for Georesources and Pollution Research, Ayres Associates Inc., and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. He earned his BS (High Honors) and MS in Civil Engineering and his PhD in Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin where he conducted research within the Small Scale Waste Management Project. Prof. Siegrist is an internationally recognized expert in decentralized water reclamation and in situ remediation of contami- nated land. During his 40-year career he has published over 300 technical papers and 3 books and was awarded 2 patents. His new textbook, Decentralized Water Reclamation Engineering, was just published by Springer (www.springer.com/us/book/9783319404714). He has given invited keynote
and how we empower learners to be interdisciplinary.Tyler J. Kerr, University of Wyoming Tyler Kerr received a B.A. in Geology from Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, PA in 2011, and an M.S. in Geology (Paleontology) from the University of Wyoming in 2017. His background in pale- ontology and interest in emergent technology has led him to pursue a career 3D scanning, rendering, and digitizing museum collections. In addition to his digitization work, he runs the University of Wyoming’s Coe Student Innovation Center (CSIC), the university’s newest educational STEAM-oriented campus makerspace for students, faculty, and staff.Mr. Larry Schmidt, University of Wyoming Larry Schmidt is an associate librarian at
third iteration, the first author proposed a model based on the data and the results of the second iteration. The author presented this model and the others helped refine it with comments, questions, and suggestions for data. Another member joined the team here to offer additional perspectives, and due to his familiarity with professional formation. The remainder of the paper discusses and tests the hypothesis that resulted from this iteration.Current HypothesisThe current theorization has foundations in Ibarra’s11 framework for professional identityformation during a mid-career change, which consists of three processes: • Engagement with professional activities – This refers to the process of identifying and
interview transcripts. We present a representativequote and several similar, though truncated, quotes from other participants to illustrate thethemes. Each of these themes is an aspect of how the participants have constructed theirunderstanding of and managing uncertainty in design.Theme 1: Managing uncertainty can be learned, but none learned to do so in schoolA common conclusion from the participants is that the ability to manage uncertainty in designcan be learned. This was most succinctly stated by Stephen who responded to a question aboutwhether he approaches projects the same way at the beginning of his career versus where he wasnow by simply stating “No. Again it’s a learned experience.” The participants explained thatthere were five main
Paper ID #21738Motivational Attitudes and Behaviors in Capstone Projects: QuantitativeValidation of Assessment InstrumentsBashirah Ibrahim, Ohio State University Bashirah Ibrahim is a postdoctoral researcher in engineering education at the Ohio State University.Dr. Peter Rogers, Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers is a Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education The Ohio State University. He joined the university in October 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing developing products using
“Easier to walk about the class today; students and interactions with fourth-year students. or career. started approaching me as well.” (UTA, 3)Table 1. The left-hand column notes the opportunities for improvement, as well as an excerpt from the undergraduate teachingassistants’ classroom observations and then a suggested alternative.4.1 ARCS Model of Motivation4.1.1 Attention: Peer-to-peer mini-lessons The identified opportunity to improve student motivation and engagement was that the timespent in the discussion section was often underutilized by the first-year students. The UTAsobservations routinely noted that the less structured time made many students feel that it wasacceptable to skip class and nothing happens, as
mastering it does not look rewarding.Moreover, students are unlikely to use BBL once they graduate, while they will probably use GDfor something no matter what career they may enter.An obvious benefit of eLN is that we can keep full copy of student works semi-permanentlywithout taking up physical space. With the paper-binder format, we would return it to thestudents after final grading but many students actually never pick up their binders, which wouldbe sent to recycling after several months as we do not have storage space for them.ConclusionWe are looking for ways to make engineering documentation process less of a chore, and moreengaging and rewarding for students. We also wish to reduce the workload of grading. After thetrial implementations of
programs will be covered.IntroductionMost degree programs that teach building engineering have design opportunities are often less thanideally constructed to reflect practical careers due to relatively few faculty members being trained, or theyhave no similar industry experience necessary to guide students [1]. Consequently in these settings, only asurface level understanding of their value is realized [2]. Many engineering students do not know how toapproach large complex systems due to their exposure to idealistic examples [3]. Additionally, they notcapable of providing critical multi-disciplinary integration of their designs due to the isolated nature oftopics in the classroom [4] [5]. Capstone courses provide a comprehensive evaluation of
number of our undergraduates are interested in pursuingindustry careers in design and innovation and would benefit from open-ended context drivendesign experience in medicine that fosters observation skills, deep empathy, and needs-finding.These contextual skills have been found lacking among engineering graduates by nearly half ofrespondents in a survey of 1,622 employers [3]. A contextualized learning approach [4-5] inengineering education has been shown to improve student motivation, confidence, andconceptual understanding in a variety of studies [e.g. 6-7].To meet this “design gap” in our curriculum and to address the need for human-centeredcontextualized design experience for our students, we developed an upper-level elective courseentitled
relative, contingent, and develops hisor her own opinions via critical reasoning. The stage of Commitment within Relativism refers toa commitment to a relativistic view. In this stage, individuals claim a contextual and relativisticview in different areas of life in addition to one’s study or one’s pursuit of knowledge. By takinga contextual constructivist view, individuals carefully go through factors and examine relatedinformation in decision-making processes. Individuals confirm their commitments to carefullythought-through values, careers, relationships, and personal identity while recognizing thelimitation of reasoning, and thus assuming major responsibilities in different areas of life.Since the first proposal of Perry’s model, subsequent
perspective towards a clear focus on learningoutcomes. Another Cohort faculty similarly noted: In my classes now, I emphasize how important the actual learning is and what they're going to take on, what they're going to take from this into their future careers. I’m thinking about if the students are actually transforming and learning a lot throughout the class, rather than just getting through it. (Faculty member C1-C)We now hear the faculty using the terminology and patterns of the Engineering Learningframework. It has now become a mantra for some faculty answering most questions about theircourse as “well of course we first think about the learning outcomes.” As they align theirpractices with Engineering Learning, faculty
help our colleagues who work on coursedevelopment at various levels of Engineering Education. Further details may be provided perrequest.DIYers can be turned into professionals by helping them understand that after graduation, real-world projects require much more rigor and attention to detail than the simple experiments thatare typically meant to show concepts. The student who can adapt to the demands of thecommercial world will be much better off when starting a career. We believe these labs showthat bridging the gap is doable.References[1] For example, see the following web sites: https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Arduino-so-popular https://makezine.com/2011/02/10/why-the-arduino-won-and-why-its-here-to-stay/ https
particularly useful long term. I think making more of the labs like lab 7 could help us prepare for the testing we’ll need to do later on in our careers.” “Let students set up the labs and calibrate equipment themselves.” “In the lower level labs students do not get too much hands on time with the labs. I think it would be better to get the students involved rather than watch a TA run the test.”Comments of this type have been appearing since the beginning of the survey and also on theinitial voice of the student focus groups. However, the number of these comments has decreasedover time. A concerted department wide effort has been made to increase the hands on nature ofall lab courses. Some experiments are easier to make
the instructor during the laboratory day,it appears many students gained insight by being able to generate numbers via an experimentrelated to equations previously applied only to textbook-type problems.Introduction:Laboratory experiences are common in engineering curriculum [1], and examples of realengineering tasks [2] and concepts can help student learning [3]. As stated by Feisel and Rosa[4], a typical goal of a laboratory course is to relate theory and practice. They also mention theadded benefit of students interacting with physical systems, which can be useful in a successfulengineering career where the theory must be applied. If done well, laboratories can assist inhands on skills, problem solving, and analytical thinking [5]. While
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. that are committed to increasing the number of young women pursuing science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers. Currently, Paige is serving as the Immediate Past President for the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN). Paige earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in industrial and systems engineering and B.S. in engineering science and mechanics from Virginia Tech.Kurubel Belay, University of Maryland c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 1Work in Progress: Assessing the Impact of the First Year Summer ExperienceProgram on
, because I work best when I know what Ineed to be doing, my mind is settled, and I am not distracted.” Although Mary intended to solveher distraction problem by studying alone, cutting herself off from others, working ineffectivelywith others, or not attempting her homework alone first, these strategies may have prevented herfrom learning from others what she did not realize she did not know. Mary is able to connecther work as a student broadly to her future career as an engineer when prompted and expresses adesire to use her Industrial Engineering degree to do good in the world. Mary received Bs innon-STEM courses, Ds in engineering and chemistry, and a failing grade in math.Geoffrey: Geoffrey initially had difficulty adjusting to the pace of the
design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 All Games Are Not Created Equally: Differences in How Games Contribute to Learning in EngineeringAbstractReviews of game-based learning literature treat games as a unified
Paper ID #21233But How Do You Feel?Mr. Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College Werner Zorman is the Associate Professor and Annenberg Chair of Leadership at Harvey Mudd Col- lege. Before he joined Harvey Mudd, he was the Associate Director of Leadership Programs at Cornell’s College of Engineering from 2012 to 2016. Mr. Zorman received his M.S. degree in computer science from the University of Technology in Vienna. He worked for 23+ years in the telecom industry in Europe and North America as engineer, leader, mentor, coach and leadership development professional. After a long and fulfilling customer-facing career, Mr
co-directs Project EPIC, an NSF-funded project since 2009 that investigates how members of the public make use of social media during times of mass emergency. Professor Anderson leads the design and implementation of a large-scale data collection and analysis system for that project. Prof. Anderson was a participant in the first cohort of the NCWIT Pacesetters program, a program de- signed to recruit more women to the field of computer science and encourage them to pursue their careers in technology. As part of his Pacesetters efforts, Prof. Anderson led the charge to create a new BA in CS degree at CU that allows students in Arts and Sciences to earn a degree in computer science. This new degree program
instructional strategy that seeks to overcome issues of student conceptual understanding.Dr. Mark Henry Clark, Oregon Institute of Technology After receiving a B.S. in mechanical engineering at Rice University in 1984, Mark Henry Clark decided to pursue a career in the history of technology, earning a Ph.D. in the subject at the University of Delaware in 1992. Since 1996, he has been professor of history at the Oregon Institute of Technology. He has also been a visiting faculty member at the University of Aarhus and the Technical University of Denmark. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Bridging the Gap: A Co-Taught Field Course with Integrated History and Civil
is, paraphrasing myself from above, is to attend to the configuration of the curricula,its particular pedagogical strategies, how they cultivate students’ identity, the nature of theirprograms’ educational cultures, student-teacher relationships, deliberate recruit, career advising,etc. By attending to the entire educational system, and not focusing on discrete “creativity”knowledge chunks, engineering educators are more likely to reliably arrive at robust educationaloutcomes of enhanced student creativity, but then those changes will come at a cost toeducational outcomes currently achieved. Engineering educators may wish to assume there is nofriction between engineering and design educational logics, and hence to define their
interviewed for this analysis, with eachinterview following a semi-structured interview script and lasting approximately 90 minutes.Students volunteered to be interviewed after a brief introduction to the project by the authorsduring the participants’ engineering courses; additional students were invited to participate viasnowball sampling. The students in this analysis represent a diverse array of majors inengineering and lab-based sciences, at all levels of their respective undergraduate careers, avariety of socioeconomic and regional backgrounds, multiple political perspectives, and adistribution of genders (including trans/gender non-conforming students).The interview protocol moved from rapport-building questions, through open-ended
, tours, and social activities thatfacilitated mutual experiences, conversations, and friendships. In between scheduled class andinformal homework sessions, students went together to lunch, where the first author was alsopresent, and participated in dialogues ranging from the class work to career plans, summer travel,generic complaints, and current events. Students had the opportunity to discuss their respectivebackgrounds, interests, goals, aspirations, and challenges with the instructor during class trips,formal dinners at the beginning and end of the course, and small-group dinners. Undoubtedly,the individual student-instructor relationships developed and the learning community establishedand positively influenced learning. Within the
Boulder. He co-directs Project EPIC, an NSF-funded project since 2009 that investigates how members of the public make use of social media during times of mass emergency. Professor Anderson leads the design and implementation of a large-scale data collection and analysis system for that project. Prof. Anderson was a participant in the first cohort of the NCWIT Pacesetters program, a program de- signed to recruit more women to the field of computer science and encourage them to pursue their careers in technology. As part of his Pacesetters efforts, Prof. Anderson led the charge to create a new BA in CS degree at CU that allows students in Arts and Sciences to earn a degree in computer science. This new degree
influence, and thus theability to separate those influences from their own design processes. Here, a social scientific lenson the CAD learning activity can be productively integrated with the more technical approach ofteaching command and strategic CAD knowledge.While all students whose career paths intersect with CAD should gain practical and theoreticalexpertise with relevant CAD platforms, students whose educational experiences and potentialcareers may span different disciplinary domains would benefit by being agile in terms of howthey talk about what they know. In particular, these practitioners need to be able to translate theirpractical expertise and disciplinary understandings into other domains: moving from, say,engineering to design, or
challenges for educators [12].Engineering education scholars Juan Lucena and Jon Leydens suggest incorporating contextualdetail into more traditional technical problems that students are presented with. They proposedoing so by asking traditional technical questions in ways that require students to interrogatepotential circumstances of problems they are given in class [13]. This can be done in ways thatdo not forfeit the technical requirements demanded of an engineer, but rather complementlearning in the classroom to better mirror (and prepare students for) the socio-technical worknecessary for acting as Engineering Changemakers or, simply, for successful careers inengineering.This paper details the first iteration of a module to incorporate
computerengineering elective courses. However, at the very least, exposure to these concepts could helpChE students to better understand and collaborate with other engineers later in their careers. Table 1 – Overview of ModulesExamples of Other 3D Printed Devices Intuitive and disruptive technologies like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, and 3D printing (i.e.,additive manufacturing) have made prototyping and device development easier than ever. Indeed,many scientists have already taken advantage of these technologies to design their own labequipment (see Table 2 for examples), including small centrifuges, syringe pumps, pipettes,thermal cyclers, microscopes that can save images on a smartphone, and many more [1,2].Specialized