. Scholar. Dr. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in September 1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design and manufacturing, in addition to a teaching laboratory for prototyping, reverse engineering measurements, and testing. During his academic career, Dr. Wood was a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the United States Air Force Academy. Through 2011, Dr. Wood was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Design & Manufacturing Division at The University of Texas at Austin. He was a National Science Foundation Young Investigator, the ”Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in Engineering,” ”Uni- versity Distinguished Teaching
program because in this framework students are led to view the coursecontents as unconnected pieces. Thus, students lack the understanding of how theseunconnected course materials build on each other to form the core knowledge expected of acompetent electrical engineer. This lack of understanding manifests itself in low studentmotivation, interest, and knowledge regarding the discipline. Furthermore, it results in studentsperceiving a lack of value and career opportunities relative to the amount of effort required togo through the program [1]-[4]. As a result, attrition rates in engineering departments havebeen higher than expected. For example, the number of American students earning bachelor’sdegrees increased by 16% over the past 10 years
associated with teachingthe course include consistency across sections as well as limited teaching experience among newinstructors.As additional context, the College uses the framework of the “World-Class Engineer,” which wasdeveloped within the Leonhard Center. This framework is used as a set of guiding principles forstudents on what to strive for in their undergraduate path and into their careers and is often usedin strategic planning by the College. The attributes of the World-Class Engineer include solidlygrounded, technically broad, globally engaged, ethical, innovative, excellent collaborators, andvisionary leaders. This framework is relevant to this study as it served as the foundation for someof the instructional changes made within the
approachin preparing graduates for engineering careers is to require students to attend classes, listen toinstructor’s lectures explaining the basic theories and concepts related to the subject; and observeor participate in solving example problems during lectures. Students are also asked to read thecontent of the required textbook describing the theories and concepts.Textbooks used in undergraduate engineering course cover basic concepts and theories in eachchapter and provide several example problems to help students gain a better understanding of thetheory and engineering applications. At the end of each chapter, textbooks frequently include alarge set of problems to be used as homework assignments. The purpose of homework is forstudents to gain
influence of students’ individual characteristics(e.g., personality, prior knowledge, values, motivations) on their interpretation of theirexperiences and subsequent understanding or perspective shifts [8]. Further, student decisions toengage in global activities after returning from a global experience can increase the long-terminfluence of the global program on their attitudes and career plans [9]. These studies suggest thatalthough the structure and components of global programs can influence program outcomes,there can still be different pathways for students who have the same experience. As argued byStreitwieser and Light, global education research has often focused only on aggregate programoutcomes and not individual student experiences, but
general, the commentswere focused primarily on Contributing and secondarily on Having Related Knowledge, Skills,and Abilities; not all five CATME dimensions. However, when detailed comments are given,they often provide additional insights into peer ratings and explanations for the CATMEexception codes. These insights into team functional or dysfunctional behavior provideinformation to the instructor that goes well beyond what can be obtained from the peer ratingsalone.1. IntroductionWorking in teams is widely viewed as a key skill for having a successful career. However,effective team behavior does not necessarily come naturally to many students. In engineeringeducation, developing teamwork and communication skills, among other things, are
. He has taught courses focused on first-year engineering students, materials science and engineering, en- gineering design, systems thinking and engineering leadership. He has a PhD in Polymer, Fiber Science from Clemson University. His research background is in the synthesis of polymer nanocomposites and engineering education. He was trained as a Manufacturing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven-year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Convergent Approaches for Developing Engineering Leadership in UndergraduatesAbstractHere we describe a shared approach to engineering
IntroductionEvery measurable quantity in the physical sciences is a tensor. Mass, distance, time, position,velocity, acceleration, momentum, force, torque, work, energy, pressure, charge, the electric andmagnetic fields, temperature, heat, entropy, stress, strain, moment of inertia, curvature—these areall tensor quantities. Every time we write down an equation, perform a calculation, take ameasurement, run a simulation, or perform an experiment, we are dealing with tensors in one wayor another. Indeed, the very laws that govern the universe are most conveniently formulated astensor differential equations. It is therefore no exaggeration to say that, as scientists andengineers, we work with tensors on a day-to-day basis throughout our entire careers. And so
solution’ when the research paper is completed.The new instructions for the research paper project and presentation are given in Figure 2 andthese deliverables are due during the last week of the quarter. The text narration in the newinstructions came mostly from the KEEN framework, depicted in Figure 1. The narrative wasadapted to fit the course description and content of EE 463. The research project intends toincrease students’ development of entrepreneurial skills to further their career in engineeringwhile understanding research trends in communications.Research Paper and Presentation Based on Author’s Air Force ExperienceThe idea of the project was based the one of the author’s Air Force experience during his twenty-six years in managing
. However, some items still needed to be cut, as thegoal of piloting these two surveys was to shorten them and combine them in to one. As a result,we looked back to interview data gathered previously [11] and determined that the best items tocut were 'My family sees me as a SCIENTIST' and 'Others ask me for help with SCIENCE'. Thefirst was cut due to statements from students that, as they became increasingly specialized intheir graduate careers, their families were less familiar with the work they were doing and theylooked to them less often for recognition and approval. The second was cut to maximizeparsimony, as it potentially conflated 'recognition' with 'performance/competence' and there wasalready an adequate number of 'recognition
the author of several technical publications, including 17 journal papers and two book chapters. She received an NSF CAREER award in 2014. Dr. Marais has worked in engineering for two decades, first in industry and then in academia. She holds a B. Eng. in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from the University of Stellenbosch, a B.Sc. in Mathematics from the University of South Africa, and an S.M and Ph.D. from the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT.Hanxi Sun, Purdue University Hanxi Sun is a Ph.D. candidate at the Department of Statistics of Purdue University. Her research focuses on nonparametric Bayesian statistics and applied statistics. Hanxi received a master degree in Statistics at
Paper ID #23589Development of an Introduction to Circuits Course and Lab for MechanicalEngineering Students via Systematic Design of InstructionDr. Grant Crawford, Quinnipiac University Grant Crawford, PhD, P.E., Colonel (retired) U.S. Army, is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of Career Development for the School of Engineering at Quinnipiac University. He is the former Director of the Mechanical Engineering Program at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. Grant graduated from West Point in 1985 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Me- chanical Engineering. He earned a M.S. degree
scientific writing support, and then describe our activity including asummary of possible benefits and challenges. We conclude in section 5 with some thoughts onhow we see our program developing in the future, and also with a summary of our impressionson the usefulness of this learning community initiative to provide scientific writing support toengineering graduate students.2 Engineering graduate students and scientific writing2.1 The importance of scientific writing for engineering graduate studentsGraduate students must share the results of their research, mainly by writing and publishingscientific papers, in order to disseminate their ideas and begin the path to a successful career, beit in academia or industry. Studies have shown that
and potential collaborationbetween engineering librarians and mechanical engineering faculty. For the course in this study,the plan for next year will be to use these instructional activities again. It also has started thediscussion of where additional library collaboration earlier in the mechanical engineeringprogram would be appropriate and beneficial. This additional exposure and training will buildfamiliarity with information fluency skills, which may be perceived as difficult, but are essentialin the professional environment.Works Cited[1] G. Kerins, “Information seeking and students studying for professional careers: The cases of engineering and law students in Ireland,” Inf. Res. Int. Electron. J., vol. 10, no. 1, Oct. 2004.[2] S
U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at Delhi College of Engineering.Dr. Aqdas Malik, George Mason University Aqdas Malik is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Information Sciences and Tech- nology, George Mason University. His multidisciplinary academic and industry experience spans two key disciplines: Human-Computer Interaction and Social Media Communication and Analytics. He is currently engaged in a
fromtheir disciplines, they also develop and apply professional skills important to team functioning,which will translate to their future careers. The large-scale, long-term projects mirror situationsstudents will encounter in the workforce. As they join large ongoing projects, they are onboardedby peers, but also take responsibility for their own learning as they get up to speed. They dealwith decisions made in previous years and with documentation developed by others; conversely,their own documentation becomes a resource for the team. They also learn and apply professionalcommunication skills, communicating problems to the appropriate individuals and navigatingconflict. 6. Multi-disciplinary teams are encouraged but not required. Multi
. One thousand and eighty-four responses were collected; 520 collected betweenweeks 1 and 3; 222 responses between weeks 4 and 6; and 342 responses collected betweenweeks 7-9. The average participation rate across the clases for participation in at least one of thefeedback commenting opportunities was 66.3%.Data were collected roughly every 3rd week on different topics. In week one students providedpersonal information about their styles of learning and engineering interests. Every weekstudents provided ‘Muddiest Point’ feedback about the concepts and content they werestruggling with [4]. Additional feedback responses were collected about exams and quizzes, thelab section of the course, career planning and goals, and end of semester comments
Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross
faculty member at Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering educa- tion. While at Oklahoma State, he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Founda- tion, he took a chair position in electrical engineering at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Dr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial
. Therefore,the student responses to course evaluations conducted during the fourth and fifteenth week of thesemester may be influenced by both a sense of “maturity” (i.e., Seniors who have participated innumerous courses with a variety of different instructor types) as well as a sense of “apathy” (i.e.,Senior slide before Spring Graduation and subsequent career placement).Table 1. Demographics of a total of 79 students enrolled in three course offerings of “PublicHealth for Environmental Engineers” in the Spring semester of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Spring 2016 Spring 2017 Spring 2018 N = 22 N = 28 N = 29
the Engineering Education framework. Recently, he received the Early Career Researcher Award from European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) in 2017. In addition, he is one of two scholarship recipients awarded by National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST) to attend the ESERA summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. He has also been named as Jhumki Basu ence in Cesk´ Scholar by the NARST in 2014. Additional projects involvement include: PictureSTEM, STEM+C, Engineering is Elementary (EiE); Rocket Project; World MOON Project; and Robotics. He can be reached at iyeter@purdue.edu.Dr. Monica E. Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette
overall student learning?The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has observed that its mission toimprove “the understanding and application of science, engineering, and medicine toward thesocial, economic, and cultural well-being of the nation and planet” requires collaboration with thearts and humanities. NASEM is overseeing the publication of a consensus report examiningevidence for the assertion “that educational programs that mutually integrate” artistic andhumanistic learning with STEM learning lead to improved educational and career outcomes forstudents. In addition to examining “new models and good practices for mutual integration” ofhumanities, arts, and STEM, the report –expected to be published later this year
cognition about cognitive phenomena” (Flavell, 1979, p. 906), is ahigher-order thinking skill and is key to developing life-long learning skills necessary for ABETand for an effective work career. Despite the critical role that metacognition plays in engineeringeducation, surprisingly, it is rarely integrated into the curricula of engineering programs (Redish& Smith, 2008).1 National Science Foundation, Improving Undergraduate STEM Education grant 15043632 ABET, Inc., is in the process of changing some student outcomes required for accreditation. The new languageproposed for the current “lifelong learning” criterion is: An ability to recognize the ongoing need to acquire newknowledge, to choose appropriate learning strategies, and to apply this
important problems at the interface between chemistry, physics, engi- neering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers in academe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she devotes significant time developing and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of undergraduate courses to train engineers who are critical thinkers, problem solvers, and able to understand the societal contexts in which they are working to addressing the grand challenges of the 21st century. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Peer Review and Reflection in Engineering Labs: Writing to Learn and Learning to WriteAbstractClear
Vehicle Research Institute operates as a technology development center that provides undergradu- ate students with opportunities for career specific training and research. Funding comes from a variety of sources including the Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, EPA, Paul Allen Family Foundation, BP, Washington State Department of Agriculture, Whatcom Public Utility District, Boeing, Janicki Industries, Northwest Porsche Club, Danner Corp. and Fluke. Past supporters include the De- partment of Defense, Fuji Heavy Industries (Subaru), PACCAR, Mazda, Ford, Bentley (parent company Audi), Alcoa, Conoco-Phillips, CNG Fuels of Canada, Chrysler, and DaimlerChrysler. c American Society
,” PBS Online News Hour, 24-Dec-1999.[2] Bay, Susan, “Review of I Is an Other,” Leg. Comm Rhetor., vol. 11, pp. 189–194, 2014.[3] Bowdle, Brian F.; Gentner, Dedre, “The Career of Metaphor,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 193–216, 2005.[4] Nilsson, Tonya Lynn, “Why Am I Learning This? Using Everyday Examples in Engineering to Engage Female (And Male) Students in the Classroom,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, 2014.[5] Homolka, Robert; Stephens, Greg, “A Triple Play: Mathematics, Baseball, and Storytelling,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, 2010.[6] Magana, Alejandra; et al., “Scaffolding Student’s Conceptions Of Proportional Size And Scale Cognition With Analogies And
Florida Patrice M. Buzzanell is Chair and Professor of the Department of Communication at the University of South Florida. A Fellow of the International Communication Association (ICA), she has served as Pres- ident of ICA, the Council of Communication Associations (CCA), and the Organization for the Study of Communication, Language and Gender (OSCLG). She became a Distinguished Scholar of the Na- tional Communication Association (NCA) in 2017. Her research focuses on career, work-life policy, resilience, gender, and engineering design in micro-macro contexts. She has published: 4 edited books; 200 journal articles, chapters, and encyclopedia entries; and numerous engineering education and other proceedings. She