affairs CollaborationABSTRACTThe Student2Scholar initiative began as a collaboration between library and engineering facultyin the Spring of 2017. The primary focus of Student2Scholar (S2S) was to develop focusedprogramming to reinforce professional skill development among engineering students. Duringthe Summer of 2020 the S2S initiative partnered with New York University’s Tandon School ofEngineering Summer Undergraduate Research (SUR) Program to develop an 8 week longworkshop series focusing on opportunities in areas such as scientific communication,visualization, ethics and research, information literacy, and mentorship. A
illustrating the common mistakes found in the engineeringliterature.IntroductionFor scientific publications to contribute to the advancement of knowledge, it isnecessary that researchers be objective, complete, fair, and accurate in reporting theresults of their work, and to act with integrity throughout the publishing process. Theauthors of scholarly publications bear the responsibility for adhering to ethical norms,including those related to authorship and attribution, disclosure of conflict of interest,and the integrity of the peer-review process. As many graduate engineering programsrequire journal publications and/or conference presentations for graduation, it is criticalthat students learn about best practices in scholarly communications and are
nuclearenergy to raise awareness of nuclear power and its related issues in security, safety, and nuclearenvironmental protection.Course modules are developed to supplement a required freshman engineering course GEEN 100Engineering Design and Ethics (Introduction to Engineering). The modules give an overview ofnuclear engineering to students to broaden their career options. Two new elective courses arebeing developed. An engineering elective is for engineering seniors on nuclear energy andnuclear engineering. It is intended to prepare students for the workforce and/or graduate studiesin the nuclear engineering field. The second elective is for all majors, and it will focus on energyfor America's future, covering nuclear energy among other alternatives
across economicsectors that are, in often cases, beyond the technical competencies that are taught in traditionalclassroom. These competencies include, but not limited to, engineering entrepreneurship andengineering enterprise management, ethical and professional considerations in engineeringpractice and decision making, critical thinking skills and engineering problem solving creativity,intercultural awareness in managing multinational and multi-background engineering teams aswell as sustainability and environmental awareness. These competencies correspond to a numberof ABET outcomes including to analyze social context in historical and contemporary settings;to communicate effectively in writing and visual presentation; to engage effectively in
: % of URM studentscompared to 10-year average of 18% 40 35 30 25 20 Total % 15 10 5 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Increases based on intentional actions…• Curricular & co-curricular changes • from 0 to 3 unrestricted electives • study abroad programs within a 4-year graduation plan • from competitive to cooperative first-year design project focused on assistive design technologies • multi-disciplinary senior design capstone option for all majors • ethics across the curriculum • extremely strong SWE student chapter• Retention program for “at-risk” students • any first- or second-year student in good academic standing, but behind cohort … typically starting in pre-calculus
department, we have more students in ME thanin EE. However, it is imperative for all students to have the basics of EE in order to work on therobotic projects. In this case, we mix students from two programs together in the engineeringorientation course. “What topics should be covered in this course?” is always a question and achallenge for the instructors. After 3-year practices and continuous improvements, we decide tocover not only the basics of ME and EE but also diverse soft skills trainings especially theproject management trainings. Three teaching assistants (two juniors from EE and one juniorfrom ME) are assisting a professor in the lab sections. This paper studies the outcomes of severalactivities such as the ethics debates, self-identities
NSF GRANTEES POSTER SESSION Research Experiences in Pollution Prevention and SustainabilityAbstractRowan University hosts an NSF REU Site in Pollution Prevention and Sustainabilityevery summer. Undergraduate students from various science and engineering disciplinesfrom all over the USA participated in these pollution prevention research activities.Engineering faculty mentored students for an eight-week period. While research was theprimary activity, other community building modules, seminars, social events andcommunication strengthening exercises were an integral part of the Pollution Preventionexperience. A special workshop on environmental ethics and environmental justice wasalso offered to help students connect pollution prevention
Puerto Rico. The program isintended to provide students interested in graduate studies with an introduction toresearch methods, and to provide students who will not continue their studies past aBSCE with a better understanding of how research provides the theoretical foundation ofengineering practice. Students work individually with faculty on literature reviews,computer modeling, laboratory testing, and field research. Four students have researchedstructural failure case studies and the technical and ethical lessons to be learned fromthem. Participants also have the opportunity to tour construction sites and constructionmaterial manufacturers’ and fabricator’s facilities. During the past three years, an ethicsseminar series has been added. At
thedegree program. It makes more sense to group these types of courses within departments withparallel plans of study and common goals. It would therefore be logical that engineering andengineering technology colleges develop their own entry level freshmen courses to beadministered by in house faculty, with faculty of other departments coming as needed.Areas of concentration could include the importance and application of courses not directly in thedepartment (physics, math), communication (written and oral), ethics (both professionally), andcheating.IntroductionOver the past two years, this campus has been embroiled in a debate on offering a GeneralEducation (commonly referred to as “Gen Ed”) component to the curriculum. The intent is toexpose all
Paper ID #41641Engineering Identity Development Among International Students in UK FoundationYearDr. Madeline Polmear, King’s College London Madeline Polmear is a lecturer (assistant professor) in engineering education at King’s College London. Her research interests relate to engineering ethics education and the development of societal responsibility and professional competence through formal and informal learning. Madeline received her Bachelor’s in environmental engineering, Master’s in civil engineering, and PhD in civil engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder, USA. Prior to joining KCL, she was a Marie
articulate their assumptions regarding the purpose(s)of engineering education, the role of sustainability in the engineering curriculum, and therelationship between sustainability and the “ethics” and “environmental awareness” criteriaposed by the engineers’ accreditation agency (ABET 2005). Specifically, electronic dialogicjournals will be created that allow select engineering faculty to share their pedagogical ideology,to explore the relationship between the technological content that they teach and the objectivesand outcomes required by ABET, and to articulate the methods and goals they have for shapingour students’ philosophical perspectives as regards sustainability.Word count: 199
to improve their advising skills, but don’t know how. This workshop will be an interactive session with video segments and discussion, using the professionally developed Noel-Levitz advisor development program “Academic Advising for Student Success and Retention”. You will walk away with tools to improve advising, with the goal of improving student retention and student satisfaction. Topics will include specific sections on advising freshmen, meeting needs of students of color, ethical implications and practices of advising, accessing campus resources, as well as specifics of how to conduct a quality advising session with students.
itslearning success. The dimensions of learning objective educational integrity even when AI tools are used.attainment are: Educators should identify tasks where AI assistance • Cognitive Depth - The cognitive complexity of an does not compromise the learning process but rather assignment can be measured using Bloom’s enhances it. Designing assignments that require human Taxonomy, which classifies learning into hierarchical judgment, ethical considerations, and nuanced levels: remembering, understanding, applying
their work on public welfare and society,especially in the context of creating a more equitable and inclusive society. Recent research hasshown that student interest and commitment to social responsibility declines as students’progress through their academic career [2] [17]. Furthermore, although the majority ofengineering curriculum includes considerable and meaningful ethics education, it often excludesdiscussion and connection to larger societal issues and social justice content [18].The importance of social justice has been echoed by many engineering organizations,corporations, and businesses through their mission statements, core values, diversitycommitments, and strategic initiatives. ABET has recently revised their criteria for
; Personnel Management; Team building; TQM; Value Engineering; Ethics in Engineering Practice Section V: Avoiding Losses - Retaining a Profit. communications; Project overruns; Contract Language; Insurance; Liability and loss prevention; Dispute ResolutionCOURSE MATERIALS In addition to the lecture notes mentioned above, a number of other materials are available throughthe Institute for Professional Practice. The so-called “course-in-a-box” is available at no cost to schoolswilling to implement all or portions of the course. Materials include copies of three texts, the lecture notes,several references, and a set of audio tapes. The lecture notes are being revised and should be ready by Fall
of decision making in the light of incomplete and oftencontradictory information. In a course on Professionalism and Ethics—required of allengineers—we challenge students to examine professional and ethical issues by envisioning thefuture with a follow-up study on the impact of their outcomes on societal, political, andintellectual aspects of professional life. The course emphasizes the Theory of Constraints andThinking Processes as emphasized in The Goal by Eliyahu Goldratt. The course is consistentwith the desired outcomes as listed in ABET Criteria 2000. The course accentuates theimportance of adopting holistic thinking comprising higher-order life skills, professional skills,and technical skills. The paper provides an analysis to make
contribute to support the named abilities/skills? • What is the impact of the PELARS’ technology seen from the final users: students and teachers? • Will the new technology change the accreditation procedures?The schedule for trials in PELARS is shown in figure 1.Creating a comprehensive plan for each of the trials include also ethics considerations. Allactivities are and will be carried out taking into account FP7 guidelines as well as nationalguidelines on ethic issues, guaranteed by the Ethics Committee under EU. Participation of users isin line with agreed European and National ethical procedures for user participation andremuneration of test subjects, and subject to sign off by the Ethics and Research committees
of the ways discussed in Section II. The notes for the two slides are given in Table 3. Fig. 3: Two slides from module on reverse engineeringV. EthicsEngineering ethics is typically covered at various points throughout an engineering curriculum;however, because it is often a central issue in design, ethics should be emphasized in a capstonedesign project. The intent in this module is not to give a complete coverage of all the topicsassociated with engineering ethics but to give a review of some of the issues involved. The moduleuses information from a variety of sources, but the principal source of material is the NationalSociety of Professional Engineers' (NSPE) web page2,3
research interests include integrating creativity into the engineering curriculum, development in- struments to measure the engineering professional skills, and using qualitative data to enhance response process validity of tests and instruments.Dr. Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Page 25.1062.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Preparing the Engineer of 2020: Analysis of Alumni DataThe College of Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University aspires to educate engineers of2020: engineers who are innovative, ethical, and good
musician. Why wouldn’t a theater want avirtual orchestra?Some say that virtual orchestras do not give the same quality performance of livemusicians, but isn’t it possible to measure the quality of a performance based onengineering principles? Isn’t a note a vibration and thus quantifiable? What about theethical responsibility of engineering technology? Shouldn’t we as engineers beresponsible for our inventions?These are just some of the questions, mirroring the subjective and objective issues raisedby the use of virtual orchestras, that this paper addresses. Included are discussions of thecurrent trend of virtual musicians, the possibility of virtual orchestras, and the ethical
. As weprogress in our work, we are committed to addressing these challenges, ensuring that ourAI-based tools are not only effective but also ethically responsible and transparent in theiroperation.Ongoing developmentsAs part of our desire to refine the use of AI in education, we are actively exploring approaches toboth highlight and counteract the limitations of chatbots. Concurrently, we aim to leverage thestrengths of these AI tools in our pedagogical practices. This summer, we are set to pilot a “Whatcan chatbots do well” theme into our already existing a sophomore dynamics laboratory course.The essence of these lab activities will be to encourage students to interact with chatbots incompleting existing lab assignments. Minimal
society is shaped by technology, theconverse relationship is less apparent. It is a goal of the course for students to gain a broadunderstanding of the complex relationships among engineering, technology, and societyincluding the variety of ways that society does influence the development of technology,including its adoption or rejection. The course also emphasizes the importance of ethics in allaspects of engineering decision-making from design decisions to project management. Thecourse design departs from the more common first year engineering course consisting of design,engineering ethics, engineering problem solving and engineering topics, by fusing a scaled-backversion of such content with content addressing concepts and knowledge associated