. (2006). Conducting Rigorous Research in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 103.12. Douglas, E. P., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Borrego, M. (2010). Challenges and Promises of Overcoming Epistemological Partiality: Advancing Engineering Education Through Acceptance of Diverse Ways of Knowing. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(3), 247 - 257.13. Flick, Uwe. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.14. Jamieson, Leah H., & Lohmann, Jack. (2009). Creating a culture for scholarly and systematic innovation in engineering education. Phase 1 report.15. Kemnitzer, S. . (2008). The need for theory-based research in engineering education. Video
this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Bibliography[1] S. G.-O. a. E. O. Sheybani, "Retaining Minority Students in Engineering: Undergraduate Research in Partnership with NASA," in ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas, June 2012.[2] C. a. Z. D. Alvarado, "Women in CS: an evaluation of three promising practices," in Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2010.
., and S. Hu. 2001. The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education 24: 309-32.2. Lundberg, C. A., and L. A. Schreiner. 2004. Quality and Frequency of Faculty-Student Interaction as Predictors of Learning: An Analysis by Student Race/Ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development 45: 549- 65.3. Kim, Y. E., and L. J. Sax. 2009. Student-Faculty Interaction in Research Universities: Differences by Student Gender, Race, Social Class, and First-Generation Status. Review of Higher Education 50: 437-59.4. Sax, L. J. , A. N. Bryant, and C. E. Harper. 2005. The Differential Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction on College Outcomes for Women and Men
by promoting the use of authenticliteracy practices while engaging in the solution process of a complex engineering problem.AcknowledgementsSupport for this work is provided by the National Science Foundation under Award No. EEC1664228. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Some of this material is based on work accomplished while serving at the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] R. Schoenbach, C. Greenleaf, and L. Murphy, Reading for understanding: How reading apprenticeship improves disciplinary learning in secondary and college classrooms, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: WestEd
Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, 19-22 Oct. 2005 2005, pp. S2C-15, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2005.1612216.[3] S. A. Sorby, "Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459-480, 2009, doi: 10.1080/09500690802595839.[4] M.-T. Wang and J. Degol, "Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields," Developmental review : DR, vol. 33, no. 4, p. 10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001, 09/13 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001.[5] R. H. McKim, Experiences in visual thinking. Boston, MA: PWS Publishers, 1980.[6] D. H
Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24990[3] Mohrman, S.A., Cohen, S.G., & Mohrman, A. M. (1995). Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work, Jossey-Bass, CA.[4] Adams, S. G. (1999). An investigation of the attributes contributing to team effectiveness of engineering and science faculty. 9th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, November 10 - 13.[5] Cain, S. 2012. Quiet - The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.[6] Soderhjelm, T., Bjorklund, C., Sandahl, C., & Bolander-Laksov, K. (2016). Academic leadership: management of groups or leadership of teams? A multiple-case study on
Proceedings, Rapid City, South Dakota, October 2011.6. S. Lord, K. Kramer, R. Olson, M. Karsada, D. Hayhurst, S. Rajala, R. Green, and D. Soldan, “Special Session – Attracting and Supporting Militray Veterans to Engineering Programs,” 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, Rapid City, South Dakota, October 2011. Page 23.620.7
development skills were important in theirprofessional careers. Finally, it should be noted that the majority of the interviewed studentscited their professor and TAs as important aspects of their experience in the course in futuresemesters.References 1. Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2. Angelo, T.A., and Cross, K.P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. pp. 148-153. 3. Kuc, R. (2001). Teaching the nonscience major: EE101-The digital information age. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44 (2), 158-164. 4. Orsak, G. C., Wood, S. L., Douglas, S. C., Munson, D. C., Treichler, J. R., Athale, R. A
determined by the flux density. In Simulink,the model of solar cell can be found in the library of Sources in SimElectronics. This blockmodels a solar cell as a parallel combination of a current source, two exponential diodes and aparallel resistor, Rp, that are connected with a series resistance Rs. Figure 2 shows theimplementation of solar cell module in Simulink. 1 Constant PS S Simulink-PS Converter1 + Ir
. Journal of Nano Education. 3. Hill, P. J., Koshka, Y., Myers, O. J., Thibaudeau, G., and Henington, C. D. (2012). NanoExposed! – An Introduction to Nanotechnology. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 4. Hiemenz, P. C. & Rajagopalan, R. (1997). Principles of colloid and surface chemistry (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker. 5. Tao, A. R., Huang, J., & Yang, P. (2008). Langmuir-Blodgettry of nanocrystals and nanowires. Accounts of Chemical Research, 41, 1662-1673. Page 23.74.66. Zhang, L., Gu, F. X., Chan, J. M., Wang, A. Z., Langer, R. S., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008
Page 25.683.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Great Expectations: Engineering Kansas ScholarsAbstractThe GEEKS Program (Great Expectations: Engineering Kansas Scholars) is a National ScienceFoundation (NSF) Scholarships for STEM students (S-STEM) project that awards scholarshipsof $5,000 per year for 2 years to academically talented low-income, full-time students (in threeseparate cohorts) to obtain degrees in engineering at Wichita State University (WSU). Therecruitment efforts specifically target low-income students in three populations: women,minorities, and students from underserved urban schools. The objectives are: to increase thegraduation success among low-income
Context: Page 24.511.6 impact on natural systems, including key vocabulary; client(s) Primary - Engr (redesign desired features; and budget. They are given an option list for park considering client choices of what they would like to place in the outdoor area. At the needs and budget) closing of the lesson, the students share their design with the Secondary - Sci (use client, as well as a planned persuasive presentation to influence the learned info on human client to
, 2004. Coal: A Human History. Penguin Books.7. Jacobs, Jane. The Economy of Cities (1969) or The Nature of Economies (2001), both from Vintage Press8. Lau, Andrew (2010) "Sustainable Design: A New Paradigm for Engineering Education" in International Journal for Engineering Education, 26(2) 252-2599. Lau, Andrew S. (2004) "Life-centered Design - A Paradigm for Engineering in the 21st Century" ASEE 200410. Lau, Andrew S. (2010) A Philosophy of Sustainability for the 21st century. In Materials Research Insittute, PSU, Summer 2009.11. Lubchenco, Jane (1998) "Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science" Science 279(23 January) 491-49712. McConville, J.R., and J.R. Mihelcic, “Adapting Life Cycle Thinking
input from other faculty members who are activelyengaged in hands-on pedagogical activities.Biobliography1. B. Ferri, S. Ahmed, J. Michaels, E. Dean, C. Garvet, S. Shearman, "Signal ProcessingExperiments With LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT Kit for Use in Signals and Systems Courses,"Proceedings of the American Control Conference, St. Louis, June 2009, pp. 3787-3792.2. G. Droge, B. Ferri, and O. Chiu, “Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments withLabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, SanAntonio, June 2012.3. B. Ferri, J. Auerbach, “A Portable Finite State Machine Module Experiment for In-Class Use inLecture-Based Course, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, June 2012.4. B. Ferri, J. Auerbach
Paper ID #9177Creating an Infrastructure Education Community of PracticeDr. Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, PlattevilleDr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Carol Haden is s Senior Evaluator with Magnolia Consulting, LLC. She holds a doctorate in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis on program evaluation from Northern Arizona University. Dr. Haden has extensive experience in the evaluation of formal STEM education projects across the K-20 spectrum and the evaluation of informal STEM Education and Public Outreach (E/PO) programs. She has designed and implemented evaluations of programs
supported by the National Science Foundation under awardnumber DUE - 1317238 and is supported in part by funds given to the National ScienceFoundation by the Intel Foundation and the GE Foundation. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not Page 24.736.5necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References 1. American Society for Engineering Education. 2012. Going the Distance: Best Practices and Strategies for Retaining Engineering. Engineering Technology, and Computing Students. http://www.asee.org/retention- project 2
, Honolulu, HI, March, 2010. 3. D. Hercog, B. Gergic, S. Uran, K. Jezernik, “ A DSP-Based Remote Control Laboratory,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol.54, no.6, pp.3057 -3068, Dec. 2007. 4. S. Gallardo, F. Barrero, S.L. Toral, M. J. Duran “ eDSPlab: A remote -accessed instrumentation laboratory for digital signal processors training based on the Internet,” 32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics, IECON 2006, pp. 4656-4661, 6 -10 Nov. 2006. 5. C. Olmi, B. Cao, X. Chen and G. Song, "A Unified Framework for Remote Laboratory Experiments," in Proceedings of 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 26 - 29, 2011. 6. C. Omli, X. Chen, and G. Song, "A
process. Fig. 1: The introductory scene of Mystery of Traffic Lights Fig. 2: The road map is enabled in the gameProblem solving demands problem solvers to be constructively responsive, thoughtful, andengaged. The more students are aware of their constructive thinking processes, the more they cancontrol, and the better they can solve the problem. To facilitate students’ self-monitoring andself-regulating their problem-solving in the game, the What I Know-What I Want to Know-What I Have Learned (KWL) reading strategy [6] is adapted to provide students a virtualnotebook called KWS, where S stands for What I Have Solved. Through KWS, students can
could motivate unhelpful actions, such as blaming students in an educational setting. Byunderstanding a robust picture on how professional shame functions in the interior worldsindividual faculty, we aim to help faculty have tools to harness this powerful emotional state inways that increase social connectedness, both for themselves and their academic programs.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported through funding by the National Science Foundation (NSF CAREER#2045392). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewersfor their
Education, Educational Research Methods, Multidisciplinary Engineering, Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies, and Systems Engineering Divisions. He also volunteers as a Program Evaluator for ABET accreditation in the EAC and ETAC. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Leveraging Innovation and Optimizing Nurturing in STEM:Engineering identities in low-income students across their first year of college (NSF S-STEM #2130022)Leveraging Innovation and Optimizing Nurturing in STEM (NSF S-STEM #2130022, knownlocally as LION STEM Scholars) is a program developed to serve low-income undergraduateEngineering students at Penn State Berks, a regional campus of the
: Computer Science FAQ”, https://www.NJ.gov/education/techno/csfaq.htm.[6] K. G. Herbert, V. K. Anu, K. Z. Sultana, S. Robila, J. R. Miller, S. Hagiwara, R. A.Goldstein, and T. J. Marlowe, "Professional and Capacity Building in K-12 Computer ScienceEducation: A Multi-Faceted Approach”, ACM SIGCSE '23: Proceedings of the 54th ACMTechnical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Toronto, Canada, March 2023.
, Eds., New York, NY, USA: Routledge, Aug. 2023, pp. 125-143.[6] C. Lewis and R. Perry, “Lesson study with mathematical resources: A sustainable model for locally-led teacher professional learning.” Math. Teacher Educ. and Develop., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-20, Jun. 2014.[7] K. Smith, S. Finney, and K. Fulcher, “Connecting assessment practices with curricula and pedagogy via implementation fidelity data,” Assmt. & Eval. in Higher Educ., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 263-282, 2018, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1496321.[8] M. Swain, S. J. Finney, and J. J. Gerstner, “A practical approach to assessing implementation fidelity,” Assmt. Update, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5-13. Jan-Feb. 2013.[9] M. Vazquez Cano and M. Yin
conductingcontrol group data collection. All educational materials will be designed to use in the controlgroup (without SedimentSketch), and then repeated using SedimentSketch in the test group.Additionally, we are working on the initial user interface design and development of the pilotversion of SedimentSketch.In years two and three, we will complete SedimentSketch development, test it in the classroom,and work on assessment data analysis and evaluation.1 AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant “HSI Implementationand Evaluation Project: SedimentSketch, teaching tool in and beyond the sedimentologyclassroom to provide equitable and inclusive learning for Hispanic students” #2318386.References[1] R. S
.; Johnson, M. Advanced Manufacturing Research Experiences for High School Teachers: Effects on Perception and Understanding of Manufacturing; 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30079.(3) Pinnell, M.; Taylor, M. R.; Mian, A.; Preiss, S. M.; Petry, L.; Franco, M. S. Assessment of a Collaborative NSF RET Program Focused on Advanced Manufacturing and Materials, 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26325.(4) Zhu, W.; Fan, X.; Brake, N.; Liu, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, J.; Sisk, D.; Yoo, J. Engineering Design and Manufacturing Education through Research Experience for High School Teachers. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 26, 1340–1348.(5) Zhang, W. Manufacturing
Integration in Core Engineering Science Courses,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, p. 1, Jan. 2015.[8] J. Larson, W. M. Barnard, A. R. Carberry, and D. Karwat, “Student Recognition, Use, and Understanding of Engineering for One Planet Competencies and Outcomes in Project-based Learning,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Jan. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/student-recognition-use-and-understanding-of-engineering-for-one-plan et-competencies-and-outcomes-in-project-based-learning[9] D. Lopatto, “Undergraduate research as a high-impact student experience,” Peer Review, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 27+, 2010.[10] A. L. Zydney, J. S
approach to assess newly designed modulesfor the QIST hardware course offered in the Spring 2024 semester at the University of Florida.Introduction & BackgroundQuantum computing is a field of computing that utilizes principles from quantum mechanics, abranch of physics that deals with the behavior of matter and energy at the atomic and sub-atomicscales. At the atomic and subatomic levels, electrons, photons, and ions act as qubits. In classicalcomputers, bits are processed sequentially, performing tasks one after the other. However, inquantum computing, qubits can be entangled, a phenomenon where the state of two or morequbits becomes correlated. Unlike classical computers that use bits to represent information as0’s and 1’s, quantum computers
refining K-12 engineering standards, our work can inform that process andsupport the NAE’s goal of expanding the pipeline of engineering students.We will also prepare and deliver research briefs targeted to each of the stakeholders andrepresentative organizations. This will include organizations like the National Academy ofEngineering and individual K-12 engineering programs like Project Lead The Way and FIRSTRobotics. Finally, we will prepare journal articles and conference presentations targeted atundergraduate engineering educators.Bibliography1. NAE Committee on K-12 Engineering Education. Engineering in K-12 education : understanding the status and improving the prospects. (National Academies Press, 2009).2. Brophy, S., Klein, S
motivation. Inthe beginning of the learning styles module, students take a learning style questionnaireto determine their preferred learning style(s). We chose the Barsch Inventory1 for our e-learning module because it is simple and can be used free of charge with permission. Itidentifies four learning styles: visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic. Figure 1summarizes the content of the learning styles module. Page 23.895.2 Barsch Inventory • Pre-‐test Tutorial on Punnett • Material presented in most preferred (or least Square (or mitosis) preferred) style • Post-‐test
the National Science Foundation under Grant No.(2236075). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] D. Ebert-May, T.L. Derting, T.P. Henkel, J.M. Maher, J.L. Momsen, B. Arnold, H.A. Passmore, Breaking the cycle: Future faculty begin teaching with learner-centered strategies after professional development, CBE Life Sci. Educ. 14 (2015) 1–12. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-12- 0222.[2] S. Bernstein-Sierra, A. Kezar, Identifying and Overcoming Challenges in STEM Reform: a Study of four National STEM Reform Communities of Practice, Innov. High. Educ. 42 (2017) 407–420. doi:10.1007/s10755
research facilities and under expert guidance. Overall, 70% participants concludedthat they would recommend the program, signaling its value.AcknowledgementThis research was funded through the National Science Foundation (NSF)’s ResearchExperiences for Teachers (RET) Program. Award # 2206952.References:1) Ayuby, M., and Sarder, MD. (2016). Assessing Reshorability of US Manufacturing Industries, Proceeding of the Annual Industrial & Systems Engineering Research Conference (ISERC), Anaheim, California.2) Noshir F. Kaka, 2006. Running a customer service center in India: An interview with the head of operations for Dell India3) Levy, D. (2005). Offshoring in the new global political economy. Journal of Management