targeted variability at least once in theirinterview: a large fraction. However, the nature of our participant recruitment likely biases thisstatistic. To produce a reasonable population-level estimate of targeting rate among practicingengineers, we must recruit a representative sample and deploy a scalable survey instrument.While we have future plans for such sampling, Study 2 was designed to begin development ofthis instrument.Study 2: Mixed-methods Study of Student EngineersThis study was conducted under a protocol approved by Brandeis University’s IRB, number#23053R-E. Study 1 allowed us to identify and describe the behavior of targeting; the goal ofStudy 2 was to develop a survey instrument that could help measure targeting of variability
styles. Research thatsupports efficacy of online education [19, 20, 21] highlights important features such as teacherpreparedness, clear guidelines, and structured coursework. These online courses typically arearranged in advance with planning and thorough organization about six to nine months before thecourse is delivered [17]. Another study found that aspects of online education that are integral tolearning virtually include staff's readiness and confidence, student accessibility and studentmotivation [23].This past March 2020, Universities across the U.S. experienced an emergency shift to remoteteaching almost overnight [24]. This sudden shift caused courses designed for face-to-faceinstruction to be moved online for “remote learning
national ASEE teaching awards, and is internationally recognized in his primary research field.Dr. Temesgen Wondimu Aure, University of Cincinnati TEMESGEN W. AURE, Ph.D., is the STEM Program Coordinator working under Dr. Kukreti on the NSF Type 1 STEP and S-STEM Projects in the Department of Biomedical, Chemical and Environmen- tal Engineering at the University of Cincinnati (UC), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Temesgen joined UC as a graduate student in 2008 Fall and completed his doctoral degree in Civil Engineering in 2013. He started working on his current position at UC in January 2014. He plans, designs, evaluates and modifies pro- grams supported by the NSF Type 1 STEP and S-STEM Grants in the College of Engineering and
reflection sessions; 2) submit a summative reflection that asksquestions related to the professional competencies and their role in their project; 3) complete avideo recorded mock interview in which they answer 4-5 behavior based interview questions;and 4) submit a reflection in which they review and assess their mock interview performance.It is during the reflection sessions that students are introduced to engineering problem typology.Through discussion, students consider the idea that engineers solve different types of problemsand that the most common problems in engineering include: design, engineering case analysis,selection, planning, troubleshooting, and diagnose-and-solve. Figure 1 provides examples of howthese problem types are explicated
current focus of Dr. Wood’s research includes the development of robotic ground and air vehicle systems using innovative design techniques using cur- rent technology implementations, as well as futuristic projections. Dr Wood also publishes research on advances in the methodology for creative electromechanical systems design.Brock U Dunlap, University of Texas, Austin Brock Dunlap is currently a graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin studying active learning and prototyping methodology. He plans to graduate in May 2014 with a master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in design and manufacturing. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University.Ella
of conceptual learn-ing, gender and the student’s grade point average (GPA). This suggests that development ofmodeling ability may be constrained by the naiveté of one’s personal epistemology. Finally,metacognition, or ‘thinking about thinking,’ has an impact on the development of modelingstrategies of students, when the impacts of four metacognitive dimensions are considered:awareness, planning, cognitive strategy and self-checking. Students who are better at self-checking show higher growth in their modeling abilities over the course of a year, compared tostudents who are less proficient at self-checking. The growth in modeling abilities is also moder-ated by the cognitive strategy and planning skills of the student. After some experience
comparatively low retention and graduationrates.The paper is organized as follows. Section II outlines the project’s aims and goals. In section III,we present the methodology, including the outline of assessment metrics, both qualitative andquantitative; the timeline of the project; and course descriptions and the philosophy behind thedesign of the integrated curricula. The first results are provided in section IV, followed by theirdiscussion in section V, which also includes the transpired project limitations and changes that weare planning to implement for the second cohort. The conclusions are given in section VI.II. MotivationThe primary motivation behind exploring co-teaching in interdisciplinary STEM courses in thisproject is to enhance student
at XYZ University to be exposed to the concepts of electricalengineering and computer science by integrating MPAD into their own custom RC cars. ThisMPAD implementation was also proof of its modularity aspect, where different RC cars were allable to utilize MPAD to add autonomous driving features to their design. This process exposedproject participants to various challenges in developing a system and scaling that to be used in acourse. In terms of future work for MPAD, there are several additions planned such as utilizingadditional sensors such as LiDARs for obstacle detection and switching to local hotspot and a localserver-based system for enhanced connectivity and restricted-free access.This course does provide a good concept where the
participatein an online survey by the external evaluation team from the Institute for Social ScienceResearch (ISSR) at the University of Alabama. This survey was a comprehensive assessment ofthe students’ experiences that included both quantitative and open-ended questions. The surveyincluded items measuring students’ satisfaction with various aspects of the program, attitudestoward the research and training they received, their perceived impact of the program on theirskills and future plans to be an engineer or computer scientist. Additionally, on the final day ofthe program each summer the evaluation team conducted a focus group during whichfeedback/discussion from the students was solicited. This focus group feedback was thensummarized for the
key role in economic development on Long Island and in Stony Brook’s role as a co-manager of Brookhaven National Laboratory. McInnis most recently served as the executive vice president and provost for the University of Texas at Austin, a top public research university serving more than 50,000 students, where she acted as chief academic officer, led strategic planning for the university’s academic mission, and made significant advancements in equity, diversity, and inclusion initiatives. Prior to that, she American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID
]. Thus far, two faculty members have participated inthe summer industry immersion program, which has broadened faculty views and strengthenedtheir ties to industry. Although the Faculty Immersion program was interrupted by the pandemic,other faculty members plan on joining the immersion in the coming summers.b. Faculty training. Faculty have attended multiple training courses since the beginning of theproject. In the past year, the Center of Faculty Development, the Project Center, and the Centerfor Digital Leaning and Innovation at Seattle University led various training courses on topicssuch as inclusive pedagogy, building relationship-rich classroom experiences, and effectivelymoving our courses online. Some faculty also attended workshops
) The professor in this class often teaches in an organized way. The professor in this class often uses real-world examples or illustrations to explain difficult points. The professor in this class often stops to ask questions during class. The professor in this class is often funny or interesting. I have discussed career plans with the professor in this class. I have discussed academic work with the professor in this class. I have had intellectual discussions outside of academic work with the professor in Faculty this class. Contact I have discussed course selection with the professor in this class. (α
departments likely varies significantly by region,policy environments, and student and faculty demographics. Research is needed to advance ourscholarly understanding of cultural factors in engineering that impede and promote LGBTQequality, which in turn will allow us to contour the content and promising practices of Safe Zoneworkshops to be most effective for engineering audiences.Our mixed-methods research plan uses surveys of engineering deans, faculty and students as wellas ethnographic participant observations of a Virtual Community of Practice for LGBTQinclusion in STEM. The surveys and ethnographic research generate new knowledge andunderstanding of engineering cultures, which provides empirically grounded ways that the nextSafe Zone workshops
University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.[35] Simmons, D. R. & Ye, Y., Hunsu, N. J. & Adesope, O. O. (2017). Development of a Survey to Explore Out-of-Class Engagement of Engineering Students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4), 1213-1221.[36] Lashari, T. A., Alias, M., Akasah, Z. A., & Kesot, m. J. (2012). An Affective-Cognitive Teaching and Learning Framework in Engineering Education. ASEAN. Journal of Engineering Education, 1(1), 11-24.[37] Simmons, D. R. & Yu, R. (2015). Conducting a Q Study to Refine and Develop New Measures of Engineering Student Co-Curricular Involvement. Research in Engineering Education Symposium. Dublin, Ireland.[38] Simmons, D
could serve with their scientific knowledge. They attended several volunteer board meetings and familiarized themselves with the organization and then decided to help create curriculum for the food based summer youth program that is hosted by the food bank. Kids spend time working in the community garden and then learn to prepare some of the food that they are growing. While it is cooking, they then play a game or do some other activity related to that food. The students created eight lessons plans based around different vegetables. Self-Help International - Students worked on a two part project with a local nonprofit that serves communities overseas with a variety of initiatives. In the first
] and “depoliticization” (relegation of questions of social justice and inclusion as“political,” and thus irrelevant to “real” engineering) [39, 40].This project used a mixed-methods research plan with surveys of engineering deans, faculty andstudents as well as ethnographic participant observations of a Virtual Community of Practice forLGBTQ inclusion in STEM. The surveys and ethnographic research generated new knowledgeand understanding of engineering cultures, which provided empirically grounded ways that thenext Safe Zone workshops were contoured to be most effective for engineering audiences. Theresearch findings help the members of the Virtual Community of Practice advocate moreeffectively as they try to promote LGBTQ equality in their
, and the TEAMS Program at the University of Boulder. Dr. Rivale’s research uses recent advances in our understanding of how people learn to evaluate and im- prove student learning in college and K-12 engineering classrooms. Her work also focuses on improving access and equity for women and students of color in STEM fields.Hannah Smith Brooks, University of Texas, Austin Hannah Brooks is a doctoral student at the University of Texas at Austin. Her research focuses on promot- ing equitable access through collaboration and instructional design. She is also interested in improving teacher education programs in the sciences by studying how teachers plan and structure learning using various methods. She has a BA in
areas that you would choose to test your solution on.You are tasked with the development of an initial design of a solution to this challenge,including: A) An annotated drawing and description of the design that will be used for achieving gum removal B) A plan for testing this method in select locations to prove it works in all anticipated conditions C) An operations procedure and schedule to be followed to implement this solution twice a year D) A list of materials needed. E) Methodology for construction.Figure 1. Ill-structured problem used for the studyData Analysis Verbal protocols (i.e. recordings of participants verbalizing) were transcribed for dataanalysis. Each transcript was coded
evaluatingtheir ongoing learning activities, and of developing plans and selecting strategies for learningnew material” [34]. The homework system’s Preliminary Assessment Sections (PAS) are beingdeveloped to include a variation on the Knowledge Monitoring Assessment (KMA) of Tobiasand Everson [35]. The KMA is a simple multiple choice test that allows for a measure of thecoherence between an individual’s perception of their knowledge in a given domain with theiractual performance. In a PAS, the student will be presented with a list of select course outcomessuch as those suggested below. • Rate your confidence to properly apply Ohm’s Law. • Rate your confidence in solving a circuit problem in which the proper understanding of the model of an
Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow.Dr. Cheryl Matherly Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education at The University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Dr. Matherly’ co-directs the
board developed at Rose-Hulman. The signal board provides aneasy way to implement the MATLAB exercises into hands-on hardware based experiments. TheDigilent Analog Explorer platform used in the workshop can be replaced by the NationalInstrument ELVIS board that is available at the USMA. The board provides portableinstrumentation and interfaces with the computer. Therefore, all the experiments introduced inthe workshop are easily adapted. My plan is to change two of the MATLAB exercises intohands-on activities for the fall term of the 2015-2016 academic year. Since the majority of theelectrical engineering students enjoy hands-on building exercises, this change will further help instimulating their learning.In particular, the two hardware labs
interventions done to increase the number of women in engineering.Dr. Dianne Raubenheimer, Meredith College Dr. Dianne Raubenheimer is Director of Research, Planning and Assessment at Meredith College, Raleigh, North Carolina. She also works as an educational consultant, primarily as external evaluator on educa- tional research and development grants.Dr. Alina N. Duca, NC State University Dr. Alina Duca is a Teaching Associate Professor and the Director of the Undergraduate Programs in the Mathematics Department at North Carolina State University. Her primary interests are in educational research about the teaching and learning of mathematics by pre-service teachers and STEM undergraduate students.Dr. H. Joel Trussell
valid values, that all dependent sources have uniquecontrol variables that are properly defined somewhere in the circuit, that there are no duplicatesought variable names, and that the circuit is in fact soluble by both node and mesh analysis (i.e.,not inconsistent). When this editor has been incorporated into tutorial exercises, as we plan to doin the near future, the validity check will be extended to ensure that the student has made acircuit transformation that is in fact correct. For example, we would check that the student hascorrectly combined a series or parallel set of elements if they are being asked to simplify thecircuit in that manner. They will be required to perform only one such simplification at a time,to make this check easier
Page 26.1438.7 on it, so we put the words from the suggested list. It wasn't very meaningful at that point to us. It was just an assignment we had to do, and we didn't really put much thought into it later on the semester. We just uploaded it because that was what we were supposed to do. (Student C) However, six students explained that the team charter was more useful in settingexpectations or making sure team members do their share of the work, which aligned with theteam charter’s objective in enabling each team “to develop and understand the rules of conductexpected of each team member27.” We also plan- started planning our team charter which was just a contract agreement between people in the
(pilot) Intro to Mechanics majors only) (pilot) Calculus STEP Exit STEP Exit STEP Exit Exam STEP ALEKS PPL Placement Exam Exam Method Advising tools Advising with Advising with Dedicated staff Dedicated staff advisor Golden Eagle Golden Eagle advisor; Flight Plan8 Flight Plan Faculty MentorsThe FYrE16 cohort had 67 students, on the new semester system, chosen randomly from eligibleand
involved with heating the polymer network from themagnetic particles. The objectives of this focus area are to teach students to i) identify howstimuli-responsive delivery systems work and their potential applications, ii) build a remotelycontrolled drug delivery system using magnetic particles and an alternating magnetic current, iii)use the system as a test-bed for the application of fundamental mass and heat transfer principles.4. EVALUATION PLAN Summative and formative project evaluation will be carried out according to therecommended practices of the National Science Foundation 64. The following instruments willbe used as a formative assessment of whether the project is meeting its goals.• Pre and post-tests: The questions (written and
sponsored by National Science Foundation Page 24.621.2(DUE-0942932). As the robotics curriculum and its educational structure as well as effectivenesswere previously covered16,17, this study presents the NSF-sponsored robotics curriculum impactas well as linkage on the engineering design process and describes an open-ended autonomousforestry robot design and construction perspective to retrieve simulated soil samples during theIEEE 2013 Region-5 robotics competition that simulated a forest fire region filled with differenttypes of obstacles and required autonomous robot navigation and effective path planning. Therobotics curriculum focuses on
Page 25.1356.5 6. I withdraw from or drop classes when they are too 2.23 0.95 difficult or inconvenient 7. I considered majors other than engineering 3.53 1.18 8. I am thinking about attending law school or medical 1.80 1.10 school. Total Score 2.33 0.61The mathematics attitudes of our students are on the high end of the scale indicating that ourstudents are already positively predisposed to mathematics. The withdrawal attitudes indicatethat, after completing the course, most students were planning on staying in
continued to modify and label their sketches into more concrete design plans. Their actions suggest a collaborative effort in the design process, which is crucial in engineering design. c) Sad – This emotion was observed in the building phase of the design activity. The building phase is characterized by hands-on activities from both participants. Although their faces indicated sadness, the interaction is constructive as they both decided to select another material relevant to each design component when the initial material chosen did not fit properly in the final product assembly. The grandmother directs the process and instructs the daughter on the next steps. They keep trying diverse