encouraged.AcknowledgementsThis work presented herein was supported in part by Texas Workforce Commission under theaward number 2908WSW000 and U.S. Department of Education ARRA grant award numberS397A090044.Bibliography1. U.S. NRC, “Combined License Applications for New Reactors,” Sep 22, 2010, available online at http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors.html.2. U. S. Energy Information Administration, “Electric Power Industry 2009: Year in Review,” Nov 23, 2010, available online at http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html.3. K. Bozynski and J. D. McCowan, “Recruitment to the Profession: A Student-Led Approach,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 257-261, July 1995.4. J. Gleason, K. Boykin, P. Johnson, L. Bowen, K. Whitaker, C. Micu
Annual Conference & Exposition (2004)3 A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula, Macias-Guarasa, J.,Montero, J.M., San-Segundo, R., Araujo, A., Nieto-Taladriz, O., IEEE Transactions onEducation, 49 3, 389-3974 Project based learning as a pedagogical tool for embedded system education Rui Hong Chu.Lu, D.D.-C., Sathiakumar, S., IEEE Transactions on Education, 51 1, 108-1135 PeopleMover: an example of interdisciplinary project-based education in electricalengineering Daems, W., De Smedt, B., Vanassche, P., Gielen, G., Sansen, W., De Man, H.,IEEE Transactions on Education, 46 1, 157-1676 Online Labs and the MARVEL Experience Dieter Müller and José M. Ferreira, International Journalon Online Engineering, 1 1, p
of these groups are involved with another group in the decision making process,there is a high probability that there will be conflicts in their value systems that must beovercome.References1. Morris, William T. 1977. Decision Analysis. Grid Publishing. Columbus, OH. 290 p. Page 22.164.122. Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J.,and Greco, S. 2010. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, Inc. New York,NY3. Giron, F. J., and Martinez, M. 1998. Applied Decision Analysis.Kluwer Academic. Boston, MA. Page 22.164.13
University. 1991; 66: 201-208.2. Alkhasawneh R, Hobson R. Summer transition program: A model for impacting first-year retention rates forunderrepresented groups. American Society for Engineering Education. 2009; AC 2009-926.3. Bernold LE, Spurlin JE, Anson CM. Understanding our students: A longitudinal-study of success and failure inengineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education. 2007; 96(3): 263-274.4. Conley DT. Rethinking college readiness. New Directions for Higher Education. 2008; 2008(144): 3-13.5. Evenback S, Hansen MJ, Williams GA. The influence of a summer bridge program on college transition. StudentLearning Outcomes, Academic Performance, and Retention. 48th Annual Forum of the Association for
, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006, pp. 101,97, 111.12. S. K. Foong, D Kiang, P Lee, R H March and B E Paton, How long does it take a bouncing ball to bounce aninfinite number of times? Physics Education, January 2004, 40- 43.13. Audacity(http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ ). Retrieved on January 4, 2011.14. Goldwave (http://www.goldwave.com/ ). Retrieved on January 4, 2011.15. Holly M. Matusovich, Ruth A. Streveler and Ronald M. Miller, Why do Students choose Engineering? AQualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Students’ Motivational Values, Journal of Engineering Education, October2010, October 2010. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3886/is_201010/ai_n56442207/?tag=content;col1Retrieved on January 4, 2011.16. Holly M
Learning,from the Visible Knowledge Project. Academic Commons January 2009 issue.http://www.academiccommons.org/files/BassEynonCapturing.pdfMehlhorn, Sandy; Parrott, Scott; Mehlhorn, Joey; Burcham, Timothy; Roberts, Jason; andSmartt, Philip. Using Digital Learning Objects to Improve Student Problem Solving Skills,Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Corpus Christ, TX, Feb 6-9,2011 http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/98763/2/LivescribeSAEAPaperFINAL.pdfHannon, Charles., Paper Based Computing , Educause Quarterly, #4, (2008)http://hubscher.org/roland/courses/hf765/readings/hannon.pdfPowers, Mary F.; Bright, David R.; Bugaj Patrick S. A brief report on the use of paper-basedcomputing to supplement a pharmaceutical
Page 22.1629.10 The curriculum requires a proficient if not advanced knowledge of certain buildingsimulation strategies to execute the analysis approaches central to the proposed course’sconcepts. There are many software packages and pathways and each have certain strengths andweaknesses when it comes to building performance modeling. This section focuses on thecriteria upon which to select the appropriate tools for the curriculum. The students will need some previous knowledge of a few different performancemodeling software applications. Primarily, they will need proficiency with software(s) capable ofreliable yearly thermodynamic modeling for multiple zone buildings. It is critical that thesoftware be able to compute the load
present study, the students in universities of technology hold somealternative conceptions in Electricity. Therefore, the physics teacher should think how to teachthe topics of electricity in an effective way. Furthermore, more research is need on developingmore effective teaching strategy to enhance UT students’ conception about electricity. Finally, itis found that the UT students did lack of the ability/intention in reasoning and explanation. It issuggested that physics teacher should encourage students and provide them more opportunities toengage in reasoning activities in physics course.AcknowledgementThe funding of this research work is provided by the National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC,under grant NSC 97-2511-S-259-008-MY3
constructive, effective study groups to maximizeeach person’s learning within the study group environment.References Cited:1 Brower, A. M. & Inkelas, K. K. (2010). Living Learning Programs: One High-Impact Educational PracticeWe Now Know a Lot About. Liberal Education, 96 (2).2 Inkelas, K. K., Zeller, W. J., Murphy, R. K., Hummel M. L. (2006) Learning Moves Home. About Campus,10 (6), 10-16.3 Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Blimling, G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on students. InC. L. Schroeder & P. Mable (Eds.), Realizing the Educational Potential of Residence Halls (pp. 22-52). SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.4 Pike, G. R. (1990). The Effects of Residential Learning Communities and Traditional
Education, 94(1), pp. 41-56, 2005.8. Besterfield-Sacre, M. and LJ Shuman, “The Future of Assessment” (Chapter 12) in Spurlin, J., Rajala, S., & Lavelle, J. (2008) (eds.) Designing Better Engineering Education Through Assessment: A Practical Resource Page 22.836.12 for Faculty and Department Chairs on Using Assessment and ABET Criteria to Improve Student Learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing; pp. 307-327.9. Diefes-Dux, H.A., Moore, T., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P.K., & Follman, D. (2004). A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: Model-eliciting activities. Proceedings of the 30th ASEE
. ―Learning to Navigate.‖ In Chaiklin, S. and J. Lave (Eds.) Understanding Practice: perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 35-63, 1996.15. Kusterer, Ken. Know-how on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of “Unskilled” Workers. Westview Press, 1978.16. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.17. National Academy of Engineering. (NAE) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press, 2004.18. Orr, Julian. Thinking about machines. Cornell University Press, 1996.19. Robbins, Philip and Murat Aydede. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge
, TR-83-3048, Oct. 1960 (Revised 1978).13. Husman, J., Lynch, C., Hilpert, J., and Duggan, M. A., "Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: Steps toward improving engineering education", presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.14. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. , “Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq)”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1993, 53(3), 80115. Yasar, S., “Discourse in freshman engineering teams: The relationship between verbal persuasions, self-efficacy, and achievement”, 200816. Bandura, A., “Guide for
Work (SOW) a. Period of performance; minimum 8-14 weeks b. Research & development requirements c. Statement of Work agreed to by Corporate Partner, University Engineering Page 22.882.4 Department, and the Student d. Cost and Schedule requirements3 e. 2-3 presentations at corporate partner facility f. 1-2 presentations to university representative(s) g. Sr. Project Work log to indicate effort during paid time and personal time associated with Senior Project effort. h. A final presentation of work done and/or product demonstration i
languages. Limits in conceptual knowledge means that they are limited to solving well-defined tasks with specified tools. When faced with a more open-ended or complex problems, limits in conceptual knowledge will mean they will probably not be able to solve the problem. Proficiency The individual has some conceptual knowledge of both computing systems and their application domain. When presented with a problem, they are able select the appropriate tools(s), seek the necessary information, and present a solution. The regularly used technical skills are committed to memory and external information resources are
evolvedaccording to government and industry demand. Agriculture, the mechanical arts, andmanufacturing dominated the 19th century needs, resulting in the development of shop courseswhere students gained hands-on experience with machine tools for farming and manufacturing.1With the rise of electrical engineering in the early 1900’s, combined with increasing promotion Page 22.913.3of a scientific approach to practice and the desire to “professionalize”1 engineering and establish it as a credible academic discipline, laboratory experience became the norm for practicalexperiences within the engineering
is a sample ofrepresentative answers, categorized by theme. Student comments are verbatim andoccasionally contain grammatical errors, etc. Content statements I learned that laser colors are that because of the number of nanometers that the laser has Page 22.1323.7 On a mirror a laser reflects opposite direction on an angle Vocal cords don’t vibrate when you say “s” Careers Now I know the difference between a scientist and an engineer. I learned that to get into speech technology you just have to have a bachelor’s degree They are looking for engineers Relevance Many people
learners: active learners have the opportunity to “do” experiments, sequentiallearners follow step by step instructions revealing the concept(s) piece by piece, and summaryquestions are provided for reflective learners. An example experiment is shown in the Appendix. For the first time, students have remarked that the labs are fun (emotionally engaging),and the demonstrations have improved understanding of concepts as measured by targetedproblems and through formative assessment. 4 5 2
Statistics.4. Goodman Research Group (2002). Final report of the women’s experiences in college engineering (WECE) project, Cambridge, MA.5. Davis, C-S. & Finelli, C.J. (2007), Diversity and Retention in Engineering, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, v2007, n111, p63-7.6. Derlin, R.L. & McShannon, J.L. (2000), Faculty and Student Interaction and Learning Styles of Engineering Undergraduates, Retrieved May 10, 2008 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/89/1d.pdf.7. Goldberg, J. & Sedlacek, W. (1996), Summer Study in Engineering for High School Women, Maryland University, College Park, Maryland.8. Pantano, J. (1994), Comprehensive Minority SEM Programs
effective for your learning. • It was perfectly fine. • They did well; I don’t see any way it could be improved. • Providing more examples that were mentioned through the non-SI sessions. Go over previous tests. Finally, maybe making the session longer. • All math classes should have SI sections. • It’s really good with this class, can’t say I would add anything to it. • I don’t know. • Nothing from my experience, it was the best way to become highly successful in the class. • I thought it was fine. Please indicate the reason(s) you did not attend SI sessions: • I didn’t feel it was
experience both the frustration and satisfactionof that experience. Such learning prepares them for professional practice in ways that a projectrequiring only a paper/computer design does not. For instance, students in the lower end designteam, while having some background due from their coursework, became much more proficientand confident in their understanding of design and machining. Students designed, programmed,setup, machined, and inspected complex CNC parts. They assembled the parts into a completemachine and successfully tested it. They were able to adapt their engineering skill sets to theproject at hand. This was a lifelong-learning experience the student will not soon forget.Bibliography 1 Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., &
Austin, TX INDUSTRY 1 Lockheed-Martin Various Locations INDUSTRY 5 Master card O'Fallon, MO INDUSTRY 1 Nissan Canton, MS INDUSTRY 1 Raytheon Tucson, AZ INDUSTRY 4 SAKS New York New York, NY INDUSTRY 1 Union Pacific Omaha, NE INDUSTRY 2 U. S. Army MIL 1 Jackson State University Jackson, MS STATE
designsituations. With the conversation as a backdrop, students were then introduced to the notion of adesign rationale and asked to draft a sample design rationale as a way to introduce them to thisconcept.Case 2: Graduate multi-week projectThe journal landscape project was a multi-week project in a graduate level course entitledEmpirical Traditions in Human Centered Design and Engineering. Per the syllabus, the task was Page 22.1116.3as follows: “Working in teams of two or three, you and your teammate(s) will characterize oneyear of articles in a major journal in our field in terms of five to seven dimensions of yourchoosing and then prepare a summary of
). Online Delivery Management for Teaching and Learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(2):237-246.51. Enriquez, A. (2010). Assessing the Effectiveness of Synchronous Content Delivery in an Online Introductory Circuits Analysis Course. Proceedings: 2009 American Society of Engineering Education Zone IV Meeting, Reno, NV, March 25-27, 2010..52. CCC Confer (n.d.). CCC Confer Products. Retrieved December 21, 2009 from http://www.cccconfer.org/products/products.aspx53. Kowalski, F., Kowalski, S., & Hoover. E. (2007). Using InkSurvey: A Free Web-Based Tool for Open-Ended Questioning to Promote Active Learning and Real-Time Formative Assessment of Tablet-PC-Equipped Engineering Students. Proceedings; 2007 American
. vol. 2011: The Gale Group, 2009.[3] Gibbs R. Rural Education at a Glance. In: Service ER, editor. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 2003.[4] Bard J, Clark Gardener, Regi Wieland. Rural School Consolidation: History, Research Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations. The Rural Educator, vol. Winter: National Rural Education Association, 2006.[5] Provasnik S, Angelina KewalRamani, Mary McLaughlin Coleman, Lauren Gilbertson, Will Herring, Qingshu Xie. Status of Education in Rural America. In: Education USDo, editor. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, 2007.[6] United States Libraries: Our Approach. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, vol. 2011
, and A. Ganz, IEEE EMBS Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, September, 200920. FIREGUIDE: Firefighter Guide and Tracker, by S. Gandhi, A. Ganz, and G. Mullett, the 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC'10), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1st-4th September, 2010.21. Wireless Technologies for e-Healthcare, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol.17 No. 1, February, 201022. Department of Transportation website: www.its.dot.gov/resources.htm23. Mullett, Its 2010 and the new Electronics Technology Paradigm is Emerging Page 22.936.15
, Engineering is Elementary web site: http://www.mos.org/eie/20_unit.php9. Museum of Science, Boston. (2011). Thinking inside the box: Designing a plant package. Retrieved from Museum of Science, Boston, Engineering is Elementary web site: http://www.mos.org/eie/20_unit.php10. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning: Belmont, CA.11. Hsu, M., Cardella, M., & Purzer, S. (2010). Assessing elementary teachers’ design knowledge before and after introduction of a design process model. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) annual meeting, Louisville, KY
assistant at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University. She is the coordinator of two component projects of a National Science Foundation grant focusing on retention issues and engaging early engineering students, and also serves as an academic advisor. McDonough earned a bachelor’s degree in sociology from William Smith College and a master’s degree in Public Administration from the University of Southern California. McDonough is currently a third year doctoral student in the Higher, Adult and Lifelong Education program at Michigan State. Her areas of interest include educational theory, student development and engineering education.S. Patrick Walton, Michigan State University S. Patrick Walton is an
, and the electronics component interface anddisplay, respectively. We further acknowledge companion support from the World Bank for ini-tial graduate student support for PhD students involved in the study.References1. TIDEE. Integrated Design Engineering Assessment and Learning System. 2011 [cited; Available from: http://tidee.org/page/Front.2. Sageev, P. and C. Romanowski, A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 2001. 90: p. 685-693.3. Sheppard, S., et al., What is engineering practice? InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 2006. 22(3): p. 429-438.4. Johnson, M., et al., Use of the
?”Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, 20-23 Page 22.1294.12June, 2010.22 Meyer, K., Bert, S., 2007, “A Technique for Program-Wide Direct Assessment of Student Performance,”Proceedings of ASEE Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.23 Marin, J.A., Armstrong, J.E. Jr., Kays, J.L., “Elements of an Optimal Capstone Design Experience,”Journal of Engineering Education, January 1999, pp.19-22.24 Welch, R.W., “Addressing Professional Practice Issues within the Curriculum,” Proceedings of theAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 26-29 June, 2011.25 http
college at America's public universities. 2009, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. xxi, 389 p.4. Ehrenberg, R.G., C.V. Kuh, and Cornell Higher Education Research Institute., Doctoral education and the faculty of the future. 2009, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ix, 308 p.5. Lowell, B.L. and H. Salzman, Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. 2007, The Urban Institute: Washington, D.C.6. Sheppard, S., et al., Exploring the engineering student experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES). 2010: Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. TR-10-01.7. Astin, A.W