, particularly for international students. He aims to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by interventions, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection to promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group. He served as the ASEE Purdue Student Chapter President from 2022-2023, the Program Chair of ASEE Student Division, and Purdue ENE Graduate Committee Junior Chair.Dr. Moses Olayemi, University of Oklahoma Moses Olayemi is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Pathways at the
studies from Old Dominion University in 2015. Isaac’s consultancy, HEDGE Co., focuses on working with formal and informal educators to grow the numbers of females pursuing engineering or technology careers. Additionally, she is a conferred Fellow of the Society of Women Engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Does How Pre-College Engineering and Technology Role Models See Themselves Relate to Girls' Engagement in the Fields? [Research to Practice]IntroductionSince the Equal Pay Act in 1963, female participation in engineering has increased only eightpoints, from less than 5 to 13% [1], while, in the fields of medicine, female participation
positiveattitude during their collaboration activities. The data set was provided by the Shark Lab at CSULong Beach and we gratefully acknowledge the support we received from the shark expertsthere, in particular the director, Dr. Chris Lowe, and Graduate Student, Patrick Rex. References1. M. LaalSeyed, and M. Ghodsi (2012) “Benefits of collaborative learning” Elsevier Proceedings - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 31, Pages 486-490.2. E.F., Barkley, K.P. Cross, and C.H. Major (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.3. D.W Johnson, R. Johnson, and K. Smith (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.4. D. Kantor (2010
,Signals and Systems, and Microcomputers I, through which students gain solid foundation beforestudents take on senior design projects. Lab modules with open-ended design learning experience through using a lab-in-a-boxapproach were developed to allow students to solve lab problems with multiple approaches thatallow problem solving independently and collaboratively. Because this innovative lab designallows problem solving at various cognitive levels, it is better suited for concept exploration andcollaborative lab learning environments as opposed to the traditional lab works with a“cookbook” approach that tend to lead students to follow certain procedures for expectedsolutions with the absence of problem exploration stage. In addition to
20 declines to participate, we will fill with a similar schoolthat meets the same selection criteria. Figure 2. Map of Institutions Targeted for RDI participation.The diversity of partner institutions – large land-grant universities, major private institutions,minority-serving institutions, all located across the USA - provides a broad range of uniqueperspectives and experiences that can be shared and modeled. In the fourth year, we will develop a network of institutions hosting RDI interventionsand ‘train-the-trainer’ sessions with the initial collaborating institutions. Throughout the first fouryears of the project, our team will research doctoral students’ transition into graduate schoolbased on the nationwide RDI
sociocultural dimensions of engineering education.Andrew Elby, University of Maryland, College Park Andrew Elby’s work focuses on student and teacher epistemologies and how they couple to other cognitive machinery and help to drive behavior in learning environments. His academic training was in Physics and Philosophy before he turned to science (particularly physics) education research. More recently, he has started exploring engineering students’ entangled identities and epistemologies.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Assistant Research Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in
-academia partnership in the area of Software Verification and Validation. In his current role he serves as the University’s Sponsored Research Officer, manages research grant applications/awards, supervises all international programs, and teaches undergraduate software engineering and graduate engineering management courses. Dr. Acharya plays an important role in international students recruitment at his University.Jennifer Creamer, Robert Morris University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Opening the Doors for International Students - Are we Ready? AbstractHigher Education Institutions in the United States are facing the effects of the
on October 3, 2015 on thecampus of LU. Over 120 students and faculty attended sessions created to emphasize improvingSTEM education. College and university faculty members, administrators, and peers involved inSTEM education, or interested in getting involved, were invited to share and explore research,best practices, and ideas with their colleagues around the states of Texas and Louisiana. Theconference was also attended by eight S-STEM PI or co-PIs. This paper describes the ASCENTapproach, its structure and its expected results.Keywords- Bridge program, undergraduate research, STEM retention, timely graduation Introduction ASCENT is a collaboration between the Department of Mathematics (MATH) and
academic and professional futures.3. Course Design and ObjectivesThis course is a small component of a Title V project, the City Tech STEM SuccessCollaborative, funded by the US Department of Education, aimed at enhancing retention,graduation rates, and workforce readiness among Hispanic and low-income students interested inSTEM fields. The project emphasizes the early academic support and integration of academicresources to foster career awareness, engagement, multidisciplinary collaboration, hands-onproblem-solving, and alignment with current industry practices. This initiative aims to streamlinethe educational journey, minimizing time to degree completion and reducing the accrual of non-contributory credits.Course objectivesThe 'Exploring
Paper ID #42713Developing an AI and Engineering Design Hybrid-Remote Summer CampProgram for Underrepresented Students (Evaluation)Alvin Talmadge Hughes IV, University of Florida Alvin (TJ) Hughes is a graduate of the University of Florida with a Bachelor of Science in Materials Science and Engineering and a minor in Engineering Innovation. He has interests in additive manufacturing, materials analysis, and data analytics. He is the Data Science/AI curriculum lead for the EQuIPD grant at the University of Florida currently manages teams working on Python Professional Development for teachers interested in Data Science, as
the learners by allowing them to modify, or “tweak” their role. For reasonspreviously stated, gamification of this experiment was intrinsically motivating as was the noveltyof controlling a MUAV.2. Collaboration and cooperative learning: On the day before the experiment, the students weredivided in the groups of their respective role and given ample time in class to meet and discusshow they might approach the experiment as a whole. Likewise, they had ~10 minutes toexchange thoughts at the parking lot just prior to beginning the experiment when theirexcitement was building. In between each trial, the graduate researcher instructed each group tothink critically out loud about the previous trial and how their role affected it. As a result
diverse spectrum of knowledge,including fostering flexible modes of thinking, qualitatively demonstrated enhanced creativityand collaboration within design teams. Additionally, they reported developing a deeperunderstanding of themselves and cultivating more profound purposes.Building on this trajectory, this paper explores the implications of the HE pedagogy onengineering design education, examining its role in preparing students for engagement in designpractices, and considering what may motivate their deeper understanding of design. It provideshistorical context underscoring the pivotal role of design in engineering education and advocatesfor a more holistic approach to design methodologies. The research also investigates whetherexpanding
various aspects such asstudent recruitment, funding allocation, and public perception [3]. It is crucial for a university toinvestigate retention to understand the reasons behind student departures. Retention rates amongcollege students are frequently employed as a metric for gauging institutional accountability andsuccess. Moreover, these rates are increasingly utilized as a basis for allocating resources.Gaining insights into the factors that influence college student retention has become imperativefor institutions of higher education. The ongoing issue of low graduation rates among students inengineering programs remains a significant cause for concern within the higher educationlandscape. Many students drop out early in their undergraduate
, the proposed research has the potential to broaden participationin STEM by increasing engagement, retention, and graduation of underrepresented minorities.Second, in building SocioTechnical Learning capacity, the research will also contribute to newapproaches for community centered solutions that leverage cultural assets of underrepresentedstudents and consider alternative knowledges in collaborative technology design, development,and implementation. As students graduate and enter the workforce, they carry with them thecapacity to respond to human and societal dimensions of technology in daily practices.3. Conceptual FrameworkThe literature characterizes multiple separate flavors of social learning and techno-centriclearning in the context of
Paper ID #33176Student Recognition, Use, and Understanding of Engineering for OnePlanet Competencies and Outcomes in Project-based LearningJames Larson, Arizona State University James Larson is a graduate of Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus. The general engineer- ing program in The Polytechnic School takes a project-based pedagogical approach when designing the curriculum. James has previously researched influences for this program design in examinations of the Maker Movement. Previous contributions to ASEE on this subject include conference papers, ”Sup- porting K-12 Student Self-Direction with a Maker Family
scholarly journals, we used this natural experiment to spurour exploration of this population’s information seeking behaviors. Would this change in accessimpact the way this community found, accessed, or ultimately used scholarly literature? Wouldthey even notice? The purpose of this research study was to gain a more nuanced understandingof engineering faculty and graduate students’ information seeking behaviors to better understandtheir current practices and needs.Exploring these questions has implications for engineering librarians’ collection developmentand instruction choices. It also has implications for the way access points like link resolvers ormessages about navigating back to a library’s subscription-based resources are designed
science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educators in an easily accessible and compelling form:that of an online forum student usage model. Recent work in engineering education providesprecedent for the use of personas to communicate research findings [10-12]. Moreover, incommunicating our findings using personas with contextualized scenarios that describe how thepersonas choose to actively engage (or not engage) with the online forum, we anticipate (a)improved transfer of contextual findings to a broad audience of STEM education stakeholdersand (b) heightened motivation and confidence among STEM educators toward implementingonline forums in order to increase participation of diverse, nontraditional undergraduates.Prior Use of
communities21, service learning22, problem-based learning23,24, cooperative learning24and the use of team projects25. More recently, researchers have tried to improve engagement byintroducing cultural touch stones for teaching engineering concepts in large classrooms26,collaboration with multiple disciplines27, collaboration between multiple schools28, ethnographicrecords and virtual learning experiments29.Recent research efforts have identified the role that faculty plays in the classroom to create anenvironment that is engaging to the students30. This is especially true in teaching focusedschools such as Tuskegee University31,32. The way teacher behaves in classroom and his/hercommunication ability plays a crucial role in the engagement of students8
today, about14% of the first year engineering cohort is enrolled in Pre-Calculus or year-long Calculus I their firstsemester [2].Eight credit hours of math is a lot to ask of first semester students, especially those among theleast mathematically prepared in the college.During the course approval process, it was decided to make Engineering Math a 3000-levelcourse (a designation usually reserved for third year courses) so that it could count as a technicalelective in several engineering degree programs. If it had been approved as a 1000-level course,most students would not have had free space in their degree plan to count the four-credit coursetowards graduation. For all these reasons, it was important to explain the course to students andmake
Paper ID #41099Text Mining Analysis for Assessing Washington Accord Graduate AttributeProfiles through Techno-Socio Project-Based Learning ProgramMr. Hiroyuki Ishizaki, Shibaura Institute of Technology Hiroyuki Ishizaki is a Visiting Professor at Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), a leading Japanese engineering school. His research interests include multidisciplinary teaching and learning, cross-cultural competence, collaborative online international (COIL), technopreneurship, and project/problem-based learning methods. As a Director of the Malaysia Office, he has been expatriated in Malaysia since 2014 and leading
., The Citadel Robert Rabb is an associate professor and the Mechanical Engineering Program Director at The Citadel. He previously taught mechanical engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy and his M.S.E. and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. His research and teaching interests are in mechatronics, regenerative power, and multidisciplinary engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student Veteran Leadership Skills in an Engineering Technical Writing CourseTechnical proficiency is a
commitment and motivation [7], [9]. faculty. - Faculty members serve as inspiration and as partner of discussion improving the aspiration of the students [3], [7], [10]. - Learning requires cooperation between student and faculty. Enhanced student-faculty contact promotes the cooperation [11]. 2. Promote student collaboration and - After graduation students will enter jobs where team-work-skills are often a requirement or at least appreciated [12]. responsibility for own learning. - Collaboration promotes
students in different fieldswill have different levels of wellbeing as well as perceptions of stress, competition, andachievement. This relationship is hypothesized because they would be socialized in differentcharacteristics that are deemed particular to their fields. In this exploration, we first use largegroups to identify any specific differentiation of engineering compared against the other twolarge categories considered. However, future work will involve the exploration of differencesbetween engineering and specific majors individually.MethodsDataWe used data from the Healthy Minds Study (HMS), a web-based survey administered throughthe Healthy Minds Network for Research on Adolescent and Young Adult Mental Health(HMN). The initiative was
, Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education.20. Grandy, J. (1994). Gender and ethnic differences among science and engineering majors: Experiences, achievements, and expectations. (RR-94-30). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Services.21. Morozov, A., Kilgore, D., Yasuhara, K., & Atman, C. (2008). Same courses, different outcomes? Variations in confidence, experience, and preparation in engineering design. Paper presented at the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Pittsburgh, PA. https://peer.asee.org/348622. Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_423. Center
engineering techniques. His recent research focuses on the effect of high-impact practices on engineering and computer science undergraduate student outcomes around academic success and persistence.Dr. Candis S. Claiborn, Washington State University Professor Emeritus Candis Claiborn has been at Washington State University since 1991. In 2016, she returned to faculty after serving for 10 years as Dean of the Voiland College of Engineering and Archi- tecture at WSU. Prior to that, she served as interim dean and as associate dean for research and graduate programs. Dr. Claiborn received her PhD in chemical engineering from North Carolina State University in 1991. Her research interests are in engineering education
Paper ID #33752The PEERSIST Project: Promoting Engineering Persistence Through Peer-ledStudy GroupsMs. Thien Ngoc Y Ta, Arizona State University Thien Ta is a doctoral student of Engineering Education Systems and Design at Arizona State University. She obtained her B.S., and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering. She has taught for Cao Thang technical college for seven years in Vietnam. She is currently a graduate research associate for the Entrepreneurial Mindset initiative at the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her doctoral research focuses on Entrepreneurship Education and Innovation in
disagree.Literature ReviewEstablishing the link between EI and teamwork is crucial for several reasons. Teamwork skill isstressed by ABET but unevenly distributed among engineering graduates according to employersurveys (Marra et al. 2016). When students with varying skill levels work together in teams, theirinteractions and perceptions of themselves and others can influence their EI formation.Underrepresented minority (URM) students may be particularly affected. Studies have shownthat female students who asked questions during teamwork were perceived as less competent inSTEM (Hoehn et al. 2020), and racial minority students suffered from low self-esteem for fear ofbeing viewed as diversity “tokens” (Ong et al. 2020). Weatherton et al. (2017) found
sandwich (cooperative) principle of integrated periods of study and trainingin industry. The most popular was six months in industry followed by six months in collegein each of four successive years [4].A requirement of the NCTA was that all students for their diplomas should have participatedin programs of liberal study. This was reinforced in 1957 by a government edict that extendedthe idea of compulsory liberal studies to all levels of technical education even though muchof it was part time study [5]. By 1962 it was seen that the development of literacy, that is theability to read and write, was essential for the general education of all students. Thus, it wasthat in those colleges the term Liberal Studies came to be substituted by General
development [18-20].Research on student engagement has been rooted in a well-established field of inquiry on howpostsecondary students’ experiences affect their learning and development [21-24]. The generalconclusion of this body of literature is correlational, that is, the greater the students’ engagementin curricular and co-curricular activities on campus, the greater their level of cognitive andpsychosocial development. For this reason, student engagement has been well recognized as apredictor of student learning and an important factor of student success [5, 25, 26]. The positivecorrelation between student engagement and learning outcomes has been reported extensively inhigher education literature. For example, a study that used multi
graduate students. If we areto preach teamwork to our students, we had better train young faculty in teamwork,and leadership skills necessary for success. Although we would continue to witnessfaculty who can research and publish on their own; but, at the very least the lonewolves will have to learn to travel in more collaborative packs. Having more trainedfaculty in team-based, collaborative research will bolster the pool of potential groupleaders, department heads, and future administrators, when the need arises.Institutional RoleColleges of engineering would excel at teaching and learning when the majority oftheir faculty develop and achieve a reasonable level of pedagogical knowledge, and atthe same time, are able to enrich the learning process