of the inherentlyphilosophical character of engineering, philosophy may actually function as a means to greaterengineering self-understanding. This paper argues that academic programmes could usefullyinclude a module on ‘Philosophy in Engineering’ in the undergraduate engineering curriculum toprovide that enhanced self-understanding, and in turn to relate that understanding to the greatercommunity and contribute therefore to engineers being more accountable to society. The methodused in this paper to characterize engineering is based on the direct use of the activities thatcorrespond to the five classical branches of Philosophy – namely Epistemology, Metaphysics,Ethics, Logic, and Aesthetics. The paper also briefly considers Post-modernism
level. They include: an ability to apply knowledge ofmathematics, science, and engineering; an ability to identify, formulate and solve engineeringproblems; and an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. In contrast, all threegroups rate a knowledge of contemporary issues at a relatively lower score. The foregoingattributes are among those that have been proposed by the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET) as criteria that should be satisfied in order to be awarded an accreditedengineering degree.IntroductionOver the years there have been studies conducted by employers and varioustechnical/professional organizations to revise the engineering curriculum to ensure that studentsare prepared for the future
2006-982: FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW FORMAT FOR FRESHMANENGINEERING COURSE AT VIRGINIA TECHJenny Lo, Virginia Tech Jenny Lo is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She is the co-coordinator of the first semester engineering course and has been involved with educational projects related to freshmen programs, engineering ethics, and undergraduate research.Vinod Lohani, Virginia Tech Vinod Lohani is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is the co-coordinator of the first semester engineering course and has been involved in many educational research projects including a departmental level reform
Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the founding editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in the engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from The Johns Hopkins
activities.Dr. Marilyn A. Dyrud, Oregon Institute of Technology Marilyn Dyrud is a Full Professor in the Communication Department at Oregon Institute of Technology and regularly teaches classes in business and technical writing, public speaking, rhetoric, and ethics. She is part of the faculty team for the Civil Engineering Department’s integrated senior project. She is active in ASEE as a regular presenter, moderator, and paper reviewer. She has also served as her Campus’ Representative for 17 years, as Chair of the Pacific Northwest Section, and as section newsletter Editor. She was named an ASEE Fellow in 2008, and two years later received the McGraw Award. Currently, she is on two division boards, Engineering Technology
at Michigan State University strives for its graduates toacquire the abilities and attributes listed below by integrating the knowledge and skills acquiredin a diverse set of courses, through the culture of the program, and the attitude of the programfaculty. a. Apply the knowledge of basic mathematics, science, and engineering b. Design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data c. Design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d. Function on multidisciplinary teams e. Identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. Understand
Senior Associate Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the founding editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in the engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from The Johns Hopkins University in
across the United States. They and their institutions’ names are held inanonymity.Originally, 50 individual researchers were asked to participate. Thirty five said, ‘yes,’ andmet with me once. Twenty three have met with me twice, and I anticipate that by the timeof this writing, eighteen of those will have completed or were scheduled for a thirdconversation, and one will have had a fourth. It could be argued that the group of twentythree continuing participants is a self-select group. It is likely that those who continue tomake themselves available for these discussions probably have a genuine interest inreflecting on the meaning and ethics of their work in nanotechnology. They may havebeen predisposed to participate. I began meeting with
understanding of various subject areas required by ABET has been enhanced byattendance at and/or participation in class field trips in addition to lectures and seminarspresented by practicing professional engineers. In particular, the findings suggest that bothundergraduate and graduate students believe that three areas have been greatly enhanced withthis activity. They include environmental engineering, project management/scheduling andestimating, and team work. In addition, undergraduates perceive that their understanding ofhealth and safety issues, and ethical considerations has also been increased at a high percentage.In contrast, graduate students believe that their knowledge of hydraulics/hydrology/waterresources and geotechnical engineering has
is a “Call to Action” for collaborators. Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2022, American Society for Engineering EducationIntroductionThe National Academy of Engineering identified ethical issues and responsibilities as the majorchallenges for engineers in the 21st century.1 Practicing engineers are expected to adhere to theNational Society of Professional Engineers’ Code of Ethics 2 and engineering students areexpected to “recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations andmake informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global,economic, environmental, and societal contexts.”3 The result was an
frequent in higher education,especially in engineering [1], [2]. Engineering is a profession guided by a code of ethics, yet theincidences of academic dishonesty in engineering students indicate that students are notpracticing the values that, per the code of ethics, practicing engineers ought to uphold. Previousresearch, such as [3], has also shown that there are differences in how cheating is defined, bothwithin a group of students, and when comparing faculty definitions to student definitions.Additionally, ongoing (though yet unpublished) research by the author and a colleague hasshown that student perceptions of and experiences with academic integrity change their first yearof engineering, with more lax definitions of what behaviors constitute
4 Triple Bottom Line/Sustainability 5 Social impacts of infrastructure 6 Teamwork 7 Ethics I 8 Ethics II 9 Traits of effective written and oral communication 10 Financing public works 11 Safety/licensure 12 Land use and planning/growth/forecastingThe process to create these lessons is as follows. Team assignments – teams of faculty members were assembled to create each lesson. Faculty members were asked to give preferences to the 12 lessons they would like to develop. Teams contained three
senior level course, such as design, and isbeing assessed mostly for technical competence and as one of several other criteria underevaluation [11]. The lack of validated assessment methods for process safety thinking, coupledwith the general lack of authentic situations in which students can make these decisions presentsus with an opportunity to address both points. In this paper, we will discuss both the creation of avirtual process safety environment which attempts to address the authenticity issue, as well as thedevelopment of an assessment tool, the Engineering Process Safety Reasoning Instrument(EPSRI), which is based on previous work in assessing students’ moral and ethical reasoning inan engineering context.Project ObjectivesThis work
has co-authored three books on Technology and Society. Page 11.608.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Examining the Impact of Nanotechnologies for Science, Technology and Society (STS) StudentsAbstractThis paper presents an overview of new and emerging nanotechnologies and their societaland ethical implications to address 21st Century challenges and issues. The discussionincludes a range of different types of nanotechnologies and their effects and potentialeffects on markets, cultures, resources, and ethics on local and global levels.The paper highlights the approaches of a Science
UniversityDr. Tewodros Ghebrab, Texas Tech University Assistant Professor of construction engineering Page 25.674.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Globalization and the New Challenges for Construction Engineering EducationAbstractThe world has been transformed in past decades by a phenomenon affecting us all, what we callglobalization. Globalization brought a critical inquiry into the shifting ground of ethical thoughtin the changing climate of the global economy. The need to educate engineering students on howto work in a globalized
SafetyWednesday Field Trip to Jersey Shore H Rowan University Library Tour/ Computer FacilitiesThursday Meeting with Faculty Mentor Introduction to Ethics ComponentFriday Laboratory Orientation Discussion of Student TasksFor the remaining 7 weeks, students work on their research, under the supervision of theREU professors and graduate research assistants. Students attend formal seminars once aweek to broaden their knowledge of contemporary environmental research, issues inengineering education and professional engineering practice. Some seminars focus onissues facing minorities in science and engineering, pursuing graduate school
professional responsibility • Develop an appreciation of ancillary workplace tasks (health and safety, regulatory and code compliance, and hazardous material responsibility) as crucial engineering functions and duties.The course is organized by topic. Topics are introduced in Lecture, and specific Workshopactivities are prepared that illustrate the topic under consideration. Major topics coveredinclude: • Intellectual Property • Engineering Codes of Ethics • Regulatory Compliance and Environmental Law • Engineering History and the evolution of Professional Societies • Academic and Professional Honesty • Design Codes and Standards
faculty in 2004 and is currently responsible for copyright and intellectual property rights compliance. Michelle is a recognized expert in intellectual property rights as they relate to academic library services and has spoken on these issues at international and national conferences. She regularly teaches workshops for science graduate students and faculty on authors’ rights, copyright, and right infringements including plagiarism. Her current research interests include the cultural bases of ethical decisions made by students and the broader issues of rights embodied in the Open Access movement.Margeaux Johnson, University of Florida Margeaux Johnson is a Science & Technology Librarian at the University of Florida’s
integrated into the existing curricula in differentengineering departments.The committee identified the objectives of the minor program as follows: • To train undergraduate students in the fundamentals of nano-scale materials, devices, and systems for a broad variety of applications. • To create a multidisciplinary program that combines courses from a variety of engineering disciplines, and is accessible to students from all engineering backgrounds. • To encourage students and prepare them to pursue graduate degrees in nanoscience and technology. • To prepare undergraduate students for the global workforce by combining technical training with diversity awareness, engineering ethics, and an understanding of
level and the literary history of science and technology. She has served twice as the chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society (LEES) Division of ASEE and received that division's Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to liberal education for engineers. Her current research projects focus on humanistic education for engineers as a system that transcends particular courses and institutions; the interdependence of ethics, communication, and STS in engineering; and establishing a collective identity for the diverse community engaged in teaching and researching engineering communication.Sofia Zajec Sofia Zajec is a rising fourth-year student at the University of Virginia majoring in systems
Paper ID #35336Integrating Humanitarian Values into First Year Engineering CourseworkDr. Gary P. Halada, Stony Brook University Dr. Halada, Associate Professor in Materials Science and Chemical Engineering at Stony Brook Univer- sity, directs an interdisciplinary undergraduate degree program in Engineering Science. He designs ed- ucational materials focused on nanotechnology, advanced manufacturing, and how engineers learn from engineering disasters and how failure and risk analysis can be used to teach about ethics and societal implications of emerging technologies. Halada is the PI and Faculty Director of the REU Site in Nan
and community development. Dedicated to promoted social justice and peace in the engineering profession. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Work In Progress: The Sky’s the Limit: Drones for Social GoodAbstractA full semester course, with a focus on engineering design to promote social good, wasdeveloped for second-year engineering students. The course, The Sky’s the Limit: Drones forSocial Good, engages students with drone technology as well as the awareness of the needs,challenges, and resources of diverse communities and how drones can serve these communities.Humanities, ethics, and human centered design are explored in the context of engineering, andinterwoven throughout the semester. The
AC 2012-4405: ECE CURRICULUM IMPROVEMENT TO INCORPORATEGLOBAL LEARNINGDr. Phillip A. Mlsna, Northern Arizona University Phillip Mlsna is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Northern Arizona University. His primary research interests are in image processing, computer vision, engineering education, and academic ethics. He has extensive experience as a Computer Hardware Engineer at Hewlett-Packard.Dr. Niranjan Venkatraman, Northern Arizona University Niranjan Venkatraman obtained his Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, in 2004, and is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical
, students are exposed to othernon-technical aspects of engineering, such as how engineering decisions might be influenced byother factors such as business, ethics, and socioeconomics. A third-year engineering capstonecourse was recently transformed to incorporate real-world problem statements and industrialmentorship. For the 13-week semester, students worked in teams of six or seven people to solvea problem statement that a company had provided. This study explored how students viewedindustrial partnerships in this capstone course. It specifically examined how it influenced theirperception of problem-solving, consideration for ethics, and overall confidence as engineers. Weused the stratified random sampling technique to select 16 participants
Paper ID #43414Work in Progress: A Novel Two-Semester Course Sequence that IntegratesEngineering Design, Sociotechnical Skills, Career Development, and AcademicAdvisingDr. Benjamin J. Laugelli, University of Virginia Dr. Laugelli is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Society at the University of Virginia. He teaches courses that examine social and ethical aspects of technology and engineering practice.Dr. Keith Andrew Williams, University of Virginia Born in Georgia, USA; moved shortly thereafter to Jordan and then to southern Africa, including Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), Botswana, and South Africa, attending local/native
integratesengineering design with meeting the needs of the local community through a multi-disciplinaryservice-learning curricular structure. The EPICS courses can be counted for a wide range ofcourses in several disciplines, including capstone design in electrical and computer engineeringand computer science. The approaches of EPICS to conceptualize and measure specificprofessional skills for program evaluation purposes are discussed. These include: social-responsibility, awareness of ethical issues, teamwork, and communication competence.Specifically, the theoretical framework used for scale construction, preliminary results, andevidence of the scales’ psychometric properties are provided. The aim of this paper is to provideinformation regarding the use of
, multicultural ingenuity, and ethicalintegrity). Further, this framework argues that conscientious negotiation of risks and benefits forthe betterment and transformation of societies is underpinned by four reasoning quadrants(experiential reasoning, trade-offs reasoning, first-principles reasoning, and future reasoning),fluently examined through the core practice of multicultural ingenuity and ethical integrity. Thispaper details the theoretical foundations of the socially transformative framework and providesexamples of its pedagogical translations to guide pedagogy practices.IntroductionEngineering, as commonly understood, is the practical application of scientific and mathematicalprinciples [1], the creation of new products [2], and the procedures
Figure 1: New teaching and learning model with a thread dedicated to professional formation(research, design, and optimization tools), and professionalism (communication, culturaladaptability, ethics, leadership, and teamwork).The professional formation thread – While the new pedagogical and organizational modeldramatically changes the educational landscape in the department, with broad impacts to theculture and discipline as a whole, this paper focuses on the professional formation thread, anddiscusses how the innovative structure provides a framework for developing professional skillsmore effectively and meaningfully. It examines the important role of the professional formationthread champion – a former Fortune 500 executive – and her
Cornell University (1999). Prior to coming to UPRM, Papadopoulos served on the faculty in the department of civil engineering and mechanics at the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in Structural Mechanics, Appropriate technol- ogy, Engineering Ethics, and Mechanics Education. He is a PI on the NSF-sponsored project Full-culm Bamboo as a Full-fledged Engineering Material and is developing community bamboo projects in Puerto Rico and Haiti. He is also co-author of the book Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis and served as the Chair of the ASEE Mechanics Division in 2015-16. c American Society for Engineering
AC 2010-1781: CCLI: MODEL ELICITING ACTIVITIES: EXPERIMENTS ANDMIXED METHODS TO ASSESS STUDENT LEARNINGLarry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academics and Professor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former senior editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Dr. Shuman is the founding editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in the engineering education literature, and is co-author of