included emotionalintelligence, intellectual property, social justice, ethics, negotiations, professionalcommunication, and professional etiquette. In addition, students receive career advisementworkshops in resume writing, interviewing, and internship success skills.An Industry Scholars Mentorship Program has also been developed [19]. The goals of thementorship program were to provide continued industry mentorship for students who hadcompleted the ISP program and to foster organic one-on-one mentorship relationships betweenindustry and students to further their professional skills education. The mentoring programmatches students who have completed the ISP program with mentors from Industry based oncharacteristics of the mentors and mentees and
understanding of these concepts after learning the developed M3E module. Thus, trainingstudents to establish such a mental model using solid mechanics concepts is a reasonable approach,which can even contribute to students’ engineering career development through their lives. Viaappropriate analysis, fundamental concepts in mechanics can be completely separate in students’mind before they have a firm understanding of their meaning, as shown in Figure 6. The M3Eapproach is expected to help students connect these abstract concepts and develop their mentalmodel to represent a network of such complex concepts. A well-developed concept map,externalization of the mental representation, will show the fundamental understanding of theseconcepts. Once students
to their military experience or in engineering; however, their narratives illuminate howthey conceptualize engineering identity as central to their experiences; and (4) althoughparticipants did not indicate that gender was central to their identities and experiences, nearly allof them discussed relational elements, including the significance of relationships and caregivingto their educational experiences. That is, family roles (e.g., daughter, wife, sister) were central totheir identity, even if the women did not say that gender, per se, was salient.Our initial results offer insights into the unique experiences of women who served in the militaryand who then chose to advance their careers and education in engineering. Policies and
American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #20368 Dr. Kara Ieva is currently an Associate Professor in the Counseling in Educational Settings program at Rowan University. Kara’s areas of research interest include counseling children and adolescent of un- derserved populations regarding college and career readiness particularly in STEM and group counseling. Further, she was the principal investigator and project director for the Rowan University Aim High Science and Technology Academies (grant funded; $998,259), that aids first generation and low-income college students access and preparation for post-secondary
. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MSC Software Corp. His research includes design of Micro Air Vehicles, development of innovative de- sign methodologies and enhancement of engineering education. Dr Jensen has authored over 100 refereed papers and has been awarded over $4 million of research grants.Prof. Paul Henry Schimpf, Eastern Washington University Paul H. Schimpf received the B.S.E.E (summa cum laude), M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from the Uni- versity of Washington, Seattle, in 1982, 1987, and 1995, respectively. Dr. Schimpf began his academic career in
research universities, in- cluding the interactions of levers (people, organizations, policy, initiatives) of change and documenting the good, hard work required across disciplinary boundaries to achieve meaningful change in STEM ed- ucation.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts.Prof. Thomas Dick, Oregon State University Thomas Dick is a professor of mathematics at
target tracking and physical layer communications. Her work on target detection and tracking is funded by the Office of Naval Research. Dr. Nelson is a 2010 recipient of the NSF CAREER Award. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, and the IEEE Signal Processing, Communications, and Education Societies.Dr. Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University Margret Hjalmarson is an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Education at George Mason University and currently a Program Officer in the Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Infor- mal Settings at the National Science Foundation. Her research interests include engineering education, mathematics education, faculty development
research interests within computational intelligence include ensemble systems, incremental and nonstationary learning, and various applications of pattern recognition in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering. He is a member of IEEE, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi and Eta Kappa Nu. His re- cent and current works are funded primarily through NSF’s CAREER and Energy, Power and Adaptive Systems (EPAS) programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT OF A WORKSHOP ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION IN BIOMETRIC SYSTEMSABSTRACTBiometrics is the science of recognizing and authenticating people using theirphysiological features. The global biometrics market has a compound annual
presentation as for the examples of different types and contents of feedback. Participants were 12 experienced system engineers who attended the regional conference. Although they found the workshop useful, they mentioned that this workshop would be more helpful to early career engineers. • First-year engineering peer teachers (undergraduate teaching assistants) training: About 65 peer teachers were asked to provide feedback on the sample student team design work as a calibration exercise. At the end of each milestone, they were given some samples of educators’ feedback on the same design work. After all peer teachers provided feedback on all of the four milestones, their feedback was analyzed to highlight
interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and re- flective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Page 26.60.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Knowledge-Delivery Gravity Model to Improve Game-Aided
University of Colorado at Boulder. He has worked for Texas Instruments, Lockheed Martin, NASA, University of the Pacific, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and MSC Software Corp. His research includes design of Micro Air Vehicles, development of innovative de- sign methodologies and enhancement of engineering education. Dr Jensen has authored over 100 refereed papers and has been awarded over $4 million of research grants.Prof. Paul Henry Schimpf, Eastern Washington University Paul H. Schimpf received the B.S.E.E (summa cum laude), M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. degrees from the Uni- versity of Washington, Seattle, in 1982, 1987, and 1995, respectively. Dr. Schimpf began his academic career in 1998, and is currently a Professor in the
indicated that students initially struggled with the new format and that the students feltthat “freshman did not have the academic maturity needed to succeed in an [inverted classroom]setting” (p. 343).A recent study by Love et al.[8] found that students in a linear algebra course employing theflipped classroom approach performed as well as their traditional lecture counterparts on exams,but also reported increased enjoyment of the course and a greater perceived relevance of the Page 26.175.3course material to their career. Students also reported an increase in the strength of their socialnetwork in the flipped section as opposed to the tradition
Nu. His re- cent and current works are funded primarily through NSF’s CAREER and Energy, Power and Adaptive Systems (EPAS) programs.Dr. Ying Tang, Rowan University Ying Tang received the B.S. and M.S. degrees from the Northeastern University, P. R. China, in 1996 and 1998, respectively, and Ph.D degree from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, in 2001. She is currently a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) at Rowan University, Glass- boro, NJ. Her research interests include virtual reality and augmented reality, artificial intelligence, and modeling and scheduling of computer-integrated systems. Dr. Tang is very active in adapting and devel- oping pedagogical methods and materials
research universities, in- cluding the interactions of levers (people, organizations, policy, initiatives) of change and documenting the good, hard work required across disciplinary boundaries to achieve meaningful change in STEM ed- ucation.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Oregon State University. His research interests include conceptual change and situated cognition. He received the NSF CAREER award in 2010 and is working on a study to characterize practicing engineers’ understand- ings of core engineering concepts.Dr. Thomas Dick, Oregon State University Thomas Dick is a professor of mathematics at
, and senior electives. Exposure tobiomedical topics will provide excellent preparation for interested students to pursue graduatestudies in related disciplines such as biomedical engineering or medicine. Because the modulesare rooted in fundamental engineering principles, they will be equally valuable to students whopursue careers in other engineering areas. Once developed, the modules could be adopted byclassic engineering programs such as Chemical, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, as wellas specialized Biomedical Engineering programs, and could be implemented by faculty who donot have specialized biomedical expertise. A previous paper by Farrell et al. 3 focused on thedescription of the course modules. This paper focuses on the
. Candidate at the University of Washington. He received his B.A. from TheUniversity of Puget Sound and his M.A. from The University of Denver. He is currently a LIFE (Learningin Informal and Formal Environments) Center Research Assistant on The Knowledge In Action Project.He is also an Early Career Researcher, working in collaboration with Oregon State University and TheUniversity of Turku in Finland, looking at engagement across virtual and project-based environments. Hisresearch focuses on engagement and identity development and the role of designed and alternative envi-ronments on these processes. His dissertation focuses on students entering into alternative high schoolsand explores students’ re-engagement in school and re-negotiation of their
-groups analysis. The only task-specific self-concept that did not have a significant difference in either the within-subjects andbetween-groups comparisons was motivation; this was seen in both the overall data(Fmotivation(3,219) = 1.7, p = 0.2) and the within-subjects data (t(11) = 0.6, p = 0.5). Thisdemonstrates that freshmen, sophomore, juniors, and seniors experience similar motivationlevels when it comes to engineering design. This may be due to the fact that engineers begintheir undergraduate career with a high level of motivation, and there is not much room forimprovement in that area. The within subject pairwise results also showed the same trends fromfreshman to senior with high statistical significance for self-efficacy, expectancy
for Education Research. His most recent book is How Computer Games Help Children Learn.Dr. Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi C. Chesler is Professor of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active
to conduct a research project,increased confidence in research skills, and an increased awareness of feeling or thinking like ascientist are often reported (Hunter et al., 2007; Russell et al., 2007; Lopatto, 2004; Seymour etal., 2004). Zydney et al. (2002) found that engineering graduates with undergraduate researchexperiences had self-reported “significantly greater enhancement of important cognitive andpersonal skills, including the ability to speak effectively, understand scientific findings, knowliterature of merit in the field, analyze literature clearly, and possess clear career goals.”Summer experiences represent one of the most common approaches for immersingundergraduate students in authentic research. Yet, students are often not
Early Concept Grant for Exploratory Research (EAGER) that tested the feasibility ofcoupling Maker concepts with real world concerns in manufacturing and production engineeringin high school classrooms. Through the EAGER, we engaged in a 3-year pilot research study onhow the Making as Micro-Manufacture M2 model may create a situated learning space. In the M2model, students can develop self-constructed educational experiences through their directengagement in Making for everyday, real world use. Practically, we applied the M2 model in theform of a practice-based learning career and technology education (CTE) course focused oncombining Making, Engineering, and elementary science curriculum implementation.For our study, we pursued the following two
Lindsay Jarratt is a PhD candidate in Educational Policy and Leadership Studies. Her research follows from fifteen years of experience in student support and equity roles in higher education, and is focused on the dynamics of equity and belonging in educational institutions.Dr. KC Culver, University of Southern California KC Culver is a postdoctoral scholar at the University of Southern California. Her research focuses on the core academic mission of postsecondary institutions with an emphasis on access, equity, and inclusion; she studies faculty careers, pedagogy and the curriculum, and the experiences and outcomes of students from diverse backgrounds.Dr. Alberto Segre, The University of Iowa Alberto Maria Segre is
students ratetheir interest in taking each on a scale of 1 to 5. A combined score is calculated using sixcourses relevant to biometrics, namely, computer forensics, biometric signal processing,machine learning, digital image processing, pattern recognition and biometric securitytechnologies. For questions 3 and 4, fourteen subject areas are given. For question 3,students rate each area in terms of pursuing a graduate degree. In question 4, students ratetheir interest in pursuing a career. A combined score is calculated using five subject areasrelated to biometrics, namely, image processing, computer forensics, machine learning,biometrics and speech processing. Table 2 gives the results. For questions 2 and 4, thereis a statistically significant
University. He was a recipient of the NSF CAREER award in 2009. He serves as an associate editor for the IEEE Power Engineering Letters and the IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. His research interests are related to electromechanical energy conversion and the analysis of power systems. More recently his work has focused on technologies that enable the integration of renewable energy sources in the electric power system, and the electrification of transportation.Prof. Maryam Saeedifard, Purdue University Page 23.422.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
linkbetween program impacts on student motivation and self-efficacy and ultimate graduate rates.The Wright State ModelIt is well known that student success in engineering is highly dependent on student success inmath, and perhaps more importantly, on the ability to connect the math to the engineering1-6.However, first-year students typically arrive at the university with virtually no understanding ofhow their pre-college math background relates to their chosen degree programs, let alone theirfuture careers. And despite the national call to increase the number of graduates in engineeringand other STEM disciplines7 , the inability of incoming students to successfully advance past thetraditional freshman calculus sequence remains a primary cause of
AC 2012-3670: ENGINEERING FUTURE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS: IN-CORPORATION OF PROCESS INTENSIFICATION CONCEPTS INTOTHE UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUMDr. Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State UniversityDr. Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of chemical engineering at Michigan Tech having moved from Mississippi State University in Jan. 2010, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She re- ceived her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Tech- nological University in 1998. Minerick’s research interests include electrokinetics and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a 2007 NSF CAREER Award and the
cleaned up but is far better than the previous ones. • Improve the isolation design. • Add one more +‐5V power supply. What is the most you would pay for a system like this if it were used in several classes over the course of your academic career? ___ $0 ___ $50 ___$100 ___$200 ___$300 ___$400 ___$500 (check one) Average response: ~$205 Page 25.892.14How would you prefer to pay that amount? ___lump sum ___payments across semesters LS: 4; PAS: 7 Would you prefer to pay a lesser amount as ‘lab fees’ each semester to fund the purchase and upkeep of a set of RASCL units that would be available for check
coming together to work on the projects. During the past threeyears, California State University Los Angeles faculty team worked collaboratively to developCPBL-beyond-Classroom pedagogy that has proved to be effective to enhance student learningon commuter campuses. As an extension to CPBL, a specific PBL model developed in theauthors’ previous work to address the retention issues of minority students in theirfreshman/sophomore year [5-7], CPBL-beyond-Classroom aims at preparing senior students forprofessional careers. To address the learning needs of students on commuter campuses, the newpedagogy emphasizes on virtual collaborative learning and community inquiry in a remotefashion. Iterative classroom implementation and assessment demonstrated
#1237868. Portions of this paper were orally presented at the SEACconference (2013), the Frontiers in Education conference (2013) and the National ScienceFoundation EESE PI meeting (2013). Attendees at each of these venues provided valuablefeedback. We are also grateful for the administrative and technical support received fromHUBZero, GlobalHUB, and Eckard Groll.INTRODUCTIONEducating future engineers to effectively handle novel ethical dilemmas they may encounter intheir careers, especially those developing and implementing new technology, is a critical andrelevant challenge for a nation that is advancing science and engineering technologies at an everincreasing rate. However, the ethics education programs of most engineering colleges do
modeling, numerical modeling, electromagnetic com- patibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published eight book chapters, several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his areas of the research interests. He has also been PI or Co-PI for various research projects United States and abroad in power systems analysis and protection, load and energy demand forecasting and analysis, renewable energy, microgrids, turbulence and wave propagation, radar and remote sensing, instrumentation, atmosphere physics, electromagnetic compatibility, and engineering education
, gender and performance in the prerequisitecourses were recorded. Additionally, as students in the course are typically further into theiracademic careers, students were identified by transfer status: first time in college (FTIC) –started their college at University of South Florida, transfer students from a community college(CC) with a completed Associate of the Arts degree, or other (OT) which includes studentstransferring from another institution without a completed degree. All of the above data werecollected from official institutional records.Student achievement in the course was assessed through a combination of homeworkassignments, class activities and examinations, including the final comprehensive examination.The same topics were covered