officialpolicy or position of William Beaumont Army Medical Center, Department of the Army,Defense Health Agency, or the US Government.Introduction This project will advance middle school student math and sciences progress through itsinnovative use of non-invasive personal and familial data collection and analysis. Usingaccessible technologies such as: non-contact infrared thermometers with memory function, pulseoximeters with Bluetooth that painlessly clip on to your finger, electronic digital calipers, andhousehold tools including tape measures, students will learn to collect and analyze their personaland familial health-data. Using laptops and tablets with MS Excel software, students will uploadtheir data and explore it with simulation and
an emerging need: “…it will become more and moreessential that schools of engineering pay greater attention to the effect of their work on thepersonal development of the students.” (p. 108). Personal development was not described itoften is today in terms of self-fulfillment, rather it is seen more as a prescriptive process to betterfit people to jobs, thus improving production : “…admission to college is an important divisionof the central problem of education — vocational guidance. If any reasonably trustworthymethod of discovering what work each individual is best fitted for can be found, the otherproblems of education will in large measure solve themselves.” (p. 49). The purpose of the corecurriculum—“all the facts, principles, and
women felt theyhad benefitted from the program and all the students wanted it to be offered to them during theirsophomore year. Fall semester, 2014, the COE and MSGC implemented an expanded programjointly funded by the college and the consortium. The program was designed and managed by afemale faculty member in Mechanical Engineering, the Associate Dean for Student Success inthe college, and an academic adviser from the Department of Education. All eligible freshmenand sophomore females were included in the program and in all information and invitations sentout by the program, but their responses and participation were voluntary. In parallel withestablishing a peer mentoring program, data has been collected to track if the program canimprove
expectation source. However, that clarity is tempered by the stress of the academicexpectations themselves, as well as the potential implications of failure to fulfill them.Besides academics, expectations can also come from engineering superiors, who were definedas entities within the engineering major with influence to directly and professionally influence astudents’ grades, learning environment, career-related decisions and other engineeringexperiences. These entities range from individuals such as professors to small organizations suchas the student advising center.For example, if an instructor unknowingly creates a hostile learning environment with rigidexpectations and methods, the learning experience can become extremely stressful
skills. The firstcase considers both skills within a higher range of decision-making, where teamwork, togetherwith one's own awareness as influencer within the organization, are closely linked. The secondcase considers technical skills which are present at a lower or operational rank within theorganization, and they are therefore not faced with definitive decision-making, probablyadopting a more consultative leadership style, which lists among its characteristics that of notmaking decisions without first consulting thers.Conclusions, future directionsThe present work was geared to study leadership styles in senior students of the IndustrialEngineering program of an Engineering Faculty of an important Chilean university. Theobjective was to
. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student Satisfaction and Perceptions of Summer REU Experience in an Engineering/Communicative Disorders Focused Site at Program MidpointIntroductionParticipating in a research experience for undergraduates (REU) site provides opportunities forstudents to develop their research and technical skills, raise their awareness of graduate studies[1], and understand the social context of research [2]. In support of this mission, our REU site atThe University of Alabama (Sensors, Systems and Signal Processing Supporting SpeechPathology) is exploring research at the intersection of engineering and
and Industrial Engineering, in 1980 and 1979 respectively. He has piloted programs for increasing the number of high quality high school students enrolling in Engi- neering, co-developed and co-taught a freshman success seminar and tutoring program, and co-developed and co-taught mentoring programs for new faculty members and graduate teaching assistantsJane Hunter, University of Arizona Page 22.498.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN— AN AP ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE FORHIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AT THE STATE LEVEL
achievement and career development.30 A total of 1,479 seniorengineering students participated in the survey. The results revealed that the students with moreworking experiences had a higher starting salary after graduation and were more likely to get ajob offer prior to graduation. But the influence of work experiences on GPA is minimal. Inaddition, the work experiences equally benefit male and female students. Samuelson and Litzlerspecifically explored the influence of work experiences on female students.31 They interviewed27 female engineering students with an internship or co-op experience. The internship and co-opexperiences influenced students’ perceptions of the engineering field, persistence in engineering,and career decisions. Overall, the
politics.Dr. Cassandra Rutherford Dr. Cassandra Rutherford is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil, Constructions and Envi- ronmental Engineering. Her research focuses on geotechnical engineering and engineering education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021WORK-IN-PROGRESS: INVESTIGATING ON-CAMPUS ENGINEERING STUDENTORGANIZATIONS AS MEANS OF PROMOTING ETHICAL DEVELOPMENT 1. ABSTRACT Ethics is and should be intrinsic to engineering. However, many engineering students donot recognize that every engineering decision contains ethical dimensions and that underlyingvalues and current sociopolitical and cultural contexts can influence those
Paper ID #33371Work in Progress: A Framework for an Improv Intervention to IncreasePsychological Safety and Sense of Belonging on Student EngineeringDesign TeamsJenn Campbell, University of Virginia Jenn Campbell is a Ph.D. Fellow in the Behavioral Science for Sustainable Systems program at the Con- vergent Behavioral Science Initiative at the University of Virginia. Jenn spent 9 years working in a variety of roles in engineering and marketing before beginning her doctoral program, and her time in industry spurred her interest in behavioral science and how we can help people make better decisions. Her re- search
education.Today’s traditional-aged college students belong to Generation Z, which is the generationalcohort following the Millennial Generation. Generation Z begins with those born from 1995 to1998 depending on the reference consulted (Vision Critical, 2016; Patel, 2017; Beall, 2017;Tullier & Paris, 2018). They currently represent 25% of the population in the United States andare the fastest growing generation to be represented in the US workforce (Beall, 2017; Tullier &Paris, 2018).Generation Z’s career-related goals and aspirations do not immediately illuminate their desire topursue an entrepreneurial path. According to one study, when considering their future careers,members of Generation Z reported they care about work life balance, job
in machine element design and introduction to design and graduate courses in product design and dynamics. Dr. McAdams' research interests are in the area of design theory and methodology, concept generation, product architecture, design for manufacturing, tolerance design, and modeling for design, with specific emphasis and applications in product design. Page 11.1138.1Matthew Campbell, University of Texas-Austin MATTHEW CAMPBELL is a faculty member of the Manufacturing & Design program of the Mechanical Engineering Department. He has served on the College of Engineering faculty since
enormous amount of content thatrevealed the political, economic, cultural, and social nature of engineers' personal andprofessional lives.Surveys and Interviews YTT members completed 360 surveys that helped the project team understand how to communicate with them, what their unique perspectives on being a student, the future, making decisions, careers, university, STEM. They interviewed 100 female engineers, 26 engineering students, 7 engineering romantic Page 26.772.12 couples, and over 700 peers, parents and teachers to develop insights about perceptions of engineering, communicating with teens and gender issues and
extracurricular activities, informal conversations inthe residence hall and social events.20 These types of activities combine to cultivate membership in a community for thestudent.21 The degree of integration in the community impacts the student’s commitment torelated goals and persistence in that domain. For example, students who participate inengineering-related events outside of class are more likely to feel connected to the community ofengineers and see more value in persisting to degree completion. In addition to the structuralobstacles of curriculum and pedagogy, Seymour and Hewitt noted that a lack of identificationwith STEM careers was an additional factor influencing students’ decisions to leave thediscipline.22 This is an element that
mentorship. Today, as an engineering faculty member ata large Midwestern university, Dr. James continues to engage in mentoring relationships throughher informal mentoring relationships with engineering undergraduates and her work with a peer Page 26.1146.6mentoring program she helped to initiate that pairs incoming graduate students with currentgraduate students. Dr. James develops relationships with her protégés so that they are more opento sharing which can open the door to them accepting her guidance. In her mentoringrelationships and experiences, she: (1) works to develop personal relationships with her mentorsand protégés, (2) recognizes that
(FCG) program.Student 5Student 5 grew up in Canton, a suburb of Detroit. Student 5’s mother works in the healthcarefield as a respiratory therapist and her father is a fire fighter. Both parents have bachelor’sdegrees. She has two younger sisters one of whom is finishing nursing school and the youngestis graduating from high school. A person of influence in her career choice was her grandfatherwho was an engineer working for General Motors and provided for a large family. Student 5 andseveral of her cousins have been inspired by his career and are pursuing engineering. During herearly years in school, she had Math anxiety and would cry in Math classes but Math turned intoher favorite subject in high school. This happened through a combination
interested in helping students to make career and major choices that are best for them. It isquite possible that by helping students to make better-informed decisions about their major, somestudents may be “counseled out” of engineering. If that is the case, the seminars were successfulboth in helping the students make a better choice, and in improving the confidence (andmotivation?) of the pool of students that continue in engineering.Table 1 shows the comparison between major choice at the end and beginning of the seminar. Alarge majority of the students report no change in major. Some (6.7%) switch from oneengineering major to another, and 11.5% change from an engineering major to either a majoroutside the college or to being undecided. This is
teams that have had access tocommunication systems. 6 What factors are behind these unproductive teams? How can weexplain why two members of a three-person team report satisfaction with the team’scommunication and collaborative processes while the third member indicates dissatisfaction inthe same areas? Research studies in Leadership Communication and Organizational Behaviorsuggest that differences in evaluation of communication levels within teams often stem fromeach group member’s perception of particular situations. 4,7,8 Put another way, communicationpatterns found in engineering design groups suggest that effective groups adopt an intricately-connected web of both cognitive and social interactions.9,13Perceptual FactorsPerception is
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Character Development in the Engineering Classroom: An Exploratory, Mixed-Methods Investigation of Student PerspectivesI. IntroductionEthics education is an undisputedly essential part of engineering education. Society, industry,universities, and accreditation demand that engineering students be better educated to handle themany ethical situations that professional practice will require of our graduates. Whileengineering educators continue to explore how to most effectively prepare students for complexand nuanced ethical decision-making in their professional careers [1] – [8], traditionalapproaches to engineering ethics education have been largely limited to ethical reasoning guidedby
professor, she brings three overarching objectives to the learning environment that originate from the belief that teaching is an invitation to inspire, encourage, and impact lives. Her students have received national recognition under her tutelage as a result of her efforts. She carefully advises students toward making conscious decisions about their studies that will ultimately impact their careers. Horsey has made impactful change to the construction management department since becoming interim department chair in June 2020. She was also instrumental in the transition of all degree programs and certificates to online modality during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. She is the founder and creator of the KSU Women in
. Despite this, the nation still struggles to produce the ENG talent it needs. Given this, programs to increase the number of ENGs that graduate have been promoted across the nation [1]-[3]. Such programs focus on recruitment [4], retention principles [5], persistence [6], as well as practices that help students with critical thinking [7]-[8], academics [9]-[10] and professional development [11]-[12]. The latter includes mentoring by faculty [13]-[14], peer mentoring [15], project-based learning [16]- [26], research experiences for undergraduates (REUs) [27]-[28], internships [29], preparing for graduate school [30], career planning [31], etc. We at Arizona State University’s (ASU’s) Fulton Schools of Engineering, have
each other, engineering students more senior to themselves,departmental faculty and staff, and alumni. Each program attempts to activate criticalingredients known to influence professional wayfinding and academic success. Takencollectively, they provide a robust ecosystem for supporting better transitions to college,discovering personal motivations to pursue an engineering education (or not), and creatingpositive connections to others on campus.The co-curriculars also facilitate a culture of entrepreneurially-minded learning (EML) adoptedthroughout MADE. The EML framework consists of (1) exploring one’s innate curiosity of theworld around them; (2) finding connections to realize how engineering is interrelated withcomplex sociocultural
majors at our university. Studentsparticipated in team-building activities that prompted research into their engineering majors andcareer options. In Week 3, we organized an industry career panel with a diverse mix of recruitersand alumni that currently work as engineers. The students asked questions about the panel’s pastcollege experiences, internships, graduate school, and careers. Students also had the opportunityto practice their “60 second pitches” with the panel members to help prepare for a career fair.Throughout the quarter, we incorporated activities that addressed global perspectives ofengineering, current events, and social justice. In Week 4, we collaborated with an EthnicStudies faculty member and her students from a Gender, Race
Paper ID #16444Design of an Interactive Multidisciplinary Residential Summer Program forRecruitment of High School Females to EngineeringDr. Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University Dr. Paula Monaco, E.I.T., successfully defended her dissertation research Spring 2016 and will begin a career in the water/wastewater reuse treatment. Paula has led multiple outreach summer programs at TTU and provides support to student organizations within the college of engineering. Her technical research focuses include; anti-fouling and scaling RO technology and pharmaceutical and personal care product screening to predict environmental
first year. Despite those constructs increasing,students generated questions pertaining to Information Seeking and Stress Tolerance constructsmost frequently in the direct pre and post assessment, with approximately 60% and 25% ofquestions coded into those categories, respectively. The frequency of codes was not differentbetween the pre and post assessments. These findings suggest that further work is needed tounderstand discrepancies between how students perceive their curiosity personality and how theyexercise that curiosity in an academic context. This paper explores the direct and indirectassessment data sets and discusses implications for our findings on pedagogical approaches tofostering curiosity in first-year
rewarding career path 4) Prepare students to make informed choices about their academic and career options by providing them with information regarding the vast number of engineering career paths 5) Help students identify “false positives”- that is, allow students who think they want to be engineers to explore the field and to figure out if engineering is for them within the safe environment of their high school classroom ENGR 102 HS benefits high school students by allowing them to: 1) Explore an introduction to engineering and the engineering profession without having to commit to a semester’s worth of engineering courses at the University
educators to develop innovative ways to teach mathematics and science.15,22 Inparticular, both the NCTM and NSTA focus on the use of “inquiry-based” and “authenticlearning” experiences that focus the applications of math and science in a “real-world”context.22,20According to Subotnik et al., high school appears to be a key point at which young people’simpressions of science influence their career decisions.30 Brody outlined elements of successfulpre-collegiate STEM programs with an exposure to strong content knowledge in mathematicsand science based on academic instruction and hands-on demonstration as well as anappreciation for the utility of STEM subjects in the workplace.3 Further evidence from Bloom,Pyryt, Subotnik et al., and Tai et al
-college)-level with a goal of pursuing an engineering major never make it to that200-level. In contrast to the 200-level experience, students earlier in their academic path aremore diffuse in 100-level math, physics, and chemistry courses that also serve other STEMmajors and include no direct instruction on how course content is relevant to their career goals.Opportunities to build community around engineering are up to individual students to seek out inextra-curricular opportunities such as student clubs. This challenge is amplified for most WCCengineering students who must complete 10-20 credits of prerequisite math and physicscoursework before credits apply toward their eventual Bachelor of Science degree.Table 1 illustrates the differential
forentrepreneurship and innovation. Although studies have analyzed how students perceive this typeof training, few of them have unveiled its influence on behaviors and career goals. The formativeuse of the assessment instruments employed is limited, so more efforts are needed to evaluateentrepreneurial training towards its continuous improvement. This article proposes a methodologyto involve students in curriculum evaluation so they become partners in curriculum delivery andteaching practices. To explore its benefits, we applied it on a Major focused on engineering design,entrepreneurship and innovation. During classroom sessions of three Major courses, a form wasused to generate individual reflections and collective discussions about course methods
ofwomen than their representation as undergrads may be having a positive impact on PhDattainment. This suggests that further study of ECE-specific URE programs might be warranted.Relative to the BS level, PhD programs are strongly impacted by recruiting, candidate screening Page 24.604.9and financial support controlled by departments and individual faculty (Fox, 2000, Bowman,2014). ECE programs and individual faculty have independent control over recruiting andmentoring graduate students in their research groups as they do for URE students. The recentgrowth in female doctoral attainment, particularly for domestic ECE students, is an area ripe