nanotechnology fabrication. The virtual SEMis located in a room designated for measurement which also includes a virtual light microscope.Other rooms include a photolithography room, an etching room, and a room for thin filmdeposition. This paper focuses on the SEM module of the VR project.2.0 RationalThe goal of the SEM module is to enable students to become familiar with the features,capabilities, and controls of the SEM in a cost effective, safe, and interactive environment, priorto, or in the place of, using a real SEM. Benefits of using the VR SEM are listed below.Cost effectiveThe VR SEM can negate costs associated with SEM education in the following ways: • Reduces the high energy and material costs of running the SEM continually during
used to troubleshoot the fictitious Arduino blink exercise while he actively modeled his troubleshooting procedure to the unique problem students approached him with. Most of these instructional interventions had durations of under ten minutes and frequently occurred after students attempted to solve the problem on their own for some period of time. These interactions occurred throughout the entirety of the prototyping process with no obvious phase of the project where these episodes were most frequent. With that said, these episodes most often revolved around electronics and programming faults. In our observations, Holmes put in considerable effort to be prepared to help students with the flaws they would likely encounter within
efforts on Mathematics Socialization and identity amongst pre-service elementary teachers, an effort at understanding the reasons for lack of interest in the subject with a view to proffer solution and engender/motivate interest amongst this group that will eventually reflect in their classroom practices. She is currently a Graduate Assistant with UIC Engage, a commu- nity focused project that provides help for less-privileged students from K-8 in mathematics, reading and writing. She continues to work as a substitute teacher occasionally to keep abreast with current practices within the school system. Her work as a Research Assistant for the BEST program has turned out to be one of her best experiences as a
environments in different ways thantheir male peers altering their continued interest in computer science.Personal FactorsPersonal factors such as motivation, sense of belonging, personal fulfillment, and identity caninfluence persistence to degree. Research shows that while these personal factors are unique toeach student, educational environments can be structured or altered to influence some personalattributes in ways that positively impact retention.Motivation can impact how students face and persevere through challenging concepts and coursework. Research using project based computer game development has shown that assignmentscan be structured to facilitate student motivation and encourage them to work through difficultmaterial [13]. Motivational
. Randy Russell. He provides expertise in Out of School Time (OST) programming with student supports and STEM education. Ristvey coordinates each of the teams and lead the design team as well as the work of the advisory board. He has conducted extensive research and development work in STEM OST projects such as Cosmic Chemistry (Institute for Educational Sciences, Department of Education) and NanoExperiences. Ristvey was the PI for three NSF-funded projects: NanoLeap, NanoTeach and NanoExperiences. He also was the lead developer for the Dynamic Design series of engineering modules for NASA’s Genesis mission. He holds a Master’s degree in Secondary Science Education from University of Houston, Clear Lake, TX.Dr. Randy
think-aloud findings24, and resulted in 62 key heuristics articulated aspotential directions for instructional change in instructional settings for organizations. Anexample of an instructional heuristic in this study is negotiate the scope of the project with theclient and create a statement of work upfront, emphasizing the importance of consensus aboutthe expectations of the work ahead of its implementation. However, determining which heuristicswere actually used in practice was beyond the scope of this study.Other studies of instructional design practices show common approaches, with varying researchmethods across a variety of settings and in a variety of instructional design tasks. Visscher-Voerman26 extracted 16 principles demonstrated by
do you spend with organized extracurricular activities (sports, clubs, professional organizations)? • How many hours a week to do spend with work commitments (i.e., part-time job/work-study)? • If you have an assignment or project due in 2 weeks, how far in advance do you usually start? • If you have an exam in 2 weeks, how far in advance do you usually start studying?A group of questions also addressed questions of how students seek help, including in class,through classmates, or through other means. Students have numerous ways to get information,especially with videos and tutorials being posted online for free. These questions helpedinvestigators to better understand what students do more frequently. • How
tutorials around learn or be taught a community-based development project, where the local community was developing as an asset the capacity to operate the project after they left. “we… create nice little teaching videos and hand that over to the community…” Deficit/Weakness Lacks information 22 “I think there’s a mix of people. There are people who really understand what about engineering engineering is, what engineers do, and then there [are] people who have no idea what we do…” Lacks information 21 “I think one of the problems with the public is they have no idea what’s going on, I generally mean, I used, and this isn’t to think I’m a genius
Engineering1 Historically, the undertaking of service projects – engaging marginalized individuals or communities in improving some facet of their lives – has been viewed by many as simply doing ‘nice things for poor people’. […] Showing ‘solidarity with the poor’ and making a human connection are necessary to sustain hope and thus affect change, and are powerful and essential elements in ‘making the world a better place’ 2 [p.6]. -T. Colledge Editor-in-Chief, Int’l Journal for Service-Learning in EngineeringEngineers as “benefactors” to society is a core value of engineering and central to how
university.Prof. H. Tuba Ozkan-Haller, Oregon State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Empowering Faculty and Administrators to Re-Imagine a Socially Just Institution through Use of Critical PedagogiesAbstractOregon State University received an NSF-supported ADVANCE Institutional Transformationaward several years ago. The innovation and core of the project is a 60-hour seminar for STEMfaculty and administrators, most of whom have positional authority. The ADVANCE seminaraddresses the need for ideological and structural changes across the university grounded in anintersectional understanding of identity and social structures. Participants are introduced totheories of systems of
on next generation biofuels and bioproducts and agricultural biotechnology. Current projects examine the management of microbial communities in applications including water treatment, food and energy production, and soil treatment for the control of pests and pathogens. More than $9 million of her ex- tramural funding at UC Davis has been in support of undergraduate and graduate student preparation in engineering. This includes a NSF GK-12 award to improve leadership, communication and collaboration skills, and teaching capabilities in engineering graduate students pursuing research in the areas of renew- able energy, climate change and environmental sustainability. She received her BS degree from Syracuse
a member of the University Research Council before pursuing doctoral studies. Prior to joining ADDU in 2008, Ms. Soledad was a Senior Team Lead for Accenture, where she worked on and managed systems maintenance and enhancement projects.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes
Paper ID #22424Faculty, Student, and Practitioner Initial Conceptions of LeadershipDr. Kenneth Lamb P.E., California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Kenneth is an Associate Professor at Cal Poly Pomona and a licensed Professional Engineer in Nevada with experience working on a variety of water, storm water, and waste water systems projects. He holds degrees from the University of Nevada Las Vegas (BSCE and PhD) and from Norwich University (MCE).Mr. Werner Zorman, Harvey Mudd College Werner Zorman is the Associate Professor and Annenberg Chair of Leadership at Harvey Mudd Col- lege. Before he joined Harvey Mudd, he
vocabulary, and basicin-class activities. Teachers are expected to review these materials and prepare questions to askthe Hk Maker Lab program team during the subsequent virtual workshops. Table 1 provides an overview of the virtual workshop schedule. The teachers and Hk MakerLab project team virtually meet using online conference tools (appear.in, Google Hangout,Skype, etc.) The engineering design process is previewed, providing teachers with theopportunity to ask the program team preliminary questions about the design process. This givesthe program team the opportunity to share their knowledge of the engineering design process,engineering design pedagogy, technical vocabulary, hands-on research, and engineeringexperience. Reciprocally, teachers
for many faculty in improvingundergraduate teaching.IntroductionProviding students with rich and inclusive education is at the heart of any institution. Even inhighly intensive research institutions, the goal of research is arguably to push the boundariesof knowledge and educate others about what is found. As a part of this mission, a major partof student learning is the opportunity to learn. Learning is a process that is active1-3, builds onprior knowledge4, occurs within a social environment5-7, and requires cognitive engagementin the process itself8. Research shows that assessing students in more in-depth ways improvesstudent learning outcomes9; however, assigning a design project or holistic portfolio as anoutcome rather than a scannable
software and systems engineering and technical project management. Tanya taught mathe- matics at the Denver School of Science and Technology, the highest performing high school in Denver Public Schools. She is a PhD student in the School of Education at University of Colorado Boulder studying Learning Sciences and Human Development.Prof. Shelly Lynn Miller, University of Colorado Boulder Shelly Miller joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado at Boulder, as an Assistant Professor in August 1998. Dr. Miller held the distinguished position of Chancellor’s Post- doctoral Fellow, from October 1996 through August 1998. Dr. Miller completed her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering at
specified loads. Create construction pattern or matrix from diverse elements specifications for a project. Key Words: Categorize, compile, create, design, devise, plan, revise, summarize (6) Evaluate: Making judgements about the Example: Critique a proposed design. value of ideas, work products or processes. Justify a novel design or construction technique. Key Words: Assess, conclude critique, judge, justify, validate.The classification scheme developed by Krathwohl and his colleagues
Paper ID #23163Learner Types: A Means to Expand the Definition of Diversity and to Re-design Ethics ModulesDr. Rider W Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and the City’ thematic research cluster for the Center for
2014. He specializes in sustainable technology and policy making from a background in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, working on energy and environmental policy in New York State, and a former life in cellular biology.Dr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. He is also the co-leader of the ’Nano and
first-year undergraduate females in STEM. Her research interests include pre-service science teacher education, curriculum development, STEM identity, and K-12 outdoor science education. She is currently working on research projects focused on diversity in engineering and the retention of women in STEM.Mr. Hector Enrique Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Raised in South Florida, born in Mexico. Half Colombian and half Mexican; proud Mexilombian. H´ector acquired an MS in Computer Engineering and is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education, both from Purdue University. His research interests are in investigating the experiences of LGBTQ+ students in engineering
M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Ms. Mayra S. Artiles
University of Applied Sciences, and he did a second exchange at the Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences in the Fall of 2017. His engineering education interests include collaborating on the Dynamics Concept Inventory, developing model-eliciting activities in mechanical engineering courses, inquiry-based learning in mechanics, and design projects to help promote adapted physical activities. Other professional interests include aviation physiology and biomechanics.Prof. Peter Michael Becker, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Teaching Mechanics in Another Country – Reflections on a ProfessorenaustauschAbstractIn an ever-expanding global economy
’ understanding of the ethics of assisted reproduction, within a social-technicalcontext of multiple human and non-human actors. ANT has also been a very helpful toolfor teaching UVA’s STS 4600: “Engineering Ethics.” Through that course students aresupported in writing their Undergraduate Thesis, from a design project based largely onthe capstone project within their majors. The STS 4600 engineering ethics course guidesstudents to identify a research question related to their capstone project, to incorporatesocial and ethical considerations. For example, as one student wrote, in synthesizing hercapstone project and STS 4600 research [9]: Many of the technologies schools are incorporating in the classroom are merely being used for
, 2018 Design Thinking in Engineering Course DesignAbstractDesign thinking is a robust framework for creatively and effectively identifying and solvingimportant human problems. While design thinking is commonly associated with fields likeindustrial design, it can be applied to many problem types. For example, several recent examplesdemonstrate the applicability of design thinking to the design and development of educationalmaterials, courses, and systems. These results suggest that design thinking could be used as aframework to (re)design and develop effective engineering courses. The goal of this project is tounderstand how nine educators from different backgrounds did or did not use design thinking toredesign a sophomore
a major focus of the ASSIST Engineering Research Center at theuniversity, and they make an excellent source for activities for older students. Students useAdafruit Gemma or Floras, conductive thread, and LEDS to design a pattern of flashing lights oncloth or a headband (such as cat ears near Halloween). Such wearable electronics are easilyavailable and inexpensive for small numbers of students, and research in this area is leading tomedical monitoring applications with life-saving results.Each of the three activity examples discussed above require creativity and collaboration andallow students to approach projects in their own way, key elements of the SciGirls report [2].They are also directly linked to real-world engineering projects that
camp program.The logistics were co-determined by the participating institutions and were based on the planned,annual activities of the experienced outreach organization. The experiences of the US studentcohort mirrored the activities (on a modified timeline) that participating Canadian studentsendured. For this project, we worked within a qualitative research paradigm to explore theelements of the collaboration. Data collection thus far for the project was conducted through twomethods: document analysis and open-ended survey. Document analysis examined the physicalartifacts [9] from the Canadian and US outreach groups, including agenda, program schedules,manuals, curriculum documents, and training materials. Documents were assessed
a nineday period. Each day’s lesson lasted 2 hours, with a total of 18 hours for the entire unit. Fortyseven students participated in the STEAM project over two years. The unit consisted of lessons in neuroscience, sensory impairment, ethics, circuitry, programming Arduino microcontrollers, and the engineering design process. Students then spent the last three days of the unit engaging in the creative process of planning, building, and testing a model of a device that substituted one sense with another (see Appendix A for an outline of the lessons). Two neuroscience lessons involved the discussion of sensory inputs, processing through the central nervous system, and motor outputs. Since the class was multigrade, 7th and 8th grade
form theirideas and create effective proposals. The written responses from the focus groups were based ontwo questions: (1) describe the writing you did in the course and (2) what would you changeabout the writing process for this course? The responses were coded thematically by thoserelated to the scaffold structure of the assignments and those related to the writing process.Based on the 45 students’ written responses at the beginning of the focus groups, almost a third(29%; n=13) of the students felt that they either needed more time between drafts to be able todevelop quality writing or the writing process needed to start earlier in the course. Students saidthe turn around times for different iterations of the scaffolded project were too
Associate in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His teaching spe- cialty is on the topic of Biomedical Engineering Design and Bioinstrumentation and has taken initiative to develop hands-on blended learning based courses on the same topics. His research interest is on global health and engineering and currently working on projects in Honduras, Ethiopia, India and Vietnam. He has received the Recognition Award for Achievement in Global Engaged Scholarship in 2013 through the Wisconsin Without Borders at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the Professor of the Year Award in 2012, through the Biomedical Engineering Society at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and a number of teaching awards
Paper ID #21640Connecting STEM Scholars with Employers WorldwideMelissa Gavin, University of Wisconsin,Platteville After graduating from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Gavin worked for a government research nonprofit and since obtaining her master’s degree has worked for a variety of nonprofits in various roles. Currently, she is the Special Projects Coordinator for the Distance Learning Center at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. Gavin also teaches MEDIA 3010/5010 Business Communication and APC 3300 Technical and Professional Communication.Lisa Naderman, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Lisa Naderman