Paper ID #19440Computational Curriculum for MatSE UndergraduatesAlina Kononov, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Alina Kononov is a Ph.D. student in Physics and the computational teaching assistant in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She obtained her S.B. in Physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Her research in the Schleife Group uses time-dependent density functional theory to study charge transfer and secondary electron emission processes during ion irradiation of thin materials.Dr. Pascal Bellon, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
, such as Solid Mechanics, Mechanism Analysis and Design, Mechanical Design, Computer Aided Engineering, etc. Her interests include inno- vative teaching pedagogies for increased retention and student motivation, innovations in non-traditional delivery methods, as well as structured reflective practices throughout the engineering curriculum.Dr. Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University Dr. Benjamin Mertz received his Ph. D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2010 and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2005. He is currently a part of a lecturer team at Arizona State University that focuses on the first-year engineering experience, including
Paper ID #18437Transitioning Students into BAE from a Common First-Year EngineeringCurriculum - A Work in ProgressDr. Alicia A. Modenbach, University of Kentucky Alicia A. Modenbach is a lecturer in the Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Department at the University of Kentucky, 128 C.E. Barnhart Building, Lexington, KY 40546.Dr. Sue E. Nokes, University of Kentucky Dr. Nokes obtained her Ph.D. in Biological and Agricultural Engineering in1990 from North Carolina State University. She has served on the faculty at the University of Kentucky since 1995 in a teaching and research position. Nokes’s research involves
Paper ID #18783Nepantleros and Nepantleras: How Latinx Adolescents Participate in SocialChange in EngineeringDr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, Angelo State University Joel Alejandro Mejia is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Angelo State University. He is interested in research regarding underrepresentation of minority groups in Science, Technology, Engi- neering, and Mathematics (STEM), especially the use of culturally responsive practices in engineering education. He is particularly interested in the use of comprehension strategy instruction in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms; physical and
high-GPA, honors track, or other special categories. It has beendesigned with the goal of transforming typical engineering transfer students into graduatescapable of rapidly assimilating into high performing professional environments. The programdesign was informed by an industry/community needs assessment as well as the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET) standards. Program design addressesleadership, professionalism, and communication skill with equal importance to the engineeringskills. The sets of tools applied include leadership development tools such a personalityassessment, a proprietary strength finder tool, and curriculum tools such as active learningstrategies, learning communities and technical presentation
effective, efficient, and inclusive. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Easing Engineering Transfer Students’ Transitions: Recommendations from Students Who Successfully Navigated the Transfer PathwayI. Introduction In 2012, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology documented theneed to prepare more than 1 million additional STEM professionals in the U.S. workforce overthe next decade. To meet this demand, leveraging the transfer pathway between two-year andfour year institutions is an approach that has garnered increased interest. In addition to adoptingguided pathways model to move students logistically from one
; Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President.2. Didion, C., Fortenberry, N. L., & Cady, E. (2013). Colloquy on Minority Males in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: National Academies Press.3. National Science Foundation, N. C. f. S. a. E. S. (2017). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. Retrieved from Arlington, VA: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd4. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297
Manufacturing Engineer. By providing applications of experiential learning in the exploration ofnew designs that stimulate creativity, Dr. Bairaktarova aims to prepare her students with innova-tive thinking, helping them to face rapidly changing technologies. Ranging from the exploration ofhumanly made objects to the education of her students, she strives to enhance her students’ abilityFALL 2017 15 ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION Thermodynamics in High Rhythms and Rhymes: Creative Ways of Knowing
Paper ID #18015Ethics and Responsible Innovation in Biotechnology Communities: A Peda-gogy of Engaged ScholarshipDr. Joseph R. Herkert, North Carolina State University Joseph R. Herkert, D.Sc., is Associate Professor Emeritus of Science, Technology and Society and a Visiting Scholar in the Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University. He was formerly Lincoln Associate Professor of Ethics and Technology in the Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University (retired May 2015). Herkert has been teaching engineering ethics and science, technology & society courses for
Paper ID #20999Linking facts with judgment: a critical thinking component in introductorycalculus physics for engineering studentsProf. Tak Cheung, CUNY Queensborough Community College Tak Cheung, Ph.D., professor of physics, teaches in CUNY Queensborough Community College. He also conducts research and mentors student research projects.Prof. Vazgen Shekoyan, Queensborough Community College Dr. Vazgen Shekoyan is a professor of physics and his experiences include pedagogy, CubeSat, etc.Dr. sunil Dehipawala, Queensborough Community College Sunil Dehipawala received his B.S. degree from University of Peradeniya in Sri Lanka and
Success in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science, joining UVa in January 2014. Prior to that, she has served in many roles that bridge student affairs and academic affairs including Student Services Specialist and Residence Dean at Stanford University, as well as Hall Director and Interim Area Coordinator for residential academic programs at the University of Colorado-Boulder. She earned her BS in Applied Math from the Missouri University of Science and Technology and her Masters in Education from Grand Valley State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Transfer Student Pathways to Engineering Degrees: An Update on Project FindingsThe President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) documented the needto prepare more than 1 million additional STEM professionals in the U.S. workforce over thenext decade, primarily through efforts focused on increasing retention rates and diversifyingpathways. To meet this need, we must tap the entire domestic talent pool, includingunderrepresented minorities. According to data collected by the National Center for EducationStatistics, 57% of Hispanic students and 52% of African American students in undergraduateeducation during Fall 2014 were enrolled in 2-year public colleges. Given that more ethnic/racialminorities begin their pursuit
using MATLAB/Simulink at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He is currently the advisor for the CPP Hyperloop team, and a co-advisor for the CPP ASHRAE club. He holds an active California PE license.Dr. Paul Morrow Nissenson, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Paul Nissenson (Ph.D. Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, 2009) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He teaches courses in fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and numerical methods. Paul’s research interests are studying the impact of technology in engineering education and computer modeling of atmospheric systems.Dr
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20835Enhance the Effectiveness of Teaching Geotechnical Engineering Courses us-ing Various Design and Analysis ProgramsDr. Lei Wang, University of the District of Columbia Dr. Lei Wang is an assistant professor of civil engineering at the University of the District of Columbia. He received his PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University in 2013. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in California. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Enhance the Effectiveness of
a motivating tool for students to learn toprogram, a new senior-elective course was offered (in spring 2017) to Mechanical Engineering(ME) and Information Systems Technology (IST) majors on our campus, entitled, “Video GameDesign and Development.” This course had a prerequisite of any computer programming course.Course Philosophy, Format & AssignmentsThe course was designed to include both rigorous technical components and “social science”components. The first half of the class took an academic view of video games from a psychologyperspective. Starting with theory and viewpoints such as Koster’s Theory of Fun and Lazzaro’sFour Keys, students engaged in discussion and cited examples. In other upper-level engineeringcourses, discussion
interested in technology-enhanced teaching and in experiential learning for undergraduates in science and engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Summative versus formative assessments in promoting learning of physiology by biomedical engineering students: a comparison of outcomesTesting plays three roles in education. First, it serves a motivational role by holding studentsaccountable for their work.Second, testing serves an assessment function, not only for the purpose of assigning grades(“summative assessment”) but also for providing feedback to students to guide their learning(“formative assessment”). Formative assessment has been broadly defined: “Practice in a
withstudent motivations. However, across the board, current engineering education largely focuses onmastering the engineering sciences with little attention paid to technology transfer orhumanitarian engineering (9). Showing students the connection between social issues andengineering within the curricula may help broaden participation of female and minority students(8; 10). Helping students develop an engineering identity by connecting their personal values tothe practice of engineering can encourage students to persist in engineering (11). In addition,undergraduate engineers should be exposed to the breadth of engineering practice beyondteaching just the fundamental engineering skills (11).This paper describes the motivations of undergraduate
increased from the new courses approach to teaching its core topics. References[1] D. R. S.-M. Dr. Afsaneh Minaie. "Capstone Projects in a Computer Engineering Program Using Arduino," 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, 2016, pp.[2] D. S. G. N. Dr. Jose Antonio Riofrio. "Teaching Undergraduate Introductory Course to Mechatronics in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Using Arduino," 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA, 2013, pp.[3] D. Y. E. Dr. Warren Rosen, Mr. M. Eric Carr. "An Autonomous Arduino-based Racecar for First-Year Engineering Technology Students," 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Indianapolis, IN, 2014
nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural im- pacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable structures, prod- ucts, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Mrs. Tanya D
Paper ID #18470High-Impact, Short-Term Study Abroad in Lyon, France: An EngineeringStudent’s PerspectiveAlexander Kim, North Carolina State University Alex Kim is a Senior studying Chemical Engineering at North Carolina State University. He also serves as President of Musical Empowerment at NC State, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit.Dr. David F. Ollis, North Carolina State University David Ollis is Distinguished University Professor at North Carolina State University. A past chair of the Liberal Education Division of ASEE, he has been sending engineering students to the France IPL program for 15 years. He is co-editor, with Kay Neeley
&M University, Nate specializes in helping faculty increase student engagement through the use of technology and inter- active teaching strategies. He also conducts classroom teaching observations, facilitates a wide range of professional development workshops, and is available for individual or group faculty consultations. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017KHAN ACADEMY STYLE VIDEOS FOR SOPHOMORE TO SENIORAEROSPACE ENGINEERING COURSES (Work in Progress Paper) Khan Academy Style Videos For Sophomore To Senior Aerospace Engineering CoursesAbstractAerospace engineering students frequently encounter difficulty in their upper division coursesbecause the course material is not only
for more than two decades. A strongargument for the use of circuit simulators in the classroom can be found in [3], where the authorsargue the superiority of the ‘learn by doing” approach to teaching circuit analysis. A more recentexample of this teaching paradigm can be found in [4] where circuit simulation software iscombined with Mathcad to permit student interactive experimentation.Incorporation of projects into lecture classes provides an added mechanism to align thecurriculum with the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) programoutcomes. Four of the relevant program outcomes are listed below.• Outcome a: "an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering" The proposed project requires the
enhancesand encourages creativity, independent thinking and proactive self-directed learning (Newell andSimon 1972). An important new mantra in undergraduate engineering education is theentrepreneurship-curriculum approach. In the curriculum approach, technology and appliedengineering education are blended with entrepreneurship for all semesters of study. Traditionaljunior and senior level courses in all walks of engineering learning in the undergraduatecurriculum has traditionally relied on home work, quiz, assignments, exams and projects foradministering the course as well as to assess student performance. Traditional method of learninghas its advantages but has also some major disadvantages. The amount of knowledge retention instudents is a major
Paper ID #20073Lessons Learned in K-12 Engineering Outreach and Their Impact on Pro-gram Planning (Evaluation)Dr. J. Chris Carroll, Saint Louis University Dr. Carroll is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Saint Louis University. His experimental research interests focus on reinforced and prestressed concrete, while his engineering education research interests focus on experiential learning at both the university and K-12 levels. Dr. Carroll serves as a voting member on ACI Committee S802 - Teaching Methods and Educational Materials and is Chair of the Career Guidance Committee for the ASCE
nebulous “fuzzy”front end and ‘wicked problem’ area of design and development when the outcomes are more unclear.10Engineering Design ProcessLike the disciplines in the design field, the engineering field also has its own variations on the approachesto the design process; there is agreement within the community about what the engineering design processencompasses at a high-level, however many variations exist.Engineering students across the nation are familiar with the Engineering Design Process, as it is aninfluential process in industry and thus a notable part of any accredited engineering curriculum, as manyreaders will know. ABET (The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) has articulatedseven student learning outcomes that are
from Memorial University. Her research interests include exploring STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) education through co- curricular and non-formal learning experiences, and investigating the equity and accessibility of STEM and post-secondary education.Ms. Kirstin Newfield, University of Toronto Kirstin is a PhD candidate in the Civil Engineering Department at the University of Toronto and a part of the Collaborative Program in Engineering Education. Kirstin previously received a MASc in Civil Engineering at the University of Toronto and a BASc in Geological Engineering at Queen’s University.Mrs. Narges Balouchestani Asli, University of Toronto Narges Balouchestani-Asli holds an M.A.Sc. in
., Cappel, J.J., “Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study”, Journal of Information [4] Slomanson, W. R., “Blended Learning: A Flipped Classroom Technology Education, Vol. 5, 2006, pp.201 – 219. Experiment At the Lectern”, Journal of Legal Education, Vol. [21] Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K., “Learning and Teaching Styles 64, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 93 – 102. in Engineering Education”, Engineering Education, 78(7), [5] Roach, T., “Student perceptions
indication the student’s motivation. Design Projects for the First Year Engineering Experience,” 6th FirstThe statements given in our survey were: Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, August 7-8,• Enjoyment: I enjoyed working on this activity. College Station, TX.• Value: The concepts I learned while working on this [2] Hargather, C. Z., 2014, “Re-design of an Inter-Disciplinary First-Year activity will be of value to me. Introduction to Engineering Course Focusing on Active Learning and Regarding 'Enjoyment,' as can be seen from Fig. 12 and Technology in the Classroom,” 6th First Year Engineeringconsidering all
, the cumulative GPAs (Table IV) for HOME over the country. The HOME Program is a 5-1/2-week resi-students ranged from 3.03 to 3.53 as compared to 2.23 to dential bridge program, for incoming freshmen engineering3.1 for non-HOME Program students. For future study, and computer science students. This recruitment and reten-the authors recommend evaluations at regular intervals tion program seeks to attract and retain high achieving stu-with validated instruments as well as a longitudinal study. dents in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). While most bridge programs focus on providing re-Index Terms – College readiness
Paper ID #19839Assessment of Student Learning in Undergraduate Engineering Courses Us-ing Quizzes In Lieu of HomeworkDr. James H. Allen III, University of Evansville Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Evansville in Evansville, IN.Dr. Jared Fulcher, University of Evansville Dr. Fulcher is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Evansville. He is faculty adviser of the student chapter of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) and faculty adviser to the UE SAE Baja Design Team. He is also the faculty adviser of Tau Delta Kappa, the University of Evansville