: Framed within Latino critical race theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(8), 810-823.Coso-Strong, A., Kendall, M. R., Henderson, G., & Basalo, I. (2019, June). Impact of Faculty Development Workshops on Instructional Faculty at Hispanic-serving Institutions. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Coso-Strong, A. C., Kendall, M. R., & Henderson, G. (2022). Voices of Engineering Faculty at the Margins, Handbook of STEM Faculty Development, 15.Crisp, G., Doran, E., Carales, V. D., & Potts, C. (2020). Disrupting the dominant discourse: Exploring the mentoring experiences of Latinx community college students. Journal for the Study of Postsecondary and Tertiary
://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2018/09/why-is-college-so- expensive-in-america/569884/. [Accessed 9 January 2019].[5] K. Hopkins, "New Three-Year Degree Programs Trim College Costs," 29 February 2012. [Online]. Available: www.usnews.com/education. [Accessed 22 November 2018].[6] A. R. Kukreti, T. C. Keener, P. L. Bishop and S. T. Kowel, "The Accelerated Engineering Degrees (ACCEND) Program in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Cincinnati," in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003.[7] K. R. Leitch and E. B. Butler, "Creating a New Civil Engineering Program in the 21st Century," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2015.[8] N. M. Safai and L. Reaveley, "Universal Model - A Partnership for
-distributed engineering teaming and early engi- neering education development and has over 30 years of combined academic and industrial management experience. He received his BSME and MSME degrees from Michigan Technological University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 20194/11/2019 A Study of Augmented Reality 2019-Draft for final - Google Docs A Study of Augmented Reality for the Development of Spatial Reasoning Ability Abstract This study builds on prior work testing the use of augmented reality (AR) on smartphones for
. Buckley, T. N. Barnes, J. Enszer, S. Rooney, and R. Davidson, “Adjusting the Lens: Comparison of Focus Group and Cross-Sectional Survey Data in Identifying and Addressing Issues of Diversity and Inclusion in Undergraduate Engineering Programs,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] C. E. Foor, S. E. Walden, and D. A. Trytten, “‘I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:’ Achieving individual diversity,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 103–115, 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00921.x.[6] M. Paretti, R. Layton, S. Laguette, and G. Speegle, “Managing and mentoring capstone design teams: Considerations and practices for faculty,” Int. J. Eng. Educ
theapplication materials to seek out that information, as well as descriptors for each criterion’snumerical rating. A score is given for each criterion and then all criteria scores are totaled andused as part of the overall admissions evaluation.Faculty dialogues, meetings, and educational emails were used to increase implementation of therubric across the school beginning with the admissions cycle for students matriculating in the Fallof 2019. The rubric was updated for the admissions cycle for students matriculating in the Fall of2020 based on continued feedback of faculty users, and review by premier experts in the field ofholistic graduate admissions. In the admissions cycle for students matriculating in the Fall of 2020,57% of admitted PhD students
., vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 27–39, 2003.[2] L. N. Fleming and K. C. Smith, “Engineering identity of Black and Hispanic undergraduates: The impact of minority serving institutions,” Age (Omaha)., vol. 23, no. 1, 2013.[3] H. Darabi, P. C. Nelson, R. Nazempour, R. A. Revelo, L. C. Nitsche, and J. Abiade, “Board 35: An Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of Academically Talented Low-income Engineering Students,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[4] M. R. Nazempour, H. Darabi, P. Nelson, R. Revelo, Y. Siow, J. Abiade, “Execution Details and Assessment Results of a Summer Bridge Program for Engineering Freshmen,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[5] R
, “Collaborative research: Supporting agency among early career engineering education faculty in diverse institutional contexts: Developing a framework for faculty agency,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2019, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10148508[30] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis,” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 589–597, Aug. 2019.[31] Consumer Reports, “Costs of ADHD Tests,” Jul-2010.
a computational design instructor in the Art and Design department at the California Polytechnic State University (CalPoly), San Luis Obispo where she leads the Computing for the Interactive Arts minor.Dr. Aaron Keen, California Polytechnic State UniversityChristian Eckhardt, California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo c American Society for Engineering Education, 20193/3/2019 ASEE CIA paper - Google Docs A crossdisciplinary minor to engage student’s creativity and engineering skills Zoë Wood (Computer Science), Enrica Lovaglio
these concerning attributes, mostengineering graduate students consider writing to be a “knowledge transforming” process [3]. Inour most recent work for ASEE 2019, we observed the differences between international studentsand U.S. domestic students, finding that international students differ from U.S. domesticengineering graduate students in statistically significant ways on nearly all the attitudinal facets onwhich we characterize students [5]. Interestingly, international students tend to view academicwriting ability as an “innate ability,” whereas domestic U.S. students do not.These results directly inform the development of interventions for engineering graduate students,and inform our work-to-date on the Broader Impacts of this research
2011 26.00 18.2 2012 27.46 18.9 2013 28.33 20 2014 30.16 19.9 National undergraduate enrollment data from ASEE Engineering by the Numbers, 2011-2019 https://bit.ly/36naM9S
%, the four-year graduation rate was 46%, and the six-year graduation rate was 59%. These quantitative data indicatethat both FTIC and transfer students at CEC share similar attributes; they are part-time students, need morefinancial support, are older than traditional students, and many do not earn their degrees within four or evensix years.All of the CEC graduation rates are considerably lower than reflected in some national data sets (see Table1). For instance, the national four-year graduation rate for engineering undergraduates is 32% (AmericanSociety for Engineering Education or ASEE, 2019), compared to just 14% at Florida InternationalUniversity. The six-year graduation rate for CEC and all engineering undergraduates in the US is
is designed to support online coursedevelopment. His application was accepted in Dec. 2018 and he developed the course in spring2019 in collaboration with a professional instructional designer. The course was offered in summer2019. The course demographics, student’s performance results, and student feedback are comparedbetween spring 2019 when the course was taught face-to-face and summer 2019 when it was taughtonline. The student performance indicated that the drop, fail, or withdrawal (DFW) rate was notmeaningfully impacted by the mode of delivery. However, the students’ final GPA in the course(before any form of adjustments or curving), improved from 81/100 in the face-to-face class to 88in the online class. Also, the rate of homework
%, respectively (ASEE,2019). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019) projected higher job growth for computationalroles (12%) compared to mechanical, electrical, and computer hardware engineering (4-6%).Reflecting this demand, computer science and computer engineering faculty emerged with thehighest salaries in academia, surpassing their engineering counterparts (ASEE, 2022).These disciplinary distinctions permeate beyond academic and professional spheres, influencingsocialization, enrollment, and persistence, and carrying significant implications forunderrepresented groups. Hocker and colleagues (2019) pinpoint challenges in academiacontributing to a noteworthy doctoral dropout rate in engineering, particularly impacting womenand URMs. The prevalence
," in ACM SIGSCE 2019, Minneapolis, 2019.[14] J. Christman and R. Yerrick, "”She’s More Like a Guy”: The Legacy of Gender Inequity Passed on to," in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual conference, 2021.[15] M. A. Silva and A. Dominguez, "Women in Construction Engineering: Improving the Students' Experience throughout their Careers," in 2021 ASEE Vitrual Annual Conference, Virtual conference, 2021.[16] S. Beyer, K. Rynes, J. Perrault, K. Hay and S. Haller, "Gender differences in computer science students," in In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '03), New York, 2003.[17] G. D. Ruxton, "The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and
/25979.[2] A. Huynh and N. T. Buswell, “How was your internship: Stories about the engineering internship experience from five female engineering students,” in 2019 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting. California State University, Los Angeles , California: ASEE Conferences, April 2019, https://peer.asee.org/31829.[3] D. Weagle, D. B. Ortendahl, and M. A. P.E., “Universities and industries: A proactive partnership shaping the future of work,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, no. 10.18260/1-2–33486. Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences, June 2019, https://peer.asee.org/33486.[4] J. P. Martin, S. D. Garrett, S. G. Adams, and J. Hamilton, “A qualitative look at african american students: Perceptions of developing engineer of
University, Will participates in robotics, is the past president of his school’s ASEE chapter, and is a member of Tau Beta Pi, IEEE and ACM. His engineering interests lie mainly in the fields of electrical and computer engineering. Upon graduation, he hopes to begin teaching engineering to high school students and to serve as both a role model and advocate for pursuing STEM, and specifically engineering as a field of study and career. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Lessons Learned from a First-Year Engineering Wind Turbine Project Project Description Learning Objectives
Precollege division of ASEE in 2004; was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education, and was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011. She has served on multiple NAE committees, and on the NSF ENG division’s Advisory Committee. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Minority Status and Belonging: Engineering Math as a Vehicle to Build CommunityAbstractThis research explored feelings of belonging and engineering identity among entering first yearstudents, within the case study of an engineering math course at a large, public institution.Incoming first-year students who did not place
staff. When reviewing accreditation criteria, the ACCE considers trends in construction technology as they relate to means and methods, societal and professional needs, and construction industry association recommendations and needs. [13]• Prior to 2019, the criteria review and revision process used by the American Institute of Architects (AIA) was largely “haphazard and ad hoc” [14]. But effective January 1, 2019, the AIA’s Standards for Continuing Education Programs [15] established a standardized review cycle of at least every two years. The Continuing Education Committee consists of nine AIA members and two representatives from AIA chapters and is responsible for reviewing and approving criteria revisions. AIA works
Engineers and Surveyors as the public member andher term expired Dec. 2019. She was the first public member to serve as the NC board chair (2018) .She is also heavily involved as an ASEE-CIPD Board member and in 2019 she was elected to be CIECTreasurer and the Assistant PIC V. Ms. Thurman is also member of the WiMfg national and NC Chapterand SoACE and NCACE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: A Holistic Approach to the First-Year Engineering ExperienceIntroductionThe University of North Carolina (UNC) at Charlotte is North Carolina’s urban researchuniversity. The William States Lee College of Engineering (COE) at UNC Charlotte
several papers on engineering education and the unique undergraduate curriculum at Rowan University, especially the Engineering Clinics. She has been involved in various outreach activities to recruit more women and minorities into engineering and is Program Chair Elect of the Women in Engineering Division of ASEE. She is the recipient of the 2011 New Jersey Section of ASCE Educator of the Year award as well as the 2013 Distinguished Engineering Award from the New Jersey Alliance for Action. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #26105Dr. Ralph Alan Dusseau P.E., Rowan University
literature. Some specificcollegiate courses that have documented their use of exam wrappers include engineeringmechanics [4], food science and human nutrition [5], introductory science [6], as well asintroductory calculus, statistics, and chemistry [1].Modified Exam WrapperIn order to meet the needs of our students, a modified exam wrapper assignment has beenimplemented in the learning strategies course associated with the GELC. The first iteration,detailed in our 2019 ASEE paper [2], took place in Fall 2018. The second iteration, which will bethe primary focus of the current paper, took place in Fall 2019. For the purposes of this paper,the students enrolled in the learning strategies course during the Fall 2018 semester will bereferred to as the
mathematicians. SIAM Review, 61(4):860–891, 2019. [2] Mehmet Ergezer, Bryon Kucharski, and Aaron Carpenter. Work in progress: Designing laboratory work for a novel embedded AI course. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 2018. ASEE Conferences. https://peer.asee.org/31280. [3] Jayson Paul Mercurio, Ayesha R Iqbal, Kevin Yamada, Jose L Guzman, Xiaorong Zhang, Wenshen Pong, Amelito G Enriquez, Zhaoshuo Jiang, Cheng Chen, Kwok Siong Teh, et al. Inspiring community college students in electrical and computer engineering research through live digit recognition using Nvidia’s Jetson Tx1. In 2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference, 2018. [4] Jack Bergquist and Anahid A Behrouzi. Multidisciplinary research
Paper ID #40699Weaving Students into Engineering Versus Weeding Them Out: A Frame-workfor InstitutionsDr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is Immediate Past Presi- dent of ASEE, past president of WEPAN, a past NSF ADVANCE PI, and co-recipient of the 2022 NAE Bernard M. Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Engineering Technology Education. She also received the 2019 ASEE Sharon Keillor Award for Women in Engineering Education and the 2018 WEPAN Founder’s Award. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
with natural fiber composite materials. He is also interested in entrepreneurship,sustainable engineering, and appropriate technology in developing countries. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 What Skills Do Engineering Students Really Need for the Workplace and Life?AbstractEach year technology changes impacting the requirements has for engineering entry level jobs.Students must increasingly be prepared for the unexpected in the workplace. Disruptivetechnologies will have a profound impact on industry and society as a whole. Faculty must alsobe ready for these changes and adapt engineering programs to this new world. Thus, it is good toperiodically
using automatic assessment (computer based assessments) using algorithms for test generation and LMS systems.Dr. Maria M. Larrondo-Petrie, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Larrondo Petrie has a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering and is a Professor and Associate Dean of In- ternational Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computer Science of Florida Atlantic University. She is the Executive Director of LACCEI (Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions) and served in the past as an officer of the International Division of ASEE (American Society of Engineering Institutions). She is Editor-in-Chief of the Latin American and Caribbean Journal of Engi- neering Education, forms part of the
work systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Co-Designed Research Agenda to Foster Educational Innovation Efforts Within Undergraduate Engineering at HSIsAbstractThe responsibility to educate and empower underrepresented groups in undergraduate educationoften relies on the commitment of educators and the curricula they design. Without financial orinstitutional support, there are limited opportunities for educators from different Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) to engage in conversations about their curricula developments andshare their vision for the future of engineering education. This multi-institutional research projectadopted a participatory research design to
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018[14]. D, G. Dimitriu, K. Bartels, and D. Dixon, “Reflections on Eight Years of Undergraduate Research Program at Our Community College”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Tamps, FL, 2019[15]. Hispanic Outlook on Education < https://www.hispanicoutlook.com/articles/top-10-schools-major-2019 >[16]. The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) < https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/ >[17]. D. G. Dimitriu and M. Shadaram, “The Making of a Technology Literacy Course”, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education
overall and forunder-represented groups). STEER members facilitate STEM Teaching Workshops sponsoredby the university provost. Each year, STEM Scholar Awards are made to several faculty whohave successfully applied EBT to their courses.We described many of these thrusts at the 2019 ASEE conference. In this paper, we will focusmore on describing the thrusts that have been implemented, or have evolved, since then. Also, asthis grant is in its no-cost extension year, we will present results and lessons learned.Specifically, we will address the number of faculty, graduate assistants and undergraduatestudents directly impacted by each thrust and will quantify, to the extent possible, the effect ofthat impact. Institutional data related to retention
Foundation.References[1] Menezes, G. B., & Won, D., & Tufenkjian, M., & Allen, E. L., & Schiorring, E. (2017, June),An Integrated First-Year Experience at ECST (FYrE@ECST) Paper presented at 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27573[2] Menezes, G. B., & Allen, E. L., & Ragusa, G., & Schiorring, E., & Nerenberg, P. S. (2019,June), Board 106: Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Large-scale Interventions in aFirst-year Experience Program Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://peer.asee.org/32177[3] Kornblum, S. L., & Avery El, Z. K., & Menezes, G. B., & Won, D., & Allen, E. L. (2017,August), Enhancing
5514 50.9 1.3Table 1 shows 2018 and 2019 were the years when most students took part in study abroadprograms. Engineering students usually accounted for about 40-45 % of all TTU students going Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 3abroad. After the onset of the Covid pandemic in early 2020 the TTU Office of International Affairsrecalled all TTU students who were abroad to return in March. Thirty-eight (38) engineeringstudents were among those that returned from