Educational Research and Methods Divisionreviewers for their extensive and helpful comments targeted not only on the paper itself, but also,most helpfully, on future research on this topic. The Ideation Space used in this study was madepossible by a generous gift to SMSE from San Diego-based Cymer, Inc., makers of complexlasers used in semiconductor production. This study’s faculty team greatly appreciates Cymer’sgenerosity.Bibliography[1] M. Komarraju, S. Musulkin and G. Bhattacharya, "Role of student-faculty interactions in developing college students' academic self-concept, motivation, and achievement," Journal of college student development, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 332-342, 2010.[2] L. M. Martin, "the relatinship of college experiences to
leadership of other healthcare organizations havesimilarly aided in the successful completion of student projects and implementation of theresults.Table1.PartialListofStudentProjectsProject Level of Effort Deliverable(s)Patient falls Two-semester senior Identification of major contributing factors,prevention/reduction design project recommendations, and training programPrevention of retained Two-semester senior Low-tech simulator and training programobjects during surgery design projectRedesign of existing Two-semester senior Customized software package thatperformance measuring design project consolidates
anticipated that the deeper understanding of the materials gained by being aUTA will entice them to enroll in more rigorous courses as they matriculate. It is possible thatthe teaching experience may influence them to pursue an academic career at either the primary,secondary or collegiate levels.5. AcknowledgementsPartnership for Retention Improvement in Mathematics, Engineering, and Science (PRIMES),National Science Foundation Project NSF-08569, $1,997,451, June 1, 2011 – May 31, 2016.Bibliography1. Otero, V., Pollock, S. & Finkelstein, N. A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model. Am. J. Phys. 78, 1218 (2010).2. Otero, V., Finkelstein, N., McCray, R. & Pollock, S
Engineering Education, Indianapolis, IN June 15-18, 20142. Villalobos, D., Nagchaudhuri, A., Mitra, M., Diab. A., Henry, X., “CAUTION – An Innovative Aquatic Platform to gather Water Quality Data for Environmental Studies” Proceedings of 2015 Annual Conference and Exposition of American Society for Engineering Education, June 14-17, Seattle, Washington3. Nagchaudhuri, A., Mitra, M., and Zhang, Lei, “AIRSPACES: Air-propelled Instrumented Robotic Sensory Platform(s) for Assateague Coastline Environmental Studies- A Multidisciplinary Experiential Learning and Research Project at Minority Serving Land Grant Institution”, Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1623-1625, October 23-26, 2013, Oklahoma City, OK.4
UIF, in July 2016 she will transition the program to its new home at the Stanford Hasso Plattner Institute of Design, also known as the d.school. Serving in her role as Senior Program Officer at VentureWell for over a decade, she led the creation of numerous programs including the organization’s first foray in venture accelerators, which today account for over half of the 501c(3)’s income. Prior to VentureWell, Humera created innovation networks between industry and the University of Mas- sachusetts Amherst under an NSF Partnership for Innovation grant. Humera began her career at the publicly-traded UK firm Rexam, serving as product manager in their precision-coated materials sub- sidiary. Humera holds an M.B.A
therefore as being afraid of being wrong, but their highperformance on both assessment games regardless of condition suggests that they know how toapply these design thinking strategies related to “failing early and often” when given a context inwhich that is valued. Our results also offer an existence proof that the lower-tracked studentscan learn these strategies as well, and moreover that they benefit the most from learning designthinking strategies.REFERENCES[1] Kolodner, J.L., Camp, P.J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by DesignTM Into Practice. The Journal of the Learning
Libraries Vol. 31, No. 1, 2012, pp. 124-132.[6] Robbins, S., D. Engel, and C. Kulp," How unique are our users? Comparing responses regarding the information-seeking habits of engineering faculty", College & Research Libraries Vol. 72, No. 6, 2011, pp. 515-532.[7] Association of College and Research Libraries, "Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education", Chicago, Illinois: American Library Association, 2000. Page 26.881.9APPENDIX A: INFORMATION CONTEXT WORKSHEET 1. Literature Review Title __________________________________________ Authors(s
visits from practicingprofessionals within the field. This may be promising news for the K-12 classroom, in that thisrequires the re-definition of what students do in the classroom, not the acquisition of additionalspeakers. Locating willing STEM speakers can be challenging; securing motivational speakerscan be close to impossible.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0930257. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in the materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. National Research Council. Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science
26.917.3sustainability, as described in the previous section. At least one instructor “flipped theclassroom” for this introductory portion, assigning students to watch several sustainability-related TED Talks8 outside of class and discussed and debated the topics in class. Followingthis, they were assigned a project consisting of the following five basic steps: 1. Identify a product with opportunities for improvement in sustainability. 2. Research product’s current design and manufacture. 3. Analyze sustainability of current design and manufacture. 4. Identify alternative design and manufacturing approaches which may increase product’s sustainability. 5. Communicate proposed solution(s) through written and oral summary reports.Some students at
Analysis, Measurement, & Science Authors and Contact: Wendy Niesl S. Selcen Guzey Tamara J. Moore University of Minnesota Purdue University Purdue University nies0023@umn.edu sguzey@purdue.edu tamara@purdue.edu Project Website: http://engineeringteams.org Project Description The Engineering to Transform the Education of Analysis, Measurement, & Science (EngrTEAMS) project is an engineering, design-based approach to teacher professional development that has 50 teachers per year designing curricular units for science topic areas related to the Next Generation
Paper ID #9097Why I Am an Engineering Major: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergradu-ate StudentsDr. Louis Nadelson, Boise State University Louis S. Nadelson is an associate professor in the College of Education at Boise State University, with a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher professional development, program evaluation, multidis- ciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college math, science, and engineering teaching to frame his research on STEM teaching
through guided activities and assignments. After class, assignments are completed andstudents prepare for the next class. Table 2: Typical Inverted Class Day ScheduleBefore Class In Class After Class• Preparation activity: Reading, • Short lecture • Finish application assignments, • Activities Page 24.1389.3 video, tutorial, or problem(s) open lab• Evaluation: online quiz or turned • Application assignments or lab • Prepare for next class in solutionThe
forvisualizzation and ccommunicattion. This study s also foound that BIIM educatioon in the CEEMcurricullum needs tot focus on “general “ inttroduction and a knowleddge of BIM M”, “BIMimplemmentation in the construuction proceess”, and “rooles and respponsibilities of GeneraalContracctor/Construuction Manaagement (G GC/CM) andd other stakeeholders”. •When: A At the freshmen o or Introductory sophomore level BIM •Main Focuses: BIM practices
high school students’ knowledge of Page 26.482.7 environmental issues related to energy and pollution. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2), 15–22.10. DeWaters, J. E., & Powers, S. E. (2011). Energy literacy of secondary students in New York State (USA): A measure of knowledge, affect, and behavior. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1699–1710.11. Bodzin, A. (2012). Investigating urban eighth-grade students’ knowledge of energy resources. International Journal of Science. Education, 34(8), 1255–1275.12. National Environmental Education & Training Foundation . (2002). Americans’ low “Energy IQ:” A risk to
., “Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Moves towards Theory and the Enhancement of Pedagogic Practice”, Higher Education, 477-501, 2003. 6. Kowalski, S. E., Kowalski, F. V., Hoover, E., “Using InkSurvey: A Free Web-Based Tool for Open-Ended Questioning to Promote Active Learning and Real-Time Formative Assessment of Tablet PC-Equipped Engineering Students”, Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI, June 2007. 7. Koretsky, M. D. and Brooks, B., “Student Attitudes in the Transition to an Active-Learning Technology”, Chemical Engineering Education, 41-49, 2012 8. Bakrania, S., “A rubric-based grading app for iPads”, Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Conference and
was that more and flowery does not help, but in fact hinders. Page 26.552.10 I realized how simple yet effective CE writing is. The thing that impressed me most today was how poor my grammer [sic] and editing skills are. I think the biggest challenge for me in writing for CE will be to ignore the temptation to sound fancy and smart. The information that made the biggest impression on me was how P.E.’s make use of I, you, we in their writings. I realized I make the same mistakes that other people do. I think the biggest challenge will be staying consistent in
13.7% (119) 5 8.4% (73) 6+ 18.2% (158)These results indicate almost industry wide use of at least one construction specific computerapplication, and the high percentage (65%) of respondents using three or more constructionapplications supports the increased adoption of technology in the industry, and the importantrole(s) emerging technology will play in the construction industry going forward.To explore future technology interest and adoption among participants, they were asked whatother new technologies they have seen and hope to see applied in future construction projects, orthat their company was experimenting with or using
to students. Therefore,future research needs to be done while using cases in the classroom and more specific analysissuch using test and assignment results in the evaluation. The first step to this research wasaccomplished. We think we achieved some improvement in teaching decision analysis. Thefocus of the next step of our research is to evaluate the students’ calculations in order to evaluatehow the students performed in conjunction with how they though the performed.References 1. Anwar, S., & Ford, P. (2001). Use of a case study approach to teach engineering technology students. International journal of electrical engineering education, 38(1), 1-10. 2. Hackney, R. A., McMaster, T., & Harris, A. (2003). Using cases as a
student will work with the faculty mentor and graduate student to formulate their own research question(s). Develop a computer study and/or experimental measurement plan. • Weeks 2-9 - Research: Students actively participate in research projects. Here, the students will: o Conduct the research according to plans developed in week 1. o Meet once a week with the full group to review progress with peers and meet twice per week within subgroups to provide peer critique at subgroup and full group meetings and respond to feedback from full group during the following week. o Document changes in research plans as needed. o
subjects, which is arguably agood response; but when asked to specify her answer, she relays the traditional subjectsassociated with engineers. We believe K-12 engineering education has the chance to properlyeducate pre-college students on what engineers do, as well as, expand students’ understanding ofthe skills that qualify a good engineer. Five of the six participants knew practicing engineers (e.g. parent, grandparent, uncle,cousin). However, they could say very little about what the engineer(s) did at work. For example,when we asked one participant if he knew what his Chemical engineer parents did at work heonly offered a general response: I: Oh I’m sorry Um do you know what your parents do at work as engineers? P: Mm they
% 26.4 0.0% 16.7% 09F 11.2% 26.0 0.0% 16.0%Table 1: Employment Statistics (Fall 2009 to Fall 2014; F=Fall, S=Spring, U=Summer).Table 2 breaks down how much students worked each semester. The five columns show thepercentage of students (among those working that semester) that worked up to 25% of full time,up to 50% of full-time (not including the previous group), up to 75% of full-time (not includingthe previous two groups), up to full time (not including the previous three groups) and thoseworking overtime.The urban setting and the density of high technology companies in the area contribute to therather high levels of employment among students.Official Internships vs. Other EmploymentStudent
): p. 877-907.3. Shaw, E.J. and S. Barbuti, Patterns of persistence in intended college major with a focus on STEM majors. NACADA Journal, 2010. 30(2): p. 19-34.4. Bandura, A., Self‐efficacy1994: Wiley Online Library.5. Schunk, D.H., Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 1990. 25(1): p. 71-86.6. Ketelhut, D.J., The impact of student self-efficacy on scientific inquiry skills: An exploratory investigation in River City, a multi-user virtual environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2007. 16(1): p. 99-111.7. Marra, R.M., et al., Women Engineering Students and Self‐Efficacy: A Multi‐Year, Multi‐Institution Study of Women Engineering Student
improving the aesthetics and life of those (although we didn‟t domuch in this direction). Another example is to study Van Phillips‟s prosthetic leg and analyze itas a curved beam. This was also modeled in NX9.0 to compare the results.In this paper the author will enumerate different examples and present the assessment andlearning outcomes of using real life examples in the classes.IntroductionAs instructors, we routinely try to use several real life examples in the classes we teach, whetherthey are engineering or non-engineering subjects. Other fields such as medical, fine arts, media Page 26.1075.2and communication, etc., cannot do away without
3. Huntzinger, D. N., Hutchins, M. J., Gierke, J. S., and Sutherland, J. W. (2007). “Enabling Sustainable Thinking in Undergraduate Engineering Education.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2) 218-230. 4. Chau, K. W. "Incorporation of Sustainability Concepts into a Civil Engineering Curriculum." Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 2007: 188-191. 5. Segalas J, Ferrer-Balas D, and Mulder K. F. (2010). "What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach". Journal of Cleaner Production. 18(3), 275-284 6. Thatcher, T. (2007). “Incorporating Active Learning into Environmental
Asset Management Through 2020. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.6. Smithwick, J., Thurston, A., Hurtado, K., Kashiwagi, D., & Sullivan, K. (2014). Student Engagement in the Facility Management Profession through Mentorship. International Journal of Facility Management, 5(2)7. Sullivan, K., Georgoulis, S. W., & Lines, B. (2010). Empirical study of the current United States facilities management profession. Journal of Facilities Management, 8(2), 91–103. doi:10.1108/147259610110411438. McManus, S. E. & Russell, J. E. A. (1997). New directions for mentoring research: an examination of related constructs. Journal of Vocational Behaviors, 51, 145-161.9. Nayab, N. (2010). The role of mentoring in effective succession
Education, vol. 101, pp. 95 - 118, 2012. 4. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, "Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 92, p. 19, 2003. 5. M. Borrego, C. B. Newswander, L. D. McNair, S. McGinnis, and M. C. Paretti, "Using Concept Maps to Assess Interdisciplinary Integration of Green Engineering Knowledge," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. Winter, p. 26, 2009. 6. M. W. Roberts, C. Haden, M. K. Thompson, and P. J. Parker, "Assessment of Systems Learning in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Course using Concept Maps," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Expostion, Indianapolis, IN, 2014. 7. G. Starns and M. Hagge, "Quantifying
] Kumar, S. & Hsiao, J. K. (2007). Engineers learn “soft skills the hard way”: Planting a seed of leadership inengineering classes. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 7 (1), 18-23.[2] Lesgold, A., Feuer, M.J. and Black, A.M. (1997). Transitions in work and learning: Implications for assessment.Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.[3] Hesketh, A. (2000). Recruiting an elite? Employers’ perceptions of graduate employment and training. Journalof Education and Work, 13, 245-271.[4] Koring, H., & Campbell, S. (2005). Peer-advising: Intentional connections to support student Learning.(NACADA Monograph No. 13). Manhattan, KS: National Academic Advising Association.[5] Schwitzer, A., & Thomas, C. (1998). Implementation, utilization
Paper ID #11226USACE’S COASTAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE PROGRAMMr. Jose E. Sanchez P.E., Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Mr. Jos´e E. S´anchez is the Director of the Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory (CHL) at the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) in Vicksburg, MS. ERDC R&D supports the Depart- ment of Defense and other federal agencies in military and civilian projects. Principal research mission areas include Warfighter support, installations, environment, water resources, and information technology. CHL is the national laboratory for the specialized professional field of coastal and
, Upper Saddle River, NJ.[4] Barrett, S. F., LeFevre, E. W., Steadman, J. W., Tietjen, J. S., White,K. R., and Whitman, D. L., 2010, Using the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Examination as an Outcomes Assessment Tool, National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying, Seneca, SC.[5] Streveler, R. A., Geist, M. R., Ammerman, R. F., Sulzbach, C. S., Miller, R. L., Olds, B. M., and Nelson, M. A., 2006, “Identifying and Investigating Difficult Concepts in Engineering Mechanics and Electrical Circuits,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.[6] Cornwell, P. J., 2000, “Dynamics Evolution – Change or Design,” Proceedings of the 2000 ASEE Annual Conference