Council (SSRC). From 2004-2007, Professor Sudarshan served on the faculty of the School of Architecture and ENSAV- Versailles Study Abroad Program in France. He has been a recipient of the ”Excellence in Teaching Award” and has been consistently listed on the ”UIUC List of Teachers Ranked as Excellent/Outstanding by their Students” for architecture and civil engineering courses.Ms. Yaxin Li, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Ms. Yaxin Li is currently a Ph.D. student (Building Structures) in the School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). Her Ph.D. research focuses on the geometric and structural design of deployable structures. She obtained her M.Arch degree from UIUC and B.Arch
recommendation processconnected either people or organizations based on their personal preferences once the data hadbeen entered into the system. Social science research has revealed that people build socialrelationships with each other, and these relationships may help them locate either information orservices more effectively. Wan et al. (26) found that a collaborative group-learning environmentin which students could express their thoughts, voice their opinions, and share their experienceshad a positive outcome.Thus, incorporating teamwork and communication skills into the core curriculum of allengineering and technology programs is essential for success. McDonald (27) emphasizes that itis clearly important that faculty consider incorporating
Peking University, Beijing, China. Dr. Zhao also received a Master of Science degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 1998 at University of California, Santa Barbara. Dr. Zhao joined CSU faculty in 2004. He is currently serving as the director of the Master of Science in Electrical c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25637Engineering, and the Chair of the Graduate Program Committee in the Department of EECS, the ABETcoordinator for the BS in Computer Science Program, and a member of the faculty senate at CSU. Dr.Zhao has authored a research monograph titled: ”Building Dependable
AC 2010-805: DESIGNING INTERDISCIPLINARY CURRICULUM & TEACHING:INVESTIGATING INNOVATION & OUR ENGINEERED WORLDAustin Talley, University of Texas, Austin Austin Talley is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin, a Cockrell Fellow, and a licensed Professional Engineer. His research focus is in design methodology with Universal Design and engineering education. He has received his B.S. from Texas A&M University and M.S.E. from The University of Texas at Austin. Contact: Austin@talleyweb.comChristina White, Columbia University Christina White is a doctoral candidate in Curriculum & Teaching at Teachers College, Columbia
, programimplementation will (rightfully) be challenging, if not impossible. Cooperation via an outreachfocus group, for example, with a school district at the point of initial program development andgrant proposal can be an integral part of the process. Initially, curricula must be examined andprospective areas for engineering content addition must be identified initially.Clear communication between district administrators, teachers, graduate students, and outreachproject representatives is crucial in the process of successful outreach development. Clearly,problems most often develop where the communication ties are weak or nonexistent. It shouldnever be assumed that project information will naturally disseminate to reach all partiesinvolved; direct
- and evidence-based reasoning,Robinson, S. Generation Physical Science and respondents. service teachers and collaborative problem-solving. Everyday Thinking (Next Gen PET) general education curriculum, a guided-inquiry students curriculumMcAlpin, J. D., 2022 To develop and validate the 296 STEM faculty Quantitative USA Biology, Chemistry, CACAO Model of Yes The study focuses broadly on evidence-Ziker, J. P., Cooperative Adoption Factors
this program and by providing meaningful, innovative and exciting opportunities for industry and professionals in the field. • To get academia (faculty, research associates and students) closer to industry, and to explore technology development opportunities in collaboration with international institutions. Page 6.426.3Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education 3 This program also provides a vehicle to Industry and its practitioners to
server, as well as linkfiles from the web. eCAT was one of the ELNs used in the Electronic Lab Notebook pilot study12at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. This study involved academic researchers, mostlygraduate students, in fields of science, engineering, and medicine. A significant finding in thereport is that the users found two features of most use: the ability to add data and link files. Thesimple drawing tools in eCAT were not deemed very useful by many of the users. Although thefile structuring functions of eCAT may not be necessary for simpler undergraduate laboratories,given that practicing engineers found this useful, eCAT may be a good option for upper-levellaboratories and students involved in undergraduate research.Sophomore
involved project is the product of collaboration among faculty who teach courses Page 9.643.5in global development engineering at several schools. The project was developed last summer at Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineeringa workshop hosted by MIT. Students are asked to design a crutch for a 12-year old child who haslost part of a limb in a land mine accident. Design and societal/individual considerations here aremore inter-related. For example, the
-Teacher Identities: In addition to identity issues regarding area of specialization amongthe teachers, similar concerns were noted among the facilitators. As specified previously, the fourdedicated facilitators for the PD were graduate students and postdoctoral researchers inengineering fields. However, as the PD progressed, the facilitators began to develop a greaterappreciation for the work done by the teachers. This illustrates an effective, bidirectionaloperationalization of social capital with facilitators and teachers learning from one-another.For each of the aforementioned themes, Table 2 below provides examples of key issues affectingteachers during the PD while Table 3 provides examples of changes induced and observed in boththe
’ learning.IntroductionCollege provides boundless opportunity to a student in his/her personal, intellectual and socialdevelopment. Among different connections that a college student can make, research shows thatstudent-faculty relationships are the most crucial connection within a collegiate community(Duberstein, 2009). A sense of connection with a faculty member helps students feel like theytruly belong at the institution. When students feel connected to the campus community, they aremore often retained and excel academically, creating a winning situation for everyone. Facultymembers who understand the learning needs and interests of their students can appropriatelytailor assignments, expectations, and conversations.The center of this faculty-student relationship is
engineering innovation. Graduate education must be responsive to this change and mustbuild a new type model of in-service graduate professional education which reflects thesubstantial changes and characteristics of the engineering innovation process itself, and thestages of lifelong growth, professional dimensions, and leadership responsibilities associatedwith the modern practice of creative engineering in a knowledge-based, innovation-driveneconomy. Whereas traditional research-based graduate engineering education and teaching haveresulted during the last three decades as a byproduct of the linear research-driven model ofinnovation, a new model of graduate professional education has been developed which focuseson lifelong professional education for
assists the students inlearning and applying the subject matter in a consolidated fashion.The three courses in the minicurriculum require students to work in groups during the laboratoryexperiments, project development and execution and oral presentation. This will developproblem-solving skills and will foster cooperation, communication skills and ability to worktowards a common goal. This is consistent with the research conducted by Behm and others18“Connections across Cultures: Inviting Multiple Perspectives into Classrooms of Science,Technology, Math, and Engineering” and funded by the National Science Foundation.Prototype for this ProjectIn the prototype stage from 2002 to 2004, we developed a minicurriculum uniting programs inIndustrial
activity in the Computer Science training curricula20. At the University of CostaRica, the Bachelor of Science’s program in Computer and Information Science offers anelective undergraduate course in software resting, and Master of Science’s program in Com-puter and Information Science offers an elective graduate course in software testing as well.Both are 4-credit-hour courses, with 64 hours of class time in a 16-week semester. The un-dergraduate and graduate versions of the courses are very similar in their core contents(since the undergraduate course is not pre-requisite for the graduate one), differing mainlyon the applied research project (only performed at graduate level), advanced topics presentedby students (topics and depth vary according
strategies including inquiry-based learning, case-based teaching, problem-based learning,project-based learning, collaborative learning, and integrated curricula are described below.Inquiry-based learning is based on the investigation scientific or engineering questions,scenarios or problems. Those ‘inquiring’ will identify and research issues and questions todevelop their STEM knowledge or solutions, guided by an instructor. Inquiry-based learningactivities are designed for students to investigate, apply prior knowledge, examine, broadenconceptual knowledge, and to assess the growth of developing new knowledge.36,37,38,39 Inquiry-based learning is most effective when students are able to make a connection between theirlearning and real life
) – Indicates a Work in Progress Friday, April 1, 2011 (Morning)08:30 – 09:45 AM Concurrent Session Presentations Experiential Learning Jim Helbling, et al., Configuration Of Senior Capstone Course Using Team- 1 Teaching To Maximize Communication Skills And Minimize Team Conflict Mohammad Amin, et al., Investigation of a Masters Research Project for 13 Validation of Program's Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Jennifer Van Donk, et al., Developing a low cost prosthetic foot for the Vida Nueva 30 Clinic: A multidisciplinary senior design project Instrumentation & Lab Studies Ricardo Medina, et
that students are not able,either psychologically or physiologically, to pay attention to the material nor to retain itthroughout a traditional lecture. Their study showed that students could recall approximately70% of the content from the first 10 minutes of the lecture but only 20% from the last 10minutes.In his book “Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and UniversityTeachers”, Wilber McKeachie enumerates several techniques that can be used to capture andmaintain the students' attention, such as referring to material that is likely to be on tests, usingchanges in voice, facial expression, and movement, audiovisual aids, eye contact, and givingexamples that are linked to student interests. Yet he concludes,“all of
design-build-compete-document project. Most of the student teams design and build small autonomous robotsthat have to perform a given series of tasks. The classrooms used for these courses aretechnology enhanced such that each student has access to a computer and collaborative learningis facilitated4. In the classroom portion of the course, each faculty member has twoundergraduate Peer Mentors (teaching assistants) who help when the students are working ondaily assignments do much of the grading. When the students go to the hands-on labs, theteaching team consists of the faculty member, a graduate teaching (GTA) and two undergraduateteaching associates. The class size is limited to 36. The students work in teams of two or fourdepending on the
Center which promote innovation and entrepreneurship among engineering students and in collaborations with other colleges on campus and partnering with other institutions across the country.Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn, Boise State University Donna Crystal Llewellyn received her BA (major in Mathematics and minor in Economics) with High Honors from Swarthmore College in 1980. She went on to earn an MS in Operations Research from Stanford University in 1981 and a Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University in 1984. After 30 years at Georgia Tech in a variety of roles, Donna became the Executive Director of the new Institute for STEM and Diversity Initiatives at Boise State University in January 2015. Donna’s current
. Examples of using robotics to teach STEM concepts abound in literature and cover theentire education spectrum from elementary to graduate school.4-6 Unfortunately, theextracurricular nature of robotics contests has not made the use of robotics more central to K-12science and math education. Moreover, the potential for explicitly exploring science and mathprinciples using robotics-based activities remains largely untapped in K-12 schools.7 Manyrobotics-focused K-12 programs are organized as outreach efforts for students’ educationalenrichment and necessitate on-site support of teachers through college-level engineeringstudents5 or volunteer engineering professionals,8 thereby making it difficult to sustain and scale-up projects. Therefore
?," Career Outlook, U.S.Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2015.[29] Strayhorn, T. L. (2010). Undergraduate research participation and STEM graduate degreeaspirations among students of color. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 85–93. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.fsu.edu/10.1002/ir.364[30] Bergerson, A. A. (2009). College Choice and Access to College: Moving policy, researchand practice to the 21st century. ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(4). San Francisco: WileyPeriodicals.[31] Hines, E.M., Harris, P.C., Mayes, R.D., & Moore, III, J.L. (2020). I think of college assetting a good foundation for my future: Black males navigating the college decision makingprocess. Journal for Multicultural Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No
thesubsequent sections of this paper.2. Literature ReviewDespite nationwide efforts over the last 30 years, the participation of women and marginalizedstudents in engineering and CS has increased only slightly [3]. Scholarship on underrepresentedminority students in STEM gives us insights into their experiences, challenges they face, andpotential ways of increasing their representation and improving their persistence.Following a review of literature that explores challenges that women experience when pursuingcareer in the sciences, White and Massiha discuss several general retention theories, propose aconceptual framework for persistence, and raise a number of possible research questions [4].Blackburn performs a thematic review of the literature
, rather than listening passively to a lecture. If students informally assist one another inthis process, the technique is deemed to be collaborative learning [2]. PBL builds on ACL byintroducing engaging real-world problems for students to solve as part of a group [2]. A newtwist on PBL is the inclusion of student skills associated with an entrepreneurial mindset, such asintegrating information from many sources to gain insight and/or identifying unexpectedopportunities to create value. The resulting EML activities emphasize “discovery, opportunityidentification, and value creation with attention given to effectual thinking over causal(predictive) thinking” [3].Atman et al. [4] reported on the Academic Pathways Study to address research questions
ScienceFoundation, National Academy of Engineering, American Society for Engineering Education,and the United States government, among others.After a substantial review process that took several years and several committees of high rankingmembers from academia and industry, the National Academy of Engineering in its EducatingThe Engineer of 2020 report1 recommended in 2005 that engineering education establishmentsseek to achieve the following: 1. Pursue a student-centered approach to undergraduate engineering education. 2. Increase the value in engineering education research to better understand how students learn. 3. Develop new standards for faculty qualifications. 4. Help promote engineering and technological literacy among the
libraries can be so fortunate, and must put in extra effort to make their 3D printingservice a successful initiative. Pryor 28 described the University of Southern Illinois-Edwardsville Lovejoy Library’s 3D printing service as a “mixed bag” because of theexpressed excitement from both students and faculty, but relatively low usage numbers. Heposited the reasons could have included a lack of access to 3D modeling software or familiaritywith the creation of 3D models, patrons simply being unaware of 3D model repositories withready to print objects on the web, or the campus community had yet to grasp how 3D printingtechnology can be useful in scholarship, research and other creative activities. Zuberbier, et al 7shared a similar story of high interest
. in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.Dr. Jessica R TerBush, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Jessica received her B.S.E, M.S.E., and PhD in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. After graduation, she worked as a post-doc for approximately three years at Monash University in Clayton, Victoria, Australia. She then spent three years working as a Senior Research Specialist at the Missouri University of Science and Technology in Rolla, Missouri, where she trained users on the focused ion beam (FIB), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and transmission electron microscope (TEM). In 2016, she moved to the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
discussed the curriculum content of the workshop through his orher own disciplinary filter; therefore, students were able to consider a multiplicity ofperspectives and understandings as presented by the faculty team. We believe that thisset a climate of intellectual openness and honesty during the workshop sessions; modeledrisk-taking and interdisciplinary thinking and doing; and invited students to move beyondtheir own academic comfort zones and supported them in their explorations.3. The engineering education workshop was required for all the graduate studentspursuing the EdM and MAT degrees at Smith. The workshop was a part of their firstsemester in the graduate program. The required nature of the workshop and its placementduring the beginning
continued at Franciscan University.Ms. Megan Elizabeth Mericle Megan Mericle is a PhD student in Writing Studies. She is a member of a research team focused on writing in STEM, where she works with faculty to develop and implement learning objectives for writing in undergraduate science and engineering courses. In heJessica Raley, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Jessica Raley is the outreach coordinator for the Illinois Center for Advanced Studies of the Universe (ICASU) at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. She is also the adviser for the P.O.I.N.T. VR program.Julie L Zilles, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Zilles is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Crop Sciences at
EngineersAbstract Hands-on learning experiences and interactive learning environments can be effective inteaching K-12 students. Design, in essence, is an interactive, hands-on experience. Engineeringdesign can be taught in the classroom using innovative hands-on projects, such as designing andbuilding serve to teach design, promote creativity, and provide opportunities for hands-onproblem solving, in addition to giving students experience working in cooperative teams. In turn,these experiences could encourage students to consider future careers in engineering and science. This paper explores findings from data collected during the authors’ recent experienceteaching a group of fifteen 4th – 6th grade students enrolled in a 6-week Saturday
future research could not only impact the ways inwhich multidisciplinary teaming is taught and assessed, but also the ways in which studentstransition into industry and work within organizations that demand multidisciplinary teamingskills.1 E.M. Olson, O.C. Walker, R.W. Reukert, and J.M. Bonner. “Patterns of cooperation during new productdevelopment among marketing, operations and R&D: implications for project performance,” The Journal ofProduct Innovation Management, 18, 258-271(2001).2 M. Klein. “Managing Knowledge drives key decisions,” National Underwriter, 103, 17-19 (1999).3 B. Olds and R. Miller, “An Assessment Matrix for Evaluating Engineering Programs,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, 173-178 (1998).4 R.G. Quinn, “Drexel’s E 4