qualitative interview datawith individual faculty, which constitutes a fruitful avenue for future research.Nevertheless, some generalizations can be made based on the data at hand. First, there is noevidence of stand-alone civil engineering courses being offered on accessibility. A scan ofuniversity-level information and communication technology programs similarly found anabsence of separate courses dedicated to accessibility, which the authors concluded indicated alack of faculty interest, student interest, or perceived need for expertise on the topic [11]. Giventhe amount of coursework required in typical civil engineering undergraduate programs, theabsence of individual courses is not surprising. Both students and faculty are often resistant
following National Academies panels: Survivability and Lethality Analysis, Army Research Laboratory (ARL) Au- tonomous Systems. Dr. Rodriguez received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1990. Personal Web site: http://aar.faculty.asu.edu/Mr. Nirangkush Das, Arizona State University Nirangkush Das is the Research Associate in the NSF S-STEM grant 1565177. He is currently pursuing his Ph.D in the department of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering (ECEE) at Arizona State University.Mr. Brent Wallace, Arizona State University Brent Wallace is an undergraduate Electrical Engineering student at Arizona State University. He spe- cializes in the study of control
engineering, math, science, technology, computer science, physics, STEM,and chemistry, in order of decreasing frequency of responses. Figure 9 shows a bar graphindicating the response categories of the participants, based on percentage of responses recorded.DiscussionThe first survey question, “What was your favorite part of the activity?”, elicited the largestnumber of responses in the categories of participation, experimentation, and creation, as shown in Number of Responses Observation 0 New Technology 0 Teamwork 1 Learning 1 Everything 5
Analytics Scientist with interest in design research, learning analytics, re- search methods and under-representation in engineering, A major strand of his work focuses on develop- ing and analyzing learning analytics that model students’ cognitive states or strategies through fine-grained computer-logged data from open-ended technology-centered science and engineering projects. His disser- tation research explored the use of Minecraft to teach early engineering college students about the design process.Ms. Sherry Hsi, Concord Consortium Dr. Sherry Hsi is the Executive Vice President of the Concord Consortium. She leads the strategic de- velopment, design, and research of learning technologies using her background in
Genaro Zavala is a Full Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies of the School of Engineering and Sciences at Tecnologico de Monterrey. Professor Zavala is National Researcher Level 1 of the National System of Researchers of Mexico and leads the Physics Education Research and Innovation Group. He works with the following research lines: conceptual understanding of students on subjects of physics, transfer of understanding between the different areas of knowledge, use of technology in learning, the impact of using innovative learning environments and development of assessment tools. He has 92 articles in refereed journals and conferences, over 680 citations according to Scopus, 6 books, 14 book chapters, 142
classrooms.For this study, interested parties of engineering university academics and K-12 Science,Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) researchers have partnered to evaluate componentsof a digital and dynamic learning tool that can grow as teachers and researchers continue todefine best practices in education. This award winning digital Personalized LearningManagement System (PLMS) has been developed by a leading Canadian STEM educational not-for-profit organization. The system supports personalized curriculum based hypermediainstructional tool for K-12 educators and students. Being digitally based, it has the potential forrapid integration into classrooms. The tool appeals to digital natives (students), and incorporates:mind mapping (discovery
, Lincoln Jenny Keshwani is an Assistant Professor of Biological Systems Engineering and Science Literacy Spe- cialist in the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. She is active in promoting science and engineering education in both formal and informal settings through her research, extension, and outreach activities. Dr. Keshwani is actively engaged in several cross-disciplinary regional and national efforts related to STEM education and outreach. Most recently, she was part of a team that received NSF funding to engage youth in STEM through wearable technologies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding student
line?,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513: Physics Education Research Conference, 2013.[24] H. D. Young and R. A. Freedman, University Physics. Mexico City: Pearson Education, 2016.[25] L. C. McDermott and P. S. Shaffer, Tutorials in Introductory Physics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002.[26] G. Zavala, “An Analysis of Learning in a Multi-Strategy Active-Learning Course of Electricity and Magnetism for Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the Eleventh LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology, 2013, pp. 1–10.[27] C. J. Hieggelke, D. P. Maloney, T. L. O’Kuma, and S. E. Kanim, E&M TIPERs: Electricity & Magnetism Tasks. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Paul Prior is the Director of the Center for Writing Studies and Professor of the Department of English at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Julie L. Zilles, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Zilles is a Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign. She received her B.S. in biology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her Ph.D. in Bacteriology from the University of Wisconsin Madison. She teaches biological principles of environmental engineering and a graduate level scientific writing class, conducts research at the intersection of microbiology and environmental
contexts through an online platform. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Participation in Small Group Engineering Design Activities at the Middle School Level: An Investigation of Gender DifferencesIntroductionAs demand for expertise in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)continues to increase, STEM education is of growing concern in the United States and around theworld. With ongoing calls for improvements to K-12 STEM education [1], [2], pre-collegeengineering experiences are becoming increasingly common. The Framework for K-12 ScienceEducation [2] and Next Generation Science Standards [3] include engineering practices withinthe scope of science, indicating that
exercises,” Engineering Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39 – 49, July 2006.[9] Dunlap, J. 2005. Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research & Development 53: 65–85.[10] A. Bandura, Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1986.[11] M. Hutchison, D. Follman and G. Bodner, “Shaping the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First- Year Engineering Students: What is the Role We Play?” in the 112th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 12 – 15 June 2005, Portland, Oregon USA [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/shaping-the-self-efficacy-beliefs-of-first-year- engineering-students
Engineering Students," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 27, pp. 1072-1080, 2011.[4] G. M. Novak, Just-in-time teaching : blending active learning with web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.[5] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, et al., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of 11 America, vol. 111, pp. 8410-8415, Jun 10 2014.[6] R. R. Hake, "Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student
Paper ID #27310Queer(y)-ing Technical Practice: Queer Experiences in Student Theater Pro-ductions at a Technical UniversityMitch Cieminski, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Mitch Cieminski received a B.S. in electrical and computer engineering from Olin College of Engineering in Needham, MA in 2017. They are currently pursuing a PhD in Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, studying the intersections of engineering cultures, peace and ethics, educational power structures, and the experiences of disabled, queer, and trans engineers. c American Society for Engineering
&M UniversityDr. Astrid Layton, Texas A&M University Astrid Layton is an assistant professor at Texas A&M University in the Mechanical Engineering depart- ment and received her Ph.D. from Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, Georgia. She is interested in bio-inspired system design problems and is currently working at the intersection of ecology and engi- neering for the design of complex human networks and systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 An Analysis of Factors Impacting Design Self-Efficacy of Senior Design StudentsIn many engineering senior design programs, students are taught an engineering design processthat
, Virginia Tech Dr. Vinod K. Lohani is a Professor of Engineering Education and also serves as the Director of education and global initiatives at an interdisciplinary research institute called the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech. He is the founding director of an interdisciplinary lab called Learning Enhanced Watershed Assessment System (LEWAS) at VT. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from VT. His research interests are in the areas of computer-supported research and learning systems, hydrology, engineering education, and international collaboration. He has served as a PI or co-PI on 16 projects, funded by the National Science Foundation, with a $6.4 million research
set-up of the spaces vary greatly between locations, agrowing number of universities have shifted from more traditional machine shop equipmenttowards digital design and rapid manufacturing tools (Wilczynski, 2015). These technologies areavailable to students through their coursework, their participation in certain extracurricularactivities, their status as an engineering student, or simply through their university enrollment.Students visit the Makerspaces for academic, personal, and extracurricular projects (Ali et al.2016; Wilczynski, Zinter & Wilen 2016). Since its establishment at the University of Texas atAustin in 2014, more than 30 courses offered by the university have included course projects thatprompt students to utilize the
Paper ID #27025Effect of Integrated Life Science Units on Middle School Students’ Engage-mentMs. Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette Saira Anwar is a third-year doctoral student at School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. She is interested in exploring the effects of using technology to enhance students’ learning. Further, she is interested in understanding the ways and interventions that can be designed to deal with conceptually hard concepts in STEM courses especially programming and software engineering courses. Prior to Purdue University, Saira worked as Assistant Professor in Computer Science
Paper ID #26687Stakeholder Perspectives on Increasing Electric Power Infrastructure IntegrityDr. Efrain O’Neill-Carrillo P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Efra´ın O’Neill-Carrillo is a professor of power engineering at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez (UPRM). He holds a Ph.D. (Arizona State), an M.S.E.E. (Purdue), and a B.S.E.E. (UPRM). His profes- sional interests include energy policy, sustainable energy, distributed generation, power quality, social and ethical implications of engineering and technology. He has authored or co-authored over 70 peer-reviewed journal and conference papers. O’Neill
expert and kind of engineering scientist by the subreddit to be not very successful.Among the possible factors leading to this is that members of that subreddit most often link newsarticles, blog posts, and other content as a post rather than an entire essay written by oneself. Itwas not deleted by moderators, but it does not follow the conventions of this community.YouTube ChannelsOne four-person group and one individual participant, Participant 3, made YouTube channelswith a series of videos that set out to convey the fundamentals of PV solar technology, and in thelatter case, how it relates to his research project. In a similar vein as Participant 2’scharacterization of researcher in her Wiki article, they make bids to position themselves as
programs and services fostering excellence and innovation in teaching at WPI and supports course-based and program-level assessment of student learning outcomes.Ms. Paula Quinn, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Through her role as Associate Director for the Center for Project-Based Learning at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Paula Quinn works to improve student learning in higher education by supporting faculty and staff at WPI and at other institutions to advance work on project-based learning. She believes project- based learning holds significant potential for increasing the diversity of students who succeed in college and who persist in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields, and she views her work
, "Decision making in the engineering classroom," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 349-356, 1997.[5] D. H. Jonassen, "Designing for decision making," Educational technology research and development, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 341-359, 2012.[6] C. E. Zsambok and G. Klein, Naturalistic decision making. Psychology Press, 2014.[7] G. A. Klein, J. E. Orasanu, R. E. Calderwood, and C. E. Zsambok, "Decision making in action: Models and methods," in This book is an outcome of a workshop held in Dayton, OH, Sep 25–27, 1989., 1993: Ablex Publishing.[8] E. De Graaff and W. Ravesteijn, "Training complete engineers: global enterprise and engineering education," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol
Paper ID #26817Incorporating DOD Research and Historical Materials into a Second-semesterIntroductory Calculus-based Physics CourseDr. Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, U.S. Military Academy Dr. Lanzerotti is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Physics and Nuclear Engineering at United States Military Academy (West Point, NY). She has conducted research presented at 2017 ASEE on learner-centered teaching techniques in her classes at Air Force Institute of Technology, where she was an Associate Professor of Computer Engineering. She has also held positions at IBM at the Thomas J. Watson Research Center, where she was
Engineering Education, vol. 96, issue 4, pp. 359-379, Oct 2007.[6] P. Steif, et al., “Improved Problem Solving Performance by Inducing Talk about SalientProblem Features,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, issue 2, pp. 135-142, April 2010.[7] B. Crandall, et al., Working Minds: A practitioner's guide to cognitive task analysis.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.[8] G. Polya, How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 1957.[9] D. Jonassen, “Instructional Design as Design Problem Solving: An Iterative Process,”Educational Technology, vol. 48, issue 3, May-June 2008.[10] S. Salehi, “Improved Problem-Solving Through Reflection,” PhD dissertation, GraduateSchool of Education, Stanford
. Training scholars tothink and work across disciplinary boundaries can enhance disaster preparation and management,which, in turn, can enhance disaster resilience, especially in vulnerable locations and forvulnerable populations. To that end, we have embarked on a cross-university collaboration thatbrings together scholars in engineering and science with expertise in natural hazards modelingand characterization, scholars in urban planning and policy with expertise in the social impactsof disasters (e.g. housing, economy) as well as in community engagement, and scholars inbusiness information technology with expertise in supply chain management that considers howsupplies are allocated and distributed before and after disasters. The disproportionate
Engineering (WECE) study. Cathy received her S.B. in cognitive science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her Ph.D. in educational psychology from Stanford University.Dr. Christine M. Cunningham, Museum of Science, Boston Dr. Christine Cunningham is an educational researcher who works to make engineering and science more relevant, accessible, and understandable, especially for underserved and underrepresented populations. She focuses on developing research-based, field-tested curricula. For sixteen years, she worked as a vice president at the Museum of Science where she was the Founding Director of Engineering is Elementary, a groundbreaking program that integrates engineering concepts into preschool
, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM). Plentiful prior studies [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6] documented positive impacts ofsuch efforts using exit interviews. This paper evaluates a STEM-oriented summer programdesigned for high school students and examines the effectiveness of its educational instruments,using an opening survey, an end-of-program survey, and an alumni survey. Activities of highimpacts identified by this study can be used by other similar outreach programs that aim toincrease high school students' interests in STEM. The National Summer Transportation Institute (NSTI) program is one of the FederalHighway Administration’s (FHWA) educational initiatives. It is "to increase awareness andstimulate interest in
curriculum development. She is passionate about hands-on engineering design for every student, at every age level.Dr. Janet Y. Tsai, University of Colorado, Boulder Janet Y. Tsai is a researcher and instructor in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second
. Krause, S. Yaşar, C. Roberts, and S. Robertson-Kurpius. “An Intervention toAddress Gender Issues in a Course on Design, Engineering, and Technology for ScienceEducators.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 213-226, 2007..[10] C.S. Lee, N.J. McNeil, E.P. Douglas, L.M.E. Koro, and D.J. Therriault. “IndispensableResource? A Phenomenological Study of Textbook Use in Engineering Problem Solving.”Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 269-288, 2013.[11] A.F. McKenna, B. Yalvac, G.J. Light. “The Role of Collaborative Reflection on ShapingEngineering Faculty Teaching Approaches.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 1,pp. 17-26, 2009.[12] R.M. Felder, R. Brent, and M.J. Prince. “Engineering Instructional
education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. 2009.[3] National Academy of Engineering, Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008.[4] Ş. Yaşar, D. Baker, S. Robinson-Kurpius, S. Krause, and C. Roberts, “Development of a survey to assess K-12 teachers’ perceptions of engineers and familiarity with teaching design, engineering, and technology,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 205–216, 2006.[5] E. J. Marti and E. Kaya, “Assessing high school science teachers’ nature of engineering (NOE) perceptions with an open-ended NOE instrument (fundamental),” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[6] A. L
her research focuses on the role that various forms of technology play in terms of student learning in physics and in engineering. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for over 30 years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directors for ASEE from 1997-1999 as Chair of Professional Interest Council (PIC) III and as Vice President of PICs. She has received numerous national and international awards including the ASEE Fellow Award in 2016 and the Distinguished Educator and Service Award from the Physics and Engineer- ing Physics Division in 1998. In January 2014 the Center for Teaching, Research and Learning at AU