) • analyze issues in professional ethics(12 comments) • explain the importance of professional licensure (2 comments) Page 26.1185.6 • General Comment(s) not tied to any specific element of the CEPC (41 comments)The raw number of comments indicated an area of interest but were not necessarily helpful ingaining a consensus. Many of the comments contradicted each other. For example, for the 20comments received for “applying math and science…”, seven were positive toward the criterion,ten were negative and three were neutral in that they made suggestions or asked for clarification.Even such classification was problematic. Some comments were
entrepreneurship projects are constructed primarily in polysemous, contradictory terms. Students largely perceive empirical reality from secondary sources and superficial immersions in “local culture” that average four to eight weeks at a time. As an initial step in the reproduction of the ideology of humanitarian engineering/service learning, a series of markers are argued to constitute certain “facts” about the “third world” (a term used by engineering educators as recently as 2008). Subsequently the third world denizen(s) appears to stand as an abbreviation or, shorthand for a disparate constellation of attributes identified by outsiders visiting from the developed world. This results from a series of markers that apparently speak of
Education.” Association of College & Research Libraries. Last modified February 2015. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework. 4. Lafferty, M., and J. Jeffryes. "Gauging Workplace Readiness: Assessing the Information Needs of Engineering CoOp Students." Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship , no. 69 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5062/F4X34VDR. 5. Robinson, M. A. "An Empirical Analysis of Engineers' Information Behaviors." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, no. 4 (2010): 64058. 6. Wertz, R. E. H., S. Purzer, M. J. Fosmire, and M. E. Cardella. "Assessing Information Literacy Skills Demonstrated
description of situated learning, Greeno et al. 32 describe knowledge as,“distributed among people and their environments, including the objects, artifacts, tools, books,and the communities for which they are apart.”32 This is nearly identical to Newstetter’s 8paradigm shift description of student learning in engineering design teams. This environment isalso consistent with Salas et al.’s 17 integrative model of team effectiveness. In describing thetheory, Salas et al. reference team leaders (plural) not team leader (singular) and describe howshared cognition affects leadership and vice-versa. Within the context of engineering education,this situated learning environment has been described by Johri & Olds 33 as a promising constructfrom the
National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1262274. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.” Page 26.1434.17 References:1. Fouad, N. A., and Singh, R. (2011). Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering. Retrieved from Center for the Study of the Workplace website: http://www.studyofwork.com/2011/10/stemming-the-tide- women-engineers-report/.2. Riley, D. (2008). Engineering and Social Justice. Morgan & Claypool.3. Geek. (12
urges practitioners to avoid causing harm. 3Indeed, responsibility to hold an ideal paramount is substantively different from responsibility topromote the same ideal. For example, teachers, pilots, and doctors must all hold paramount thehealth and safety of the individuals in their charge, but among them only doctors must dedicatetheir work to the promotion of these individuals’ health and safety. The American MedicalAssociation’s (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics states that physicians are obliged to provide“competent medical care, with compassion and respect for human dignity and rights.”4 TheAmerican Bar Association’s (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct urge lawyers tofunction as “representative[s] of clients, [officers] of the legal system
platform may be used to create dynamicexams and textbooks in which students can physically interact with exam questions andinstructional examples. This work in progress describes the educational requirements of thesystem and the technical challenges involved in the initial development of the first FLATLABmodule.1 ObjectivesEffective instruction can be Assessment-centered (A), Student-centered (S), or Knowledge-centered (K) 1 , but these models need not be mutually exclusive. In this work in progress, wepropose a visuo-haptic learning platform that integrates these three models into a unified (ASK)paradigm suitable for assessment, study, and teaching.The platform is called FLATLAB, a Focused Learning, Assessment, and Teaching Laboratory
. Page 26.743.13[4] Atman, C.J., Adams, R.S., Cardella, M.E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J.J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96, 359 -379.[5] Trevelyan, J. (2014). The making of an expert engineer. London: Taylor & Francis.[6] Van de Poel, I., & Verbeek, P. (2006). Editorial: Ethics and engineering design. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(3), 223-236.[7] Van de Poel, I., & Royakkers, L. (2011). Ethics, technology, and engineering: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.[8] de Moura, G.R., Leader, T., Pelletier, J., & Abrams, D. (2008). Prospects for group processes and
and teacheach other discipline-specific concepts; and (4) to provide a replicable interdisciplinaryframework for pre-collegiate programs and collegiate-level interdisciplinary programs.The preliminary results suggest that the materials-based framework was effective inachieving the objectives. However, the limited data that was collected requires furtherinvestigation on the generality and applicability of the framework to otherinterdisciplinary contexts (e.g., peer-to-peer, graduate-undergraduate laboratories).ReferencesChandler, J., Fontenot, A.D., and Tate, D. (2011). Problems Associated with a Lack of CohesivePolicy in K-12 Precollege Engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering EducationResearch: 1(1): 40-48. Jones, F., & Harris, S
, almostexclusively use a bottom-up approach in teaching, that is, from general knowledge, first, to detailshow to use this general knowledge next, which is also true in software engineering9-10 . TheFAST Learning method definitely represents something opposite, that is, a top-down approach.Students are presented with solutions first, and learn by generalization, that is, proceed from detailto abstraction.ACKNOWLEDGMENT The following students in the Software Engineering program at Florida Gulf Coast Universityare gratefully acknowledged for their contributions to the projects: S. Curry, M. Evans, S.Gafford, A. Hughes, E. Hutchinson, S. Pais and R. Sinjari. Thanks are due to Dr. Anna Koufakoufor using information from one of the projects in her software
all students majoring in one of the College of Engineering departments.Furthermore, 25 were graduate students, and 4 were undergraduate students. Page 26.786.4 Table 2. Classes surveyed at Institution XX.Class Topic Registered Department(s) Length Enrollment Survey Margin Respondents of Error A Climate Change Civil & Environmental Sept – 41 10 7
the so-called “six themes of Six Sigma”: genuine focus on the customer; data andfact driven management; processes are where the action is; proactive management; boundary-less collaboration; and drive for perfection-tolerate failure [1], this paper unpacks thecollaborative processes and perspectives by which this course was developed and continues toevolve and improve. Authors suggest that collaborative industry/academic efforts may benefitby reflecting upon their work product through the six themes of Six Sigma as an alternativeassessment framework to traditional academic assessment approaches.IntroductionSix Sigma – An improvement mindsetSix Sigma is a quality management system that swept the industrial sector in the 1990’s andbecame
material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography1 D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, J. Eng. Educ. 95, 139 (2006).2 D. H. Jonassen, D. Shen, R. M. Marra, Y. H. Cho, J. L. Lo, and V. K. Lohani, J. Eng. Educ. 98, 235–254 (2009).3 J. R. Herkert, Bridge Link. Eng. Soc. 32, 8–13 (2002).4 L. J Shuman, M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty, J. Eng. Educ. 94, 41–55 (2005).5 William T. Lynch and Ronald Kline, Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 25, 195–225 (2000).6 E. T. Layton Jr, The Revolt of the Engineers. Social Responsibility and the American Engineering Profession.(Johns Hopkins University Press, 701 W. 40th St., Baltimore, MD 21211 ($29.50 hard cover, $9.95 paperback).,1986
Frontiers in Education, Indianapolis, IN. 3. Rais-Rohani, M., A. Walters, A. Vizzini. 2010. Emporium based redesign of statics: an innovative approach to enhance learning and reduce costs. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference. Paper AC 2010-610. 4. Handelsman, J., D. Ebert-May, R. Beichner, P. Bruns, A. Change, R. DeHaan, J. Gentile, S. Lauffer, J. Stewart, S.M. Tilghman, W.B. Wood. 2004. Education: Scientific Teaching. Science, 304 (5670), 521-522. 5. Borrego, M., J.E. Froyd, T.S. Hall. 2010. Diffusion of engineering education innovations: a survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. J. Eng. Ed. 99 (3), 185-207. 6. Michael, J. 2007
Writing Project, 23: 32-35.[8] Sundararajan,S., Faidley,L.E., Meyer,T.R. (2012). Developing inquiry-based laboratory exercises for a mechanical engineering curriculum, 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Page 26.924.12 Exposition.[9] Burke, K., Ouellette, J., Miller, W., Leise, C., and Utschig, T. (2012). Measuring Writing as a Representation of Disciplinary Knowledge, International Journal of Process Education, 4: 13-27.[10] Greco, C., Reasoner, J.D., Bullock, D., Castillo, C.L., Buford, P.S., and Richards, G.G. (2011). Efficacy of Lab Reports for Electric Circuits Laboratory Assessment, Proceedings of ASEE.[11] Goldberg, R
] Benjamin, S.," Learning for Mastery", UCLA Evaluation Comment Vol. 1, 1968, pp. 1-12.[27] Block, J.H., Airasian, P.W., Bloom, B.S., and Carroll, J.B., Mastery learning: Theory and practice: Holt, Rinehart and Winston New York, 1971. 15[28] Keller, F.S., Sherman, J.G., and Bori, C.M., The Keller plan handbook: Essays on a personalized system of instruction: WA Benjamin, 1974.[29] Sangelkar, S., Ashour, O.M., Warley, R.L., and Onipede, O., "Mastery Learning in Engineering: A Case Study in Statics", ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[30] Brosvic, G.M., and Cohen, B.D.," The horizontal-vertical illusion and knowledge of results", Perceptual and motor
--- studieordning.pdf5. Milwaukee School of Engineering CE Program website (retrieved on January 26, 2015), http://catalog.msoe.edu/preview_program.php?catoid=8&poid=410&returnto=2356. Meier, R., Barnicki, S. L., Barnekow, W., Durant, E., Work in Progress – A Balanced, Freshman-first Computer Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. F3H-17 - F3H-18, 2007.7. Meier, R., Barnicki, S. L., Barnekow, W., Durant, E., Work in Progress – Year 2 Results from a Balanced, Freshman-first Computer Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. S1F-17 – S1F-18, 20088. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, CE Program website (retrieved on January 26, 2015
-boomers = a labor shortage? Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service. 3. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduate engineers leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 4. Huang, G., Taddese, N., & Walter, E. (2000). Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. 5. Adelman, C. (1998). Women and men of the engineering path: A model for analyses of undergraduate careers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. 6. Eris, O., Chachra, D., Chen, H. L., Sheppard, S. D., Ludlow, L., Rosca, C., . . . Toye, G. (2010). Outcomes of a longitudinal
: Jossey-Bass,1997.13. Fink L.D., "Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses", San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 200314. Saroyan A., Amundsen C., "Rethinking teaching in higher education: From a course design workshop to a faculty development framework", Sterling, VA, Stylus Publishing, LLC,2004.15. Toohey S., "Designing courses in Higher Education", Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press,1999.16. F.P. Deek, F.P., Kimmel, H., & McHugh, J., “Pedagogical changes in the delivery of the first course in computer science: Problem solving then programming”, Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 3, pp. 313-320, July 1998.17. Meier, R.L., Williams, M.R., and Humphreys, M.A
Center for STEMLearning at the University of Colorado Boulder. Thanks to Garrison Vigil for assistance withdata collection and processing.1. Hekkert, P. Design aesthetics : principles of pleasure in design. Psychol. Sci. 48, 157–172 (2006).2. Billington, D. P. The Art of Structural Design. A Swiss Legacy. 210 (Princeton University Art Museum, 2003).3. Pugh, K. J. Transformative Experience: An Integrative Construct in the Spirit of Deweyan Pragmatism. Educ. Psychol. 46, 107–121 (2011).4. Dewey, J. Experience and Education. 116 (Touchstone by Simon & Schuster, 1938).5. Dewey, J. Art as Experience. vii–371 (Perigee by Penguin Group, 1934).6. Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P. & Sorenson, C. D. A review of
textbooks in the syllabus, as well as additional tutorialsprepared by the instructor. The required and recommended references for this course are:Capehart B.L. et al, Guide to Energy Management, Doty, S. and Turner, W.C., EnergyManagement Handbook, Morvay, Z. and Gvozdenac, D., Applied Industrial Energy andEnvironmental Management, and Putman, R.E. Industrial Energy Systems: Analysis,Optimization and Control13-16.The class is planned for 10 weekly lectures of 4-hour each which represent 11 weeks on a regularquarter. This represents a normal quarter or can be adapted to summer sessions; this class isrecommended for both scenarios. Lectures are considered to be classes that are given completelyby the instructor or a specialist of the topic being
California State University attached a robotic arm to theASEP platform and the assembled new arm-rover system was called Articulated SuspensionExploratory Platform System (ASEPS).There are twelve planned weekly labs during the semester, each consisting of two portions. Thefirst portion covers the description of the lab project, including objective(s), required parts/partdescription and step-by-step tutorial instructions. The second part requires the students to applythe knowledge learned from the lecture and the first lab portion to solve the specific project. Toincrease the quality of writing [13] and presenting, the students will be asked to submit designoverview reports in the end of each lab and give bi-weekly oral presentations on their
Paper ID #11208Development of the Whole Student through an Engineering Abroad ServiceLearning Program: Rainwater Catchment/Filtration System in GuatemalaJo-Ann Panzardi PE, Cabrillo College Jo-Ann Panzardi is a Professor and Chair of the Engineering Department at Cabrillo College, Aptos, California since August 1995. She is also the Program Director of a USDE Title III STEM grant and Project Investigator of a NSF EAGER grant and NSF S-STEM grant. She received her BS in Civil Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of New York and her MSCE in Geotechnical Engineering from University of Maryland. She is a registered civil
their PI or advisors, the influences that impact their careerdecision-making, and other relevant matters. Qualitative data gathered from interviews with bothstudents and faculty (and former faculty) was analyzed and coded for themes. Page 26.555.8 The researchers recruited participants by first making contact with key faculty and staff atinstitutions that were selected for one or more of the following reasons: (1) pre-existingprofessional connections with the principal investigator(s); (2) ten or more Black engineeringtenured or tenure-track faculty as of 2012 data; (3) and/or contact was made at a nationalengineering-related
.AcknowledgementsLaboratory space and equipment was generously provided by the Armour College ofEngineering, Illinois Institute of Technology. We would like to thank Craig Johnson for helpingequip the laboratory and for supporting students in our machine shop. We would also like tothank our many engineering students who provided constructive feedback throughout the pilotimplementation.Bibliography1. Eagan, M., Hurtado, S., Chang, M., Garcia, G., Herrera, F., & Garibay, J. (2013). Making a Difference in Science Education: The Impact of Undergraduate Research Programs. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 683-713.2. McLaughlin, D., Schmitz, S., & Mean, E. (2013). Report on the Learning Experiences of Undergraduate Students in a Novel
that they wanted to avoid keepinga design notebook, which is a requirement for the EPICS class. After discussions with the currentstudent leaders, it was determined that the actual differential of work between EWB-USA andEPICS is not that significant and the benefits of the additional accountability of being graded forcredit motivated the change in policy to limit the number of audits.The EPICS curricular and assessment processes aligned very well with the EWB-USA structureand philosophy. Both EPICS and EWB-USA promote and rely on strong student leaders. TheEPICS structure did not reduce the student leadership and it allowed the inclusion of theprofessional mentors. The relationship between the professional mentor(s) and the faculty