soon after entering theworkplace, if they haven’t already. Students need to understand how they compare to the“average” that is used to determine costs and benefits. Very often these averages are the basis forpublished advice on what choices should be made and for marketing materials for products andservices.IntroductionEngineering economy is often the only engineering course dealing with money. Nearly every textand course include some level of personal finance, as well they should. Class testing of materialhas demonstrated that students have a keen interest in personal finance examples because theycan identify with the topics [1]. Those topics include loans, investing for retirement, insurance,social security, stocks and bonds, and
U.S. are finally heading the many calls to include sociotechnicalthinking–grappling with issues of power, history, and culture–throughout the undergraduateengineering curriculum. While non-purely-technical topics have historically been relegated toseparate courses, universities are now working to integrate sociotechnical content in coursespreviously considered to be purely technical. Researchers have varying motivations for thisfocus, including to better prepare students for engineering practice, which is inherentlysociotechnical [1]; to increase the sense of belonging of historically excluded students, who aremore likely to be interested in the social aspects [2]; and to create better societal outcomes [3-5].Attempts to disrupt the social
targeted efforts designed tocreate a ‘pipeline’ of well trained and educated individuals for specific industries. In many cases,preparing a competent workforce is also widely seen as part of the university mission.The changing landscape of higher education funding has also no doubt had an impact. Asuniversities deal with cuts in public funding sources, collaborations with business and industryare often viewed as financially attractive, by both the university and the business. The universitymay receive funding to help deploy a project, and the business or industry can access theexpertise found on university campuses on a needs basis, as opposed to funding entire training orresearch departments within the organization itself [1]. Overall, then
professionals.It was implemented through a short discussion followed by facilitated role plays. The modulewas implemented and tested on a smaller scale for testing before its use with the large incomingstudent population.This paper presents assessment results from three implementations of the module, done after sixmonths. The first was as training for engineering students hired as leaders for engineeringsummer programs. The second was for a group of college advisors working with high schoolstudents. The final implementation was as a part of new student orientation for 1800 new firstyear students.Diversity Training DesignThe design of this training is based on an input/output model derived from Bezrukova, et al. [1]and is shown in figure 1. Bezrukova, et
increase. This has resulted in many changes to civil engineering undergraduateprograms accredited by the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC).One of the historical subdisciplines of civil engineering is structural engineering. At a university,this area commonly includes most of the introductory engineering mechanics coursework alongwith structural analysis and structural design courses. Many have noted that the field of structuralengineering has continued to become more complex and requires more advanced coursework,possibly even a graduate degree [1]-[2]; this sentiment aligns with other professions that are vitalto public welfare, such as medicine and law, where graduate education is the entry level [3]. Dueto the flexibility in course
perceptions of the NYC LSAMP Scholars.IntroductionThe NSF supported NYC Louis Stokes Alliance (NYC LSAMP) at the City University of NewYork (CUNY) has, since its inception in November 1992, been at the forefront of a concentratedeffort to substantially increase the number of underrepresented minority students (African-Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans and Native Pacific Islanders), who pursue and graduatewith Baccalaureate Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).Since inception in November 1992 (through 2018), over 18,000 baccalaureate degrees have beenawarded to underrepresented minority students in CUNY. The campus-based NYC LSAMPActivity Coordinators (ACs) served a critical role in the NYC LSAMP from inception [1
engineeringIntroductionWomen now have better access to higher education compared to previous generations. A studyshows that women's participation in higher education in recent years has surpassed that of men[1]. However, this increase in enrollment by women in higher education does not lead to greaterwomen representation in leadership and decision-making positions. For example, in the field ofeducation, a study by Riquelme [2], found that the number of woman rectors at Chileanuniversities belonging to the Consortium of State Universities of Chile (CUECH, in its Spanishacronym) is only 16.7%. According to the data, these leadership positions are highly dominatedby men, meaning there is an overrepresentation of males in said positions. The presence of agender
and characteristics previouslyreported. The diversity of the self-selected team members (most commonly 4-6), as measured bythis diversity index, reveals a marked trend for teams to have a lower diversity index comparedto their departmental, class, or course makeup, exposing some probable implicit biases onidentity. Some other results show how diversity impacts team performance differently dependingon the prevalent characteristic of the group. The analysis provided in this paper offers criteriaand methodology applicable to institutions and situations to quantitatively assess diversity thatcan lead to practical guidelines and even policies.IntroductionDiversity is currently sought as a necessary component of engineering education [1] required
-efficacy, and career satisfaction(Noel, Miles, and Rida, 2022). LEGACY intentionally models these research findings and usesfoundations of programs like the REACH Scholars Program to provide an improved experiencefor minoritized STEM postdocs.Program Description Aspects of LEGACY was modeled after Purdue University’s Reinvigorating Engineeringand Change History (REACH) Scholar Program using Walker et al.’s (2008) multipleapprenticeship model focused on graduate engineering students exploring multiple academicpathways with a community of supporters to be prepared for a career in different disciplines(Zhu et al., 2011). Figure 1 shows how the program goals of REACH have been expanded uponby LEGACY to support postdoctoral scholars. As shown in
treatedexactly the same in only 12 states, and each state has different policies. Currently, there 2are two states that are the most restrictive (Illinois and Kansas) that totally block 4-yearET grads, even if the individual has a PhD in Engineering from an institution that hasABET EAC accredited engineering programs. This prohibits 4-year ET grads from; 1)pursuing higher salary positions available that require professional licensure, and 2)owning their own engineering company.ET grads are forced to take the FE exam only in states that permit licensure of 4-year ETgrads. In the two “hell-no” states ET grads are not valued for their ability to protect thepublic
experience andentertainment to generate awareness as well as exploring the application of modern technologiessuch as 3D printing at the point of need as a mean for a potential solution for food insecurity [1].Several study reports focusing on college students reported that about 20-40% of the studentsface food insecurity across the US college campuses [2]–[6]. The main goal of this socialexperimentation is to explore the opportunity at the intersection of food & entertainment forawareness of food equity, security, safety issues, explore new innovations & knowledgeretention among students. The educational goals of the 12-week project was to: Develop an awareness on the topic of food inequity issues, nutrition security and health
design, and engineering education. He is currently on the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc, a senior member of the IEEE, and a member of ASEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Educating Engineering Students Innovatively: A Model for Improving Retention and Academic Performance of Black Upper-Level StudentsA. IntroductionIn a study of the Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering pre-engineering program, almost 700 engineering students were analyzed that were enrolled throughthe HBCU (FAMU) partner of the joint college [1]. Of the students who completed the pre-engineering program, 72% eventually graduated from the university with a
for skilled workers across a range of energy sectors because ofretirements, infrastructure growth, and changing energy technologies [1]. Science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and a diversified workforce are the essentialbuilding blocks to accomplishing the U.S. Department of Energy's mission. Further, theConsumer Energy Alliance has indicated, STEM education is a must for the next generation ofenergy workers as a STEM bachelor's degree nearly doubles the likelihood of working in theenergy industry. Currently, the energy industry is facing three key workforce challenges: (i)technical and soft skills gap, (ii) lack of awareness of job opportunities, and (iii)underrepresentation of minorities and women. The adoption
Engineering Collections & Research Analyst to spend timedirectly interfacing with departments to complete analysis and assessments, enhancing liaisonrelationships, and using subject-specific knowledge to support RII.To meet demands, strengthen human resources, and leverage skill sets the Research Impact &Intelligence department was formed and the Provost’s Office is funding an additional positionfor the team. RII collaborates with principal investigators and delivers competitive intelligencereports on several grant proposals, and has already collaborated across many campus units as canbe seen in Figure 1. The Research Impact & Intelligence department represents a relatively newtype of department for academic libraries and presents
improveeducational outcomes, especially among undergraduates in the early stages of their academicprogram [1], [2]. In introductory computer programming courses, where inordinately high drop-out rates have been reported [3]–[5], early feedback can play a vital role in supporting studentsuccess and retention. Computer systems capable of automatic grading and feedback generationhave gained considerable traction over the past two decades. Recent literature on automatedfeedback and assessment examines key benefits, opportunities, and challenges of the consideredpractice [6]–[8]. Our study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by examining theeffectiveness of optional no-credit programming exercises featuring automated real-timefeedback in motivating
Saldana’s work (2019).The following table introduces all the themes that we transformed into masks to explore the marginalizedexperiences of Black PhD students at PWIs. The reason we chose to represent the narratives by usingmasks are-we anticipated the magnitude of the audio-visual elements of emotions and metaphors ofmarginalization through different “masks” will prove to be profound tools for reflection. Also, masks canhelp enhance a theatrical experience if we perform the narratives as ethno-theatre.Table 1: Masks and all the identity hats description Masks (Themes were transformed into masks) Definition of each identity-related mask Model Student Mask Navigating as Black student at Predominantly
research experiences (CUREs) for undergraduate students somake research accessible to a more diverse group. In this study, they can succeed in STEM. Three models of CUREs will bethe introduction-level lecture was given to freshmen as part of the developed in this project to engage students in addressingUNIV 100 Student Success class. Data was collected during thefirst academic year before and after the I-CUREs course common and diverse research questions,implementation at Jackson State University. Research projects including 1) Introductory-level CUREs (I-CUREs), 2)related to a range of cutting-edge technologies including advanced
project is open-ended and requires the students to make a series ofassumptions, depending on the data available, to complete their technical analyses. Further, thestudents must deliver their analyses through technical memoranda, reports, and presentations.This course structure follows Wiggins’ framework for authentic assessments [1, 2].The objectives of the present work-in-progress study are to assess the impact that interacting withmuseums has on the technical and professional development of the students. Two cohorts ofstudents are studied, the first cohort is currently (2022-2023 academic year) taking the aerospacestructures courses at Clarkson University, while the second cohort took the courses during the2021-2022 academic year. Two cohorts
game-based learning elements intoan existing curriculum that teaches undergraduate linear algebra via an inquiry-orientedpedagogy. The aim of this paper is to discuss the game design strategies used in connecting gamebased learning to inquiry oriented methods.1 IntroductionAn introduction to linear algebra is widely accepted as an important, albeit being challenging,course for engineering undergraduate students. It is an important foundational course for manyengineering students as it provides the ability to apply mathematical constructs in real-wordproblem based settings that are essential for any engineering discipline [1]. Many strategies havebeen proposed to help teach linear algebra across various modes, representations and
-19pandemic in 2020 led to a significant shift towards virtual education, as traditional teachingmethods had to be adapted to a virtual platform due to the necessity of social distancing measuresand remote learning [1]. Many students opted for virtual courses due to the flexibility and financialbenefits they offered before the COVID-19 pandemic [2]. However, this global crisis brought anunprecedented need to widely implement and explore virtual teaching and learning across all levelsof education and subjects. According to UNESCO, the pandemic resulted in over 1.5 billionstudents (90.1% of total enrollees) worldwide facing educational changes due to school closures.This sudden shift to online or blended learning caused traditional, in-person teaching
, whethernegative or positive, provided feedback to improve the course. Although students value in-person interactions over technology-based interactions, technology is a good ally to fostercommunity and aid the learning process.IntroductionEngaging students in the classroom is always challenging for instructors, but research suggeststhat motivation can be sparked by appealing to students’ desire to make a positive impact on theworld [1], [2]. Keshwani and Curtis [2] found that sophomore students in biological engineeringare motivated by the opportunity to make this world a better place, help others solve problems,and improve other people's lives. Keshwani and Keshwani [3] provided evidence that 67% ofbiological engineering students, who participated in a
- standing how student perceptions and behaviors are influenced by immersive environmental and engi- neering education programming. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 1 Community Perceptions of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Engineered Systems: A Case Study of Community-Engaged Vehicular ElectrificationEngineered systems often reproduce injustices via infrastructures that result in harm to the healthand economic well-being of historically minoritized groups.1 As examples, ports of manykinds—including seaports, airports, and inland ports—are usually sited by Communities of Coloror low
Perspectives on Chemical Engineering EducationAbstractThis study investigated faculty perceptions and needs salient to the future of the journalChemical Engineering Education (CEE). Specifically, we sought to understand (a) how facultyuse CEE and what they value about it; (b) barriers and improvements to publication and use; and(c) perceptions of the “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Consideration Requirement,” whichbegan in 2021. To guide this work, we posed the following research questions: 1) What is theperceived utility of CEE? How do faculty use CEE? What do they value about the journal?; 2)What are the opportunities for improvement? What barriers preclude publication and use?; and3) What are the perceptions of the “Diversity, Equity, and
research so much as they design. This pathway begins at the undergraduate levelwhere engineering students are expected to devote their time to theory and problem sets.Information retrieval leans heavily on textbooks. Emphasis on efficiency means students aretaught to find answers quickly, and potentially compromise the fit of a resource in order toquickly move forward to the next task [1]. A Listening First approach utilizes the basic tenets of user-centered research, or user-centered design. User-centered research is the process of gathering information about the users ofa product or service in order to inform the design and development of future products or services.Typically, this process includes interviews, surveys, usability testing
DevelopmentAbstractTraditional proprietary textbooks for undergraduate students often cost hundreds of dollars andcreate barriers to learning by restricting which and how many courses students take and forcingstudents to decide whether or not they purchase their textbooks [1], [2]. Having low-cost or freealternatives for course textbooks helps give all students access to learning materials and canlower barriers such as affordability and retention [3], [4]. Such alternatives to traditionaltextbooks are considered Open Educational Resources (OER). OER can be comparable in qualityto traditional textbooks [5]. Given the proper context, they have been shown to lower the numberof D, F, and Withdrawal letter grades, or DFW rates, in classrooms [3]. This evidence, showingthe
. Three different first yearengineering groups were assessed in their knowledge of equity. Group 1 was the group that wereprompted with a presentation in class about the different aspects of requirements for buildingdesign to address mobility issues followed by an audio recording prompting the students to do atour on campus and experience first-hand these effects. The second group has done a campus tourwithout the audio and have been exposed to only the presentation in class. The third group is thecontrol group who has only done the campus tour with no prompts and did not have thepresentation. All three groups were assessed later in their knowledge of equity issues in buildingdesigns. This paper will share these findings and the details of what
ispresent?If a school does not have any formal programs or immediate industry connections, most studentswill find themselves on an external commercial job search site looking for the ideal position. Thesesites tend to require many prerequisites, some fair and others unfair for a person that is trying toget their foot into the door. If one does not meet all the requirements and is denied during theapplication process, what is next?The benefit of networking with those immediately within reach will be explored in this paper.This network could be friends, family, coworkers, and teachers [1]. Unconventional communitypartnerships include community centers, places of worship, social venues (i.e. cafes, cafeteria).Wewill examine the case of a student that
innovation. These five principles include 1) understand thesystem shaping inequity 2) realize your positioning and power, at the intersections of race,gender, sexual orientation, class, and (dis)ability 3) establish relationships with those closest tohealth disparities to root out root causes and stay accountable to potential harms 4) buildtechnologies that create value for all parties while remaining "safe to fail" and 5) connect theinnovation to a greater political strategy for achieving equity and liberation. Thiswork-in-progress paper ends with a call to action for engineers to choose a side: do we serve asarchitects of the visions of the powerful, or the visions of the public? As architects of medicaltechnology, our decisions shape who lives
preventative maintenanceprocedures and gaining experience with troubleshooting were most important. The studyidentified challenges associated with internships and outcomes and experiences that wereimportant to include in a virtual alternative. The results of this study can be applied broadly toensure that internships, regardless of modality, are worthwhile experiences for both students andsupervisors.KeywordsInternship; Biomedical Engineering Technology; Clinical Engineering; Experiential Learning;Virtual InternshipIntroductionIdentified in the late 2000s as a high impact practice (HIP), internships in fields such asbiomedical engineering technology/clinical engineering have been shown to provide numerousbenefits in terms of student success [1]–[7
growth [1], so engineering pathways have emerged as a topic of engineeringeducation research [2].Two major endeavors made over the past two decades have considerably shaped ourunderstandings about engineering pathways. One was the U.S.-based Academic Pathways Studyconducted in the 2000s by the Center for Advancement of Engineering Education of theUniversity of Washington. The project investigated the experiences of engineeringundergraduates and early-career engineers, with a focus on four aspects of becoming anengineer—skills, identity, education, and workplace [3]. The other was the report“Understanding Educational and Career Pathways of Engineers” produced by U.S. NationalAcademy of Engineering in 2018 [4]. The report provides an informative