„effectiveness‟ of using video,in an education pedagogy sense. To address this a metric was created and planned for use inanother course (also using the foundry).Finally, the process of creating a video is time and equipment intensive. Some ancillary aspectsof video production included a momentarily clean foundry, an outstanding archive document,and some of those higher Bloom‟s Taxonomy (3) scenarios played out on the instructor.MethodologyThis project posits the use of video to accelerate and improve some basic foundry concepts andskills. Since safety is such a prominent constraint, it is covered soon and often. Commercialvideos (4) have been used during MET257 in conjunction with lab tours and demos. Butcommercial scenarios are typically different in
proposed Grand Challenges Scholars Program.OverviewThe undergraduate curriculum for the Construction Management program in the Lyles College ofEngineering at Fresno State was overhauled nearly three years ago. The unique features of therevised curriculum comprised an interdisciplinary approach with a business minor as an integralelement of the CM major. Service learning was incorporated at all levels in the form of “S”designated courses. At the freshman level, CM 1S, the orientation course; in the mid-level, CM7S, the construction materials and assembly course; and at the senior level, the capstone course,CM 180S provide the experiential learning opportunities with one or more community basedorganizations (CBOs) in the field of construction. Each
survey indicate that industrymembers feel there are areas where academic graduate education falls short of preparing students forindustrial jobs. Future results will evaluate student experience and learning in both courses andcompare the results to students with and without internship experience. AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Dr. Bernardo Martinez-Tovar and everyone at the ManufacturingTraining and Technology Center (MTTC) cleanroom for their assistance. The research wassponsored by the National Science Foundation Division of Graduate Education award number2325367. References1. Borah, D., K. Malik, and S. Massini, Are
disparity in distribution highlightsthe prevalence of both moderate-sized particles and a considerable abundance of larger particles,offering insights into the varied particle sizes present within the fly ash sample. We used thispublished data to generate the graph of the cumulative distribution of particles by size as illustratedin Figure 1.We curve fitted the plot, generated experimentally32, by an exponential function given by thefollowing expression as follows: 𝐹(𝑠) = 100(1 − exp (−0.0145𝑠1.165 ) (11)Where s is the size of the particle in m. F(s) is the percent proportion of the particle of a specificsize contained in the coal flay ash. The power capacity of the coal-fired power
) LC s 1 d2 (x1 − x2 ) ω− = (18) m = (−k − 2kc )(x1 − x2 ) (14) L(C + 2Cc ) dt2 This differential equation has cosine solutions of These two frequencies can be related to thethe following form: observed beat frequency, ω+ − ω− = 2πfbeat , by the following relation: (x1 − x2 ) = x− = A− cos(ω
instructional and socioemotional challenges that manystudents encountered during the shift to remote instruction. This study and its findings add tonascent research exploring rapid responses by faculty to address issues associated with remoteinstruction and document effective instructional practices. References[1] Andre, E., Williams, N., Schwartz, F., Bullard, C. Benefits of Campus Outdoor RecreationPrograms: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership.2017, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp 15-25.[2] Bailey, T., Alfonso, M. Paths to persistence: An analysis of research on program effectivenessat community colleges. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation of Education. 2005.[3] Bauman, S
instruction in multiple STEM disciplines,”presented at the ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Conference, Jul 26-9, 2021. Available:https://peer.asee.org/37955.[2] C. Torres-Machi, A. Bielefeldt, and Q. Lv, “Work in progress: The strategic importanceof data science in civil engineering: Encouraging interest in the next generation,” presented at theASEE Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, Jun 26-9, 2022. Available:https://peer.asee.org/40713.[3] S. Grajdura and D. Niemeier, "State of programming and data science preparation in civilengineering undergraduate curricula," Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 149, no. 2, p.04022010, 2023, doi: doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.2643-9115.0000076.[4] J. G. Hering, "From slide rule to big data: How data
the program’s effect tobe reviewed. Comparison of these students and their career paths over a long period will determineif the program has any effect on encouraging Ph.D. enrollment, particularly for minority groups.The results of these efforts will be disseminated in future publications.References[1] R. Tormey, S. Isaac, C. Hardebolle and I. Le Duc, Facilitating Experiential Learning in Higher Education : Teaching and Supervising in Labs, Fieldwork, Studios, and Projects, Milton: Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.[2] National Society for Experiential Education, "Eight Principles of Good Practice for All Experiential Learning Activities," in 1998 Annual Meeting, Norfolk, 1998.[3] B. A. Al-Sheeb, A. Hamouda and G. M. Abdella
: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1255251[4] T. Barrett et al., “A Review of University Maker Spaces,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 2015, p. 26.101.1-26.101.17. doi: 10.18260/p.23442.[5] S. Jordan and M. Lande, “Should Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” in 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2013, pp. 815–817. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2013.6684939.[6] L. Nadelson et al., “Knowledge in the Making: What Engineering Students are Learning in Makerspaces,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Expo. Proc., Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33039. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33039.[7] M. Galaleldin, F. Bouchard, H. Anis, and C. Lague, “The Impact of
) offers three undergraduate-only engineeringprograms: Electrical and Computer Engineering (EECE), Manufacturing Engineering (MFGE),and Polymer Materials Engineering (PME). The Becoming Engaged Engineering Scholars(BEES) S-STEM scholarship program, funded by the National Science Foundation, providesacademic and financial support to 4 cohorts of low-income undergraduate students interested inmajoring in engineering. The BEES program supports scholars for the first two years of theirstudy at WWU.In addition to two years of financial support, the scholarship program that provides the focalpoint of this study offers curricular and co-curricular supports for pre-major engineering studentsduring their first and second years of undergraduate study. These
. 199–216, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2334- 4822.2008.tb00509.x.[2] K. Haag, S. B. Pickett, G. Trujillo, and T. C. Andrews, “Co-teaching in Undergraduate STEM Education: A Lever for Pedagogical Change toward Evidence-Based Teaching?,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, p. es1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-08-0169.[3] C. Henderson, A. Beach, and M. Famiano, “Promoting instructional change via co- teaching,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 274–283, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1119/1.3033744.[4] D. Sachmpazidi, A. Olmstead, A. N. Thompson, C. Henderson, and A. Beach, “Team- based instructional change in undergraduate STEM: characterizing effective faculty collaboration,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 15, Apr. 2021, doi
Pandemic. Leveraging All Available Resources for a Limited Resource in a Crisis,” Annals ATS, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 408–416, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202004-317CME.[2] M. L. Ranney, V. Griffeth, and A. K. Jha, “Critical Supply Shortages — The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic,” N Engl J Med, vol. 382, no. 18, p. e41, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2006141.[3] A. Santini, A. Messina, E. Costantini, A. Protti, and M. Cecconi, “COVID-19: dealing with ventilator shortage,” Current Opinion in Critical Care, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 652–659, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001000.[4] S. Abidi and R. Ramos, “WIP: Utilizing Guided Worksheets to Improve Student Performance
continue to use this module in their instruction, and to expand their effortto include formalize research using this cross-functional collaboration with the discipline specificversion to gather more data on the student engagement responses. Software Engineering Division (SWED)fReferences[1] Lohr, S., & Markoff, J. (2006). Windows is so slow, but why. Te New York Times,Mar..(Referenced on page.).[2] Rogers, Y. (1992, December). Ghosts in the network: distributed troubleshooting in a sharedworking environment. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supportedcooperative work (pp. 346-355).[3] Cao, L., Mohan, K., Xu, P., & Ramesh, B. (2009). A framework for adapting agiledevelopment methodologies. European Journal of Information
in engineering curricula was discussed as early as 2004 by Frame et al.[5], who mentioned that PLM is best introduced in relation to the holistic design of a product,covering its entire lifecycle. Frame et al.’s solution was to include usage of PLM softwarethroughout the undergraduate program of study however, this solution is unable to provide thecontinuity of following a singular product. Another approach is the formation of anextracurricular project group focused on providing undergraduate students with hands-onexperiences using PLM tools in a structured environment that simulates a typical industrialutilization paradigm through providing employee roles, structured workflows, collaborativeprojects, and formalized review processes. This
AccreditationCommission (ETAC) criteria and construction engineering programs at 27 institutions using itsEngineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) criteria [3].Clearly, construction management remains intertwined with engineering. This connection cannotbe ignored or discounted when studying the “supply” of construction managers. The Bureau ofLabor and Statistics (BLS) defines a construction manager as someone who “plan[s],coordinate[s], budget[s], and supervise[s] construction projects from start to finish” in theOccupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) [1]. The work of construction management (planning,coordinating, budgeting, and supervising) involves solving problems whether those problems arebefore the start of construction (planning and budgeting), during
’ Perceptions of Important EmployabilitySkills Required from Malaysian Engineering and Information and Communication Technology(ICT) Graduates,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 110-115.[3] Ruff, S. and Carter, M. (2015), “Characterizing Employers’ Expectations of theCommunication Abilities of New Engineering Graduates,” Journal on Excellence in CollegeTeaching, vol. 26, no.4, pp 125-147.[4] Reave, L. (2004), "Technical Communication Instruction in Engineering Schools: A Surveyof Top-Ranked U.S. and Canadian Programs," Journal of Business and TechnicalCommunication, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 452-490.[5] Zemliansky, P. and Berry, L. (2017), "A Writing-Across-the-Curriculum FacultyDevelopment Program: An Experience Report," IEEE
is tailored to the unique needs ofSTEM, and specifically engineering, students. The composition sequence was designed andtaught by a member of the English Department in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences(CLAS).CU Denver requires its undergraduates to take two composition courses, Composition 1 (ENGL1020) and Composition II (ENGL 2030). The ELC began including English Composition in Fall2017 and several enrolled students have been supported through a National Science Foundation(NSF) S-STEM grant beginning in Fall 2019. Students participating in the first semester of theELC must co-register for ENGL 1020 unless they have already met the requirement (a 4 or 5 onthe Advanced Placement Language and Composition exam, for example); students
between attitude andperformance outcomes.References[1] Z. Ismail, “Benefits of STEM Education,” p. 14.[2] Y. Xu and C. Maitland, “Mobilizing Assets: Data-Driven Community Development with Refugees,” in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Lahore Pakistan: ACM, Nov. 2017, pp. 1– 12. doi: 10.1145/3136560.3136579.[3] S. I. van Aalderen-Smeets, J. H. Walma van der Molen, and I. Xenidou-Dervou, “Implicit STEM ability beliefs predict secondary school students’ STEM self-efficacy beliefs and their intention to opt for a STEM field career,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 465– 485, 2019, doi: 10.1002/tea.21506.[4] Y. Liu, S. Lou, and R. Shih
and has since moved into the Computer Engineering Department. His areas of interest have branched out to include web applications for teaching and learning, as well as new approaches to digital- to-analog converters with first and second order holds.Prof. Dominic J. Dal Bello, Allan Hancock College Dom Dal Bello is Professor of Engineering at Allan Hancock College (AHC), a California community col- lege between UC Santa Barbara and Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. At AHC, he is Department Chair of Math- ematical Sciences, Faculty Advisor of MESA (the Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement Pro- gram), and Principal/Co-Principal Investigator of several National Science Foundation projects (S-STEM, LSAMP, IUSE). In
escape room game,” CHI PLAY 2017 Ext. Abstr. - Ext. Abstr. Publ. Annu. Symp. Comput.-Hum. Interact. Play, pp. 111–123, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1145/3130859.3131436.[3] S. Nicholson, “Peeking Behind the Locked Door: A Survey of Escape Room Facilities”.[4] R. Pan, H. Lo, and C. Neustaedter, “Collaboration, awareness, and communication in real-life escape rooms,” 2017 - Proc. 2017 ACM Conf. Des. Interact. Syst., no. August, pp. 1353–1364, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3064663.3064767.[5] C. Giang et al., “Exploring Escape Games as a Teaching Tool in Educational Robotics,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 946 AISC, pp. 95–106, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-18141-3_8.[6] A. Veldkamp, L. van de Grint, M. C. P. J. Knippels, and W. R. van Joolingen
21st Century,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 91–98, 1999.[2] J. Cantor, “Experiential Learning in Higher Education: Linking Classroom and Community,” 1995.[3] R. Graham, “The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2018. Accessed: Oct. 04, 2018. [Online]. Available: file://engin-storage.m.storage.umich.edu/engin- storage/jcallew/windat.v2/Documents/Conferences/ASEE/2019/MIT_NEET_GlobalStateE ngineeringEducation2018.pdf[4] L. Harrisberger, “Experiential Learning in Engineering Education,” ERIC Clearinghouse, 1976.[5] D. R. Fisher, A. Bag, and S. Sarma, “Developing Professional Skills in Undergraduate Engineering Students Through Cocurricular
assignments.References[1] M. Knoll, “The Project Method: Its Vocational education Origin and International Development.,” Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, vol. 34, no. 3, 1997.[2] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019,” abet.org, [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2018-2019//#4. [Accessed Feb. 25, 2021].[3] D. Olawale, J. Sanchez and S. Spicklemire, “UIndy Engineering DesignSpine: Engineering leadership development through interdisciplinary teams and early exposure to real life problems,” in ASEE IL-IN Section Conference, West Lafayette, IN, 2018.[4] G
. International Engineering Alliance, IEA, 2021.[9] The UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence and Commitment, UK-Spec 4th Ed., United Kingdom, 2021.[10] M. F. Ashby, “Guidance for instructors,” in Materials and Sustainable Development, 2nd ed. Waltham, MA, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016, pp. 259-273.[11] S. Farrell and E. Cavanagh, “Biodiesel production, characterization, and performance: A hands-on project for first-year students,” Education for Chemical Engineers, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. e21-e31. 2014. [Online]. Available: ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2014.02.001 [Accessed Dec. 12, 2022].[12] A. Sharma, H. Dutt, Ch. Naveen Venkat Sai and S. M. Naik, “Impact of project based learning methodology in
(Automotive, aerospace, apparel, electronics, etc.), products and businesses. Students will beinvestigating and identifying what new business ideas these challenges will be (or currently) generating.Students were asked to identify sustainable practices and processes during their VSM mapping. At theend of the term, there was a team competition based on the deliverables of the project. In the competition,students presented their cartoon(s) and VSMs that helps to illustrate some of the challenges SC designersand users face. Student teams will also suggest up to three possible captions in to accompany eachcartoon. Sample student submitted VSM charts and Cartoons can be find in Appendix B.Project DescriptionA process map documents how work either is, or
move on toother opportunities, leaving mentees without a support system. Additionally, without an explicitinstitutional support plan for sustainability, the program may not continue if the faculty and staffare assigned other duties in future semesters. However, with clearly defined interaction pointsand assessment, the mentorship model described would likely need minimal administrativesupport for long-term sustainability.4. AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the support from Georgia Tech's Hesburgh Award Teaching Fellows Programand the Provost Teaching Learning Fellow Program.5. References[1] J. H. Lim, B. P. MacLeod, P. T. Tkacik, and S. L. Dika, "Peer mentoring in engineering: (un)shared experience of undergraduate peer mentors and mentees
will typically increasethe pass rate of a course. This course is also one of the first programming classes taken by transferstudents which may contribute to the high DFW rate. Future work will include a comparison ofthe DFW rates between historic offerings and those that have made use of Plickers.In conclusion using Plickers in class is a positive experience for both the instructor and the stu-dents. Since each class has a clear structure of: Plicker question, lecture, break, Plicker question,lecture/activity, quiz, students are never doing any one task for very long. This aids in keepingstudents engaged and on task.References [1] L. Porter, D. Bouvier, Q. Cutts, S. Grissom, C. Lee, R. McCartney, D. Zingaro, and B. Simon, “A Multi
authors only and not of funding agencies.References [1] Hirose, S., 2020, “IFRR Colloquium on Creative Design”, URL http://ifrr.org/ creative-design. [2] Reuleaux, F. and Kennedy, A. B. W., 1876, The Kinematics of Machinery: Outlines of a Theory of Machines, Macmillan, URL https://books.google.com/books?id= WUZVAAAAMAAJ. [3] Thurston, R. H., 1878, A History of the Growth of the Steam-engine, International scientific series, Kegan Paul, URL https://books.google.com/books?id=G9aCBNsoeTUC. [4] Erdman, A. and Gustafson, J., 1977, “LINCAGES: Linkage INteractive Computer Analysis and Graphically Enhanced Synthesis Packages,”, Technical report. [5] Erdman, A. G. and Riley, D., 1981, “Computer-aided linkage design using the lincages
). “A statics concept inventory: development and psychometric analysis” Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 363-371.[2] N, Maramil, E. Usher, C. Li, “Measuring undergraduate students’ engineering self-efficacy: a validation study”. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 366-395.[3] P. Terenzini., E. Pascarella; and G. Blimling (1996). “Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review”. Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 149-162.[4] S. Brint; A. Cantwell; and R. Hanneman (2007). “The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement”. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 383-402.[5] K. Inkelas; W. Zeller; R. Murph; M. Hummel (2006). “Learning
Table 3, we provide a summary of identified themes for each researchquestion and further describe these findings in the following sections.Table 3: Research Questions and Identified Themes. Research Question Theme(s) Present RQ 1: How do undergraduate students’ • Prioritizing engineering-related interpretations of course performance experiences and relationships as indicators influence the formation of their professional of engineering identity identities? • Being a student versus becoming an engineer RQ 2: How do undergraduate students’ • Decreasing influence of
gender. Most of all programs and gendersspecified ramps as the facilitation way used for entrances. Looking at the EnvE program that wasnot exposed to the presentation or the tour we can see that female students mentioned theuncommon facilitation ways while male students didn’t think of them. This includes adequatelightings, door handles and sliding doors.Table 5 Facilitation ways by program and gender shown in percentages. The following abbreviations are used: PAT = Preferanother term; PNS = prefer not to say; A P = Accessible parking; A L = Adequate lighting; A D = Automatic Doors; C C = Colorcoding; D H = Door Handles; E = Elevators; L D = Light Doors; R = Railings; Ra = Ramps; S = Signage; S D = Sliding Doors; U =unknown; U B= Use of Braille