- St. Louis Section. He has eight years of formal experience with K-12 engineering education.Dr. Shannon M. Sipes, Indiana University Shannon M. Sipes is an instructional consultant in the Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning at IU. In this role she provides professional development and individual consultation services for faculty with questions regarding their own teaching and student learning. Prior to her current role, she has served as the director of assessment helping faculty members with SOTL projects and classroom assessment. Shannon holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in psychology and a Ph.D. in curriculum and instruction with a focus on higher education.Mr. Jacob W. Benton, Primoris Services Corporation
she played 2 years of women’s basketball at Bevill State Community College in Fayette AL and her last 2 years at the University of West Georgia in Carrollton GA. She was a 4 year Academic All American.Dr. Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University Sarah Lee joined the faculty at Mississippi State University (MSU) after a 19 year information technology career at FedEx Corporation. As an assistant clinical professor and Assistant Department Head in the Computer Science and Engineering Department, she is co-founder and co-director of the Bulldog Bytes program at MSU that engages K-12 students with computing and provides professional development to K-12 teachers in computer science and cybersecurity. She is the PI for the
- tors of in-person, online, and hybrid format classes. Melissa continues to serve as a teaching consultant with CTL and focuses on projects relating to equity. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Revolutionizing Grading: Implications on Power, Agency, and EquityAbstractEven as we integrate inclusive teaching strategies and course design, the philosophy andimplementation of grading continues to be a large source of inequity in higher education. Gradessignal to students whether they belong within a course or degree major and dictate access toacademic and career opportunities. Consequently, even in a classroom
somewhat between academic semesters as enrollment inclasses shifted. Students participated as many semesters as they desired, and many remained withone project for a full year to several years.Procedures We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 69 team members, comprisingthe majority of the 77 team members total. Interviews averaged about an hour (range: 28:04- to1:11:49, mean=M = 52:47 minutes). The interview protocol contained questions about the team’sproject and goals, specific decisions and considerations that were made, and the role of ethics ingeneral and specific to the project. Follow-up and probing questions were offered to expand onthese descriptions or ask about specific instances observed during design team
Neuroscience 101: Might Your Teaching and Their Learning Benefit?AbstractThis paper’s purpose is to explore the idea that if faculty members acquire significantknowledge of brain basics, much of which has been discovered and/or documented in thepast few decades, they can be even better teachers. They can use that knowledge toimprove student advising -- show students how to be more effective and efficient -- and,when opportunities arise, enable students to achieve higher levels of creativity andinnovation.The presentation begins with a summary of brain features and functions, not at a brain-surgery level of detail, but rather from the perspective of immediate application outsideof medicine and inside of engineering education. Building on
very clear in its messaging about balancinginstitutional strengths in teaching, research, and engaged scholarship, but how this translated intoactual policies, systems, and decisions regarding promotion was strategically left ambiguous toallow for flexibility in interpretation over time. Strategic ambiguity had enabled MU to maintaingrowth without doing the difficult work of exploring whether the existing promotion system wasworking to support and recognize faculty members’ diverse strengths in teaching, research, andcommunity-engaged work. The COACHE survey data, however, pointed to weaknesses in thisapproach and ushered in an intense period of negotiation.In this section, we will show how the process of negotiation involved three
campus, were important in the major selection process.To focus exclusively on which factors affect students’ aspirations to study chemical engineeringneglects the bulk of the process that produces chemical engineering graduates. For example, thereare many points in their academic careers that women may choose to enter or exit a chemicalengineering program. The problem of attrition in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) more broadly has been widely studied. The most famous study is theethnographic study conducted by Seymour and colleagues that investigated reasons why studentschoose to leave STEM. One of the most cited reasons for leaving STEM in the original study waspoor teaching in STEM courses; this remained true in the
sharing their thoughts.3.0 Departmental DEI CommitteeThe CEE Department instituted a DEI Committee in the summer of 2020 to develop a strategicplan for DEI. In addition to faculty and staff who typically comprise departmental committees,graduate and undergraduate students were asked to join the committee so that all communitymembers are represented. Volunteers from each of the community groups were sought to ensurethat committee members were deeply committed to and interested in the cause. Since creation,the committee has been meeting on a weekly basis to develop the strategic plan, discuss ideas forimproving DEI in the community, and plan events and other actions to promote DEI.The goal of the DEI strategic plan is to create a diverse, equitable
Paper ID #29158Incorporating Practical Computing Skills into a Supplemental CS2Problem Solving CourseProf. Margaret Ellis, Virginia Tech Assistant Professor of Practice, Computer Science Department, Virginia Tech My research interests include examining ways to improve engineering educational environments to facil- itate student success, especially among underrepresented groups.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Acting Vice Provost for Learning Systems Innovation and Effectiveness, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educational
careers, as engineering educators we must also concern ourselves with how studentslearn to see themselves in a global context. Students increasingly seek out short-term globalexperiences, with a majority of U.S. students now participating in programs less than 8 weeks induration [10], a trend that has sparked a corresponding focus in the international educationliterature. A short-term study abroad experience linked to a global engineering course at our owninstitution has become the fastest-growing and largest faculty-led program. Research on theRising Sophomore Abroad Program (RSAP) has accelerated in the last three years and informedcourse redesign. Rapid growth and ongoing assessment research has created an opportunity whencombined with new
Support for Blind or Low-Vision (BLV) Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) LearnersAbstractThere is a growing, yet relatively limited body of research exploring the experiences of learnerswith disabilities in introductory electrical and computer engineering (ECE) education. With theproven importance of introductory ECE education in influencing students’ undergraduateinterests and future career prospects in technology, the inaccessibility of the field to learners withdisabilities poses an inequitable access barrier that further marginalizes these learners, oftenpreventing them from exploring the field in the first place. In particular, as ECE largely relies onvisual cues for designing, building, testing, and debugging
Interdisci- plinary Engineering, all from Texas A&M University. With research interests rooted in engineering education, the learning styles of engineering students in par- ticular, Shannon’s tenure at Texas A&M is and has been rooted in the mentoring of both undergraduate and graduate students. Currently an advisor for the Texas A&M National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) Chapter and an active member of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated, a service organiza- tion, Shannon is no stranger to mission and vision of the academic excellence and cultural responsibility.Ahmarlay Myint, Texas A&M University Ahmarlay Myint is a doctoral student in Higher Education Administration.Dr. Maria Claudia Alves
each week in an n-of-1 big data approach. This approach hasthe empirical benefit of allowing more inclusive and personalized analyses to draw conclusions. Byobserving the requirements of an approved IRB protocol, the analysis based on the transcripts ofthe video recordings, and the examination of change within each individual over time wasconfidential and conducted with de-identified data. Video recordings are coded and analyzed usingHyperRESEARCHTM version 3.7.5.The result calibrates students’ comprehension, integration, and application of impactful, data-driven research skills. The metacognitive development portion examines the influence anddynamics of anticipatory cognition, stereotype threat, identity, and academic self-efficacy as
the data" (p.56). However, engineers are often more familiar with quantitative methods and summarizingtheir findings using numbers [2], which substantially limits the use of qualitative methods.According to Jackson, Drummond, & Camara [3], the goal of qualitative research involves"understanding human beings' richly textured experiences and reflections about thoseexperiences" (p. 22). As engineers have become familiar with qualitative methodologies [1-2],researchers have begun to explore different types of approaches to illuminate the humanexperience. It is clear that different engineers, engineering students, and engineering facultyexperience their education and careers differently, which modern studies have only begun todescribe [4-6
regional campuses, nor are they reported to the central campus. The objective of the first-year engineering curriculum is to provide an opportunity for students to explore engineering disciplines so that students can make informed decisions about their careers. So, these two courses achieve the goal of training these students for their second year of the degree program.5. Role of Administration: It was noted earlier that the regional campuses get limited funding to run the campus businesses. However, there is a process of submitting a budget to the central campus. Engineering coordinators submit the budget each year to the fiscal office. The purchases made for the lab supplies and equipment have to go through the university
elements withinthe system, connected by lines that represent a variety of relationships. Given its usefulness inunderstanding intricate systems, it should be helpful in mapping the engineering educationprocess. A huge number of factors affect the education of new engineers. From elementaryschool to graduate school, students are exposed to STEM curriculum, experiential learning,career development, and other external factors that contribute to them becoming an engineer.Having a systemogram that compiles this information could be used by students, teachers,professors, and administrators to refine the system for everyone’s benefit. The systemogram ofthe engineering education system is shown below in Figure 6.Figure 6: Systemogram of student flow
mentors,● The introductory CS courses had many students with although they are much more advanced academically. programming experience, and thus were not true beginner Most of the PINC mentors had no prior mentoring classes; (imposter syndrome) experience. In order to train these peer and near-peer mentors effectively and efficiently, we implemented a● They were the only one (or one of a few) women and/or series of monthly workshops facilitated by a PINC faculty URM student(s) in the room; (stereotype threat) member. The overall number of mentors was small (i.e
of online delivery of en- gineering content with emphasis on how the material can be modified to provide a personalized learning experience. LaMeres is also researching strategies to improve student engagement and how they can be used to improve diversity within engineering. LaMeres received his Ph.D. from the University of Col- orado, Boulder. He has published over 90 manuscripts and 5 textbooks in the area of digital systems and engineering education. LaMeres has also been granted 13 US patents in the area of digital signal propa- gation. LaMeres is a member of ASEE, a Senior Member of IEEE, and a registered Professional Engineer in the States of Montana and Colorado. Prior to joining the MSU faculty, LaMeres
institution, our annual career fair is characterized by a number oflarge companies that recruit every year. Both employers and students hope thisrelationship will continue.However, even students who are satisfied with the best positions and careers generallyavailable can benefit from the skills of an entrepreneur, that person who is not satisfiedwith what is and wants instead to bring some different vision to life. As we continue torefine our negotiations assignment, we hope to contribute to the development of theEngineer of 202015: engineers who exhibit “practical ingenuity,” “skill in planning,combining, and adapting” (54-55); creativity, that “indispensible quality forengineering” (55); good communication, the “ability to listen effectively as
Paper ID #39294Someone Like You: Theorizing LGBTQ Participation in Engineering throughNetwork Homophily and State AuthenticityDr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University, Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration
between gender groups.There are two parts of this study: an online survey and an interview. Engineering undergraduatesare recruited for participation, and questions are designed to gage students’ 3D printing experience,frequency, and habits, including the intended use of printed items. Students are also asked toidentify their response to printing failures, along with their use of in-person and online resourcesfor troubleshooting. Student demographics are also recorded. In interviews, participants are askedin detail about each item in their online print history. Survey results are paired with in-personinterview responses.Research results will inform future work in addressing barriers that affect students, including 3Dprinting training, makerspace
, including high school students, undergraduate and graduate students, and practicing engineers and scientists • Regular opportunities through middle school and high school to reconnect with program peers and role models at reunions, as a staff member, or through other university programsFrom the perspectives of Camp Reach participants in one study (Demetry & Sontgerath, 2013),the program elements with the most lasting positive impact were returning to the program as astaff member, the prevalence of role models, and the teamwork infused in all activities.The selection of Camp Reach participants was designed to enable creation and tracking of aControl group. The application requires only an essay; no measures
he earned an Associate of Science Degree in Engineering Science in 2015. While at Hudson Valley, he was on the President’s List twice, a member of Phi Theta Kappa, and was on the HVCC Baseball Team. Malcolm transferred to RPI after completing his degree at HVCC. At RPI, Malcolm earned a Bachelor of Science degree in 2017 in Mechanical Engineering before beginning his graduate studies during which he earned a Master of Engineering degree in Mechanical Engineering in 2019. Throughout his time at RPI, Malcolm has been involved with the Track & Field program, first as a student athlete and later as an assistant coach. He was a champion of the hammer throw at the 2018 Liberty League Outdoor Championship. In
Paper ID #19667Engaging Engineers in Inclusive Cultural Change Through a New Method,Articulating a Succinct DescriptionEmily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow is an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. She is involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of Engineering ranging from student support programs, faculty bias awareness trainings, and inclusive cultural change. She is a recent Industrial and Systems Engineering graduate from Ohio State University, where she was also very involved with
, acontextualized international development project partnering with UNHCR Zambia that the students workon remotely from on campus as part of their curriculum, an extra-curricular design project workinginternationally on a development project with a partner community and a design project based studyabroad project in a developing country. Through this we hope to understand the relative importance ofinternational experience to becoming a globally competent engineer and can students gain a reasonablelevel of competence through introducing global perspectives into their classroom or do they need to travelabroad?IntroductionEngineering student’s ability to graduate and work in an increasingly global engineering marketplace isfundamental to their future success
day of the event, setup begins three hours before the start of the first session.Immediately following the event, the location is secured for the following year. Figure 5: Timeline for event planning, preparation, and implementation. The person (Faculty sponsor, SWE members, or administrative assistant) responsible for each activity is denoted. Most activities begin approximately three (3) months prior to the date of the event.Funding and supportThe program started in 2013 and was funded, in part, from an NSF S-STEM grant, as well asdepartmental funds and donations. In the beginning, the demand was unknown, and the eventwas kept small with very little cost. Each year, donations are solicited from local engineeringindustry (e.g. John
seeming onerous or impossible, and steer clear of unnecessary social and personal triggers.Developing such a curriculum, enabling students to see a direct application to their lives increasesmotivation and fosters interaction. Such inclusion of students’ lives can help to break down racialand gender barriers regarding students’ beliefs about who can be a data or computer scientist.NJ is at a crossroads with K-12 Computer Science Education. The state is still developing itscomputer science education standards and outlining required faculty expertise for school districts,making the student and teacher experience variable across the region and even within districts.While many faculty are taking advantage of services and opportunities from
of People and Culture at Hopelab). Over 150people attended our MMW conference via Zoom. The panels of judges, BC faculty, staff, andparents, and students provided enthusiastic feedback about the event. While it would have beenfabulous to hold this conference in person, we acknowledge that the remote environment didallow for family members and friends outside of Boston to fully participate.Experimenting with reflection. Weekly evening reflection sessions provided students anopportunity to integrate course content into peer-led discussions about their own moral andethical development. We developed a curriculum that translates Ignatian reflection activities (e.g.the Examen) to a Zoom format. We also adopted BC’s innovative PODs (Purposeful
Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER award for work on learner-centric, adaptive cyber- tools and cyber-environments. He was one of 49 faculty members selected as the nation’s top engineering educators and researchers by the US National Academy of Engineering to the Frontiers in Engineering Education symposium. Dr. Madhavan leads a major NSF funded effort called Deep Insights Anytime, Anywhere (DIA2) that attempts to characterize the impact of NSF and other federal investments in the area of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education using interactive knowledge mining and visual analytics for non-experts in data mining. DIA2 is currently deployed inside the NSF and is already starting to affect federal
, and issues of power in STEM education discourse. He is also an Anthropology doctoral candidate at the University of Cape Town, where he was previously awarded a Master’s degree. His dissertation research is focused on exploring the ethical becoming of architecture students within courses utilizing community-engaged pedagogies.Dr. Justin L Hess, Purdue University Dr. Justin L Hess is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Hess’s research interests include exploring empathy’s functional role in engineering; advancing the state of the art of engineering ethics instruction; and evaluating learning in the spaces of design, ethics, and sustainability. Justin received