Conference Session

Flipped Electrical and Computer Engineering Classrooms 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth A Connor, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Dianna Newman, University at Albany/SUNY; Meghan Morris Deyoe, University at Albany, SUNY; Jessica M Lamendola, University at Albany/SUNY

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

structure, communication was noted by all as the key element for success. Initiative anddirection taken by students supports the flipped classroom approach. Table 3 Primary Decision-Maker by Activity* Decision-maker Team A member My team Decided Activities Instructor TAs Leader of my team as a group myself F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14 F’13 S’14

Conference Session

Engineering Management Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University; Emily M Hunter, Baylor University; Steven C. Currall, University of California, Davis; Ed Frauenheim, The Great Place to Work Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Management

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J Skromme, Arizona State University; Paul Rayes, Arizona State University; Brian McNamara, Arizona State University; Xiaoxuan Wang, Arizona State University; Yih-Fang Huang, University of Notre Dame; Daniel H. Robinson, Colorado State University; Xiang Gao, Arizona State University; Theodore Thompson

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

the mesh equation game.7. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation through the TransformingUndergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Program underGrant Nos. DUE-1044497 and DUE-1323773. We thank Drs. J. Aberle, M. Ardakani, R. Ferzli,S. Goodnick, R. Gorur, G. Karady, Hongwei Mao, B. Matar, L. Sankar, Donghoon Shin, MengTao, C. Tepedelenlioglu, T. Thornton, D. Vasileska, Chao Wang, Hongbin Yu, and Hongyu Yufor using our software in their sections of EEE 202 at ASU; A. Holmes for using it in his courseECE 2630 at the University of Virginia; and Y. Astatke for using it in his course EEGR 202 atMorgan State University. We thank Daniel Sayre of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. for

Conference Session

Assessing URM Programs Targeting the K-16 Continuum

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pablo Biswas, The Mercer University; Rohitha Goonatilake, Texas A&M International University; Gerardo Javier Pinzon P.E., Texas A&M International University; Mahmoud Khasawneh, Texas A&M International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Wednesday Work on projects Work on projects 7/23 Mr. Luis Portilla - Rheem Mfg Thursday Work on projects Plant 7/24 @ 3:30 PM Friday Ms. Rosa E. Trevino @ 1:30 USDA tour @ 10:00 AM 7/25 PM Monday Mr. Adrian Uresti - AEP Mr. Peter S. Davis – 7/28 @ 10:00 AM

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Faculty Perspectives and Training

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eugene Judson, Arizona State University; Lydia Ross, Arizona State University; James A. Middleton, Arizona State University; Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University; Ying-Chih Chen, Arizona State University; Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University; Yong Seok Park, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

selected from VECTERS as seedsof conversation among faculty members. Discourse about not only the strategy but the specificsof value, expectation, and cost, are anticipated to enrich dialogue. This type of deeper discussionwill hopefully aid instructors in developing introspection regarding their own beliefs andperceived obstacles of implementation.AcknowledgmentThe authors gratefully acknowledge support of this work by the National Science Foundationunder Grant No. 1524527References 1. Branford, J. D., & Donovan, S. M. (2005). How students learn: history, mathematics, and science in the classroom. National AcademiesPress, Washington. 2. Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bryan Paul Ruddy, University of Auckland; Poul Fønss Nielsen, University of Auckland

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

emphasized the ease ofholding the device, while the team on the right focused on miniaturization, using figure 2’s PCB.While both these groups used non-inverting buffer amplifiers for signal conditioning, others usedlevel-shifted inverting op-amp circuits.Student feedback is positive, with students valuing the project highly for its contribution to theirunderstanding. Student performance (as assessed via overall grades) has remained stable throughthe introduction of this project. Work is ongoing to determine the impact of this course moreprecisely, and to determine the best sequence of lecture content to complement the project.[1] Sheppard, S. D. and Jenison, R. (1997). “Freshman engineering design experiences: An or-ganizational framework

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT); Alyssa Catherine Taylor, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

describes reflection activities implemented in twobioengineering courses for the development of specific leadership competencies. The poster willinclude preliminary assessment data on the activities.          Bibliography    1. Ambrose, S. A. (2013). Undergraduate engineering curriculum: The ultimate design challenge. The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, 43(2).2. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.3. Kaplan, M., Silver, N., LaVaque-Manty, D., & Meizlish, D. (Eds.). (2013). Using Metacognition and Reflection to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.4. Seemiller, C. (2014). The Student

Conference Session

CEED Paper Session 2: Leveraging Internships and Experiential Learning in Higher Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida; Jenna Christie-Tabron, University of Central Florida; Michael Georgiopoulos, University of Central Florida; Mari Pina, University of Central Florida; Richard Allan Quinn, University of Central Florida; Jackie Herold, University of Central Florida; Kim A. Small, University of Central Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

Paper ID #14976Transforming the Culture of Internship Experiences through Social LearningCommunitiesDr. Lisa Massi, University of Central Florida Dr. Lisa Massi is the Director of Operations Analysis for Accreditation, Assessment, & Data Adminis- tration in the College of Engineering & Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. She is Co-PI of two NSF-funded S-STEM grants and program evaluator for two NSF-funded REU programs. Her research interests include factors that impact student persistence and career development in the STEM fields.Ms. Jenna Christie-Tabron, University of Central Florida Ms

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Angelina Lane, Seattle Pacific University; Donald M. Peter P.E., Seattle Pacific University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

: Lessons Learned From Community College Transfer Scholarship Recipients AbstractWith funding from the National Science Foundation’s S-STEM grant program, the ECASE(Engaging the Community to Achieve Success in Engineering) Scholarship at Seattle PacificUniversity (SPU) has targeted transfer students from urban and rural community colleges in theregion. For the past nine years, this program has provided scholarship and other support funds toassist these transfer students in obtaining a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering.The goal of the ECASE Scholarship is to provide pathways for financially needy, academicallytalented transfer students to thrive in the university environment, enter the workforce as well-trained

Conference Session

Automation, Instrumentation, and Computer Simulations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas E. McDermott, University of Pittsburgh; Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

Paper ID #15181Improving a Flipped Electromechanical Energy Conversion CourseThomas E. McDermott, University of Pittsburgh Thomas E. McDermott is an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, with over 30 years of industrial experience in consulting and software development. His research interests include electric power distribution systems, renewable energy, power electronics, electromagnetics, and circuit simulation. Tom is a registered professional engineer in Pennsylvania and an IEEE Fellow. He has a B. S. and M. Eng. in Electric Power from Rensselaer, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Virginia

Conference Session

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies: Best Papers

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anahid Behrouzi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Daniel Kuchma, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

week. The topics/activities foreach week and their type classification(s) are listed in Table 1. In this table, classifications A-Cwere developed by the authors to describe teaching approaches used in the DBE course thatrange from fully deductive to a combination of deductive/ inductive; D-G are based on theinquiry classification scheme proposed in Tafoya et al.7 and expanded by Staver and Bay8; andH-L are drawn from a comprehensive review of inductive teaching approaches assembled byPrince and Felder5. In general the classifications are listed left to right in Table 1 ranging fromdeductive to increasingly self-directed, inquiry-based methods. The remainder of this section willdefine each classification in the context of the DBE course.Table 1

Conference Session

That's a Great Idea! Learning-focused Methods to Revitalize Your Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rob Sleezer, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Twin Cities; Jacob John Swanson, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

assessments from faculty, experiments they perform, and client corrections. Theassessments from faculty are often based on intuition and wisdom which allow them to predictwith some success the outcomes of the experiments the students perform. Regardless of thepredictions of the faculty and the students, the actual outcome of the experiments dictate nextsteps. Either the design works, or it does not. If it does not, which is most often the case, at thispoint in the semester there is little to no time for recovery. Finally, as a design comes togetherthe client(s) may provide feedback that the students did not appropriately frame the problem (i.e.the design is doing what was asked, but this is not what is needed) or that the design teammisinterpreted

Conference Session

Idea Generation and Creativity in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eli M. Silk, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Seda Yilmaz, Iowa State University; Amy Rechkemmer; Jennifer Marguerite Wenger, University of Michigan College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

countsas flexibility, while also better evaluating interventions designed to improve flexibility.References1. Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Jablokow, K. W., Silk, E. M. & Rosenberg, M. N. Investigating impacts on the ideation flexibility of engineers. (2014).2. Kirton, M. J. Adaption-Innovation in the Context of Diversity and Change. (Routledge: London, UK, 2011).3. Valle, S. & Vázquez-Bustelo, D. Concurrent engineering performance: Incremental versus radical innovation. International Journal of Production Economics 119 (1), 136–148, doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.02.002 (2009).4. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P. & O’Keefe, R. D. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation

Conference Session

Assessment of Learning in BME

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aldin Malkoc, Arizona State University ; Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University; Casey Jane Ankeny, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

, interactive activities and assignments.In summary, although there are universally favored resources, there are differencesdepending on course type and assignment category (learning concept vs.programming/software assignment). Therefore, it is important to determine and developthe most appropriate resource for the student need.AcknowledgementsThe authors acknowledge the support of this work from NSF Grant #1226325.References[1] Krause, S., Baker, D., Carberry, A., Alford, T., Ankeny, C., Brooks, B., Gibbons, B. (n.d.). The Impact of Two-way Formative Feedback and Web-enabled Resources on Student Resource Use and Performance in Materials Courses. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings.[2] Pego, J. (2013). Peer

Conference Session

Concurrent Paper Tracks Session II Courses

Collection

2016 ASEE International Forum

Authors

Jennifer Craig, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

International Forum

technical content is necessary and that contentmust be well organized and specific. Based on this analysis (often done in a matter ofminutes), a speaker can then determine the scope, style, and organization of what s/hewants to say.Experienced communicators do this analysis and synthesis without much difficulty, movingefficiently to the appropriate oral communication act. But students are usually novices at thiskind of thinking and speaking. Moreover, engineering students may be unused to thestandards of excellence in their technical discipline and thus fall back onto older strategies,often adopted from the humanities. Because they are novices, they need to learn activelyunder the guidance of instructors who help shape student skills.The design

Conference Session

Professional Skills development in Design

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Deininger, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Jennifer Chen Lee, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Development, 8(1), 22-41.3) Skaggs, P. (2010). Ethnography in product design-looking for compensatory behaviors. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 3, 1.4) Kelley, T. (2007). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm. Crown Business.5) Schrage, M. (2013). Serious play: How the world's best companies simulate to innovate. Harvard Business Press.6) Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J., Turns, J., & Adams, R. S. (2008). Students with differing design processes as freshmen: Case studies on change. International Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 246. 7) Lande, M., & Leifer, L. (2009). Prototyping to learn: Characterizing engineering students’ prototyping activities and

Conference Session

Graduate Education

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan Hyungsok Choe, The University of Texas, Austin; Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas, Austin; Luis L. Martins, University of Texas, Austin; Anita Patrick, University of Texas, Austin; Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

modified version of Plett et al.’s five items. In addition, we propose amodel of key factors affecting engineering graduate students’ identities as shown in Figure 1.Constructs capturing the key factors affecting engineering identity and research identity areadapted from the undergraduate science and engineering identity model (Carlone & Johnson,2007; Godwin, 2016; Hazari et al., 2010; Prybutok et al., 2016 ). Based on the identity model, weexpect that graduate students’ engineering identities will be affected by three factors: engineeringcompetence/performance, engineering interest, and recognition as an engineer by others. On theother hand, previous work on research identity does not provide a framework for measuringresearch identity

Conference Session

Integrating Liberal Education and Engineering

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mehmet Vurkac, Oregon Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, and biology, in the commonpractice of creating microorganism by the billions even in undergraduate labs, have also movedfrom the domain of observing and explaining, into the creative domain of ‘making’. Likewise,engineers in academia as well as corporate and government labs carry out primary research,discovering the principles underlying complex artificial systems17. The line has been blurred.Nonetheless, for the typical engineer at a company and the typical scientist at a research lab,Billington’s distinction that “[s]cience is discovery[;] engineering is design” restated as“[s]cientists study the natural [while] engineers create the artificial”18 still stands in the majorityof cases.In creating the artificial, engineers design products that

Conference Session

Two-year College Potpourri

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Diana Carmen Dimitriu, University of Texas at San Antonio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

socialsupport to my students, as well as enrichment and research or practical experienceopportunities. I have been the PI and Co-PI for grants received from NSF, NASA and theDepartment of Education amounting to over $5 million to develop the engineeringprogram and award CSEMS/S- STEM (Science, Technology Engineering and Math)scholarships to students at San Antonio College. An NSF discretionary grant from EngineeringEducation I obtained in 2003 allowed me to initiate the EDGE (Early Development ofGeneral Engineering) 13 a summer program, designed to attract and retain high schoolstudents into the engineering field. The program continued through 2015 with help fromDepartment of Education MSEIP funding. A majority of my mentees have participated in

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Reg Pecen, Sam Houston State University; Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

power quality issues caused by a large-size DC to ACinverter connecting the DG modules to the AC grid. This curriculum implementation provides aninnovative opportunity for future engineering technology students to gain necessary up-to-datecompetencies in a smart grid environment.IntroductionThe need for a knowledgeable workforce in fast innovating next generation power griddevelopment and implementation is essential. As the baby boomers employed in the electricalpower systems fields have started to retire, there is an urgent need to recruit and graduate anincreasing number of well-educated and well-trained next generation professionals from bothAssociate degree and Bachelor ’s degree programs. The fast pace of innovations in electrical

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

though males rated the females’leadership competency higher comparing to the females’ ratings of males, male students stilldid not believe in the leadership ability of female students as much as females themselvesbelieve.Based on the Rowan-Kenyon et al. [19]’s study, if a female student could lead a team, itwould be useful for teams because females tend to define leading as facilitating team andhaving the responsibility toward teams. This may cause conflict with male notions ofleadership, so some instruction may be necessary to legitimize alternative approaches toleadership. In addition, the last two studies in this section proved in teams that are led bystudents, underrepresented students showed better performance. These results highlight

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago; Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

andrecognizable ECG profile. Briefly, during Fall, 2018, 22 sophomores, in 11 student groups, wereable to successfully perform the requested tasks with high levels of engagement, as measured bythe StRIP instrument. For the performance indicators LED Programming, ECG SignalAcquisition, Graphics, and Cardiograph Project Presentation Materials, the following studentpercentages reached Exemplary and Satisfactory levels: 100%, 100%, 100%, 45%, respectively.Thus, students reached Engineering Science Student Outcome thresholds in three of fourperformance indicators. Evaluation of Part II of the cardiograph project is discussed in muchgreater detail in [55].Social Justice Case Study DaysThe class of 2020’s presentations and discussion of Hurricane Maria were

Conference Session

Active & Cooperative Learning in ECE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shahnam Mirzaei, California State University, Northridge; Ana Cristina Cadavid; Vicki A. Pedone, California State University Northridge

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

,theresultsfromquestionnairesalreadyshowthattheprogramfavorablyimpactstheacademicskillsandattitudesoftheparticipantstowardtheirSTEMmajorsandSTEMcareers.URMparticipantsinparticularstronglyvaluethisearly‐careerresearchexperience.References[1] T.Litzinger,L.Lattuca,R.Hadgraft,W.Newstetter,“EngineeringEducationandthe DevelopmentofExpertise”,JournalofEngineeringEducation,January2011,Vol. 100,No.1,pp.123–150[2] Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. State University of New York: Stoney Brook; 1998.[3] Pender, M., Marcotte, D.E., Sto, M.R. & Maton, K.I. 2010, The STEM Pipeline: The Role of Summer Research Experience in Minority Students' Ph.D. Aspirations., Educ. Policy Anal. Arch., 18(30)[4] Slovacek, S.P., Tucker, S. and Whittinghill, J., 2008, Modeling Minority Opportunity Programs: Key Interventions and Success Indicators: Journal of Education and Human

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lalita G. Oka, California State University, Fresno; Kimberly Stillmaker P.E., California State University, Fresno; Constance Jones, California State University, Fresno; Arezoo Sadrinezhad, California State University, Fresno; Maryam Nazari, California State University, Fresno

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Connections, ASEE, Ed., 2018.[2] California State University, "Student Success Dashboard," ed, 2019.[3] C. Corbett and C. Hill, Solving the equation : the variables for women's success in engineering and computing. Washington, DC: AAUW, 2015, pp. xi, 141 pages.[4] E. P. Bettinger and B. T. Long, "Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students," The American Economic Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 152-157, 2005.[5] NAP, Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2007.[6] P. Gallagher, S. Alestalo, S. Bhatia, A. Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, and S. Soundarajan, "Geotechnical Women Faculty

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Baker A. Martin, Clemson University; Maya Rucks, Clemson University; Katherine M. Ehlert, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

National Science Foundation (NSF) underGrant No 1745347. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References[1] M. K. Orr, R. K. Anderson, and M. L. Rucks, “Work in progress: Developing a procedure for identifying indicators of ‘overpersistence,’” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2017.[2] K. M. Ehlert, M. K. Orr, and S. J. Grigg, “WIP: What’s Your Major? First-Year Engineering Students’ Confidence in Their Major Choice,” in Proceedings of the First- Year Engineering Experience Conference, 2018.[3] J. P. Byrnes, The Nature and Development of Decision

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Gammon-Pitman, Ohio State University; Paul E. Post, Ohio State University; Lin Ding, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

Industrial Arts Education, Pennsylvania State University OSU faculty member since 1984 Currently in the STEM education program 2013 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association Conference Co-Chair Currently Executive Director and a Past-President of the Ohio Technology and Engineering Educators AssociationLin Ding, The Ohio State University Lin Ding, Ph.D., is an associate professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University. Dr. Dingˆa C™s scholarly interests lie in discipline-based STEM education research. His work includes theoretical and empirical investigation ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work-in-Progress: The Effects of

Collection

AEE Journal

Authors

Ryan Solnosky P.E.; Joshua Fairchild

further investigated (by interviews and by examining technical reports) for possiblereasons. Teams that dropped between surveys two and three did so for several reasons. Based onthe follow-ups, the reason for most drops were identified as arisen conflicts in the team at the timein which the surveys were administrated. Identified conflicts included: diverging ideas on system(s)integration, a lack of collaboration among one or more disciplines due to personalities, confusion16 FALL 2017ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONSurvey Tools for Faculty to Quickly Assess Multidisciplinary Team Dynamicsin Capstone Courseson the direction to proceed that will produce

Collection

AEE Journal

Authors

Nicola Brown

/10.5339/qproc.2014.wcee2013.4. Bishop, L.M., Tillman, A.S., Geiger, F.M., Haynes, C.L., Klaper, R.D., Murphy, C.J., Orr, G., Pedersen, J.A., DeStefano, L.,and Hamers, R.J. 2014. “Enhancing graduate student communication to general audiences through blogging aboutnanotechnology and sustainability.” Journal of Chemical Education 19: 1600–1605. Bennet, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L. 2008. “The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence.” British Journalof Educational Technology 39: 775–786.14 FALL 2017ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONUpdating Assessment Styles: Website Development Rather Than ReportWriting for

Conference Session

Track: Collegiate - Technical Session 11

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Julia Machele Brisbane, Clemson University; Eliza Gallagher, Clemson University; Abigail E. Hines, Clemson University; Joseph Murphy, Clemson University; lesteria Armoni Dunwoody, Clemson University; Khushi Patel, Clemson University; Aubrie Lynn Pfirman, Clemson University; Shannon Roberson; Anand K. Gramopadhye, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Collegiate, Diversity

cousin that's went to, uh. She, she's just been older than me and I was asking her like what was gonna be required of me in college and stuff and like, s-s-simple things like that. But then I would also ask my aunts and uncles because they have close ties to [Four-Year Institution] so I was […] already sure that I was going to [Four-Year Institution]. – CalebAnother example of this shown when Robin, a participant from a four-year institution focusgroup, is discussing her great-aunt. Robin mentions how this relative influenced her to go tocollege and encouraged her to do well in school. My great-aunt [is] amazing. Uh, she um, was a really big influence on me coming to [public university] because this is

Conference Session

PSW Section Meeting Papers - Disregard start and end time - for online paper access only

Collection

2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Paul Morrow Nissenson, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Paper Submissions

testscores.4-10 Flipped classroom strategies often employ active learning exercises, which Felder andBrent (2009) define as, “anything course-related that all students in a class session are calledupon to do other than simply watching, listening and taking notes.”11 Active learning exerciseshave been shown to boost academic performance; Freeman et al.’s (2014) meta-analysis of 225studies on active learning in STEM courses found that performance on concept inventories,exams, and passing rates generally improved in classrooms employing active learningstrategies.12A flipped classroom strategy is not guaranteed to result in improved academic outcomes. Someflipped classroom experiments show no significant gains between a section employing a