States.The metric system continued further definition of various units over the years and addedfundamental standards with new technology, such as electricity, magnetism, and light. In 1960,the metric system was renamed, the International System of Units (SI). In 1975, Congresspassed the Metric Conversion Act which established the United States Metric Board tocoordinate and plan the increased use of the metric system in the U.S. This board was disbandedin 1982. In 1988, Congress included additional metrication language in the Omnibus ForeignTrade and Competitiveness Act. This legislation required federal agencies to use metric systemin “procurement, grants, and other business-related activities” by the end of 1992, except forhighway and construction
Page 24.199.5assessment process itself. The SOs are one set of program markers. Precisely because of theholistic nature of a well-designed capstone, all SOs can reasonably be expected to be manifestedvia completion of a capstone project. This confluence accounts for the suitability of the capstoneor Senior Project course as a medium for assessment of the program.Our BS-CS program utilizes assessment of SOs in the Senior Project course as one component ofits assessment plan. Other components include course-embedded assessment via quizzes andapplication of specialized rubrics to course artifacts; in addition, indirect measures are obtainedby surveying students, instructors, alumni and employers. In the remainder of this section, thestructure of
24.218.5top-down attention executive attention, but executive attention is a more complex system that 4also includes self-regulation (such as the type needed when following a healthy diet or regulatingthe amount of time spent on Facebook), planning, and decision making 91-93.Executive attention can be trainedGround-breaking research conducted by Michael Posner and colleagues has demonstrated thatexecutive attention can be trained in as little as five days 94. Methods for attention traininginclude interactive computer-based exercises for children and techniques for adults that do notrequire the use of technology. Several research studies have documented
key factor that allows students to connect their experiences with the concepts theylearn and their future practices is learning through performing projects. Students in this studyreported that technical content combined with the process of learning and applying knowledge tosolve a problem was important. In fact, students saw processes such as planning, thinking incertain ways, learning how to learn on their own, and doing research as important as acquiringtechnical knowledge. These kinds of knowledge can best be acquired through working on bothwell- and ill-structured problems.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1003589. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or
potential of the electric vehicle. It could dramaticallysimplify the mechanical layout by connecting the motors directly to the wheels. This designwould reduce the number of drivetrain components, thus improving the overall reliability andefficiency. This option also reduces the drivetrain weight since the mechanical differentials arenot used7. Therefore, the team designed an electric drive control system to test its feasibility andreliability.Design ProcessThe design process mainly followed the P&B method8; including four phases, namely, planningand clarifying the task, conceptual design, embodiment design, and detail design.Planning and Clarifying the TaskThe first phase of the P&B Method involves product planning as well as the
of the process requires significant time and effort by faculty advisors,including a manager of the project curriculum, with appropriate load credit. Plan ahead at least ayear in advance, so as to adequately structure and schedule the experience. Prepare students andfaculty with clear expectations. Configure an LMS to facilitate the process. These steps help notonly in effectively guiding the students through the process, but in making the experience a moreauthentic model of the “real” job search. Page 24.303.14References1. Cavanaugh, Ryan, et al. “Automating the Process of Assigning Students to Cooperative-Learning Teams
each session. In the second part,student simulates some basic NMR sequences, including saturation recovery (SR) and spin echo(SE). In SR simulation, student specifies the T1, T2 values, an excitation angle, the repetitiontime (TR), echo time (TE), and repetition number. Student will observe the vector animation andFID that is generated. In SE simulation, student specifies number of spins, e.g. 10, off-resonancefrequencies randomly distributed between -50 Hz and 50 Hz. Student can observe the animationof all these spin vectors and the aggregated FID signals. In particular, this simulation is veryhelpful in explaining the divergence and refocus of magnetization on x-y plan in SE. Thisexercise is also very long, and it usually takes students two
plywood boards. Similarly, while a few of Participant 4’sideas could be compared to existing products, many of them seemed outside of the traditionalscope of expected snow transport equipment.Another difference was that the ideas generated by the more adaptive students (Participants 1 and2) seemed more practical, more efficient for immediate implementation, and easier to predict thatthey would work as planned than the more innovative students (Participants 3 and 4. The majorityof ideas proposed by Participants 3 and 4 seemed like they would need more extensive pilottesting and experiments to prove they would function, and would take longer to bring to theimplementation stage.A third difference was noticed between Participant 2 (a more adaptive
experiences in the mini projects in a provided) more substantial creative activity in which all the skills acquired could be utilised.Exhibit 2. The projects in order of their completion. 9 & 10 as planned are not included because they werenot completed. Reproduced from Owen, S and J. Heywood (1990) Transition technology in Ireland.International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1 (1), 21 – 32. The evaluation includes a dailyaccount of what happened on the course. 12 males and 12 females in the age range 16 – 18 completed thethree week program which was completed in a custom built laboratory financed by the Irish
Page 24.379.14material. A passionate professor can make students curious about the material and motivatethem to study the material more9-10. Litzinger et. al state that instructors should focus onstimulating interest in their subject area for all students regardless of their varying backgroundsand abilities9. Educators should stress the importance of how course material will be relevant inthe future. Similarly, if students understand how current class material is vital for theirunderstanding in future classes, they may value the class more2, 9. Hence, tying course material tofuture academic and career plans will show students the importance of the course.Question O: Learning Styles and PreferencesResearch by Felder and colleagues shows the
providedsufficient amount of detail so it can be used as a point of departure for further research. It canalso be used as an educational resource in algorithm manipulation, and/or further codedevelopment, regarding the choice of mixed-mode (MPI-OpenMP) versus direct MPIimplementations. Future WorkAs a future work we plan to benchmark for memory efficiency, where the mixed-mode approachcould have an advantage, and to advance our code optimization efforts seeking an increasedperformance for both techniques. ConclusionsBy using MPI for distributing data to
in which they handle the writing tasks. Students should alsobe required to begin the process of oral presentation early in their academic careers. Professorsshould give their students every chance available to speak of the technical knowledge that theyare learning. As interest grows, planned seminars and workshops can be provided that willemphasize the importance of the engineering faculty as the catalyst for improvement.The structure of unified technical knowledge and communication skill can be accomplishedthrough a concerned engineering faculty speaking about communication, not preaching about it.By involving students in the work that they themselves do, the faculty of every engineeringdepartment can stimulate a massive movement in the
resources16. Wanget al17 develops a VA system to help bridge managers analyze bridges and plan maintenances.Wong et al18 created a visualization system called GreenGrid to examine power systeminformation through semantic encoding, multilevel graph visualization, and force-directedlayout. Jigsaw19 and CZsaw20 enable users to make sense of a large collection of text. They offera collection of visualizations to detect the connection among alternatives. With document view,scatter-plot view, history view, and dependency graph, these visualizations can help usersexamine the connection between entities and support analytical strategies. Such VA systemshave been widely adopted in many domains. But it is still rare to see the application of VA onPLM.Possible
LabVIEW programming.The rain gage provides supporting precipitation data to reduce any uncertainties in the weatherstation measurements. There are also plans to expand the field site with additional measurementdevices and data collection hardware. An ultrasonic transducer will collect stage measurementsin a weir just upstream of the site and will help to provide additional flow measurements toensure data quality and accuracy. A power monitor will also be installed to track the powerconsumption of the devices in order to optimize the energy efficiency of the lab.Data Collection HardwareData from the environmental sensors is collected using an industrial embedded computer(National Instruments CompactRIO) housed in the main control box at the LEWAS
solving industrial problems.Chesler et al.9 report on an introduction to design course where they make use of virtualepistemic games focused on design trade-offs and client conflict management. In groups of 5,they solve the design projects in 11 hours. Page 24.763.3The approach here is less ambitious in curriculum coordination and planning structure than anyof these efforts; rather this paper discusses a multidisciplinary experience targeting a single term,orchestrated in the courses offered during that term. This is simpler in scope, requiring morelimited coordination of four courses rather than an entire sequence of courses.Introduction
and engineering classes would be held. Next, it wasdecided that the Museum project would also furnish new office space for the General StudiesDepartment. As a result, the Museum was to become a dynamic space; a laboratory for learningand a venue for the synthesis of art and engineering.Following two years of intensive planning and effort, the Grohmann Museum opened in Octoberof 2007 as the newest and arguably the finest Museum in Milwaukee, in addition to being to only Page 24.784.3Museum of its type in the world. Nowhere else will one find as comprehensive a collectionsurrounding the themes of art, engineering, and occupation. Subjects
sports projectiles. She is the co-author of an innovative textbook integrating solid and fluid mechanics for undergraduates.Dr. Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is Chair of the Engineering Studies Program and Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infras- tructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, and Lafayette’s introductory first year engineering course. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt serves on the American Society of Civil Engineers
flatten the snow with a machine to make it easier to walk on. Heachieved this with two concepts: one was a snow tamper, a machine that would flatten the snowas you push it, and the other was two plywood boards. Similarly, while a few of Participant 4’sideas could be compared to existing products, many of them seemed outside of the traditionalscope of expected snow transport equipment.Another difference was that the ideas generated by the more adaptive students (Participants 1 and2) seemed more practical, more efficient for immediate implementation, and easier to predict thatthey would work as planned than the more innovative students (Participants 3 and 4. The majorityof ideas proposed by Participants 3 and 4 seemed like they would need more
0:07:04 0:03:41 distribution plan and power is out of scope. [Carla] begins to rank aloud the requirements for the project. The group begins reading through specs to determine what sensors are provided. --- --- --- --- --- [Patricia] updates [Carla] on the [Bradley] and [Olivia] are issues of sensitivity faced with testing the RFID sensor (and I the thin force sensor. [Patricia] believe distance sensor) inside 7.23 0:53:51 0:54:36
. Course resources Elective. focus on project management. Orientation Service-learning. Capstone Business, Several. Some Human services, Engineering products and are specifically access and Design focus services. “work for business abilities, including business like companies.” (business education and and industrial planning and outreach, the design issues. venture analysis
samplesize, the results indicate that self-assessment can be used as a tool to monitor the achievement ofcritical outcomes. Regular and periodic self-assessment from students might help an instructor tocome up with an early intervention plan to reconfigure course content or to change contentdelivery methods in order to enhance the possibility of achieving critical learning outcomes. Thisis important since the direct assessment of specific outcomes is typically done at the end of thesemester, or during program assessment, which is often too late for students who have alreadytaken courses in which outcomes have not been achieved. Although important and necessary, theformal means of direct assessment do not provide the instructor with an immediate
(3), 16-21. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.libraries.wright.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire ct=true&db=bth&AN=88397921&site=ehost-liveAtkinson, P., & Nicholls, L. (2013). Demystifying lean culture change' and continuous improvement. (cover story). Management Services, 57(3), 10-15. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.libraries.wright.edu:2048/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?dire ct=true&db=bth&AN=90521885&site=ehost-liveBalzer, W. (2010), Lean higher education - increasing the value and performance of university processes. New York, New York: Taylor and Francis Group.Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2013). Supply chain management : Strategy, planning, and
. James H. Block. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.3. Keller, Fred Simmons, John Gilmour Sherman, and Carolina Martuscelli Bori. PSI, the Keller Plan Handbook: Essays on a personalized system of instruction. Menlo Park, Calif.: WA Benjamin, 1974.4. Onipede, O., and Warley, R., "Rethinking engineering exams to motivate students," 26th Annual Lilly Conference on College Teaching, Miami University, Oxford, OH, October 2007Appendix: Survey Questions1. I feel confident in taking future courses that require E MCH 211 as a pre-requisite.2. I think it is important to be able to solve problems correctly3. I feel that the grades I received in E MCH 211 with mastery exams was a fair evaluation of my understanding of that subject
. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/resources/beyond/greenreport.cfm 4. National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Retrieved from http://www.nae.edu/Programs/Education/Activities10374/Engineerof2020.aspx 5. National Science Foundation, Investing in America’s Future: Strategic Plan, FY 2006–2011 (Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation). 6. Engineering Education and Practice in the United States: Foundations of our Techno-Economic Future. (1985). National Research Council: Washington, D.C. 7. Besterfield, M.E., Ragusa, G., Matherly, C., Phillips, S.R., Shuman, L.J., Howard, L. (2013). Assessing the
. Thousand Oaks: Sage.93. Koro-Ljungberg, M. & Douglas, E.P. (2008). State of Qualitative Research in Engineering Education: Meta- Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005-2006. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 163-175.94. Koro-Ljungberg, M. & Douglas, E.P. (2008). State of Qualitative Research in Engineering Education: Meta- Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005-2006. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 163-175.95. Anyon, J. (2009). Theory and Educational Research: Toward Critical Social Explanation. New York: Routledge.96. E.g., Creswell, J., W. (2007). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3rd Edition.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.97. Charmaz, K. (2006
firstly will beinhosted. hosted Broun Hall 352 and now in Broun Hall 314. Page 24.947.7Based on this test and feedback from the students, we will revisit and update the lab experiments in the summer.Some fundamental questions to be answered are, are these labs suitable for senior students? What are theprerequisites? Does our current curriculum cover the sufficient background? We also plan to find ways toincorporate our research outcomes on SDR and CR with the lab, to show students how to leverage and
. L. Waight, K. S. Zerda, and T. Sha. 2008. The relations of ethnicity to female engineering students’ educational experiences and college and career plans in an ethnically diverse learning environment. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (4): 449-465.14. Hoh, Y. K. 2008. Presenting female role models in civil engineering: An outreach activity to help teachers overcome their misperceptions of engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education 24 (4): 817- 824.15. Jain, R., B. Shanahan, and C. Roe. 2009. Broadening the appeal of engineering - Addressing factors contributing to low appeal and high attrition. International Journal of Engineering Education 25 (3): 405- 418.16. Bronzini, M. S., J. M
(1): p. 1-16.5. National Academy of Engineering, Grand Challenges for Engineering, G.C.f.E. Committee, Editor. 2008, National Academy of Sciences on behalf of the National Academy of Engineering. p. 54.6. Rittel, H. and M. Webber, Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 1973. 4(2): p. 155-169.7. Boyer, E., Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. 1990, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: Princeton, NJ. p. 151.8. Yin, R., Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2009, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.9. Godin, B. and C. Doré, Measuring the impacts of science: Beyond the economic dimension. History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, 2004.10. United
the time. Each student is also able touse as many robots as he wishes without running into cost limits as would happen with thephysical robots.Integration into the classroom is planned in a few different ways to help complement thehands-on robots. Introducing new topics to students and demonstrating how to use therobots for the new topic can be completed more easily through the simulation on theteacher’s computer. As students are developing new code to run their robots, thesimulation provides the platform to quickly alter the code before running on the hardware.When students are at home without robots, the simulation is being used to have homeworkassignments which integrate the robot lessons.Initial data was collected from students who have
” experience. Choices that do not serve this purpose should be rejected in favor of projectsthat actually do enhance the realistic nature of the project. Some of the engineering sub-disciplines that need to be exercised include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following,shown in Figure 1 below: Page 24.1083.4 Product Planning Design Product Engineering (Analysis) Manufacturing (Production) Cost analysis Figure 1: Cross-functional approach required for student