course in the program is a sophomore levelintroductory course. The course objectives are to provide an introduction to basic computer toolsand an overview of the department. The changes in the curriculum dictated changes in most ofthe department’s engineering courses including the introductory course. The intent of this paperis to discuss the content of the introductory course and how the course emphasizes theinteractions between engineering and biology.I. IntroductionTraditional agricultural engineering programs have always emphasized a strong basicengineering background. This background spans many engineering disciplines including civil,chemical, electrical, and mechanical engineering. As an applied engineering discipline, much ofthe
everyoneinvolved. While much of the lecture material was similar to that presented in the old circuitscourse, one objective was to integrate some electronics and signals material in this first course.The addition of this new material necessitated selective removal of previously-covered circuitsmaterial, i.e. details of transient and phasor analysis, that would now be covered in futurecourses. The decision was made to include more exposure to diodes and to add a significantintroduction to MOS transistors in this first course. An introduction to the Fourier series wasadded to enhance the analysis of simple circuits excited by sinusoids.While the selection and integration of new material was somewhat challenging, much more workwas required to integrate the
maindeliverable and student assessment instrument for the course. The second step is for students toconduct research in the summer as outlined in the proposal.2. Research ProgramThe two-step research program was implemented as part of a curriculum enhancement project inthe Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering. The nanotechnology LINK project, orLearning Integration of New Knowledge, exposes undergraduate students to fundamentalconcepts and applications in nanotechnology, with an emphasis on end-of-life management ofproducts containing nanomaterials. Content is delivered across multiple linked courses (Pierceand Berge, 2014) using active learning pedagogical strategies. To complement and extendstudent learning of nanotechnology, research
Paper ID #21548Active Learning Module Development for At-Risk Learners in EngineeringGraphicsDr. Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech Jeremy V. Ernst is Associate Director of the School of Education at Virginia Tech. He currently serves as the Director of the Office of Educational Research and Outreach and is Program Leader of the Integrative STEM Education graduate program. He is also a Fellow of the Institute for Creativity Arts and Technol- ogy at Virginia Tech. Jeremy specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has
learning and development ofinnovation skills such as integrative learning, teamwork, and problem-solving.Collaborative learning (CL) as an approach to learning has been shown to benefit studentssocially, psychologically, and academically (Laal & Ghodsi, 2011), and as such, incorporatingthis strategy within innovation education may help provide students with richer learningexperiences. Specifically, CL has been found to develop social support for learners, builddiversity in understanding concepts, develop learning communities, increase student self-esteem,reduce student learning anxiety, and promote critical thinking skills, among other benefits (Laal& Ghodsi, 2011; Johnson & Johnson, 1989; Pantiz, 1999). CL is often a key component
implementedcurriculum and the learned curriculum6. Each of these phases is a part of the research and designprocess for curriculum as it is created and used in classrooms. In a similar vein, Kelly examinesthe use of design-based research in education by describing an example of research-basedsoftware development in mathematics education and points to ways engineering educationresearch could adopt design research methodologies5 for iteratively creating and testinginnovative teaching methods. Design has been used in engineering education primarily from the point of view of developingstudents’ abilities as designers and considering their use of design processes in learning to beengineers 7 or from the perspective of design professionals8. We use “design research
audiences. University engineeringprograms can fill this gap to promote their educational programs to youths in their regions. Theycan begin to integrate skill development with their outreach sessions to promote desiredengineering skills, or habits of mind, such as problem solving, collaboration, creativity,communication, ethical considerations, innovative thinking, etc. [3]. Recognizing the importanceof this preparation, the College of Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno coordinatedsummer camp programming for middle and high school students to introduce them toengineering disciplines and get them excited about pursuing an education in this field. TheCollege of Engineering summer camp program primarily focused on exposing students
passion for the engineering profession among students. Theseprograms often adopt engaged pedagogies that integrate technical and non-technical (e.g., ethicsand communication) competencies into the curriculum. A major goal of such an integrativeapproach to engineering education is to present students with a more holistic vision of theengineering profession, and communicate to students that skills necessary for good, responsibleengineering are integrative by nature. Therefore, it is relatively natural that instructors oftenassess the efficacy of these pedagogies in their classes in terms of how these pedagogies affectstudents’ ethical perceptions and the development of their ethical competencies. As a result,some first-year engineering instructors
experience is that students have a more integrated approachto design and a much better understanding of the hardware, software, and instrumentation used inelectrical engineering practice.I. Structure of the laboratory sequenceAn overview of the curriculum revision and the details of the new laboratory sequence have beenpresented previously1. In brief, the Electrical Engineering undergraduate core curriculum modelincludes a total of six 1-quarter hour (3 contact hours/week) laboratory courses during thesophomore and junior years. These courses are designated Lab I (1st quarter sophomore) throughLab VI (3rd quarter junior). The laboratory courses are not tied to a specific lecture course; ratherthey incorporate material from several topic areas within
, this provides us with a good starting point to thinkabout how cases can be effectively integrated in engineering ethics as an instructional method.ConclusionWhile case-based instruction is clearly the most commonly employed method of ethicsinstruction in the engineering curriculum, it is by no means the only method. Other methods ofintegrating ethics into the engineering curriculum include the use of external course work (e.g.,philosophy classes), service-learning projects, team-based senior design course work, and theacross the curriculum approach (integration of ethics in multiple courses throughout theacademic career). However, we know little about whether or not the use of case studies is betterthan the other methods of ethics
observed to have more of an impacton IL rubric scores than students’ previous participation in IL workshops or writing intensivecourses. Results suggest that more practice with higher order skills in context of the engineeringdesign process at additional points during the curriculum may be necessary to enable students toretain these skills. Additional recommendations based on the analysis include making ILrequirements in the Capstone grading rubric more explicit and granular, and combiningengineering subject matter experts and engineering librarians to collectively score students’work. This may be a path to enabling more rubric-based assessments of IL in the engineeringdiscipline.BackgroundMechanical Engineering students at Northeastern University
Paper ID #36529On the Use of Video in Support of a Maritime Robotics STEM OutreachProgramDr. Leigh S McCue, George Mason University Leigh McCue is an Associate Professor and Chair of George Mason University’s Department of Mechan- ical Engineering.Stacey Rathbun, George Mason University Television Stacey is a Senior Producer/Director at George Mason University Television.Dr. Ali Khalid Raz, George Mason University Dr. Ali Raz is an Assistant Professor at George Mason University Systems Engineering and Operations Research department and an Assistant Director of Intelligent Systems and Integration at the C4I and Cyber
’ arechanged in each of the five basic functions to see how the simple functions changes in shape. Ingeneral, it is known that an engineering technology student will use these functions 80% of timein his professional career. So, his understanding of these functions and its x-y plots will helpclarify his understanding of derivatives and integrals of these functions.The input commands for computing the five basic functional values for given values of ‘a’ and‘b’ at ‘x’ are seen in MATLAB Command Window, as shown in Figure 1. The MATLABfunctional (f1, f2, f31, f32, f33, f4, f5) values output are shown in Figure 2. One can change thevalues of parameters 'a', 'b' and 'n' in these functions as well as for the variable 'x' value. Figure 1: MATLAB
received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Mr. Thomas W
A. Pilot Execution WPI conducted a market analysis to determine the The program was launched with an initial cohort ofdemand for SE awareness training. The findings indicated a professionals, graduate students, and corporate trainees.strong need for introductory SE courses, particularly for Marketing strategies included direct outreach to companies,professionals in interdisciplinary roles. Companies expressed social media campaigns, and integration with WPI’s continuinginterest in structured, modular learning that
that the capstone design experience itself is not sufficient for students to develop athorough understanding of the engineering design process [1-3]. There have been numeroussuccessful efforts in exploring efficient methods to integrate engineering design education intothe first year curriculum in undergraduate programs [4-7]. According to Sheri Sheppard andRollie Jenison’s study [8], one of the most important reasons for an increase in design practice atthe freshman level is the “Recognition of Freshman Attrition.” A U.S. Department of Education(DOE) longitudinal study of undergraduate engineering programs pointed out that the retentionrate during the freshman and sophomore years in an engineering program is much lower thanthat during the
environment, it is essential to incorporate appropriatecourses in the engineering curriculum. The current U.S. curriculum does not adequately prepareengineering students to work, manage and communicate effectively with engineers and otherprofessionals around the globe. A study was conducted to evaluate the current status ofengineering education around the globe and the need for updating the curriculum that willprepare U.S. engineering graduates for global work environment. The study included U.S.engineering students, international students currently studying in the USA, engineering studentsfrom outside U.S and engineering faculty for their viewpoints. It appeared that the non-USstudents have better preparation than US students to work in a global
interested in integrating information literacy skills intothe engineering curriculum. This level of integration has not been an easy sell with engineeringfaculty. Overall our results bolster the argument that information seeking and evaluation skillsare important to engineering education, as all respondents mentioned having to do at least someinformation seeking in their on-the-job activities. This study provides us with new information tobring to faculty and administrators that demonstrates the information-seeking activities thatstudents encounter in the workplaceThrough the survey findings and our literature review, we identified when and where studentsare introduced to different information types. Consistent with our previous assumptions
laboratory exercises. ThePartnership Program consists of three parts: 1) instruction at the institutes using a number ofhands-on activities that will be used in the classroom; 2) follow-up activities at the middle andjunior high schools and; 3) evaluation, both during and after the summer institutes.In evaluating Year 1 of the program, several important lessons were learned:• Arkansas Science Curriculum Frameworks are structured with minimal overlap from grade to grade, making it difficult to structure activities that fit equally well in each middle school grade levels.• Despite the imperative to directly align experiments with the Curriculum Frameworks, teachers and students thoroughly enjoyed experiments with an engineering theme.• None
required curriculum in Construction Engineering and Management programs.IntroductionFrom an owner’s perspective, Preconstruction services (PCS) consist of all the work completedon the project from the conception through the contract award. It includes activities such asconceptual design, feasibility studies, preliminary engineering, and many other activities until theconstruction contract is awarded. Capstone courses are offered at most Construction Engineeringand Management programs in order to integrate and apply the knowledge gained during astudent’s academic degree. According to Gehrig et al., capstone courses “are usually structuredin a manner that requires student teams to design construction operational plans for realisticprojects” [1
Engineering Education, 2013 Using Software Engineering Concepts in Game Development - Sharing Experiences of Two InstitutionsKey ConceptSymbiotic collaboration between Software Engineering and Computer Game Developmentstudents at two very different universities improves learning and productivity for all involved.AbstractSoftware requirements engineering plays an important role in software engineering curriculum aswell as other computing curriculum. IEEE and ACM jointly have strong curriculum guidelinesthat emphasize the importance of software engineering, and requirements engineering is one ofthe key areas emphasized in these guidelines. Additionally, system development is important sostudents practice the process - taking
additional applications of FEA. Finite element analysis can be also implemented instatic, transient, or highly dynamic ways. In short, FEA is becoming limited more so by whatapplication one can construct versus the stability and robustness of the tool itself.Teaching finite element analysis encompasses two main efforts within the classroom: 1) themathematical foundation of the finite element method itself, and 2) the proper application of thismethod to engineering problems. Each effort may independently be worthy of a semester-longcourse, yet this is an unreasonable expectation in an undergraduate curriculum. It can either beintroduced with coding such as MATLAB (Mueller, 2003), commercial tools (Kurowski, 2014),or both. However, for undergraduate
Engineering Ethics for First Year Engineering StudentsThis Work-in-Progress paper stems from an NSF-sponsored project in which a series of game-based activities have been developed for the purpose of enhancing instruction in engineeringethics. These activities have been integrated into first year engineering courses on severalcampuses. One of these activities is called Toxic Workplaces. In gameplay, the students arepresented with scenarios that involve ethical dilemmas. Each scenario comes with severalpossible responses. The game involves the student/player attempting to rank these possibleresponses in order of popularity. Thus, players do not necessarily need to take a position on whatthey themselves would do, but rather are attempting to match the
AC 2011-1238: USING ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT COM-MUNICATION AND COLLABORATION SKILLS IN A SPECIAL NEEDSCLASSROOMCarol Shields, Stevens Institute of Technology Carol Shields is a Senior Curriculum and Professional Development Specialist at the Center for Innovation in Science and Engineering Education, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken NJ. Page 22.1.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Using Engineering Activities to Support Communication and Collaboration Skills in a Special Needs ClassroomThe purpose of this paper is to provide a
”. levels. This paper will discuss ways of applying OI 2.0 Working with limited instrumentation and a newly and OI 3.0 in the teacher-student and student-industrydeveloped curriculum, both students and faculty must be directions. An important aspect, as well, is theinherently self motivated and creative in order for them to introduction of department-to-department networking. Inachieve the standards of education expected by our experience, we have encountered that there are moreprospective employers, as well as regulatory institutions. resources (e.g. experts, instruments, special devices)This prerequisite for involvement creates an environment within a particular university, and that
Construction (ID+C) and Operations and Maintenance (O+M) specialties. Additionally, he holds an accreditation with the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI), as a Construction Documents Technologist (CDT).Dr. Hariharan Naganathan, Wentworth Institute of Technology Dr. Hariharan Naganathan, an Assistant Professor of Construction Management at Wentworth Institute of Technology, has made significant contributions to sustainable construction practices through research on energy analytics of buildings and the integration of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) in construction education. As a passionate educator, Dr. Naganathan develops a curriculum that com- bines theoretical knowledge with hands-on AR/VR
integration of software engineering knowledge intothe computer science curriculum, and the earlier introduction of the related skill-set and team-based project experiences. In order to begin addressing these difficulties, we have introduced achallenging and engaging software engineering team project into our first year introductoryprogramming sequence based on the ROBOCODE robotic combat simulator. Programming in theJAVA language, students work on developing a cooperative team of robots that competes in atournament against robotic teams built by their fellow students – teams of students developingteams of robots. Our key goals with this curricular enhancement are: (a) to include softwareengineering education earlier in our program and in a more
for educators [7]-[10]. Concurrently, academicinstitutions are grappling with ethical implications, such as the lack of equitable access to AI, andacademic integrity issues, such as tensions around cheating, that GAI technologies might bring[11]-[13].This work-in-progress paper provides an initial exploration of engineering faculty perspectiveson students' use of AI assistance in homework completion. The research draws upon role identitytheory [14], [15] and activity theory [16] as guiding frameworks. By doing so, the full researchwill uncover the multi-dimensional views of faculty regarding student use of AI, investigatingthe similarities or differences across engineering disciplines and between proponents andopponents of AI assistance in
:23836. Accessed 3 January 2016.11 Bannerot, R, Kastor, R., and Ruchhoeft, P. "Multidisciplinary capstone design at the University ofHouston." Advances in Engineering Education 2.1 (2010): 1-33.12 The Ohio State University, “ME Senior Capstone Sequence Options,”https://mae.osu.edu/undergraduate/mechanical/capstone.13 University of Florida, “ME Curriculum,” http://www.mae.ufl.edu/PDFs/ME-Curriculum.pdf.14 University of Florida, “Integrated Product & Process Design,” http://www.ippd.ufl.edu.15 Carnegie Mellon, “Product Design Course 39-605/606,” http://www.ices.cmu.edu/product-design-course.asp.16 Widmann, J., Laiho, L., and Savage, R. "Initiating and sustaining an interdisciplinary capstone design course."Capstone Design
received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from the University of Illinois, and an M.S.E. in Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences from Princeton. He has been on the faculty in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Penn State since 1984. His research activities are analytical, experimental, and computational, and generally in the areas of aerodynamics, primarily aircraft and wind turbines, and aircraft design, flight mechanics, and stability and control. He has worked on aircraft designs with a number of companies, and has played a key role in the development of winglets for sailplanes and low-speed aircraft. He is actively involved in the American Institute of Aeronautics and