program, students will have a concentration in engineering leadership notedon their transcript.Formal coursework is designed specifically for undergraduate engineering students. The coursesexplore topics including: self-awareness and emotional intelligence, leadership styles andtheories, servant leadership, team dynamics, motivating and guiding others, diversity in theworkplace (cultural, gender, etc.), communication, conflict management, ethical leadership,leading change, leading technology and innovation, market analysis, product development,entrepreneurship, and strategic and financial planning.A variety of assessment methods were employed in the first year. A pre- and post-testleadership inventory was administered to students to during the
competent field. The National Academy of Engineering, for example,have stated in their vision of “The Engineer of 2020” that engineering activities should beframed in the context of rapidly moving technological changes, global interconnection ofresources, and an increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary population of individuals involvedin or affected by engineering developments. Among the NAE aspirations for the engineeringfield is “a future where engineers are prepared to adapt to changes in global forces and trendsand to ethically assist the world in creating a balance in the standard of living for developing anddeveloped countries alike”3. This vision reflects the need to embrace global competencies framedwithin ethical considerations, where
the socio-economic dynamicsand business culture globally even to succeed locally. Recognizing the need, many engineeringschools in the U.S. have started offering ethics and study abroad programs to their undergraduatestudents. Our research shows that selection of countries for study abroad programs have widenedsignificantly in the recent years. For example, in the nineties, the US Universities were offeringstudy abroad programs mostly in European and few other developed countries in the Asia pacificregion. In recent years, that list has grown significantly including many other countries aroundthe world like South Africa, Brazil, Russia, China, Chile, and India to name a few. This paperpresents a survey of select U.S. engineering schools
underserved communities globally.Prior research shows that difficulties often arise as students arrive unprepared to addressthe cultural and technical challenges international work entails. For example, oneparticular case study in Gary Downey’s book highlighted the challenges inimplementation of a program to connect student engineers with underserved communitiesin an international setting. Differences in culture and language coupled with thegeographical distance compounded made the project untenable and it had to stop. Someof the reasons she cited included that “the large body of knowledge in the developmentarea was not readily accessible or available to engineers,” and students did not activelyseek out the ethical and social understanding necessary
not be true. We have added some catalyst strategies during class study, the observation is very interesting. Third, collaboration and ethics. WReSTT-CyLE is an environment that emphasizes the collaborative learning strategy through a team based approach. At the same time, as an online learning environment, out of class study would be suitable for students and is one of the main purposes of this project. Does the organic collaboration bring efficient results and learning outcomes? Does gamification emphasize independent and team wide learning? Is each team learning on an independent based XP? If some of the answers to the above questions are no, how do we adjust the bias in the results?After the study, we retrieved the data and
, developmentally appropriate way to enable them to evaluate evidence critically, make informed judgments, and act ethically. Creat[ing] a vibrant campus learning community that blends curricular and cocurricular learning opportunities and capitalizes on the roles of all constituents (faculty, staff, and students) in promoting student learning.” (p. 19)In the summer of 2011, the College of Engineering at Michigan State University (MSU)introduced a comprehensive professional development program to complement its existingundergraduate summer research internships.12–16 As part of this EnSURE (Engineering SummerUndergraduate Research Experience) program, students participated in weekly professionaldevelopment seminars and periodic
through theREU program were also made available to the participating students in this ASPIRES program.These workshops include Responsible Conduct of Research and Ethics, Research Process,Literature Review and Conducting Research, Verbal and Written Communication Skills,Learning to Give Powerful Oral and Poster Presentations, The Elevator Pitch: Advocating forYour Good Ideas, and project-specific topics, such as structural dynamics, topologyoptimization, and training tutorials for prevalent software. These workshops intend to helpstudents develop independent research ability, better present research outcomes, and effectivelypromote research findings. Since MATLAB is one of the essential tools needed for this particularresearch project, all interns
California Polytech- nic State University where he teaches courses in materials selection and polymers. He has presented his research on engineering ethics to several universities and to the American Bar Association. He serves as Associate Editor of the journals Advances in Engineering Education and International Journal of Service Learning in Engineering. He has served as program chair and division chair for several divisions within ASEE. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Self-Efficacy and Mental Wellness Goals in Materials Engineering and Mechanical Engineering StudentsAbstractThe mental well-being of undergraduate students is a growing concern among
evaluator).# Debriefing. Onboarding. Campus tours. (WEEK) RESEARCH PROJECT EXPERIENCE (VIP TEAMS) PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT (COE USRG)* May Define project objectives, methodology, timeline Welcome breakfast. Orientation. General lab (Week-1) & outcomes. Ethics training courses. safety training. Welcome Bar-B-Q. Ethics. Jun. Research plan due! Overview of metrology/ GRE workshop: What to expect. Seminar: TAMU (Week-2) inspection principles & labs. Safety courses. early admissions program. Jun. Research questions & tasks. Training & practice GRE workshop: Maximize your study time. (Week-3) on relevant laboratory equipment. Seminar: Applying to graduate school
to focus our study on the items that had morevariability in the responses, so we eliminated these two items and re-ranked the other 5 itemsbelow to study the relationship between students’ personality types and these topics: • Orthographic drawing (Visualization) • Sustainability and ethics • Term Project (Entrepreneurship, creativity, and customer interaction) • Math, physics and mechanics • Communication (Writing and presenting)Dominating Personality Types of Engineering Students Figure 1 shows a comparison of the personality types of University of New Haven first-year students and the ASEE-MBTI data. The data is also displayed in tabular format in Table A.1in Appendix A. The ASEE-MBTI survey includes results from
reach to other majors. Wedesigned a Minor is Sustainability with a new SUST prefix that is open to all UHD undergraduates. Weare proud of this innovative, cross-disciplinary curriculum as solving future issues with social andeconomic components will require majors outside of the environmental sciences.The Minor in Sustainability is 18 hours (6 courses). Three of these courses can be selected as part of thedegree plan of most students if they choose wisely from the list of course options. For these three coursesstudents must take one course from each of three course areas. The areas include 1) environmentalscience fundamentals, 2) social and ethical considerations and 3) technical and business applications. An important addition to the technical
1 2% 1 2% 1 3% 1 2% Funding 26 52% 21 46% 19 51% 19 46% Language 1 2% 1 2% 1 3% 2 5% Low Study Participation 8 16% 8 17% 8 22% 8 20% Publishing Challenges 6 12% 5 11% 4 11% 5 12% Research Ethics Approval 8 16% 8 17% 4 11% 6 15% Research Interest 7 14% 7 15% 4 11% 7 17% Lack of Admin Training in CER 12 24% 12 26% 11 30% 11 27% Social-Familial Influences 4 8% 3 7% 3 8
#6 / #10 (differentiating memorization from understanding), #9 / #125 Pseudonyms are used for privacy and ethical concerns.(metacognitive awareness), and #10 / #13 (course performance) reinforce the model’s role inpromoting an integrated learning experience. Specifically, the correlation between items #6 and #10in both pretest and posttest phases suggests that students’ self-perceived learning skills align withtheir ability to distinguish between rote memorization and genuine understanding—a central goalof the LHETM approach.The positive correlations between item pairs #6 / #13 ( = 0.579, p = 0.012) and #7 / #13 ( = 0.542,p = 0.020) in the pretest phase alone reveal an intriguing predictive relationship: students’ initialconfidence in
of a wider range of ethical implications and societal impacts. Byembracing DEI, the engineering discipline is better positioned to tackle the grand challenges ofour time, from climate change to equitable access to technology, with solutions that are as variedand complex as the issues themselves [14], [15]. In essence, the integration of DEI into theengineering discipline enhances the field's ability to generate transformative solutions that areequitable, sustainable, and reflective of the needs of all segments of society. It is not just an idealto aspire to but a practical necessity for the continued relevance and progress of the engineeringprofession.Chemical Engineering, like many engineering fields, grapples with the underrepresentation
: Entrepreneurship and theU.S. Economy”. Retrieved on March 26, 2024.https://www.bls.gov/bdm/entrepreneurship/entrepreneurship.htmDawkins, C. (2015). Agonistic pluralism and stakeholder engagement. Business Ethics Quarterly,25(1), 1-28.Desai, V. M. (2018). Collaborative stakeholder engagement: An integration between theories oforganizational legitimacy and learning. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 220-244.Dube, B. (2021). Why cross and mix disciplines and methodologies?: Multiple meanings ofInterdisciplinarity and pluralism in ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 179, 106827.Dubey, A. K., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Basu, B. (2020). Interdisciplinary Engineering Sciences:Concepts and Applications to Materials Science.Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., Paul, J
credit hoursbased on their desired workload. Many students enroll in the course for multiple semesters tocontinue their project work, and in doing so, can fulfill a general education “global challenges4”requirement and/or a major-specific technical elective. The learning outcomes for the coursesequence include, but are not limited to: project planning, application of knowledge frommultiple disciplines, problem recognition and design processes, sustainability, leadership,teamwork, communication, application of humanitarian ethics, cultural awareness, and globalperspectives. The learning outcomes are intentionally inclusive of the seven ABET CriterionThree standard student outcomes5. As part of the program, students are regularly presenting
room.The theme of the CE483 escape room aimed to introduce the students to forensic engineeringand engineering ethics in addition to reviewing course concepts. The escape room was themed asa case study of the Harbour Cay Condominium collapse [25]. The students were given 90minutes to determine who was at fault for the collapse. The results of the investigation conductedby the National Bureau of Standards were used to create puzzles to assess the students’ ability toachieve the course objectives [25]. However, the numbers were changed to facilitate appropriatecodes for the combination locks, but the puzzles followed the storyline. The six course conceptscovered were moment envelopes, detailing reinforcement, punching shear, nominal momentcapacity
English), Can. J. High. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 71-88, 2024. [Online]. Available: ://WOS:001267821600006.[11] W. B. Johnson and N. Nelson, "Mentor-protege relationships in graduate training: Some ethical concerns," (in English), Ethics Behav., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 189-210, 1999, doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0903_1.[12] A. M. Snyder and J. R. Hartwell, "Development and Evaluation of an Experiential Career Planning Assignment to Train Students to Assess Organizational Fit," (in English), J. Vet. Med. Educ., ; Early Access p. 11, 2023 Jan 2023, doi: 10.3138/jvme-2022-0095.[13] J. H. L. Koh, "Designing and integrating reusable learning objects for meaningful learning: Cases from a graduate programme," (in English
experiences, their relationships with their advisors, howmismatched advisor-student relationships affected their mental health, and what strategies theyused to deal with stress and adversity. The flexibility of the format allowed participants toelaborate on issues they felt were most important, yielding much valuable, unexpected insight.Each interview took approximately 60 to 90 minutes and was audio-recorded with participants'consent. The audio recordings were later transcribed verbatim to ensure accuracy during dataanalysis.Ethical Considerations The research was conducted with strict adherence to the observance of ethical guidelinesthat ensure the safety and dignity of all participants. At the start of data collection, eachparticipant was
tendencies and variability, offering a clearerunderstanding of the patterns influencing participants' educational and professional experiences[20].Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative DataThe findings from both qualitative and quantitative analyses were integrated during theinterpretation phase to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research questions.The qualitative insights from the thematic analysis were used to explain patterns observed in thequantitative trends, ensuring a richer contextual understanding of the participants' experiences[24].Ethical ConsiderationsParticipant consent and anonymityBefore data collection, all participants were provided with a detailed informed consent formexplaining the study's purpose
causationfactors for the correlations noted in this study.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported by the Indigenous and Black in Engineering & Technology (IBET)PhD Project. Dissemination of the survey was supported by the UToronto Engineering Alumnioffice, Black Engineers Canada (BEC) and the Canadian Engineering Education Association(CEEA). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordancewith the ethical standards of the University of Toronto’s Research Ethics Board, per approvedprotocol #43856.References[1] G. Hanson and M. Slaughter, “High-Skilled Immigration and the Rise of STEM Occupations in U.S. Employment,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, w22623, Sep. 2016. doi: 10.3386
. Instructors must balance the educational objectives of their programs withthe needs of the communities they serve while also considering equity issues when distributingresponsibilities among diverse student design teams. Interestingly, the instructors involved in thisresearch project have long been concerned about the ethical considerations surrounding thesustainability of course projects.In the early 2000s, instructors received external funding to establish a joint course collaborationwith a local university in Kenya. However, once the funding ended, it became impossible tosustain the partnership. In 2020, just before the pandemic began, a new partnership was formedwithout funding in order to explore ways to integrate students from a Kenyan
ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2025, American Society forEngineering EducationIn general, the web provides democratized access to information. Printed materials are onlyavailable to those who have them. AI uses information from the web. AI helps overcomebarriers because it makes the web easier to use, so information is even more democratized.Q9: What challenges or limitations do you foresee in integrating AI into engineeringeducation (e.g., cost, ethical concerns, technical barriers)?All learning should be from basic theory up to application. AI adds one more level of learningthat is required. It is one more thing that must be taught. This adds to the burden of education.There are many ethical concerns. For example, AI will
) identified a significant lack of JEDI-relatedcontent in professional engineering societies, underscoring the urgent need to strengtheneducation in these areas to prepare inclusive and socially committed engineers. Armanios et al.(2021) highlighted how a curricular restructuring led to an increase from 17% to 69% in theincorporation of social justice concepts in students' final reflections, demonstrating the ability toinclude the social impact of engineering decisions. Similarly, Hess et al. (2024) emphasized theconnections between ethics and DEI, identifying the need to integrate and unify strategies thatenable engineering students to address both the social and technical aspects of their profession.Finally, Gupta, Talluri and Ghosh (2024
useof “everyday morality” is an extension of the “ethics” Lambek speaks to above, but it drawsattention to a specific set of “moral questioning and actions” that ethnographers can contributeinsights on through their ethnographic products, but not solve. The artifact-focused curriculumdesign presented here represents this line of thinking and anthropological engagement withengineering and related building processes. The AlaskaCraft game situates its creators andplayers in a design setting that requires seeking information from many sources to design homesappropriate to geographical and sociocultural contexts in remote Alaskan communities, whichvary widely across the region. The students who designed the game collaboratively researchedreal-world
to leadership roles [7]. Similarly,minority groups face systemic obstacles, including cultural biases and a lack of role models,which hinder career progression [8]. As a result, as the construction sector becomes increasinglyglobalized and complex, the need for DEI has grown, not only for ethical reasons but also todrive innovation and problem-solving [9].To address these systemic issues, higher education institutions play a crucial role in shaping thefuture workforce of the construction industry. Many universities have implemented initiatives toaddress enrollment gaps and foster inclusive learning environments. For example, programsaimed at increasing minority student participation in STEM fields have improved retention andgraduation rates
the year-long activities, including a week-long intense ‘GenCyber Summer Camp’ oncybersecurity, organized by Savannah State University’s Engineering Technology Department toprovide the participants with career counseling on cybersecurity and training in CybersecurityConcepts and Ethics through hands-on activities, guest lectures, and other professionaldevelopment presentations. Savannah State University has been organizing this camp since 2018(except 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic), and the funds for conducting the activities arebeing supported by the National Security Agency (NSA) and the National Science Foundation(NSF). The participants for the program are the middle school students from Savannah-ChathamCounty Public School System
identificationof key factors in intercultural development. This dual approach allowed us to develop both broadunderstanding of patterns and deep insight into individual experiences.Several key measures were implemented to ensure research quality and ethical conductthroughout the study. Three coders analyzed the data independently to establish inter-raterreliability achieving an IRR of 93%, and member checking was conducted to verifyinterpretations. Regular peer debriefing sessions helped maintain objectivity in the analysis. Datacollected was anonymized, any personally identifiable information was removed, and savedsecurely in encrypted files on Box. These measures helped ensure both the ethical integrity of theresearch and the trustworthiness of our
multinational companies, obscuring the“sociopolitical implications, relevance, and ultimately, liberatory possibilities of teaching andlearning CS” [12, p. 27)] Unlike some K-12 and university coding education models, the codingworkshops studied here are framed within more nuanced conversations about equity and ethics intechnology, countering deficit discourses about marginalized learners and offering a vision ofcoding education grounded in “antiracism and justice” [12, p.36].One of the first inclusive pedagogy strategies we noticed was the relatively expansive view ofaccessibility held by coding workshop organizers and instructors. In our experience, traditionaluniversity software engineering education generally thinks of accessibility in terms
construction disciplines: constructionmanagement, environmental, geotechnical, structural, transportation and water. A major goal isto introduce students to the breadth of civil and environmental engineering and constructionmanagement topics, and to acquaint students with new technology and innovations used in thesefields. Activities incorporate engineering ethics, design thinking, project management,teamwork, and communication. In addition, the course supports overall student learning throughthe use of metacognitive learning strategies, familiarization with university and collegeresources, and development of software skills.Certain phases of the engineering design process were featured heavily in the course activities.These included developing a