organization gave me the space to speakbravely and freely about my experiences in engineering to other students who empathized withme as they had similar experiences. It was validating to be in a group with like-mindedindividuals who believed as engineers we are not excused from ethics and social issues, butrather need to be accountable for our language and actions that affect others that aren’t includedin the dominant narrative.While creating a space for open dialogues for underrepresented students, The EE diversityProject also provided space for community and inclusiveness. The organization has put onseveral events in hopes of creating community for other students, and to hopefully prevent thatsense of Isolation. Some of those events include a
) students were not introduced toalgorithmic assessment. We are exploring the correlation design until upper-division courses, and (iv) we needed tobetween this logical-thinking test and student success, and attract and retain undecided and traditionally under-also improvement in students’ logic ability as evidenced represented groups of students. The overall goals were toby pre- and post-test comparisons. include project design and teamwork experience, introduce programming earlier, stress “soft skills” such asIndex Terms - electrical engineering, mentors, problem- communication, ethics and student success, and to
test scores of the value of conversations and talking through problems toengineering student responses to ABET soft skill solve their own problems. As educators, it would beknowledge, explores the possibilities for freshman convenient to ‘bottle’ the wisdom of product creation andengineering students to engage meaningfully in six of the pass it along to students. However, students need explicit11 outcomes for engineering graduates. With a focus on instruction on what engineering researchers andmulti-disciplinary teamwork, professional ethical practitioners implicitly understand and use daily. Thisresponsibility, effective communication, engineering
discipline has been an accepted practice [29-31]. However, thatpractice excludes students regardless of performance level. Twenty years ago, Seymour andHewitt demonstrated that “switchers” and “non-switchers” had similar patterns on inadequatepreparation, work ethic, conceptual difficulty with course content, and GPA at the time ofswitching [32]. Ten years ago, the National Academy of Engineering report Changing theConversation identified the accepted representations of engineering by engineers as one of thereasons that diversifying the discipline has been a challenge [33]. Through explicit and implicitmessaging shared with students, such as engineering students study all the time or engineers lovemath and science, engineering faculty perpetuate
educational experience that emphasizesleadership, physical fitness and professional development to prepare them for positions ofleadership in service of others in the U.S. Coast Guard. This paper focuses on the CGADepartment of Engineering’s efforts to harness the student leadership developmentalready taking place at CGA and utilize this leadership to improve the environment ofinclusion in engineering.The Leadership ExperienceLeadership is a focal point in cadet development. Every graduate of CGA takes at leastone academic course in Morals and Ethics and one course in Organizational Behavior andLeadership. Every graduate also spends weekly training periods and summers furtherdeveloping their leadership skills through a 200-week course of instruction
. 3.81 3.42 0.39I have the ability to integrate theory and practice. 4.00 3.76 0.24I understand how scientists work on real problems. 4.13 3.70 0.43I understand that scientific assertions require supportingevidence. 4.53 4.33 0.20I have the ability to analyze data and other information. 4.25 4.09 0.16I understand science. 4.28 4.12 0.16I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 3.84 3.97 -0.13I have learned laboratory techniques. 3.78 3.76
Community Service (Freshman) Field trip/mentoring session (construction & engr) Professional Skills Field trip/mentoring session (humanitarian engr) Professional Skills Spring Assignment to designated on-campus dormitory Learning Community Group sessions on college success and life skills Instruction Strategist College and civil engineering student mentoring Life Mentoring Moral and Ethical Development Educational Professional Skills Seminar Multi-part diversity training
students in case they don’t want to access their own devices.Data were collected electronically using checkbox, a survey management online serviceavailable at the University that aligns with the Australian Code for the Responsible Conductof Research. The study secured ethical approval, and participation was voluntary. Studentswere asked to provide consent for his/her data to be used for study purposes in thequestionnaire. Results from the survey were analysed using the Statistical Package for theSocial Sciences (SPSS). SPSS provide researchers with a secure platform to analysequantitative data and conduct different statistical procedures.Sample/PopulationParticipants included 236 undergraduate engineering students enrolled in a third
Organization, 16(4), 411-428.Stets, J.E. & Burke, P.J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Tan, J. (2008). Breaking the “Bamboo Curtain” and the “Glass Ceiling”: The experience of women entrepreneurs in high-tech industries in an emerging market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 547-564.Walker, M. (2001). Engineering identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 75- 89.United States Census Bureau. (2014, December). Retrieved January 29, 2017, from http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2014
analysis. Ability to integrate the topic of structural analysis and design of individual elements and composed systems to the architectural design process. Ability to identify and assess the fundamental qualities of construction materials and systems, and determine appropriate materials and system for an architectural project. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet the desired needs within constraints incorporating structural stability and safety. Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. Understanding of professional codes. Ability to communicate effectively and apply professional and ethical responsibility.Table 1 shows grading
science and engineering education and careers in Qatar. These surveys usedLikert scales and asked respondents to assess the level to which they agreed or disagreed with agiven statement. For each program, the first survey was administered on the first day of theprogram, before any presentations or activities. The second survey was administered at the endof the two-week program. The same statements were presented on the pre-program and post-program survey, with the post-program survey adding additional questions.Over the course of the two 10-day programs, students joined morning plenary sessions in whichthey participated in presentations on topics such as engineering ethics, critical thinking, technicalcommunication skills and the role of
ethical practices Patience and Persistence Contribute to society as an active citizen Technical Knowledge Life-long Learning Networking Ambitious but collective Team Management Aggressive but nurturing Communication Skills Critical Thinking Honesty and Integrity Emotional Maturity Achievement Orientation Interdisciplinary approach Table 1: The enriched list based on the survey and the leading modelsDeriving the top competencies based on views of expert entrepreneursWe then
populations, such as low-income students in engineering, by replacing previousmeasurements with this one that accounts for other considerations beyond just income. We claimthat any use other than what is proposed violates the basis and ethics of our work. Figure 1. Socioeconomic inequality as informed by neighborhood socioeconomic inequality.In our framework, we consider neighborhood socioeconomic inequality to be a product of multipleforms of oppression, informed by joint understanding of different localities such ZIP codes andcounties, which have histories of discriminatory redlining [27]. Information about income by ZIPcode and County Code are both available through the United States Census Bureau [32]. Further,multiple forms of discrimination
, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global
projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University Dr. Montfort is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State UniversityDr. Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington Professor of Learning Sciences & Human DevelopmentDr. Susannah C
- Year Students as of 2009 The reasons for the low retention in the minority undergraduate students were identified in the literature as lack of academic preparedness, campus climate, lack of commitment to educational goals and the institution, problems in social and academic integration and the lack of financial support [5]. The authors’ institution, the only HBCU with the Water Resources Management and Environmental Engineering majors, has a professional and ethical obligation to change this situation by providing financial support and academic guidance through the faculty and peer mentorship to the African American students, especially the female students from the low-income families. In addition, the department
policies. Currently, the federal government is threatening to rescind theDeferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Consequently, at the time ofsubmission, there was more disagreement than consensus regarding DACA recipients andimmigration policies in general.This political climate is important because SCC is located in a state with a large population ofDACA recipients and a large population of immigrants. When creating the recruitment survey,our research group initially wanted to ask questions about US citizenship, but given the largeimmigrant population at our study site, ethics, and overall empathy, we decided not to includethis question on the survey. Additionally, we believe that this political climate might influencesome students
literate citizen needs to have: (1) a basic vocabulary of scientific terms andconstructs; and (2) a general understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry [5, 6]. The sixelements of science literacy are: (a) understanding basic science concepts, (b) understandingnature of science, (c) understanding ethics guiding scientists’ work, (d) understandinginterrelationships between science and society, (e) understanding interrelationship betweenscience and humanities, and (f) understanding the relationships and differences between scienceand technology [7]. The proportion of U.S. adults qualifying as being scientifically literate isnow 28% and has doubled over the last two decades, but the current level is still problematic fora democratic society that
for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Khalil Najafi, University of Michigan Khalil Najafi is the Schlumberger Professor of Engineering, and Peter and Evelyn Fuss Chair of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at the University of Michigan since September 2008. He received the B.S., M.S., and the Ph.D. degrees in 1980, 1981, and 1986 respectively, all in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His research interests include: micromachining technologies, micromachined sensors, actuators, and MEMS; analog integrated circuits; implantable biomedical mi- crosystems; hermetic and vacuum
professional expectations of engineering as a career and discipline [9], [10]. Someprograms also use these courses to foster engineering ethics, writing and communication skills,teamwork competencies, and to develop community and engineering identity within students toaid in retention of engineering students [11], [12]. In other words, first-year engineering designstudents are typically gaining other competencies beside academic objectives (the what part ofengineering) in addition to learning how competencies are enacted within the engineeringdiscipline.While all engineering programs may structure their first year and design experiences differently[11], engineering education and design literature concurs that the emphasis on authentic andexperiential
management, design and creativity, engineeringcommunication, engineering as a career, ethics, and engineering estimations and calculationswith an emphasis on unit conversions. Grit is also a topic covered in the course with reference tothe retention of the students in the college of engineering, through to their completion of theengineering degree.Material pertaining to grit was introduced in the course and then an examination of how thismaterial may have increased student grit was conducted. Duckworth et al. (2007) [1] created atwo-factor, twelve item, self-reporting measure of grit. The foundation of this study was basedon the theory of grit as a compound trait. This compound trait was comprised of stamina in twodimensions, and these dimensions
identification correlates with spatialmemory in humans could lead to new ways in the teaching of free body diagrams, given thatshort-term spatial memory has been studied as part of the episodic memory in virtual realityresearch 11, 12. A recent MRI study showed that the brain networks could adjust themselves inreading, and a recent transcranial electrical simulation study showed positive result on creativity13, 14 . A recent report showed that neurons of the studied C-elegans could exhibit spiking actionpotential signals like a human brain. All of these advances would facilitate the understanding ofthe human brain computation mechanism for education strategy improvement, together with theassociated ethical issues 15, 16.ConclusionsThe assessment
exposure on stem and non‐stem student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410–427. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12371Shin, J. E. L., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., Lytle, A., London, B., & Lobel, M. (2016). The roles of the Protestant work ethic and perceived identity compatibility in graduate students' feelings and attitudes toward STEM and non-STEM fields. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 22, 309-327.Shively, R. L., & Ryan, C. S. (2013). Longitudinal changes in college math students’ implicit theories of intelligence. Social Psychology of Education, 16(2), 241-256. doi: 10.1007/s11218-012-9208-0Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Butz, A. R., & Rojas, J. P. (2019
engineering ethics. Professor Smith holds a PhD in Anthropology and a certificate in Women’s Studies from the University of Michigan and bachelor’s degrees in International Studies, Anthropology and Latin American Studies from Macalester College.Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering Undergraduate Programs and Out- reach at the Engineering, Design & Society Division of the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI). His books include Defending the Nation: U.S
basedon the observations and comments they received.2.5 Friday’s Workshop SessionFor Friday’s industry and workshop session, guest speakers were invited to discuss and conductworkshops related to a real-world engineering system. The following is a list of the topics andworkshops that were discussed in detail during Friday’s sessionOn June 3, a Vaughn alumni and a Ph.D. student at City College (CUNY) addressed students inthe SEE program about educational determination, willingness, and ethics as prerequisites foracademic success.On June 10, an outstanding senior student in the Mechatronic Engineering program and Co-Founder & VP of Union Crate talked about his start-up company.On June 17, a Vaughn alumni and a Control Systems Engineer at
[7].Emotion has been taken out of engineering education, which in part drives the need to “re-humanize” engineering through multiple perspectives and diverse thought [8]. Dym et al., (2003)expand further by identifying the importance of reframing problems in engineering design. Byfocusing on the non-technical complexity of the problem, students learn not to oversimplifyproblems, but to design with social, ethical, and multi-disciplinary concerns in mind [8].Encouraging students to flex their creative skill within their respective classes, rather than solelythrough sparse elective requirements is vital to enhance their approach problems such that itincludes a multitude of perspectives. Framing a problem can often be the most difficult part
in May.Recruitment and RetentionEvery year, while this institute helps to recruit 1-2 students from the pool of 25-30 participantsfor the engineering and science programs, it also helps to support the few undergraduate studentsas mentoring counselors in summer as a form of retention and to improve their leadership,management and communication skills, and work ethics. The impact of instructing engineeringphysics at early stages on performance in the college is strong and could be systematized withexpanding such instruction to include additional engineering physics.Available details on the demographic statistics of STI from 2008 to 2016 are given below(except for 2010 for which year data is unavailable) in Table 1.Table 1: Demographic
project at the end. This paper presents our study with differentlab delivery formats, including preparation, implementation, survey data, observations, andfindings.Course BackgroundIntroduction to Engineering in our institution is a 3 credit course. The course includes one 1-hourlecture, and two 2-hour labs/week. In the lecture, students develop the skills needed during theirstudy of engineering. Topics include task/time management, effective use of notes, engineeringresearch, oral and written communications, problem-solving techniques, ethics and professionalresponsibility and institute resources. In the laboratory, students work in teams to complete avariety of engineering tasks.Each class is set to 85 students maximum. The lecture is held at a
. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan has led the multi-university TeachEngineering digital library project, now serving over 3.3M unique users (mostly teachers) annually, since its inception. She is founding co-director of the design-focused Engineering Plus degree program and CU Teach Engineering initiative in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. With the intent of transforming en- gineering to broaden participation, Sullivan spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering
HonestEconomics and project management OrganizedLife-long learning Likes to LearnParticipants and SamplingThe survey population was a convenience sample of 50 grade 12 enrolled in two differentadvanced placement physics classes in a local private secondary school. 20% of the surveypopulation identified as female. Human subjects research approval was obtained through theuniversity ethics board. The private standing of the school was advantageous as it allowed forhuman subjects research approval at the school level without a long consultation process with acentral school board. As most of the participants were minors the letter of consent obtained boththe