Methodology• Overview of qualitative research and why it is important to utilize in the study of women’s STEM careers• Description of the research participants/sample• How the qualitative research was conducted, including an overview of the interview questions• Study limitationsFindings• 4 findings will be presented with the evidence that supports the findingsRecommendations• We will present recommendations based on the 4 findingsReferences are included.Introduction Introduction to Research Study • The STEM workforce drives innovative capacity and global competitiveness [1] • Intersectional gender diversity has been shown to increase innovation [2] [3] • Women comprise 47% of the workforce but only 27% of the
. 2011 to Oct. 2014, she served as a division director in theEngineering Directorate at the National Science Foundation (NSF). She was responsible for a $135Mbudget in support of interdisciplinary research centers, research translation, innovations in engineeringeducation, special initiatives in support of military veterans, broadening participation in engineering, andworkforce development programs. Her initial appointment at NSF was in 1999 to 2001, when she servedas a program director in the Engineering Research Centers program and represented the EngineeringDirectorate on several NSF-wide committees. Before entering academia, Dr. Maldonado was a member oftechnical staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories for 5 1/2 years working on optical fiber
. 7The purpose of this research is to develop a student‐focused mentoring program that can engage women in science and engineering at the University of Dayton, to help aid retention and engagement of these women. 7 Literature Review: Peer Mentors Other studies have researched impact of mentoring programs with success building a community, increasing retention rates Three main benefits of mentoring: 1) Student participation and perceptions 2) Student retention 3) Student ambassador development
et al. (2012), lecturers are concerned about a lack ofinclusion by tenure-track and tenured faculty members.3.The growth of the lecturer population calls for respectful adaptation and theinclusion of lecturers by offering opportunities similar to those of tenure-trackand tenured faculty (Kezar, 2012; Hahn & Heeren, 2016; Rideau, 2019;Sherick et al., 2020).4.Conversations with lecturers at the College of Engineering also indicated aneed. They call for the understanding of roles, responsibilities, and uniquecontributions of existing and new faculty members within the higher educationcommunity.1. To address this need, we would like to share one organizational support structure that is currently being instituted to support lecturers
;T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Bi- ological Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) social competence in engineering education and 2) innovate instructional strategies for Biological and Agricultural Engineering students. She is also a Member of the Engineering Education Faculty, Insti- tute for Engineering Education and Innovation, Food Science Graduate Faculty, and Multidisciplinary Engineering Graduate Faculty groups at Texas A&M University. American c
injustice in the U.S.IntroductionEngineering colleges and departments have been historically quiet in regard to racial and socialjustice issues, existing in the status quo, and often perpetuating a materialistic and militaristicculture rooted deeply in the history of engineering as a trade and subsequently a profession[1].Engineers are often less concerned with social issues, and rarely reflective of how their social andcultural identity impacts society and world, including engineers in academe. However, there hasbeen a shift recently in the socially and politically charged climate of the United States, particularlywithin the past decade where racially charged protests and protests against police brutality havebecome increasingly common and at the
. Ecological transitions, or changes in roles or settings throughout life, are at the heart of this approach. This framework considers both individual settings and relationships with different levels of external settings regardless of whether an individual is a direct actor in the system. Namely, four levels of systems undergird the ecological framework: 1) microsystems (settings and relationships experienced directly by the individual, e.g., families, academic programs, research groups, and peer groups), 2) mesosystems (interactions between various settings in which the individual is an active participant, e.g., research group‐academic program interactions), 3) exosystems (settings in which the individual does not actively
communication education. These initiatives would also improve the experiences and education of all students, including underrepresented students. This article contributes to discussions about the definition and usage of student resistance as a framework for education research.IntroductionThe numbers of international students attending US institutions have increased drastically overthe past several decades for multiple reasons: the students are motivated by the quality andreputation of the schools and job opportunities in the US, and the schools are interested ininternational students as quality future workers to the country and because international studentsoften pay high tuition that many domestic students are unable to pay [1
faculty representation. [1, p. 473-474]The college-wide faculty search we describe included interventions developed and implementedby the University of Colorado Boulder over the past five years [2] combined with additionalpractices known to support inclusive faculty searches. Key guidance was gleaned from theProvost’s Office [3] and publicly available information from the University of CaliforniaBerkeley College of Engineering Advancing Faculty Diversity Initiative [4-6], Emory University[7], and the Association of Public and Land Grant Universities [8].One common recruitment practice designed to create a more welcoming environment forhistorically marginalized and underrepresented faculty is the use of cluster hires [7, 8]. Based onNational
share how they are learning to provide feedback that empowersstudents to connect to existing literature in an authentic manner while validating their livedexperiences. We situate these vignettes within relevant literature to problematize the nature ofliterature reviews in STEM education. Vignette#1 (SB, Third-year Phd Student): I’ve thought about this quite a bit. Am I not doing enough work to find the literature? Does what I’m seeking even exist? What will my advisors and peers think about me if I am unable to find literature that supports my claims? Why isn’t my lived experience enough to support my claims? How is it ok for me to interview a peer and justifiably put their experiences in my work but not be allowed to personally speak to what I
between the conferring of science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) bachelor’s degrees to minoritized groups at four-yearpredominantly White institutions (PWIs) and the number of STEM faculty that representminoritized groups [1], [2]. The Morrill Act of 1862 established engineering as a major atinstitutions currently known as PWIs. From the very conception of the engineering collegiateculture in 1862, minoritized groups have been ostracized and unwelcomed. Engineering as amajor was not created with Communities of Color in mind. Studies have shown that a diverseengineering faculty contributes to improving access and success of diverse students [3].Considering this, it is important to address the effects of the lack of minority
participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity in the academy and industry; 2) discipline-based education research in order to inform pedagogical practices that garner interest and retain women and minorities in computer-related engineering fields. She uses her scholarship to challenge the perceptions of who belong in computing. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Need for Change: How Interview Preparation and the Hiring Process in Computing Can Be Made More EquitableAbstractMedia and literature frequently describe the need to increase the number of workers in computingto meet growing demands and
further study.Keywords: Undergraduate, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, EngineeringIntroductionIn an effort to address this issue of persistence for undergraduate students majoring inengineering and taking general chemistry, typically one of the pre-requisite courses taken duringthe first two-years on campus, we have developed a career-forward laboratory curriculum that isdesigned to support persistence. A career-forward curriculum targets the long-term goal ofpersistence—the personal capacity of students to continue towards an academic goal—byframing experiences with the content, context and specific skills of working in the target careerfield. Created as an extension of an earlier reform of the recitation component of chemistrycourses [1], this
Education, 2022 Increasing Minority Student Applications to STEM Graduate Programs: Lessons Learned and Outlook for a New ProgramGood afternoon, and thank you for joining us today as we discuss our lessons learnedand outlook for a new program developed to increase underrepresented minoritystudent applications to STEM graduate programs, called A Step to the Doctorate. (Tothe reviewers: The final version of this PowerPoint would/will include photos fromthe program; participants signed a photo waiver.) 1 ▪ Who We Are
, diversity, equity, inclusion, andpedagogy. Included in our findings are first person insights on the impact of this form of class onlearning and professional development, course evaluation data, and lessons learned in hopes ofinforming other practitioners in the design of similar course offerings.1.0 BackgroundThere is a rich literature base for those seeking to develop inclusive STEM curricula, with acomprehensive survey of STEM programming designed to enhance inclusion provided in a recentreview paper by Palid et al [1]. For educators, there are numerous resources to help improveinstructional design, ranging from best practices developed by the National Science andTechnology Council [2] to courses and workshops hosted by organizations like the
undergraduateengineering students and turned these into 10 distinct audio narratives. Our narrative analysis focused onconstructing a cohesive, concise, and anonymized narrative that would present key content from studentinterviews in a format that would preserve some of the immediacy and emotionality of student interviewswhile improving accessibility and coherence for faculty.Findings: In this paper, we present the scripts and link to audio narratives for two student participants: 1)Sophie, a mixed race (Asian and white) white-passing woman, and 2) Enola, an Indigenous woman. Inaddition to presenting the written and audio narrative, we comment on the specific lessons we see asvaluable for engineering faculty that emerge from each of the audio
mycorrhizaas a simile of these invisible connections. Mycorrhiza is a symbiotic association betweenfungi and plants that cycles nutrients to improve the whole ecosystem. The Mycorrhizaframework aims to raise awareness of the effects of engineering education and work,incorporate social and environmental justice in engineering education, and move closer tohelping people freely and fully develop in a sustainable world. I. IntroductionIt is essential for people and the Ecosystem that we raise awareness of our engineeringimpact. Demanding for people to take action, Singer [1] presented an ethical decisionwhere we would see a child drowning. Most people would do their best to come up with asolution to help the child. Engineering with visible results or
bills were brought before the United Stateslegislature by state representatives and senators in all 50 states [1]. This past year has seen morespecifically anti-transgender bills than any other year, making this the most overtly anti-transgender legislative session in United States history. Legislative policy does not exist in avacuum. Transgender people in the United States are facing administrative, social, and physicalviolence as a result of policy initiatives that seek to pathologize, vilify, and disparage transgenderpeople. In 2023, transgender people in 24 states [2] have lost significant civil rights, includingthe right to change or have correct identity documentation, to access gender-affirming care, toaccess public bathrooms, to retain
groups pursuing graduatedegrees in engineering [1]. While students from historically marginalized groups remainunderrepresented in engineering graduate programs, there have been increases in enrollment ofhistorically marginalized groups, in particular women and those from racially minoritized groups(i.e., Hispanic/Latinx, American Indian/Alaska Native, Black/African American, and NativeHawaiian/Other Pacific Islander) [2], [3]. Despite these increased enrollments, students fromthese groups are often isolated [4], tokenized [5], and experience hostile environments [4], [6],which can negatively affect students’ retention, degree completion, time to degree, and success.Thus, there has been a push towards equity work, or creating policies and
Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center at Penn State. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Preparing for ABET Changesregarding DEI:Results of the Big Ten++ DEISummitLeonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering EducationSarah ZappeStephanie CutlerIvan Esparragoza 1. Provide an overview of the SummitThis presentation 2. Provide attendees with access to the activities that they can potentially utilize athas three goals. 3. their own institutions Provide information on the future direction of the Big Ten++ DEI SummitIn 2021, the Engineering Deans of theBig Ten+ requested that ABETincorporate DEI
Canvas. This way, I wasable to provide detailed feedback on each learning objective and break down eachconcept into smaller parts to help students identify gaps in their knowledge.The example above shows a student who took the first assessment and the first re-assessment opportunity. As shown, there is major improvement. *Intend to show thespreadsheet used to grade assessments. 15A side-by-side comparison of the grade distribution from the previous summer to thissummer is presented.Important take-away:Greater improvement in learning objectives from one assessment opportunity to thenext in Summer 2023. Note, re-assessment 1 is not included as it was not offered
learning assignments, ad the use of technology in the classroom. Boni hopes to pursue a career in academia with a focus on teaching and engineering education.Bettina K ArkhurstStuart Montgomery, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDerek Ashton Nichols, Georgia Institute of TechnologyJennifer Molnar, Georgia Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Promotion of Graduate Student Well-being via Successful Navigationthrough Conflict Resolution PathwaysDr. Boni Yraguen, Bettina Arkhurst, Derek Nichols, Jennifer Molnar, Dr. Macrae Montgomery 1 Addressing advising and departmental issues can
Dr. Bilec is an associate professor in the Swanson School of Engineeringˆa C™s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Dr. Bilecˆa C™s research program focuses on the built environment, life cycle assessment, sustainable healthcare, and energy im ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Establishing and Sustaining Inclusive Learning Communities for Supporting Faculty Creating More Inclusive Engineering Classrooms Jessica M. Vaden1, April A. Dukes PhD 1, Amy Brooks PhD 1, Kristen Parrish PhD 2, Amy Hermundstad Nave PhD 3, Amy E. Landis PhD 3, Melissa M. Bilec PhD 1 1University
thesegoals even if time permitted.KeywordsBroadening Participation; Faculty Views; Engineering Education; Success and PersistenceIntroductionBroadening participation in STEM is an initiative of national interest in the United States. Inorder for the US to maintain its global prominence in STEM fields, as well as maintain nationalsecurity and other technological advances, the US must produce over one million more STEMprofessionals than what is currently projected [1]. Broadening participation is a term used todescribe increasing the participation of underrepresented groups in STEM fields [2]. Thisincludes providing exposure, access, and opportunities in STEM for individuals fromunderrepresented groups. According to the National Science Foundation
Society for Engineering Education, 2024 EXPLORING GENDER REPRESENTATION ISSUES IN COMPUTING BY WRITING INTERACTIVE FICTION John K. Estell Stephany Coffman-WolphNote: Those photos in this file that were taken by one of the authors can be used under theCreative Commons CC BY-NC 2.0 license.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ 1 METRIC: COMPUTER SCIENCE DEGREES • Women account for a low share of the degrees earned in computer science: CS Bachelor’s Degrees
workshops focused on issues related to power, privilege, social justice, and social identities such as race, ability, class, gender, and sexual orientation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Fostering Inclusive Learning Environments while Navigating DEI Backlash Date 1 Overview Current Landscape: Recent SCOTUS ruling & State Legislation National, state, institutional, and individual Key Areas Targeted and Examples levels Strategies You Can Control for broadening how we accomplish goals for inclusion
asking this question of hundreds of educators over the last six years, the top three answers given have been:1. Communicate the amount and/or quality of what a student has learned.2. Communicate to the student whether or not they have learned enough to be successful in a subsequent class.3. Rank students for use in future opportunities such as admission for advanced degrees, professional schools, jobs, scholarships, etc.In addition to the question asked a student gets a “B” in a class – what do we want it tomean?Top three answers from previous faculty asked:● Student is likely to be successful in a subsequent course.● Student knows most of the material but not all of it or not perfectly.● Depends on who gave the B (common answer