first-yearengineering course calls for students to develop a logical problem solving process whichincludes sequential structures, conditional structures, and repetition structures for fundamentalengineering problems; translate a written problem statement into a mathematical model; solvefundamental engineering problems using computer tools; and work effectively and ethically as amember of a technical team. One approach to having first-year students solve open-endedproblems is through team-oriented tasks called Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs). These tasksare based upon the models and modeling perspective put forth by Lesh and Doerr7 and aredeveloped using six design principles8-9. The National Research Council’s Board of EngineeringEducation
concepts they need to learn to solve the problem posed. The case study shows therelationship between technical concepts and their social and ethical impact, limitationsdue to resource availability, and inter-personal conflicts.Learning the relevant concepts and their relationship to the problem is done in threesteps. Each step uses different techniques depending on the level of learning (fromBloom’s Taxonomy) that is being addressed.Step 4a: Shallow levels of learning—remember and (for upperclassmen) understand—can, and should, be mastered independently. Students are given a reading assignmentthat covers one or two specific concepts prior to each class period. Faculty usetechniques that help students learn material independently such as Just in
), engineering ethics andgreen design. The second project is more intensive in terms of the project requirements anddeliverables to be completed in the same duration of seven weeks.In the second stage, the experimental group of eight teams was provided access to the DISTconfigured for the design problem. It was presented as a design support tool, and its usagewas optional in the completion of the project. Each design team was provided a laptop loadedwith the DIST, word processing, spreadsheet and Computer Aided Design (CAD) software. Page 11.205.8The teams were also rearranged (randomly) based on the peer
institutions, designing courses, teaching techniques, solving instructional problems, andanalyze case studies of ethical issues in academic life. Some doctoral students in the PFFprogram choose to complete the Graduate Certificate in College and University FacultyPreparation6, in which they take several courses geared at preparing them for teaching andfaculty careers and which includes a mentored teaching experience.Format of Support Activities: The format of the support activities ranged from individualconsultations with faculty developers to 1-2 year long teaching certificate programs for graduatestudents involving multiple seminar classes and a mentored teaching experience. Less clear fromthe websites was the level to which faculty and graduate
structurallyrational and economically prudent actually establishes the “correctness” and the “ethics”of building10. Khan argued that well detailed and efficient structures posses the natural elegance of slenderness and reason, and have possibly a higher value than the whims of a-priori aesthetics imposed by architects who do not know how to work closely with engineers, and who do not have an inner feeling for natural structural forms.11.What Links the Three Forms TogetherThe linkage between these three forms can be summarized as increasing constraints Page 12.693.5imposed on the designer, as one moves from sculptural form, through
availableto guide testing of more widely used equipment. The Codes are written so that they can beincorporated into an equipment purchase contract for use in conducting an acceptance test, andthey are meant to be applied to a field test as opposed to a laboratory or shop test. There areabout 40 “equipment codes” and about 15 “supplements” covering fundamental measurementtechniques and test (measurement) uncertainty.The PTCs can provide a useful bridge between college courses in the energy stem andinstrumentation/measurement and the “real world”. Also, the introduction to the ASME Codesand Standards activity and the part that individual engineers play in developing voluntarystandards is obvious link to the topics of professional ethics and
Accountability Exhibits self-confidence D2 Self Confidence PROFESSIONALD QUALITIES Possesses honesty/integrity/personal ethics D3 Integrity Shows initiative/is self-motivated D4 Self Motivation Demonstrates a positive attitude toward change D5 Positive Attitude Works effectively with others E1 Works with Others Understands and contributes to the organization’s E2 Goal orientationE TEAMWORK goals
and Wood, Leigh N. Fremantle, Australia : s.n., 2008.Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) International Education Research Conference.12. Providing in-depth and personalized feedback to online students using audio recording. Wallace, Ian andMoore, Catherine. Singapore : s.n., 2012. 3rd International Conference on e-education, e-Business, e-Management,and e-Learning.13. Inverting the Classroom: A Gateway to Creating an Inclusive Learning Environment. Lage, M., Platt, G. andTreglia., M. 2000, Journal of Economic Education, Vol. Winter, pp. 31-43.14. Psychological Considerations in Engineering Teaching: An Ethical Mandate to Produce Responsible Engineers.Lee, B. Kyun, Leiffer, Paul R. and Graff, R. William. Pittsburgh : s.n
teaching is particularly responsiveto the applications-oriented mission of NYIT and the School of Engineering?6. Did the faculty’s experience with ETIC lead to any technical consulting activities, externalfunding through grants or contracts?7. If students were engaged in completing a project to complete their senior level “capstonesequence”, how did this “course work” affect ABET Student Outcomes (SOs): “c”, “h” and “k”. c. “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability”; h. “an understanding of the larger-scale impact of engineering
. However, we are clearly at the start of a large-scaleeducational experiment and longer-term quantitative evaluations are being set up to determine: The depth of understanding behind the increased applications fluency. The level of student accountability in terms of deliverables and data ethics that goes with ownership of a personal lab. Templates for a more rigorous process for student-driven experimental planning and results analysis. How much student-student cooperation is established given that it is an additional burden that they must organize since there are no longer scheduled lab classes where cooperation is imposed through shared use of lab equipment. Whether the
across settings 9. In engineering education, such authenticcontexts have been developed through “problem based” and “project based” activities 10. Amongthe advantages of such approaches are that students have greater opportunity to be mentored andpractice aspects of engineering for development that are often missed in the “core curriculum” oftraditional engineering education. Specifically, through “project based” engineering education,students work to: - formulate and solve ill-defined problems under complex conditions; - understand professional and ethical responsibilities associated with these complex conditions; - communicate with other engineers and with non-engineering professionals and the general public; and
research articles and book chapters about contemporary education analysis in urban contexts in journal such as Curriculum Inquiry, the Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, Educational Studies, The Urban Review, the Review of Educa- tion, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, and co-edited the volumes Unsettling Beliefs: Teaching Theory to Teachers (2008) and Ethics and International Curriculum Work: The Challenges of Culture and Context (2012). In 2008, Dr. Helfenbein served as the Section Chair for Critical Perspectives and Practices of AERA Division B-Curriculum Studies followed by serving as overall Program Chair for Division B in 2009 and was nominated into the Professors of Curriculum at AERA 2011. He is currently Editor of
. Duringmost of that first semester, the course materials were being delivered “just in time” for studentuse.EST104 Topical Syllabus A. Engineering as a Career B. Ethics C. Engineering Design and Teamwork D. Engineering Communication E. EXCEL - Workbooks & Graphs F. MATLAB programming – script files, functions, input/output, plotting, logic and conditionals, logic and relational operators, conditional statements, for loops, while loops.EST104 Schedule of topics for fall 2011 Week 1-5 EXCEL with applications to Ohm‟s Law and the Speed of Sound in air. Week 6 Flowcharting and Procedural Programming Week 7-10 MATLAB – Programming a Stepper Motor in MATLAB
, cultural, ethical, and environmental awareness. Personal skills, such as persistence, imagination, curiosity, risk taking, reading and comprehension, the cultivation of a positive can-do attitude, clarity of thought, goal oriented thinking, as well as life-long, lateral learning and artistic abilities. Social skills, such as teamwork, communication and humor. Students engage in business-like experience apart from the traditional classroomenvironment. They work as a team, take risks, push past failures, interact with prospectivecustomers and are exposed to business, as well as technical issues. As in a typical businessenvironment, the students attend regular meetings and
as a tool to examine complex environmental issues with a spatial context.Kelley notes, regarding the study: “While it can be used as-is with little preparation for anintroductory environmental studies course, other disciplines might want to preface the exercisewith a discussion of partitioning coefficients, remediation technologies, or environmental law,depending on the discipline. For my use, I spend a class period ahead of time discussing the useof chemicals in our society, the economic and political placement of the sites/businesses that usethese chemicals in our midst (often along railroad lines or barge terminals for bulk transport),some ethical considerations regarding where these sites are located (near poorer, or ethnic
internationalSenior Capstone Design projects. It is anticipated that the remaining three outcomes canbe accomplished through program modifications and changes to the assessmentinstruments.It should be noted that 7 out of 8 of the FIPSE-SEAEP anticipated U.S. student outcomesdirectly align with the ABET Criterion 3 Student Outcomes (a-k).11 Outcomes d, f, h, iand j are notoriously difficult for engineering programs to implement, and assess, inalready overcrowded curriculums: d. an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams f. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility h. the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i. a
training was usually administered by a teaching and learning center. For the “workshopsthroughout year/monthly discussions,” the training was usually administered by someone in theFYEP. This could have been an experienced GTA or a faculty member. Often the topicsdiscussed in either of these trainings related to managing groups of students, facilitatingquestions, teaching ethics, and encouraging participation.Regarding the formal pedagogy training documented in Table 2, Roberto commented that: “You are supposed to go to these like seminars at the beginning. Uh, when you are in your first year, like the first week, but I don’t think they like track your attendance or anything like that…Not everyone goes. Like I went to a couple
students in both semestersreceiving instruction was much higher than their peers. Each spring, the Chemistry librarian speaks to a class in Ethics that all firstyear graduate students must take. The Computer Science department offers a year-long course for first-year PhD students, and theComputer Science librarian spoke to the class both semesters. Department Count Workstation Digital Reference Circulation Instruction Any Library (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) Use (%) Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall
communication skills. Small stepsin creating text and placing that text in the forefront of engineering courses can be a simple way tomake of engineering students a force in the world around them.The structure of the courses within a department could expand to all required courses as in thefollowing. The communication elements in each course are shown below.Table 1. Engineering Courses and the Communication Elements in eachFresh. EGR 100 – Intro to Engineering DesignYear Resumes, email, short engineering focused reports, engineering writing demands, problem solving, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the university/college/majorsSoph. ME 201 – ThermodynamicsYear Student communication survey, refresher
all participants (new and returning) each session. Table 4 shows theracial ethical composition of all participants (new and returning) each session. Table 1 Participant Cohorts Cohort Cohort Cohort #3 Cohort Cohort Cohort Cohort #1 #2 #4 #3 #4 #3 After- Summer Imagine Investigate Imagine Investig Investiga Innovate school Pilot I ate II te I Pilot Spring
whencompared to other similar students. Penner et al.23 demonstrate that students who designedphysical models better understood science models, though their instruments seemed biasedtowards these students. Further studies are needed to evaluate the learning of engineering.However, with respect to some engineering habits of mind, researchers have shown that designprovides an opportunity for students to test their preconceptions21, creatively develop uniquesolutions through multiple paths13,14,24,25, engage in systems thinking25, iteratively refine theirdesign and thinking20, learn from failure18,26, collaborate and communicate22,24,27, manipulate andreflect with materials15,18,21,26, and ethically and civically design for people28. Therefore, thoughthe
theirproject. After the first few days, their comfort with the adverse conditions for the projectimplementation increased. Their self-confidence and commitment to their work also increasedas evidenced by their long work hours and excellent team work ethic, both within their team butalso with their co-workers from Peru.Impact of the course topic. Quantitative post-survey data indicated that 67% of courseparticipants found the course topic more interesting than those from other sections of the course.Qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses and travel team interviews indicated twothemes in the data, one related to positive motivations generated by the course topic and anotherrelated to negative motivations.Subthemes under positive motivation
professional and ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity3(j) a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and global contextSustainability projects are excellent vehicles for reinforcing criteria 3(h) - 3(i). They provide anopportunity for self-directed study in an area where course work may not be common, reinforceethical considerations and provide context for work in a global sense.Student Groups:The subject program uses three criteria when staffing students into project teams. Student interestis weighed along with student GPA and with project skill set requirements. A staffing algorithmhas been implemented in software, with some human manipulation
sure thateverybody finds a thing, but rather about making it accessible and easy to use and remix andshare once it's found. Radical transparency is not a magic bullet -- it's not an "if you build it, theywill come" route to millions of readers. But it is a way to give the readers you get an opportunityand a choice to engage more deeply with a work on their own terms. What surprised me was how foreign (and consequently scary due to being an unknown)transparency was to so many people in academia. The mode of sharing that I'd taken for grantedin the open source context was much more constrained by data privacy concerns in the scholarlyrealm. There are good reasons for this; ethics are vital, and sometimes preserving privacy is theright
where students can receive academic for a project that is uniquely provided outside 9of the normal engineering curriculum. This allows the GDTs an opportunity to address thetechnical, professional, and social aspects of global competency. To control the quality of the Page 24.82.8work done by the GDTs, the faculty advisor that heads a project creates a curriculum based onproblem-solving and design. Therefore the students receive credit for their work and are boundby the usual work ethic that is expected of a student in a normal engineering course. Faculty advisors are recruited based on their
programming optimization • Power-point slides from lectures • Four lab experiments with lab manuals • Publication in "5 de Mayo" conference ME Capstone Course I Spring • Power Point presentations on ethics on the 2013 Capstone project Linear Algebra Spring • One assignment on least-squares’ method 2013 Friday Academy Fall • Assignment for plotting PV and analysis on the 2012 - need of smoothing/shifting/storage to satisfy the
technical lectures, the students are also given lectures andinstruction on Intellectual Property, Research Ethics, Conducting Literature Searches, SoftwareTools (Matlab, LabView, MapleSim, etc.) and the required use of Log Books. Students are alsomade aware of external competitions and potential publication avenues for their completedworks. Page 23.271.12Technical Meetings with Advisor: Once the proposal is accepted, the student(s) and advisoragree on periodic meeting intervals. Suggested intervals are to start biweekly and adjust asneeded. During each meeting the student(s) will give an update of progress, comment on theiradherence to the initial
over the term (Figure 9). Page 23.365.10 Figure 9: Perry Model of Intellectual and Ethical Development as presented in lecture to students during a debriefing on the activity. The number “1655” on the slide refers to the session number at the conference in which the paper was presented.4. Analysis and DiscussionThe pre-activity definitions, alongside visual word analyses generated from the entire student set,represent an initial baseline against which post-activity definitions can be compared. Anecdotalevidence from instructors on the challenges of leading the activity in the classroom, solicited inpost-studio meetings