director of interdisciplinary graduate programs. Her research awards include U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE), a National Science Foundation CAREER award, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, U.S.A, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin- Madison, U.S.A.Michael J. Prince (Professor) professorMadeleine Smith © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Reducing Student
students can more easilyobtain manufacturing experience while building on their design knowledge and producing theparts that they need for their projects.The Artisan and Fabrication LaboratoryThe Artisan and Fabrication Laboratory (AFL) at a large Midwestern university providesengineering students, faculty, and staff with hands-on access to a state-of-the-art manufacturingfacility in a “maker-space” like environment. The mission of the AFL is multifaceted, but highlyfocused on student learning. Essentially, students are provided the opportunity to manufacturetheir own parts while being overseen by laboratory staff that provide expert training on not onlymachine operation, but also on safety best-practices. The laboratory is designed to mimic
(ethics,communications, team work, creativity, ...), students tend (consciously or not) to develop a beliefthat engineering is nothing but a mixture of science and technology and that complementarystudies are just a necessary evil to get easier access to professional recognition upon graduation.4Thirdly, in supporting the two solitudes, or even in allowing it to exist, engineering schools givestudents a wrong signal, a somewhat distorted view of engineering in which ethics seems to haveno bearing on design, creativity has no impact on problem solving, and team work has no impacton the quality of the work performed. In a way, it is as if engineering schools sometimes gavetheir students the implicit message that it is possible for engineers to work
, and maintains a portfolio of NSF and private grants to support STEM and CTE pathways in the region.Christopher Russell Christopher Russell is the Information and Engineering Technologies Project Manager at Northern Vir- ginia College. His research focuses on developing novel methods of integrating digital fabrication into formal and informal STEM instruction. Currently, he manages two NSF ATE awards - Makers By Design, a design thinking professional learning program for interdisciplinary groups of educators, and Product Design Incubator, a summer-long entrepreneurship program for community college students.Antarjot Kaur ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Building Data
Paper ID #23944Technology’s Role in Student Understanding of Mathematics in Modern Un-dergraduate Engineering CoursesAndrew Phillips, The Ohio State University Andrew H. Phillips graduated summa cum laude from The Ohio State University in May 2016 with a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and with Honors Research Distinction. He is currently fin- ishing his M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering, and then he will pursue a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. His engineering education interests include first-year engineering, active learning, learning theory, and teaching design, programming, and mathematics. As a
different major.IntroductionThere is strong evidence of student flexibility and vacillation around career options post-graduation from college. Specifically, a single interaction or experience (such as a co-op) cansometimes mean the difference between taking a job after graduation in engineering or anotherfield.1 Further, research suggests that cooperative education and internships result in increasedsocial and cultural capital of those who participate, which can contribute to their ability to secureemployment after graduation.2 Student perceptions of the engineering field, which can be shapedby undergraduate work experiences, can also impact persistence in engineering programs.3-7While there is a growing literature examining the relationship
knowledge introduced to the cadetsduring the first quarter of the course. Experience 2 shows that students learn and develop problemsolving skills best through a three-step process: (1) Introduction: knowledge of the skill or toolis introduced in a traditional lecture manner. (2) Bridging: understanding the skill begins byusing it, generally on a familiar situation. (3) Application: confidence and competence with theskill are strengthened by extending the use to a new situation. In Engr 110Z, Mini-Workshops4,5and structured homework assignments were used to accomplish Steps (1) and (2). For Step (3),strengthening the skill was inherent in applying it to the Mars mission project.Mini-Workshops – Each mini-workshop was designed around an Assignment
- gineering and Applied Science Dean’s Performance Award, and the Best Technical Publication Award from the Journal of Safety, Health, and Environmental Research for a paper on a new teaching innova- tion. He has also selected as an ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Fellow Teaching Mentor and as a President’s Teaching and Learning Collaborative Member. Page 23.1139.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Teaching construction hazard recognition through high fidelity augmented realityABSTRACTThe ability of designers, managers, and workers to identify
the College of Engineering. With her background in industry, she is keenly aware that the sector-wide academisation and de-contextualisation of engineering education is leading to an engineering sectorthat struggles to relate theory to practice. Patricia teaches creative design modules that give students tools and techniques (Human-centered design, VR collaborative design tools) to find their own brand of creativity in engineering design, while prompting students to consider how their individualprivilege and biases impact on their design decisions.Dr. Catherine Groves , Swansea University A Chartered Occupational Psychologist and Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy, Catherine draws on over 20 years
situation, coupled with the growing demand for a technically skilledlabor force, business leaders, policymakers, educational institutions, and activists haveresponded by crafting numerous outreach campaigns to appeal to women to becomeengineers. For the most part, there has been a tendency to see any effort to recruit womento engineering as positive, with little consideration given to the manner in which suchcampaigns are designed to achieve their goals. In this paper, I offer a critical examinationof three prominent outreach strategies and how they present ideas about how best toengage women in engineering. I argue that the messaging in all of these programscharacterizes women as a homogenous entity, without considering questions of
Teaching” 2nd Ed, San Francisco, Wiley 200912 Watkins, Gregory K. “Engineering Graphics: The Fate of Pencil, Paper, and the 2-D Drawing”13 Contero, Manual, et al. “Learning Support Tools for Developing Spatial Abilities in Engineering Design”14 Westmoreland et al. “Sketching During Mechanical Design: Studying Sketching at the University of Maryland”, ASEE National Conference 2009 AC 2009-157015 Evans et al. “Attributes of Engineering Graduates and Their Impact on Curriculum Design” 1993 American Society for Engineering Education. Reprinted from Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 82, No. 4, October 1993. Journal of Engineering Education16 McArthur, J. M., & Wellner, K. L. (1996). Reexamining spatial ability within a
unit for analysis by WVU professors to determine the effectiveness of the unit from acontent and engineering knowledge perspective. The data is used to make modifications to theunit for future use and planning for new workshops.2.3 TIME Kit Development: Stage ThreeStage three is the ongoing research and program evaluation. Our goal for the 2009 workshop isto conduct a full field evaluation on every TIME Kit developed (20). Each teacher whoimplements a unit and a comparison teacher in that same school will conduct pre and postassessment of engineering content, math content, and student attitudes related to that unit. Thisevaluation design will allow us to examine whether learning and attitude changes differ amongstudents who receive TIME Kit
, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a Technical Communication lecturer and a Engineering Education researcher at the University of Michigan. Her teaching is primarily in team-based engineering courses, and her research focuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judgment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strategies affect group judgment in engineering design; one goal of this work is to to understand factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these inequities. In addition, she is interested in
J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, design and selection of materials, general materials engineering, polymer science, and characterization of materials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and K- 12 engineering outreach. He has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design. He has also co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for
curricula with industrial needs. The proposed three-year project would focus on: a) identifying curricular activities exhibiting astrong correlation with student co-op work performance; b) designing andimplementing processes allowing the systematic use of employer assessment incurriculum design; c) evaluating the impact of changes in curricular design uponstudent work performance; d) piloting and contrasting projects in both differentacademic fields and at different colleges; and e) developing a set of best practicesto be used for further refinement and dissemination of the process. Initialcollaborators include University of Cincinnati (UC) academic units as follows:the Department of Architecture (College of Design, Architecture, Art, andPlanning
lived experiences. This study aims to shed light on how challengingmath coursework can impact self-efficacy and retention for students who enter engineeringprograms below a calculus level and provide research-backed suggestions for improving theexperience these students have during their college journey, thus increasing retention inengineering programs. Early findings suggest that positive faculty-student interactions, a sense ofbelonging, and the ability to feel success (instead of defeat) in early mathematics coursework arekey contributors to what improves self-efficacy for students who struggle in math-specificcourses.Keywords:self-efficacy, mathematics, engineering education, underserved populationsIntroductionThe Mindset Report published
different study populations.While the primary objective of the project is to understand the benefit of the use of thiseducational technology, the sensor-based laboratories are designed to be accessible for use asmodules by college faculty and by secondary school teachers and students as well so that, if thetechnology should prove effective, broader implementation will be practical. This paperintroduces the methodology of the experiment and reports on the status of the development oflaboratories. A variety of laboratory activities have been developed, including two that have beendeveloped in sensor-based and non-sensor-based versions.The use of technology in the classroomAlthough there are many who assume that the use of classroom technology has
exposure. The reduction in water contact angle is closely related to the reduction in themechanical strengths. Two of the engineering students, also authors of this study, designed,developed and performed these tests on the 3D printed specimens. The BS students have usedthese research activities for their Engineer of 2020 requirements. Overall, these studies greatlybenefit undergraduate engineering students for their future academic studies in differentinstitutions.AcknowledgementsThe authors greatly acknowledge the Wichita State University for the financial and technicalsupports of this study.References[1] Cantrell, J., Rohde, S., Damiani, D., Gurnani, R., Disandro, L., Anton, J., Young, A., Jerez,A., Steinbach, D., Kroese, C., and Ifju, P. (2016
stratigraphy, (2)estimates of the safety factor for both the existing and remediated slopes, and (3) a qualitativediscussion of the probable environmental impacts of the remediation project. Needless to say,this project was an extremely well-received and worthwhile experience.INDUSTRIAL SUPPORT FOR THE PROGRAMThe number of scholarships and job offers received by Cal Poly graduates interested ingeotechnical engineering indicates that industry supports the hands-on approach. Manypractitioners recruit almost exclusively at Cal Poly because of the practice-oriented educationthat its graduates have received. Interest by the professional community in the Cal Polygeotechnical engineering program has led to tremendous cooperation and support. As discussed
Paper ID #38679Renewed Hope: Utilizing Freirean Pedagogies to Enhance MulticulturalSTEM ClassroomsCassandra Puletapuai, Colorado State University Cassandra Puletapuai is a construction management graduate research assistant, graduate teaching assis- tant, a doctoral student at Colorado School University in the School of Education in Education, Equity, and Transformation focusing on Construction Management. Her research interests include sociocultural and participatory action research practices that connect both the individual’s and industry’s vision for beneficial and tangible outcomes and increasing multicultural
diagnosticscourse was developed to prepare engineering technology students for the sophisticated testingand analysis technology of the maintenance field. The conceptual content of the course has beenrelatively constant; however, the laboratory activities have evolved significantly to adoptadditional technologies and software. This paper will review the original course design andcompare it to recent course offerings, with emphasis on the ongoing effort to incorporatemonitoring of a variety of operating parameters and to engage with industry.BackgroundThrough advances in solid-state electronics, instrumentation, and computing capabilities in the1970s and 1980s, the field of machinery condition monitoring obtained the technology needed tomake predictive
. Davis illuminates the nature of professional engineering;“knowing engineering ethics is as much a part of knowing how to engineer as knowing how tocalculate stress or design a circuit is. Indeed, insofar as engineering is a profession, knowing howto calculate stress or design a circuit is in part knowing what the profession allows, forbids, orrequires.”1In this paper we look at ethics across the curriculum and implementing engineering ethicseducation via the case methodology. A brief presentation on the history of engineering educationis followed by a discussion of ethics in engineering education. Case methodology is examinedincluding a look at sources for cases and case research. Finally, the two-stage engineering ethicseducation model used by
, spring semester of the sophomore year, wasmade to mirror spring semester of the first year at UWI-St. Augustine to facilitate futuresemester-length student exchanges. An aspirational goal of this program is that each engineeringstudent will have at least one study and/or research abroad experience before graduation. Furtherthere is need for adaptation of an assessment instrument to evaluate the global skills the studentsdevelop because of these international research experiences. Several instruments are beingconsidered, such as, Beliefs, Events, and Values Inventory (BEVI), Global Perspective Inventory(GPI) and Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI). 8References1. ASEE. Going the distance: best practices and strategies for retaining
Page 23.781.3to compile simple PHA's to put the process to practice. To guide and facilitate compilation ofthe information and clarify our expectations, we are providing tables outlining the neededinformation. A simple and uniform format is expected to make the procedure less cumbersomeand help establish a methodical approach that can be applied across systems for bothexperimental and design course tasks, or in future applications beyond the classroom. Thetemplate is based on the industrial experience of one of the authors (M.F.), who contributed toand compiled PHA’s while performing research and development work in the fields ofmicrochannel technology (Velocys, Inc.) and biotechnology (Draths Corporation).Unit OperationsIn the Unit Operations
,” Engineering Design Graphics Journal, Winter 1993, p29.16. Flori, Ralph E., Koen, Mary A., and Oglesby, David B., “Basic Engineering Software for Teaching (BEST) Dynamics,” Journal of Engineering Education, January 1996, p61.17. Gramoll, K/, “Using Working Model to Introduce Design to a Freshman Engineering Course,” Proceeding of the ASEE 1994 Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, June 26-29, 1994.18. Iannelli, J., “Mechanics in Action: On the Development of Interactive Computer Laboratories for Engaging Engineering Mechanics Education,” Proceeding of the TBEED 1994 Annual Conference, Gatlinburg, Tn, November 18-19, 1994. WILLIAM E. COLEDr. Cole received his Bachelors of
experience is not credible? This is often witnessed in computerprogramming. What is the best approach to teaching programming? There have been groups thatadvocate that you use a language that is designed to teach programming. Others advocate that youteach a language used by a relevant community to help the students adapt to that community. Whilethis might seem minor – consider the idea that there are computing programs in existence in theUnited States that taught COBOL and only COBOL for more than twenty-five years. Also considerthe idea that there is a body of discussion about how COBOL is the worst language to use forteaching programming. Who was right is not a matter for this paper, however, the question “WouldCOBOL have been an introduction to
participant’s design outcomes [10][11]. Further still, many papersaddress different ideation methods and their efficacy [12] [13]. However, all previouslyreferenced papers follow participants who all have similar engineering and problem-solvingexperience. This paper not only addresses the different ideation methods but also compares theoutcomes between student and practicing engineers. By understanding the importance of learningdifferent ideation methods and detailing how to use them effectively, this paper describes how tooptimize problem-solving to best demonstrate the competencies that employers are seeking. This paper and associated research is for a Senior Honors Project within the engineeringdiscipline. The inspiration behind this project
of reducing interventions from the first year to thesecond year can provide valuable insights for shaping future interventions and best practices.This paper examines the second-year academic performance of the first cohort of SSP studentsby assessing them against comparable engineering students who did not receive the same first-year academic support resources. The research question driving the study is:What impact does reducing academic support from the first year to the second year have onSSP students' academic progress and success?The SUCCESS Scholars ProgramThe SSP, funded by the NSF, was created to support low-income first-year engineering studentsby offering academic resources, financial aid, community-building initiatives, and
ethics and ethical frameworks. With the knowledge gainedfrom this research, first-year engineering programs can better explore how incoming students viewdecision-making and design more effective instructional practices. BackgroundIntroductionEthics is the “standards of conduct that apply to everyone” [1]. It is the difference between rightand wrong. People use ethics to determine how to act when confronted with any situation; askingquestions such as “who will this benefit?”, “who will this harm?”, and “what are theconsequences?”. However, engineering ethics is different from everyday ethics. Engineeringethics are a set of professional ethics, or “those special morally permissible standards of conductthat
paper.Additionally, the upcoming generation views materials retrieved online differently than thoseobtained from other sources. Clifton Poole stated “there is a tendency to think that cutting andpasting from the Internet is a form of good research and not plagiarism.”6 Several students arefurther confused because of online access to scholarly journals and conference reports throughtheir libraries web sites. Townley and Parsell note that “the Internet presents mixed messagesthat may confuse people as to what is and what is not acceptable appropriation practice.”7 The Internet also facilitates the ultimate form of plagiarism, turning in someone else’spaper as one’s own. A simple search for “research papers” on Google will produce a list ofplaces to