, while at the same time exposing them to applications fromscience and engineering. The objective of such exposure throughout the curriculum is to catchthe interest of students at an early stage, and thus encourage them to pursue those career paths. The project uses web-based modules to address its goals at two levels. One is to increaseinterest in science and engineering at the lower level courses for majors and non-majors. Theother is to improve retention by offering support for upper level courses. While some modulesare course specific, others are deliberately planned to be independent, allowing for maximumflexibility. All modules are available over the Internet. Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual
business education from the University of South Carolina. She received her Ed.D. in curriculum and instruction with an emphasis in educational technology from the University of Florida in the fall of 2012.Dr. Anand K. Gramopadhye, Clemson UniversityDr. Sabarish V. Babu, School of Computing, Clemson University Page 23.796.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Interactive Three Dimensional Visualization Based Engineering Technology Education - Modeling and AnimationAbstract: Advanced three-dimensional visualization and virtual reality technology can playan
engineering courses. In Proceedings from the international systems engineering conference (ICSE) and the international council of systems engineering (INCOSE) 2004 region II conference, las vegas, nevada, september 15-18, 2004.11. Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harv Bus Rev, 81(12), 46-54, 124.12. Sener, J, Humbert, J. (2002) Student Satisfaction with Online Learning: An Expanding Universe. Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, Volume 4 in the Sloan-C series.13. Squires, A. & Cloutier, R. (2010). Evolving the INCOSE reference curriculum for a graduate program in systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 13(4). [See Early Version available through Wiley Interscience
Development (EMD) proposal from the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to purchase additional laboratory equipment and supplies as well as to supportthe development of a web-based laboratory manual and the conversion of the existing VHS-format laboratory instruction video to DVD-format (DUE-0127279, “Integrating GenomicsResearch into the Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum in Environmental Engineering.”) Thelong-term goals identified in this NSF project include national dissemination through appropriatecommercial distribution as well as an expansion of the existing course to include undergraduatestudents from related disciplines such as biomedical engineering and chemical engineering.Broader implications of the course.In what degree of detail should
oftenregarded as facts to be memorized and mastered through repetition. At the same time, judgment-forming skills are needed by students to compel them to think about examples and problems in awider context.Facts and memorizationThere are many facts in physics for an engineering student to remember. The memorization ofhow free body diagrams are constructed to how integrals are to be implemented in problemsconcerning magnetism is already quite a challenge, but students need also to practice usingjudgment when they are presented with new examples and situations that require the linking ofknown facts with information given in a problem at the end of a chapter or a test. The laws ofconservation and related formulas are easier for students to remember when
beyond technical skills. Critical thinking also requiresmeaningful and reflective judgement which leads to better logical conclusions of arguments.Critical thinking or reflective judgment is required to solve ill-posed problems [e.g., 26].Five phases of critical thinking include the trigger event, an appraisal, the exploration,developing alternative perspectives, and integration [e.g., 27 and references therein; 28]. In thefirst phase, the trigger event, unexpected events occur that result in a sense of “inner discomfortand complexity”. This means that the problem or situation arrests attention that makes animpression that warrants further attention. During the think phase, to be most effective, thestudents’ task must pique their interest and
. Page 12.1183.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 PRIME Modules: Teaching Introduction to Materials Engineering in the Context of Modern TechnologiesAbstractThis paper discusses the progress of curriculum development under an NSF, CCLI-EMDsponsored work, “Development of Project-Based Introductory to Materials EngineeringModules” (DUE # #0341633). A multi-university team of faculty is developing five lecturemodules for use in Introductory to Materials courses. This course is required by mostengineering programs in the U.S., with an annual enrollment of 50,000 students. This freshman/sophomore class is an ideal place to excite students about their engineering majors and exposethem to real world
on the partof the Professor, Project Manager and the students to make it work well. This innovativeapproach can be used together with the traditional capstone course to enhance the problemsolving skills of students. This course may however serve as the capstone equivalent forConstruction Management students. Construction engineering students are required to take thiscourse in their final year of studies to prepare them for the construction industry.Bibliography1. Walker, Ellen, L. and Slotterbeck, Oberta, A. “Incorporating Realistic Teamwork into a Small College SoftwareEngineering Curriculum” NSF sponsored Research under Grant No. 9952749.2. Grayson, L. P., “The Making of an Engineer”, John Wiley and Sons, NY, 1993.3. ABET: Accreditation
first-year students’metacognition skills within an integrated first-year engineering curriculum [4] or createdpedagogical scaffolding approaches for students to engage with fellow students, the faculty, andthe industry [5]. Rutar and Mason [6] introduced first-year undergraduate students to thecollaborative nature of university engineering designs by forming a learning communitycomprised of first-year students and students from a high school technology course.In this paper, we present the Engineering Mentorship & Bridging Education Resources(EMBER)[7] program. It is a bridging program with a purpose of easing the transition for highschool graduates joining the university as first-year students in the 2020 Fall Semester. Ouroverarching
description of the newcourse and the factors considered in its scheduling are discussed. The events affecting the timingof course topics is discussed, including registration dates, advising needs, and the coordinationwith other courses such chemistry and calculus.IntroductionClemson’s General Engineering program has coordinated the common first-year engineeringcurriculum since 1985. 1 A closer relationship with the sciences has developed as a result of areorganization that created the College of Engineering and Science in 1995. 2 Most recently, thisrelationship led to the addition of introductory science content and perspective to theIntroduction to Engineering course to create an Introduction to Engineering and Science course. 3The course in this
Science (YES)at Polytechnic University. High school students selected met the following criteria:• Completion of Level 2 of the integrated mathematics curriculum of New York State (basic knowledge of algebra and trigonometry).• An overall average in mathematics and science courses of at least 80.• No prior experience with high-level computer programming (with the exception of BASIC programming).• Availability to attend all class meetings with no more than 2 absences.1 Only procedural aspects of C++ were presented in the C++ section. Additionally, students used input and outputstreams (cin and cout instead of scanf and printf). Students in this section did not learn object-oriented
Session 3653 Assessing a Freshman Engineering Course Christopher Rowe, Stacy Klein, Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Vanderbilt UniversityAbstractAssessment is arguably the most difficult activity in an engineering curriculum. An engineeringschool's first challenge is to align its incoming students with an area of study that appeals to theirinterests and will allow them to grow academically and ultimately embrace their profession. Asecondary challenge is to provide the students with essential problem solving tools in anatmosphere that is engaging while accounting for their diverse
Experiments for Protection and Automation in Microgrid Power Systems California Polytechnic State UniversityAbstractThis project establishes practical laboratory coursework facilitating students to operate,coordinate, and integrate microprocessor protective relays in a low-voltage three-phasemicrogrid system. Three laboratory experiments are developed to serve as the laboratorycomponent to an existing power system protection lecture course. The laboratory courseworkdevelopment is part of the Cal Poly electrical engineering department’s Advanced PowerSystems Initiatives, which aim to modernize power engineering curriculum to more effectivelyeducate power students and prepare them for the rapidly changing power
Paper ID #19657The Use of Software Package and Commercial Catalogues in Development ofDesign DocumentationDr. Jorge Rodriguez P.E., Western Michigan University Faculty member in the Department of Engineering Design, Manufacturing, and Management Systems (EDMMS) at Western Michigan University’s (WMU). Co-Director of the Center for Integrated Design (CID), and currently the college representative to the President’s University-wide Sustainability Com- mittee at WMU. Received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering-Design from University of Wisconsin- Madison and received an MBA from Rutgers University. His B.S. degree was in
. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation and
, students are encouraged to be involved in industry sponsored projectsoutside of the classroom. Many of the EE students also participate in the annual IEEE regionalrobotics competition (Figure 1). Engaging students with the concrete, hands-on, and real-worldproblems is a great motivator and learning opportunity. Page 15.197.2The EE program has strong emphasis on the implementation of design experiences. The 4-yearcurriculum has a design course each year with two in the senior year. The role of these coursesis to bring together material from various courses and form an integrated curriculum. Thedesign course Figure 1: EE Students
expertise in well-structured “building block”problems automatically translates into expertise in ill-structured (design) problems is perhaps anopen question, but several leading education researchers challenge this assumption and arguethat direct experience with ill-structured problems throughout the curriculum is necessary inorder to build expertise in activities such as engineering design1-6. We further note that ill-structured problems provide opportunities for students to anticipate topics from subsequentcourses and allow for smooth vertical integration; we adopt this approach here.The incorporation of simulation tools is important for its own sake and as reviewed inPapadopoulos et al. has several prior precedents7. But use of simulation tools
commandof the material you are teaching and it is matter of setting up an exercise that you can model(and/or students can participate in) where you break down a complex procedure into simple,discrete steps.Repeat Class/Established Relationship with Course Instructor (Level 2):The suggestions with Level 1 are consistent with what most university teaching centers willrecommend for new graduate student graders or teaching assistants. Level 2 introduces novelapproaches that allow GTAs to support curriculum development and establish a deeper sense ofownership in the course.Address Concept Challenges via Curriculum DevelopmentPrior to the start of the semester, summarize and reflect on the main course topics that challengedstudents in the previous course
Paper ID #27474Design-based Evaluation: A Novel Evaluation Approach to Examine DesignedPrograms in Engineering EducationDr. Lori C. Bland, George Mason University Lori C. Bland, Ph.D., is an associate clinical professor of curriculum and research, and the Director of Curriculum, Center for Gifted Education at The College of William and Mary. She teaches courses in program evaluation, educational assessment, educational psychology, data-driven decision-making, and gifted education. Bland received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Virginia. Her current research focuses on assessing learning and
strategies, such as use ofdepleted uranium bullets. Unfortunately, whether or not we seek the information to makecomplete choices and demand to have our choice recognized, the decisions will happen bydefault. Thus it is imperative that members of a highly functioning, sustainable society bemotivated to seek to understand the source and implications of new technologies and collectivelymake “good” decisions about adoption of those technologies.This need for science and technology savvy citizens has been recognized by most universitiesand integrated into undergraduate curriculums. Whether this curriculum thread is named“Science, Technology, and Society”, “Culture, Science and Technology”, or “Science andTechnology in Society” (STS - the designation
of / deploying / improving / problems facing / limitations to / works done in / understanding / relationships between / roles of / expanding.7) An extra criterion was included for gray literature because we found evidence that most professional development workshops in sub-Saharan Africa are posted on websites and not on peer-reviewed articles. 4Table 1. Search string keywords, synonyms, and justificationsKeywords Synonyms JustificationPROFESSIONAL Training, Workshop, These synonyms were suggested by experts in the field as well as educators who haveDEVELOPMENT Curriculum, Project undergone one or
Technical College (National Science Foundation DUE #0422405,#0806514, and #1259402) closes the digital divide and provides an incentive for choosing atargeted STEM major. Each scholarship includes an individually-assigned laptop computerequipped with program-specific software and (more recently) a mobile wireless Internet service.Engineering technology students who are awarded Tech Stars (S-STEM) scholarships receive apowerful laptop computer equipped with CAD and other software used in these programs ofstudy, whereas computer science students receive laptops equipped with different program-specific software, and automotive technology students receive a curriculum-specificcomputerized diagnostic tool. These academic tools eliminate the need for
-on learning? An hands-on learning approach requires students to become activeparticipants instead of passive learners who simply listen to lectures. The concept of “hands-onlearning” is not new in engineering education. A previous study of engineering educationshowed that hands-on learning is an effective method for engineering classes.1 In fact, over thepast 10 years or so, many engineering schools and programs have started to adopt “hands-onlearning” into their curricula. Whether using simple everyday household items or sophisticatedequipment, professors are now trying to integrate hands-on learning into their classes.Laboratory activities are the traditional method of providing students hands-on experience.However, with advancements in
new or existing technologies. Whereas engineers are typically programmed to developnew solutions, entrepreneurially minded engineers are educated in identifying the mostappropriate solution to these newly uncovered needs, regardless of whether they are new orexisting solutions that may be integrated or augmented to satisfy the market need. While thereare multiple definitions for entrepreneurs, this paper posits the definition that states“Entrepreneurs, in the purest sense, are those who identify a need—any need—and fill it. It’s aprimordial urge, independent of product, service, industry or market” [13]. Ultimately, thesuccess of an entrepreneurial engineer depends on their ability to validate, attract, and acquirecustomers who seek to
, Chem-E-Car, or Design-Build-Fly. Many competitions are sponsoredby professional technical societies, such as the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, or byindustry, such as the Shell Eco-Marathon. As Bland et al. have observed, based on their researchwith students who participate on engineering competition teams, “engineering competitions mayact as a catalyst for students to learn how to integrate technical and professional skills andknowledge in their development as an engineer.” [2] In addition, engineering students’involvement in activities outside of the classroom, such as student competition teams, contributesto their achievement of numerous other outcomes; according to Simmons et al., engagement withthese activities enhances
ABEToutcomes that would be satisfied. Post lesson student comments and ideas for additional studentactivities, and alternate assignments were also provided.REFERENCES[1] Kuh, G. D., “High Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who has Access to Them, and Why they matter, AAC&U, 2008.[2] Zhan, W., Wang, J., Vanajakumari,, M., “High impact activities to improve student learning”, 120th ASEE Annual conference, June 2013.[3] Parker, R., Buchanan, W. Circuit Simulators and Computer Algebra- An integrated Curriculum for Electronics Students, Proceedings of 1996, ASEE Annual Conference.[4] Campbell, C, Saffih, F.,Nigim, K, Improved learning efficiency with integrated math and circuit simulation tools in electrical and computer
positions with superior performance over thecourse of a semester. Faculty members—one each from the Colleges of Business, Education, andEngineering—provide support to students during their work in the Laboratory. The faculty alsoteam-teach an undergraduate Business Administration course (BusAd 392) associated with theBusiness Lab experience. The course is offered in seminar format and is comprised ofinstructional components (see Table 1) designed to provide students with some of the skills theyrequire for technological problem solving, innovation, and integration. Table 1: Instructional components Team Skills Faculty Marketing Research Methodology
, Texas 75701 mbiswas@uttyler.edu1 aadityakhanal@utyler.edu2, psundaravadivel@uttyler.edu3AbstractCourses based on experiential learning provide an excellent avenue to promote problem-solving andcollaborative skills among the students in STEM. However, the current engineering curriculum does nothave sufficient project-based learning emphasizing collaborative research on renewable energy to supportthe government’s goal of Net Zero emissions by 2050. So, this work-in-progress presents the results fromour recent implementation of project-based learning assignments to existing courses to model and analyzerenewable energy systems while introducing machine learning methods. We used assignments and selectedprojects to introduce concepts related
was to transform the exitingmaterials curriculum to keep pace with the new green technologies in the manufacturing andmechanical engineering technology programs at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT). Weattempted develop and pilot test an educational approach and undergraduate teaching modulesfor Green Plastics Manufacturing Technology within foundational courses in the materials andmanufacturing education. Page 25.916.2 1Instructional ModelThe optimal methods of instruction are to bring some desired outcomes in knowledge and skillsin green
-sizedmanufacturing companies and delivered in-depth project services to 250 companies7.These companies consider IMEC an extension of their own operations and routinely callon the specialists to help them: meet the quality registration demands of their largercustomers, contain operating costs and increase profits, improve production output andtime to market, integrate advanced manufacturing technologies and business practices,solve specific problems, reverse negative business situations such as sales decreases, lossof market share, and cost increases, and diversify their customer base8. Services that IMEC offers include Lean Manufacturing training andimplementation assistance. The training and implementation assistance helps tominimize waste in both