UTEP in 2001. He received the UT System Board of Regents Outstanding Teaching Award in 2012. From 1996 to 2001 he was the Technology Planning manager for AT&T-Alestra in Mexico; and before that was the Telecommunica- tions Director for ITESM in Mexico. His research areas are in Communications Networks, Fiber Optics, Wireless Sensors, Process Automation, and Engineering Education.Mr. Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso Mike Pitcher is the Director of Academic Technologies at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has had experience in learning in both a traditional university program as well as the new online learning model, which he utilizes in his current position consulting with faculty about the
has authored and co-authored several journal and conference publications in topics related to engineering education and course man- agement, design coordination, change management, site layout planning, constructability, claims and disputes, and simulation of design and construction operations.Miss Sarah Samir Sedra, United Arab Emirates university Sarah S. Sedra, a telecommunication engineer currently working at Etisalat UAE as mobile access plan- ning engineer. Worked previously for two years as an low voltage electrical engineer in AECOM middle east. Graduated in 2013 from Communication & electronics department in faculty of engineering Cairo university. After working for almost 4 years now I just started
universities and colleges that couldfoster student interaction. This information can provide a basic panorama of cross disciplinaryAEC education in the United States.MethodologyGiven this scenario, this study analyzes the core curricula of CM programs affiliated with theAssociated Schools of Construction (ASC) in an effort to determine overlaps and potentialoverlaps between required courses in the plans of study of CM and other AEC disciplines. Thisresearch involves curriculum analysis of construction management, architecture, and civilengineering programs of American universities that have CM affiliated programs. Researchersfocus only on bachelor’s degrees within those academic institutions.In order to provide a survey of the current state of cross
State University’s 2000-2005 Strategic Plan, which reflected an expanded mission with a focus on research. From itsinitial founding, the ECE department had significant collaborations with local industry and inparticular from two major technology corporations that surrounded it. As the program grew andexpanded, the need for a doctoral program was seen as a natural next step in the progress of theuniversity and critical to serving the needs of local industry.Since this would be the first doctoral program in engineering and only the third at the university,several challenges existed. The first was the high cost associated with such a program, thesecond was resistance to the university in moving from a comprehensive institution to a
allowed SPLs to encompass a more comprehensive view ofthe software to improve consistency and alignment with goals for the software [8], and theapplication of SPLs has been done in the classroom in dedicated classes. Effective planning forSPL development requires familiarity with relevant SPL methods and the core product beingdeveloped [18].SPLs have been developed for mobile applications previously. A product line architecture wasdeveloped for a role-playing game on an early smartphone that allowed developers to improveperformance and development speed through the incorporation of SPL development methods [21].Combining incremental prototyping and plan-driven development processes has also proveneffective for an SPL in a mobile game environment
already had a chromebook touse for these sessions. The teacher uses Google classroom. The middle school students werebused from the middle school and had to make up the work they missed.Connecting middle school students with teachers.The two middle school girls were interested in reaching out to the elementary school to sharewhat they were learning in coding in the middle school. After reaching out to the elementaryschool principal, they put together a one page proposal about their ideas. The principal thenconnected them with the elementary enrichment teacher who then connect them with a 4th gradeteacher. They scheduled two planning meetings and together they put a plan together about theactivities that would work best with the students and the
, airport operations, and transportation planning and evaluation. Her current research fo- cuses on sustainable planning and evaluation of public and rail transportation systems. Dr. Pyrialakou started working in the area of engineering education at Purdue University when she taught Introduction to Transportation Engineering in spring 2016. She currently explores topics related to undergraduate STEM education improvement, including connecting teaching, research, and practice; student retention in engi- neering; recruitment and retention of underrepresented students in engineering; and holistic engineering. Dr. Pyrialakou also teaches courses on transportation engineering, transportation/urban planning, and civil
inengineering.In this work-in-progress paper, we describe a design-based research project that explores howstudents adopt positive learning behaviors and dispositions through a course, because positivelearning behaviors and dispositions have been shown to increase persistence through challengesand setbacks4.We have designed a course titled Engineering the Mind as an eight-week, second-half semestercourse that is offered for one semester-hour of credit. We plan to pilot this course in Spring 2017to prepare for the Fall 2017 offering.BackgroundDesign-Based ResearchDesign-based research (DBR) is a research paradigm that attempts to bridge laboratory studieswith complex, instructional intervention studies5. DBR is described as “theoretically-framed,empirical
management/ This novelties could include development of newforms of incorporation for a more efficient arrangement and integration of the research,educational and innovative activities (research and educational centers, inter-department andinter-university magistracy programs, corporate universities, etc.); in the social and economic aspect – these are novelties including development ofprocess adaptation of knowledge. It could be intensive programs, among other things, in theform of opening of educational programs, departments or training centers by corporations inhigher education institution for the purpose of training students for work under conditions ofthe innovations implemented or planned to be implemented. Participation of students
0.75 Element B: Documentation and analysis of prior solution attempts 0.76 Element C: Presentation and justification of solution design requirements 0.95 Element D: Design concept generation, analysis, and selection 0.89 Element F: Consideration of design viability 0.94 Element G: Construction of testable prototype 0.96 Element H: Prototype testing and data collection plan 0.96 Element I: Testing, data collection and analysis 0.95 Element J: Documentation of external evaluation 0.96 Element K
two separateQuality Enhancement Plan (QEP). The MAPS program support initiatives: 1) Transition, academic success, andserves as indoctrination for engineering, engineering professional development coaching, and 2) Specific first-technology, and construction management students to and second-year engineering course Supplementallearn, understand, and establish personal connections to Instruction (SI) selection and funding. The focus of thisacademic success and professional development paper is on the transition, academic success, andstrategies, campus-wide resources, networking professional development coaching component of theopportunities, and organizations. The MAPS program
noteveryone could attend even at that.The approach to scheduling meetings is discussed in the Activities section, and data collectionmethodologies are discussed in the Assessment Plan and Results section. 52.2.1 ActivitiesThe NFLC held weekly meetings during the semester for the faculty. Each meeting was structured toaddress one of the three outcomes, and the outcome addressed was rotated regularly. A schedule forthe Spring 2017 semester is presented in Table 1 to illustrate this. In order to address outcome 1, on-campus speakers were invited to discuss specific topics, such as creating instructional videos, activelearning techniques, and the learning management system. Sessions addressing
programs andretirements, the academic leadership team is moving all faculty to the more accepted 60-20-20faculty workload model. While still feeling the effects of the recession on endowments andthe need to support more research/scholarship and service by the tenure-track and tenuredfaculty, the nearly 95% tenured or tenured track faculty is being reshaped to be 75% tenuredor tenure-tracked and 25% adjunct or lecturer (non-tenure track) over the next 5-10 years.With the recent requirement for development plans for staff, the School of Engineeringimmediately began discussions and implemented plans for non-tenure track facultydevelopment.Current Faculty Development ModelThere are numerous articles on the effect the recent recession had on decreasing
Paper ID #20374Student Paper: Small Team Agile Systems Engineering For Rapid Prototyp-ing of Robotic SystemsMr. Charles Avery Noren, Texas A&M University Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory Charles Noren is an undergraduate research assistant at the Texas A&M University Vehicle Systems & Control Laboratory and task leader for the rail-based robotic system project. He is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering in May of 2018, and plans to continue his education at Texas A&M University with a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering.Kendra Lynne Andersen, Texas A&M
construction was adapted in HB1647 building code of Florida Legislature. Najafi is a member of numerous professional societies and has served on many committees and programs, and continuously attends and presents refereed papers at international, national, and local professional meetings and conferences. Lastly, Najafi attends courses, seminars and workshops, and has developed courses, videos and software packages during his career. His areas of specialization include transportation planning and management, legal aspects, construction contract administration, renewable energy, and public works. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 100% Renewable energy for Pennsylvania
Paper ID #19933Work in Progress: A Strategy for Assessing Learning Through Reflecting onDoingMr. Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma Jackson L. Autrey is a Master of Science student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Ok- lahoma from Tulsa, Oklahoma. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and currently is involved with research into design-based engineering education. After completion of his Master’s degree, Jackson plans to pursue a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering.Prof. Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Zahed Siddique is a Professor of Mechanical
, ground station, andsupporting infrastructure; 2) comprehend the complex interaction and interdependencies of UASsubsystems; 3) understand mission operational planning considerations such as flight planningand data requirements planning; and 4) demonstrate the ability to clearly and conciselycommunicate a UAS mission analysis in both written and oral form. In addition, due to studentfeedback from its inaugural offering, this second offering of the course included the design,construction, and flight of an actual UAS in support of a selected remote sensing mission.While this 1-semester course was originally intended as a graduate class, its overwhelmingpopularity has resulted in it also being offered to seniors at UAF and now via video link to
that there werethree main curricular activities within engineering that had the potential to encourage EBR in theclassroom: the report to the client at the end of the unit, the types of questions the teacher askedof the students (i.e., asking students to further explain the “why” or “how” of their answers), andstudent discussions. However, this research did not address actual implementation of thecurricula. Mathis et al.18 explored students’ use of EBR during solution generation of anengineering design challenge in a seventh-grade classroom. The study found that students usedEBR most while planning a design idea and evaluating the tested design solution; also, instancesof EBR were found in student worksheets and group discussions. Both the
) award focusing on Predictive Plant Phenomics (P3). Our program aims toincrease agronomic output as highlighted by the National Plant Genome Initiative’s current five-year plan [NST, 2014]. Ph.D. training production levels and types are not always a good fit foraddressing complex technical and societal problems such as these. To train these scientists, theP3 NRT is using the T-training model proposed by the American Society of Plant Biology(ASPB) and described in “Unleashing a Decade of Innovation in Plant Science: A Vision for2015-2025”. This approach requires that students get broader exposure to multiple disciplines,work with industry and develop effective communication and collaboration skills withoutincreasing the time to graduation. This
in Higher Education in China Feifei Zhong1 and Gene Hou2 1 Department of Engineering English, School of Foreign Languages Southwest Jiaotong University Chengdu, China, 611756 zhongfeifei@163.com 2 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529 ghou@odu.eduAbstract: This study aims to develop an effective curriculum plan to improve
,and graduate students) held a three week long professional development (PD) workshop at theNYU Tandon School of Engineering for ten pairs of science and math teachers from eight middleschools. During the PD workshop, using the LEGO kits, teachers learned myriad robot-relatedtasks, such as assembly, programming, actuation, motion planning, sensor integration, operations,and troubleshooting.Figure1: LEGO Mindstorms EV3 base robot to be used for STEM lessons.3. A Few Middle School STEM Lessons Developed to Implement Using RoboticsThe project team and the PD workshop participants collaborated to plan and develop robotics-based lessons under the TPACK framework. Specifically, the teachers began by identifying middleschool relevant science and math
teams use three cycles of launch, strategy,plan, requirements, design, implementation, test, and postmortem. Each cycle’s process iscontrolled by documentation that is reviewed and inspected. Students work on teams of 4 to 6where team members are assigned functional roles. In one case the project uses a client [17]while in another a semi-realistic client is employed [18]. All three papers reported that instead ofthe recommended three iterations, they were only able to implement two in a semester. They allreported that TSP required significant process and documentation overhead.At the time the TSP papers were reported in the literature, Reichlmayr [16] reported on the use ofAgile development in a sophomore-level semester-long project. The
coordinators to centralize informational resources including support activities (e.g.tutoring, workshops, etc.) and opportunities (e.g. research opportunities, internships,scholarships, presentations, etc.). It also houses resources for the technical writing module andinformation on student enhancement plans and professional development funding. Thedevelopment and implementation of personalized student enhancement plans (SEPs) which allowprogram participants to identify long-range plans and set associated short to long range goals insupport of these plans is one of the primary aspects of the program (Kunberger & Geiger, 2016).Originally implemented for upper level students, the activity has been expanded to all programparticipants for this
, datainterchange formats such as JSON, basic API development, system concepts such as I2C andUART serial interfaces, PWM motor control, and sensor fusion to improve robotic navigationand localization. This course was offered to students for the first time in the summer of 2016,and though formal feedback collection was limited, informal feedback indicated that studentsfound the course to be challenging, engaging, and beneficial to their overall understanding ofengineering.The paper walks the reader through the background of this course. It then discusses the weeklylesson plans, supplemental material provided to the students, and our general strategy forteaching the course's programming and system design concepts in such an accelerated timeframe. Finally
mechanism to ensure a high quality education, there are manyother issues that programs must address in the self-study report. Issues range from ensuring thatpolicies and guidelines, which meet ABET criteria, are in place to having proper documentationthat provides needed evidence. This paper briefly reviews ABET accreditation policies andprocedures and provides details regarding the basic requirements that need to be fulfilled toensure a successful ABET visit. This is discussed from the perspective of an institution that hasbeen recently visited for its engineering technology programs and is preparing for a similar visitfor its engineering programs. This information is especially helpful to an engineering programthat plans to go through
automation, product and process design, materials and manufacturing processes, machine design, renewable energy and micro-manufacturing. His current research interests include robotics, CIM, sus- tainable manufacturing, micro machining and engineering and technology education. He has published several papers in these areas in various national and international conferences and journals. He has worked in heavy and light manufacturing industries, manufacturing pumps, motors, and CNC machine tools in the areas of system design, production planning, and control and manufacturing. Edinbarough also served in paramilitary forces and in the Air Force. He is a Life Member of the ISTE, a senior life member of the IE (India), a
services and supports with the system priorities of improving Access to a SUNY education, increasing the number of students who Complete SUNY programs, and ensuring that SUNY programs prepare students for Success in their lives and careers. She initially joined SUNY in 2009 as as Director of the SUNY Center for Professional Development, a university-wide program providing training and professional development to faculty and staff across the SUNY campuses in support the SUNY Strategic Plan, The Power of SUNY. In that role she led the development of competency-based, community-driven certificate programs and the establishment of services and an online platform to support, promote, and facilitate communities of practice
necessary and are all planned as part of the current project.Additionally, RCBC’s Workforce Development Institute and the Burlington County WorkforceDevelopment Board allow for the streamlined interaction between the college and industrypartners. This collaboration allows for the aligning of local, state, and federal resources underone umbrella. The WDI provides a unified, integrated workforce development system forBurlington County to identify and provide skills, training, and the education needed for theworkforce of today and tomorrow. The WDI diligently works to help prepare individuals foracademic success, for employment, and to gain critical new career skills meeting the needs ofindustry. The WDI accomplishes its mission through a mix of
administrative offices working in the areas of diversity,inclusion, social justice, equal opportunity, and access so that each office can better focus on itsmission and goals. As part of this effort, OSU has established three new positions—SpecialAssistant to the President for Community Diversity Relations, Vice President and ChiefDiversity Officer, and Executive Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity and Access, as wellas formed a new Leadership Council for Equity, Inclusion and Social Justice. All of these entitiesare working collaboratively to bring focused energy to university-wide planning andimplementation of equity and diversity efforts.Professional Development Opportunities. While there are many professional developmentopportunities at OSU
(Architecture Students TeachingElementary Kids):The longest-running outreach program at the schoolwas developed by the local chapter of the AmericanInstitute of Architecture Students (AIAS) in 1999.ASTEK began with donated materials and limitedtime outside of the classroom and studio. Thisprogram partners with the local public school districtto engage fifth grade students in architecture,planning, and structures. The ten-week program hasarchitecture students from the university visit the sixlocal elementary schools to advocate for theprofession and community. Weekly assignmentsand activities are: A Story and VisualizationExercise, Textures and Materials, Urban Planning,Scale Sketching, Geometry in Architecture, TheArchitect’s Floor Plan, Structures in