management, program assessment, university-industry partnerships, grant writing, and student development in the co-curricular learning environment with a special focus on recruiting, supporting, and graduating students from groups historically underrepresented in engineering.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is an Assistant Professor and Director of International Engagement in the Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program, Center for Human- Computer Interaction, and Human-Centered Design Program. His research tend to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more
to shorten the bridge between academics and the world of work. A study ofinterview rates among recent college graduates shows that internships increase the rate at whichapplicant receive interviews increases fourteen percent if students complete an internship duringtheir studies. (Nunley 42) Further corroboration of the importance of internships is provided bya survey conducted by the Chronicle of Higher Education in which employers identifiedemployment and internship experience outweighed college major and GPA in ranked importanceof hiring decisions. (Chronicle 24)Source: Chronicle of Higher Education (2012)Each student enrolled in internship earns credit toward the degree requirements for the workexperience. A full-time faculty advisor is
Paper ID #19655Empowering Students to Teach Flight Dynamics and Flight Simulation En-hanced Learning through Applied ModelingMr. Muhammad Omar Memon, University of Dayton Muhammad Omar Memon is a doctorate student and a part time instructor for Flight Vehicle Performance at the University of Dayton.Dathan Erdahl Ph.D., University of Dayton Research Institute Dathan Erdahl is a research engineer with the University of Dayton Research Institute and has been an adjunct faculty member with the School of Engineering since 2008. He received his M.S. (2000) and Ph.D. (2005) degrees from the Georgia Institute of Technology and has
real-world research projects with team members from multiple disciplines hashelped these undergraduates to gain experiences outside their own disciplines. This has aidedthem in developing diverse skill sets that are described in terms of: interdisciplinary experiences,links between their classroom learning and lab experiences, academic and professional skills,impacts of faculty and graduate mentoring, and impacts on academic and career decisions.1. IntroductionIn order to tackle the multifaceted problems of the 21st century, industries often engageemployees from multiple disciplines to solve a single problem. Although, industries haverecognized the need for interdisciplinary collaborations, the departmental structures in collegesand
” students for correlate ACT Math scores with student success largelyengineering study is explored. The question of how we stemmed from the author’s personal conversation andcan provide academic and advising support to the group interaction with graduating senior students that spannedof students who are identified to be “marginally throughout the students’ entire academic career at MSU,prepared” is raised and discussed. Effective strategies of Mankato. The number graduating senior students has heldusing ACT Math scores to identify this group of steady at approximately 25 students, while the number of“marginally prepared” students so that their probability students registering for the ME 101
. Purdue AET graduates areimmediately fully contributing team members when they enter the workforce.They think in terms of systems of systems including the ability to communicate across a broadrange of professional and managerial areas and the ability to learn and understand the criticaltime line and cost elements of a program. It also seems to provide a high degree of self-actualization of its graduates, by providing a defined focus of personal significance. This isespecially true in aviation or aerospace, where the student can easily understand the impacts ofspecific actions upon the health and wellbeing of other people. From that understanding,students develop a sense of personal responsibility and drive to professional integrity. Suchprograms
efforts that acknowledge learner diversity, and understand their effects in students performance. Isabel received her professional degree in biological engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile and her MA in policy, organizations and leadership studies at Stanford Graduate School of Education.Dr. Constanza Miranda Mendoza, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile Constanza Miranda holds a PhD in design with a focus in anthropology from North Carolina State Uni- versity. While being a Fulbright grantee, Constanza worked as a visiting researcher at the Center for Design Research, Mechanical Engineering Department, at Stanford. Today she is an assistant professor at the P.Universidad Cat´olica de Chile’s
The handbook for high performance virtual teams with Jill Nemiro and others.Dr. Jill Zarestky, Colorado State Univeristy Jill Zarestky, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor of Adult Education and Training in the School of Education at Colorado State University.Lei Xie, Texas A&M University Lei Xie is a doctoral student at Texas A&M University. He is currently majoring in Human Resource Development in the Department of Educational Administration & Human Resource Development. His research interests include conflict management, organizational learning/change, knowledge management, learning organization, and International HRD. As a second year international graduate student from the People’s Republic of
helped students explore what it might be like to work on aglobal engineering team. Students were placed in small groups, and each person was assigned acountry from a different region of the world (e.g., one team had members assigned Egypt, SouthKorea, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Colombia, and Indonesia). The students assumed therole of managers of an international team of engineers from their assigned countries and had todetermine how to lead the team effectively. In the first part of the project, each group identifiedquestions they could ask to learn about the cultural and business practices in their countries.Each student then located and communicated with an engineer from their assigned country todiscuss those questions. Students wrote
Science Foundation, his research was highlighted the American Society of Engineering Education’s Prism Magazine. He received a CAREER Award in 2016 to study the significance of neurodiversity in developing a creative engineering workforce.Miss Alexandra Hain, University of Connecticut Alexandra Hain is a PhD student at the University of Connecticut studying structural engineering. She received her Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering in 2015 from the University of Connecticut. She has an interest in engineering education and served as the program manager for the REU Site: Research Experience in Cyber and Civil Infrastructure Security for Students with ADHD: Fostering Innovation during summer 2016
of this effort was less about understanding the patient experience from abusiness or technology design perspective, but much more about actually understanding what itis like to be a patient with cancer. Following an introductory discussion in class on what steps ofthe disease and intervention pathways would be most challenging to patients, students exploredwhat feelings, decisions, conversations, events, etc. patients might experience along the diseaseand intervention pathways. Students were encouraged to explore the various aspects of the livesof the patients that could be affected such as finances, jobs, family, physical abilities, socialinteractions, etc. After creating a sequence of at least fifteen of these feelings, events, etc
an educational psychologist, studying motivation among pre-service teachers and college faculty members. Along with teaching pre-service teachers, she is the project manager for the STEAM project, a First in the World grant project, funded by the US Department of Education. She works for the Center for Instructional of Excellence at Purdue University.Dr. Mark French, Purdue University Mark French started his career as a civilian aerospace engineer for the US Air Force after getting a BS in Aerospace and Ocean Engineering at VA Tech. While working for the Air Force, he did an MS and a PhD at the University of Dayton. His dissertation was on the design of aeroelastically scaled wind tunnel models. After 10 years
characterize what factors contribute tostudents’ decisions to major and persist in engineering. Addressing the professionalaspects of engineering is essential to furthering the work on engineering identity.The study has important implications for perspective engineering students, undergraduatestudents, graduate students, and professionals in engineering setting. Future work willbetter inform our understanding of the connection, if any, between affect, identity, andobserved persistence. To this end we plan to further refine our identity framework byincluding content-specific identity, professional identity, personal identity, and socialidentity across contexts and backgrounds including race, gender, major, and campusculture. Truly intersectional work
activity.From an instructional perspective, each student receives the personalized EP10 report, but asummary (group) report for the entire class is not available. In addition, participants cannot seethe individual items and their associated response scores.While results from the EP10 are presented qualitatively, the EMP report is at the other end of thespectrum, reporting quantitative data in both tabular and graphical format. The data associatedwith each item is provided in a table with a score from 1 to 5, where a 1 represents the response“Does not describe me well” and a 5 represents the response “Describes me well” to anyparticular item. A group report is available to the faculty member to share with the class. Anexample data set and related items
FIGURE 1 DESIGN PROCESS DEVELOPED BY E4C [7]First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6-8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL W1A-2 Session W1A An example timeline of the course is shown in Figure 2. curriculum, other changes may also be made to ensure thatNote that this course will be taught in fall 2017 as lab sections students graduate with the skills and tools necessary for athat meet on Tuesdays and Thursdays in 100 minute periods career in engineering. Long-term indicators and futurefor fourteen
College cum laudeSamantha Swanson 2014-2015 Anticipated 2018 Augsburg College, Minnesota State University MankatoCaroline Wochnick 2014-2015 Anticipated 2017 Augsburg CollegeAmanda Kapetanakis 2016-present Anticipated 2017 Augsburg CollegeKelsey Irvin’s Evaluation of her Personal NarrativeWhat led me to STEM as an undergraduate student “Even before I first arrived at my undergraduate university, I knew that I wanted to pursue studies and a career in STEM
gradually increases thelevel of vulnerability required so as to ease students from a context where personal affectiveexperience is uncommon. Begin with low-risk Open Sentences that allow for various levels ofcomfort. To take a real-world example from a sustainable design class exploring the design ofenvironments, beginning with an Open Sentence such as, “A place that I loved as a child…” issafer than “When I look at the world today, what I find most heartbreaking is…” Along similarnotes, beginning a feedback session with an Open Sentence that prompts positive feedback isoften easier for students, and cultivates greater openness to then progress to sharing criticalfeedback, such as, “When I reflect upon my experience working on this team, I wish…”In
which engages and develops practical skills in the students. Currently she is exploring the performance and attributes of engineering technology students and using that knowledge to engage them in their studies. In addition to this work, she is interested in professional societies and how they support careers of their members.Dr. Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University Gretchen Hein is a senior lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech. She have been teaching ENG3200, Thermo-Fluids since 2005. She also teaches first-tear engineering classes. She has been active in incorporating innovative instructional methods into all course she teaches. Her research areas also include why students persist in
may have diminished; previously when FE review was part of a gradedcourse it seemed to send a stronger message from the program and its faculty that the exam wasimportant to the students’ future career. For example, on the 2011-2012 graduating seniorsurvey, students were asked “how important is it to you whether or not you passed the FEexam?” Among the 56 respondents, 9% selected not at all/not very and 9% answeredmoderately; we believe that all students should respond moderately or higher. Also, it was feltthat the level of knowledge and learning acquired in the senior design course was insufficient formany of the professional skills. For example, the ability of students to analyze issues inprofessional ethics was not being documented
technology education. National Research Council (NRC) Comprehensive research study report summarizing How People Learn10 current research in the learning sciences and actual practice in the classroom. Army Leader Development The Army’s comprehensive approach to developing Strategy11 leaders for the security challenges of tomorrow. West Point Leader Development An institution level document that implements the System (WPLDS) Handbook12 Army’s Leader Development Strategy and defines student outcomes which explain what a graduate must Be, Know, and Do. Educating
Paper ID #18260Work in Progress: Do Students Really Understand Design Constraints? ABaseline StudyDr. J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University Dr. Hylton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. He pre- viously completed his graduate studies in Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, where he con- ducted research in both the School of Mechanical Engineering and the School of Engineering Education. Prior to Purdue, he completed his undergraduate work at the University of Tulsa, also in Mechanical En- gineering. He currently teaches first-year engineering courses as well as
, and many people they care about, are members of the public that frequently comeinto some sort of contact with engineered things. There are a number of professional benefits enjoyed by engineers and ultimatelymade possible by broad adoption of a code of ethics. An example Davis offers, via ananalysis of Robert Lund’s decision to “think like a manager” rather than an engineer ishow engineers qua engineers are, due to their code, more empowered to reject anemployer’s request. Lund, then the vice-president of engineering at Morton Thiokol—the company responsible for the O-rings whose failure led to the Challenger disaster in1986—found himself in the unfortunate position of being pulled away from hisprofessional obligations by other
understand industry and are eager to share their knowledge. 2. Residency – Two week-long and one three day residencies on Texas A&M campus to connect with fellow distance students, program faculty and staff support, traditions, and the larger Aggie network while taking part in challenging leadership workshops emphasizing communication, creativity, collaboration, problem solving, and formulating the capstone project. 3. Lockstep - Engage with a supportive cohort of like-minded professionals focused on enhancing their professional development while managing responsibilities at work and home.Residency Week - The residency component is an essential part of a student’s development andpreparation for a career as a mid
education facultymembers, industry practitioner(s), context experts, instructional specialists, and graduate and/orundergraduate teaching assistants. X-teams use an iterative design thinking process andreflection to explore pedagogical strategies. X-teams are also serving as change agents for therest of the department through communities of practice referred to as Y-circles.Y-circles, comprised of X-team members, faculty, staff, and undergraduate and graduate studentsin the department, are contributing to an organizational culture that fosters and sustainsinnovations in engineering education through an agile framework that blends severaldocumented change theories, including collaborative transformation, crucial conversations, andessential tension
to quickly create clarity around key issues to ensure that strategic plans are developed, executed and monitored for success. This clarity of vision is informed by her highly diverse career, starting as an exploration/development petroleum geologist, including a brief stint in education when she lived in Venezuela, and to the present day when her clients have ranged from a heavy equipment manufacturer to a discount brokerage and a biotech firm. Ms. Pyle holds a MBA degree from Averett University, a MEd. from the University of Houston, and a BA in Geology from Cedar Crest College. She has served on various boards including the Board of Directors for the Charlottesville Venture Group where she chaired the Business
advocates for change in their future careers. Hatchery Units are onecredit courses that are designed to address gaps in students’ technical knowledge identified bylocal industry, infuse ethics and social justice in the undergraduate computer science curriculum,and build communities of practice while providing a more streamlined integration experience fortransfer students to the program. Guided by Rawl’s [33] theory of social justice, the team willwork with students and faculty to create an environment that is welcoming and supportive for allundergraduate CS students and encourage graduates of the program to work to promote thesevalues as future computer science professionals. The development of these values will bepromoted by building communities
motivations for this include “accommodation” of student interests andpreferences in hopes of influencing student learning outcomes and team effectiveness, whileproviding an efficient and fair method of assigning students to project teams.3. Objectives, Assumptions and MethodologyIn the interest of understanding how team selection might impact project results in a capstonesetting, we collected and analyzed data on over eight-two capstone project teams over foursemesters. The data consisted of a combination of quantitative and qualitative parametersincluding academic performance, practical engineering experience, career interests, projectpreferences, personality, and technical skills used to assign individual students to project teamsover four
Paper ID #18699Switching Midstream, Floundering Early, and Tolerance for Ambiguity: HowCapstone Students Cope with Changing and Delayed ProjectsDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton, Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Facilities Planning, and Human-Machine Systems. She is Director of the Galante Engineering Business Program as well as the Coordinator of Senior Capstone Design in Industrial Engineering at NU. She has also been an active member of
particular importance, since reflection is oftentimes new territoryfor engineering students [Arizona State University FG08, Bellevue College FG07, BellevueCollege FG10, Clarkson University FG01, all as cited in [14]]. Furthermore, there are indicationsthat a key factor in developing reflexive skills is the attitude towards and modeling of these skillsby mentors and faculty themselves [10][12]. Providing formative assessment on criticalreflection tasks seems to present an opportunity to model reflection for students [Georgia TechFG11, as cited in [14]].On a larger scale, Davis et al. [9], describe how multiple universities have used assessments ofreflection tasks to document ABET outcomes.It seems that the decision whether to assess or not assess a
Paper ID #19291A Systematic Review of Sustainability Assessments in ASEE ProceedingsDr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and biological waste treatment.Dr. Elise Barrella, James Madison University