. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/In- Interview-Education/47227/2. Martindale, G. (2010, February 3). College drop-out rates - Who's to blame. Retrieved from http://www.stateuniversity.com/blog/permalink/College-Drop-Out-Rates-Who-s-to-Blame-.html3 Rodriguez, S. (2003). What helps some first-generation students succeed. About Campus 8(4), 17-22.4. Braxton, J. M., Hirschy, A. S., & McClendon, S. A. (2004). Understanding and reducing college student departure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.5. National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015, January 1). Performance-Based Funding for Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/performancefunding.aspx6. Astin, A. W. (1977
particularly satisfactory response toconcept question 1. The amount of time each student spent on the first question is tabulated inTable 1. Students’ approaches are outlined below. Table 1. Amount of time that students spent on concept question 1, all three parts. Student P Q R S T U V Time (min:sec) 1:20 5:20 8:30 1:33 2:20 9:00 8:50Student S and Student T had similar approaches to the concept question. Neither of them drew afree body diagram (FBD), even though they always drew FBDs on problem-solving questionsthey encountered on their midterm and final exams. For parts A and B, they simply observed thattension from the string creates
., Nilsson, K., Zackrisson, J., Garcia-Zubia, J., Hernandez-Jayo, U., Nafalski, A. Hkansson, L.(2009). On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remotelaboratories. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 2(4), 263-274.4. Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2013). Developing the TriLab, a triple access mode (hands-on, virtual, remote)laboratory, of a process control rig using LabVIEW and Joomla. Computer Applications in EngineeringEducation, 21(4), 614-626.5. Barrios, A., Panche, S., Duque, M., Grisales, V. H., Prieto, F., Villa, J. L. & Canu, M. (2013). A multi-userremote academic laboratory system. Computers & Education, 62, 111-122.6. Harward, V. J., Del Alamo, J. A., Lerman, S. R
, Felder4 wrote: “Consider the universal vision of the professor of the 90's. Shedoes pioneering research in a critical area and brings in big bucks to support the research,including several six-figure NSF grants and 60% release time. She publishes 5-10 paperseach year in the most prestigious journals in her field and is a shoo-in for the NationalAcademy. She is a dedicated and stimulating instructor and wins teaching awards at heruniversity and nationally. She does more than her fair share of the tedious but vitalservice chores that no one wants to do and does them excellently. She is mostlyimaginary.” In 1987 Feldman5 examined 42 studies and concluded that “the likelihoodthat research productivity actually benefits teaching is extremely small…the
communication framework allows for universal application to all levels of engineeringeducation to develop individuals throughout their degree.1. S. W. J Kozlowski and B.S. Bell, “Work groups and teams in organizations.” In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen and R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (Vol. 12): Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 333- 375. New York: Wiley, 2003.2. M. Deutsch, “Cooperation and competition.” In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, and E. C. Marcus (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed.), pp. 23-42. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2006.3. K. A. Jehn, “A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict.” Administrative Science
). Engineering in the K-12 STEM standards of the 50 U.S. states: An analysis of presence and extent. JEE, 101, 539-564.4. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntembakar, S, Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design™ into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495 - 548.5. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., & Ryan, M. (2004). Promoting deep science learning through case-based reasoning: Rituals and practices in learning by design classrooms. In Seel, N.M. and Dykstra, S. (Eds.), Curriculum, plans and processes of
, ahead)? 2) What aspects are to be implemented particularlywell? Was that anticipated? 3) What aspects have been particularly challenging? Was thatanticipated? 4) Would you find it beneficial to have other individuals from yourdepartment/institution participate in the workshop(s)? and 5) Other general impressions. Theobjectives were to conduct follow-up and discuss (as needed) on each participant’s personal andprofessional development plan. Between Workshop I and the webinar three months later, participants were given theassignment to further refine and develop their personal and program expansion plans, and toconsult with their mentors periodically. During the subsequent webinar, participants willpresented their plans and engaged in
interview participants. This work was supported by aNational Science Foundation Research Initiation Grant in Engineering Education (RIGEE) grant.Any opinion, finding, and conclusion or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. Wyner, J. S., Bridgeland, J. M., & DiIulio Jr, J. J. (2007). Achievement Trap: How America is Failing Millions of High-Achieving Students from Lower-Income Families. Jack Kent Cook Foundation and Civic Enterprises. 2. Strutz, M., Orr, M., and Ohland, M. (2012). Low Socioeconomic Status Individual: An Invisible Minority in Engineering. In Engineering and Social Justice: In the University
Lifebook S761 with a 13,3 inch display and a1366x768 display resolution. The field of view was controlled with a mouse. Locomotion wascontrolled by WASD-keys, where W/S keys controlled forward and backward while A/D keyscontrolled left and right. The hardware usually results in a sitting body posture while using thedevice.Virtual Theatre. The Virtual Theatre is a mixed reality simulator which enables unrestrictedmovement through a virtual environment and therefore is used in an upright body posture.The user can move around within the environment by just walking in the desired direction.Therefore the control mode of locomotion is walking naturally. To track the movements of auser, the virtual theatre is equipped with 10 infrared cameras. They
. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación En Matemática Educativa, 12(3), 355– 382. 5. Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Mavrikis, M., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., & Pearce, D. (2009). Broadening the sense of “dynamic”: A microworld to support students’ mathematical generalisation. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 493–503. doi:10.1007/s11858-009-0182-8 6. Salinas, P., Quintero, E., & González-Mendívil, E. (2014). An environment to promote a visual learning of Calculus. In H. R. Arabnia, A. Bahrami, L. Deligiannidis, & G. Jandieri (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science and Computer Engineering (pp. 425–429). Las
initialscholarship recipients left the program to pursue non-STEM majors where theycould help others and four left for that they perceived to be less time consumingundergraduate programs so that they could spend more time working or on socialactivities.In this program, NSF S-STEM scholarships were awarded to 15 students. Therequirements for students to maintain their NSF scholarship were continuousenrollment in courses leading toward a STEM degree, 3.0 GPA, and activeparticipation in the one-credit course associated with the scholarship eachsemester. The course was used to enable more one-on-one interactions betweenstudents and faculty as well as with their teammates from different disciplines.Interacting with faculty, whether in the classroom, the
tRAT is keyto help students to correct misconceptions in real time, and the points-scale gives the studentsmotivation to learn to work together effectively as a team without instructor input. After allteams have completed the tRAT, the instructor can give a short—typically 5 to 10 minutes—lecture clearing up any remaining confusion about the topic. Students are given an opportunity tosubmit a written appeal, as a team, of any RAT question they believe might be ambiguous. Anexample of a RAT is given in the appendix.The applications–on which the most time is spent in class–are problems that the students mustsolve as a team. The applications follow a 4-S format: Same problem, Significant problem,Specific choice, and Simultaneous report. A class
/Accreditation_Documents/Current/eac-criteria-2012–2013.pdf[4] Zimmerman, Donald E., and Michael Palmquist. 1993. "Enhancing Electrical EngineeringStudents' Communication Skills." In Proceedings of the IEEE International ProfessionalCommunication Conference, Philadelphia, October 5-8: 428-31.[5] Fisher, E., Usrey, M. W., & Beaslq, H. A. (2003). OWL: A wise way to enhance engineering students’ writingskills. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 5-November 8.[6] Rohrbach, S. ; Ishizaki, S. ; Werner, N. ; Miller, J. ; Dzombak, D. (2013). Improving students' professionalcommunication skills through an integrated learning system. Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2013IEEE International[7] Werner, N. ; Ishizaki, S. ; Rohrbach, S
STEM outreach with a full engineering design, build, and test cycle. GlobalJournal of Engineering Education. 2012;14(3):225-232.15. Brown JS, Collins A, Newman S. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading,writing, and mathematics. In: Resnick L, ed. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays inhonor of robert glaser. Vol 487. Psychology of Education and Instruction Series ed. LawrenceErlbaum; 1989.16. Tillman D, Kjellstrom W, Smith S, Yoder E. Digital fabrication scaffolds for developingpreservice elementary teachers’ mathematics pedagogy. Society for Information Technology &Teacher Education International Conference. 2011;2011(1):892-897.17. Tillman D, Ducamp G, Dejaegher C, Cohen J, Kjellstrom W, Smith S. A role for
andlearning center. There are two ways to approach this overlap. The first is to make the ASEEprogramming unique. On large campuses, some Chapters have found success in providingSTEM-specific content as a supplement to the campus-level content for all majors. The secondapproach is to partner with other organization(s). This approach has extra benefits; it exposesASEE and its mission to the members of other organizations and it can provide extra assistancefor planning and execution. For research-specific programming, some campuses have foundsuccess with ASEE-hosted STEM education poster sessions. While almost 90% of therespondents reported having some campus-level teaching programming, at least 65% reportedthat they are interested in ASEE providing
toolsthat are being developed to achieve project objectives, the work related to the development ofcase studies is described here. Historically, case studies have been as educational tools inbusiness, law and medicine but not so much in software engineering. The hypothesis is that casestudies would be effective educational tools to introduce real-world professional practices intothe classroom which would help the students in identifying and solving problems, and develop aperspective on knowledge application. In this paper we describe a set of V&V related case-studies that we have drawn from industry experiences and developed them as pedagogical tools.These case-studies cover several important topics in S/W V&V domain such as software
, Disciplines in which used, Type(s) of institutions in which used, Capstone course duration, Nature of capstone General projects connected with resource, Timing of resource usage in capstone, First (for all Resources) year that the resource was used in capstone, Notes/observations/constraints/advice Category(s) of outcomes assessed, Types of student responses required, Rubrics for scoring, Number of students typically assessed at one time with the resource, Assessment Specific Instrument testing, Scoring consistency by multiple raters, Validity or accuracy in measuring what
attributesof the students entering the LLC and experiences within the LLC during the first semester. Theimpact of the LLC appears to be retained, via personal connections gained through studentinteractions within an engineering/computer-science focused dorm, through the remainder of theundergraduate years.Introduction Page 26.345.2Living-Learning Communities (LLCs) have been studied by a number of authors under a numberof conditions since at least the early 1990’s.1,2,3 As documented by multiple authors, a widerange of LLCs exist,3,4,5 including both LLCs focused on specific disciplines and residentiallybased LLCs. Within the realm of LLCs, a wide
use constructs of affect to i This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF 14-32426,14-31717, and 14-31609. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in the materialsprovided are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. understand and assess the students’ STEM affect. Each component of the theoretical frameworkis described in the following paragraphs.STEM-literacy for the 21st Century is multifaceted and includes content knowledge and habits ofmind5. For the purpose of this study, we refer to
facultyclassroom practice (RTOP Z-score). This study also found that faculty classroom practice isrelated to student outcomes and that student-centered teaching practices are related to bettergrades and less course withdrawals. In other words shifting faculty practices towards student-centeredness would likely lead to lower percentages of DEW student grades. Providing effectivefaculty development opportunities in student-centered instruction is therefore highlyrecommended in order to mend the gap between faculty beliefs and practice and to promote morepositive student outcomes.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1226586.Bibliography1 M. L. Blanton, S. Westbrook and G. Carter, "Using
Engineeringstudents. In the future, we will make more effort on generating interdisciplinary projects bystudents and faculty from different disciplines.AcknowledgmentThe project activities were funded by the Sacramento State University Enterprises, Inc. (UEI)Campus Grant Program. The authors are grateful to Sacramento State University College ofEngineering for their support on providing the space and the facility for pursuing our projects.References1. Kuribayashi, K., 1989, “Millimeter Size Joint Actuator using Shape Memory Alloy,” Proc. IEEE An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robots, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 139 – 144.2. Tanner, J., Grames, C., Jensen B. D., Magleby, S. P., and Howell, L. L., 2015, “Millimeter
on Homework Submissions. Error bars represent plus and minus one standard deviation.To determine whether homework assignment performance is related to exam performance, amultiple linear regression is conducted to predict exam score as a function of performance on thefive components of the homework rubric: solution, personalization, integration, thoughtfulpuzzle, and communication (style, usage, and layout). The form of the regression equation isgiven by Equation 1, [1]where E, S, P, I, T, and C are the student’s average exam, (homework) solution, personalization,integration, thoughtful puzzle, and communication scores
., & Rogers, C. (2010). The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design. Design Studies, 31(3), 288-309. 3. Steif, P. S., & Dantzler, J. A. (2005). A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis. Journal Of Engineering Education, 94(4), 363-371. 4. Steif, P. S., & Hansen, M. A. (2006). Comparisons between performances in a statics concept inventory and course examinations. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 22, 1070-1076. 5. Steif, P. S., & Hansen, M. A. (2007). New practices for administering and anlyzing the results of concept inventories. Journal Of Engineering Education, 96(3), 205-212. 6. Dollár, A., & Steif, P. S. (2006). Learning
. The actions that a student takes ina learning cycle are not normally provided for assessment in a traditional setting, but theprocedures explained here allows those actions to be recorded.References1. Butler, D. L., and Winne, P. H. (1995) Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis, Review of Educational Research 65, 245-281.2. Shute, V. J. (2008) Focus on Formative Feedback, Review of Educational Research 78, 153-189.3. Nicol, D. J., and Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in higher education 31, 199-218.4. Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., and Stijnen, S. (2013) Understanding
additional weekfor completion, the project can be expanded to include more variables: additional trussgeometries, which inclueds member orientation, length, and thickness. In addition, an instructorcan require each individual group to 3D print their own truss (rather than simply demonstratingthe printing procedure and conducting the failure loading test of the two optimized trusses). Thistype of expansion, of course, will require a significant time investment. It typically takes onehour to print the members needed to fully erect the truss at normal printing speeds (60-80 mm/s).The time required to train the teaching assistant (TA) to install and troubleshoot the 3D printer,and work with the g-code generator should take approximately 5-10 hours
. (2004). Learning to Solve Problems: An Instructional Design Guide. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.5. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-856. Benson, L. C. S.J. Grigg, and D. R. Bowman. (2011). CU Thinking: Problem-Solving Strategies Revealed. Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada.7. .Burtner, J. (2005). The Use of Discriminant Analysis to Investigate the Influence of Non-Cognitive Factors on Engineering School Persistence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(3): 335−338.8. Honken, N., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2013). Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look. Journal of STEM
schools. She co-leads the ”ADVANCE Hispanic Women in STEM” project in Puerto Rico, and the Latin and Caribbean Consor- tium of Engineering Institutions’ (LACCEI) ”Women in STEM” forum. Tull was a finalist for the 2015 Global Engineering Deans Council/Airbus Diversity Award, and has presented on diversity in the US, Latin America, Europe, Australia, India. She is a Tau Beta Pi ”Eminent Engineer.”Dr. David A. Delaine, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo David A. Delaine is a progressive engineer who has strong interests in the intersections of engineering, education, and society. He has obtained a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Drexel University, in Philadelphia, USA. He is currently serving his second term as an executive
October 1, 2013, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel- final_2-25-12.pdf.10. Bennett, J. (2005). The effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science on boys and girls, and on lower-ability pupils. Retrieved August 23, 2013, from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=SqD-s- 48RCY%3d&tabid=329&mid=1242.11. Hulleman, C. S., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Making Education Relevant: Increasing Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes. Science, 326, 1410-1412.12. Bennett, J., and Holman, J. (2002). Context-Based Approaches to the Teaching of Chemistry: What are They and
,University of Dayton and Shanghai Normal University have been developing and operating a3 + 1 joint degree program since 2006 [10]. The first three years of the program are taughtand managed by the university in China, then students transfer to the university in the U.S. toget an undergraduate degree in engineering. On the other hand, Worcester PolytechnicInstitute sends their students to a university in China during a summer for global project [11].As shown in the table, there are variety of programs in terms of types, characteristics andparticipants of the programs. Table 1. Survey of Global Academic Program between the U.S. and ChinaUniversity in US University in China Type of Major(s) Year Remarks
finished their projects (see figures 2a and 2b). Participants were asked to reflect back tobefore the project began to rate their confidence on skills on a Likert scale, and then considertheir confidence at the conclusion of the project. In the future, a survey will be given to studentsat the first build session, and the same survey upon completion to measure competencies.A statistical analysis of the survey results was performed. For each category considered, the datawas first tested for normality. For normally distributed data sets, a paired t-test was used. For thedata that was not normal, the Wilcoxon R-S test was used to test for significance. A p-value lessthan 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Figure 2a: First part of survey