approaches in problem-solving and communication of ideas.IntroductionThis paper discusses an ongoing, successful effort to create a culture of art at a STEM-centereduniversity, not only within the engineering curriculum but also throughout campus life and itsphysical spaces.In what follows, we will offer an overview of the educational model of our university and thequestions and concerns we seek to address. We then offer detailed information of three differentlines of inquiry we have pursued to gather data on the current culture and mindset guidingpedagogical and career decisions: a 2013-14 longitudinal study which examined four cohorts ofhonors students, a 2019 focus group study, and a 2021 student/faculty survey. The results presenta fairly
reform needed thatconnects creativity to engineering in an atmosphere that welcomes diversity. Introduction Engineering is a creative and diverse profession integral to the sustainability of a rapidlyevolving economy, and a field where the diversity and perspectives of women engineers isessential [1], [2], [3]. This study examined the creative self-efficacy (CSE) of undergraduatewomen engineering majors, their beliefs about creativity, how they describe themselves ascreative, and their lived experiences that influenced them to choose engineering as a career path.ABET [4] highlighted the significant connection of creativity in engineering curriculum to theengineering profession. The creative
undergraduate students. During 2018- 2020, she collaborated with Dr. Kavitha Chandra to utilize participatory action research (PAR) as an evaluation approach for the Research, Academics, and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) summer program for first-year women engineering students.Prof. Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell Kavitha Chandra is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs and Professor of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering in the Francis College of Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She directs the Research, Academics and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) to Success program that aims to estab- lish successful pathways to graduate school and interdisciplinary careers for new undergraduate
research to explore experiences of engineers with a diagnosed mental illness[21]; preliminary findings discuss Jack, a late career engineer, and his journey with mental healthfrom college to industry. Preliminary analysis highlights specific aspects of the culture ofengineering influencing this journey, such as a lack of information on depression being sharedwhile in college, the de-emphasis on socializing in his first job, and stigmatization faced onceemployers learned about his illness [21]. These findings, although limited, highlight theimportance of studying engineering graduate students’ mental health.In an effort to uncover the landscape of research about engineering graduate student mentalhealth, a scoping literature review was conducted by
is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Materials Technology at the Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia. He is a mechanical engineer and holds Master’s degree in mechanical engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education. He has been teaching at different levels, from the first year of technical high school to the final year of mechatronic engineering course, since 1995. He also has considerable experience in the design and implementation of mechatronic and production engineering courses. His non-academic career is centered on product development and manufacturing processes.Dr. Alberto W Mello, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Ph.D. in Aerospace from the
Advances in Engineering Education SUMMER 2020 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2Interventions for Promoting Student Engagementand Predicting Performance in an IntroductoryEngineering ClassA.RAVISHANKAR RAOFairleigh Dickinson UniversityTeaneck, NJ ABSTRACT Studies show that a significant fraction of students graduating from high schools in the U.S. isill prepared for college and careers. Some problems include weak grounding in math and writing,lack of motivation, and insufficient conscientiousness. Academic institutions are under pressure toimprove student retention and graduate rates, whereas students are under pressure to graduateand find employment. Consequently
interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Centrality of Black Identity for Black Students in Engineering: A Reflection on Methods and TheoryKeywords: Race/ethnicity, Black identity, undergraduate programsIntroductionThe recent emphasis on increasing the number of engineering graduates has been coupled withgreater concern about the lack of diversity in engineering fields. However, despite
grassroots, while also informing policy. Three thrusts that define her research interests at the intersections of engineering, technologies, and education include, ways of thinking that address complex educational challenges, democratization of K-12 engineering education, and online and technology-based learning.Dr. Stacy S Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University Stacy Klein-Gardner’s career focuses on P-12 science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education, particularly as it relates to increasing interest in and participation by females and URMs and teacher professional development. She is an Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Vander- bilt University where she is serving as the external evaluator
professionalwas done by first hosting two workshops in which mentors development event each semester to help PINC studentsfrom the same course discussed issues they were facing meet individuals in the CS workforce that can act aswith their particular students. This was then followed by a potential role models as well as provide examples ofsession in which mentors were mixed across different interesting career possibilities. We invited external guestcourses and academic levels with the goal
Campus study is to address the urgentneed to expand the pool of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) graduates,especially African American, Native American, and Hispanic students. Long-term improvementsin the pipeline of a diverse STEM workforce start with sustaining effective bridge programs thatcan produce more Engineering baccalaureates. To improve retention in Engineering, this studywill conduct academic enrichment programs for racially underrepresented Engineering studentsat three points in their career at the Penn State—entering freshmen, rising sophomores, and risingjuniors. The goals of the study are to (a) increase retention in Engineering among raciallyunderrepresented students in the Penn State system, (b) develop long
not important in promoting or supporting the shared concepts. CourseLearning Concept Maps and Team Reflections reveal the students’ perspective on what mayhave supported making the connections and which approaches were less effective. In looking atthese course concept maps, for example, similar shared concepts are represented as on the SMELConcept Maps at the beginning of the course – communication (5 occurrences), teamwork (3),and leadership (3). One important, new concept also emerges, however – career connections.All 5 groups represent ties to careers on the final course concept map. These connectionssuggest that considering social media, engineering and leadership in the context of future goalsand of defined careers adds a specific
People (3 principles) and Profit (1principle).Many students favored improving waste prevention (recycle, reduce, reuse) as the principle ofsustainability that would dominate their role as engineers in contributing to sustainable practice.29 of 94 classifiable responses were coded within this principle. Some responses were quitesimple and general such as: "Not wasting a lot of paper or electricity" (Female, Caucasian)Other students attempted to connect their career interests within their chosen major to reducingwaste. For example, one student voiced this inherent opportunity: "I want to work with nanotech so I guess making a lot smaller technology would mean less trash" (Male, Caucasian)Another student did the same with
Studies at Kansas State University beginning Fall 2019. Sean’s primary research interests exist at the intersec- tions of organizational communication, new media, gender, and organizing. Within engineering contexts, Sean has examined career issues within the engineering discipline regarding (1) new faculty experiences throughout their on-boarding and (2) educational cultures that impact the professional formation of engi- neers, which was funded by the National Science Foundation. Both projects have been published in the Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education. He has also served as a series editor, contributed to trade publications, and facilitated workshops related to higher education
(~three times as likely).18As elaborated upon below, there has been sparse research conducted on non-traditional collegestudents, and in particular those who have career paths in engineering and science. It is howeveruseful to note the important work of Rosenbaum and his colleagues who have studied suchstudents.18 These researchers determined that in general, community colleges performed poorlyin terms of providing out-of-class support to non-traditional students. Our study metrics, buildupon the work of Deil-Amen, Rosenbaum and colleagues in addition to a pilot communitycollege engineering and science study.What must be better understood about community college support for studentsCommunity colleges have taken on a “demand absorbing” role, which
matters ‚ Assessment of students ‚ Program approval, monitoring and review ‚ Career education, information and guidance ‚ Placement learning ‚ Recruitment and admissions The QAA can be compared with the ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Engineering Technology) of the US 30. There are a number of differences between theABET and QAA: a) ABET only deals with engineering and engineering technology, whereQAA manages all branches of higher education; b) QAA deals with both the undergraduateand postgraduate programs, when ABET deals only with the undergraduate programs; c)All UK higher qualifications must be accredited by the QAA, while ABET’s accreditationis optional; d) ABET now practices outcome based
government and non-profit organizations. He claimed to be very interested and vested in his teaching career and teaching-related issues. Overall, he seemed reasonably satisfied with his student ratings, reporting them as good to excellent. However, he felt the need to improve his ratings and did so by continuing to modify the courses that he teaches, and to seek out resources when developing new courses.• Fay: Fay is an engineering educator who was trained in a traditional engineering discipline and has 15+ years of teaching experience within a traditional engineering department. She reported having limited industry experience, which consisted mostly of internships while she was a student. In her position at the time of the
(Masters of Strategic Studies), and University of Minnesota (PhD, Environmental Engineering). He is active in several professional engineering organizations to include ASCE, Society of American Military Engineers, National Society of Professional Engineers, National Institute for Engineering Ethics, Order of the Engineer, and the Army Engineer Association.Robert Stevens, Arcadis U.S., Inc ROBERT D. STEVENS, Ph.D., P.E., F.ASCE is an Executive Vice President with ARCADIS U.S., Inc. in Denver, Colorado. Most of his career was spent in the transportation area with work on environmental assessments, planning, and design of roads, rail, and transit projects. He oversaw the first
the specified 16 knowledge domains. In light ofthis, it appears that the BOK is overly constrained. Due to the variety of career paths thatstudents with Bachelor’s degrees in EnvE may pursue, covering all possible topics that onemight need to know in the B.S. degree seems unrealistic. Some students are turned off by themajor due to over constraint that leads to a loss of flexibility in coursework. In addition, themost important topics that should be emphasized may be lost in such a long list of requirements.A better approach could be to develop critical thinking skills in our students and the ability toteach themselves during their professional careers in the context of life long learning.Background
preparation programs. Are there a sufficient number of teacher preparation programs to put qualified and knowledgeable teachers in our classrooms?1. IntroductionOver the next few years the demand for engineers is expected to increase three times faster thanfor all other occupations combined [1] but the number of students pursuing careers inengineering is not increasing adequately to meet this demand. In fact the number of studentscompleting baccalaureate degrees in engineering has increased very little over the last decade [2].Engineering plays a major role in shaping the world today. Yet many bright, capable studentschoose not to pursue sciences in high school, and therefore have no opportunity to enter highpaying engineering and technology
, 2017Teaching the Nature of Engineering in K-12 Science Education by Brian D. Hartman, Randy L, Bell, and Larry FlickNATURE OF ENGINEERING FOR K-12 EDUCATION 2Introduction Engineering has been increasingly promoted in K-12 science education throughnational and state standards. Arguments for including engineering in K-12 scienceinclude improving science and mathematics learning, increased engineering awareness,experience with design, increasing interest in engineering as a career, and increasedtechnological literacy (National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council,2009). The National Research Council (NRC) has now extended this position byincluding
economics, even though I'm taking the class.... It would be easier for me if I had someone else right now from economics.” - Xena “I am definitely, I feel pretty behind in terms of planning out my academic [career].... I have my transfer credits, they haven't all been aligned or something like that. The other negative is that I'm going to have to take the qualifying exam here…. Different teachers, different textbooks, different emphasis. I'm pretty worried about that….I usually rely on students to tell me about [opportunities], and I don't know too many people here…. I haven't done much preparing, honestly. I don't have a very clear plan.” - XenaThe number of hurdles she faced were intimidating
commit to academictasks, as well as persevere during challenging academic tasks. Research has connected efficacybeliefs to educational processes and outcomes such as academic major selection, scholasticachievement, persistence, and long-term, post-graduation career decisions.20-24 2Most of the literature on academic self-efficacy comes from the field of educational psychology.However, engineering education literature has embraced the value of promoting high academicself-efficacy, especially when promoting engineering students’ academic goals, success, andcareer interests. For example, based on findings from an engineering education study
), the Baccalaureate and Beyond 2008/2009 (B&B), and the Career/TechnicalEducation (CTE) Statistics. Each of these datasets is produced and distributed by the Departmentof Education’s National Center for Education Statistics.The labor market datasets used in the study were the American Community Survey (ACS), theCurrent Population Survey (CPS), the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES) database, andthe National Survey of College Graduates (NSCG). These data are made available by a variety ofgovernment agencies and present the STEM workforce generally and engineering techniciansand technologists in particular in varying degrees of detail.The survey of educational programs was conducted by the NAE. The survey of employers wasconducted by
opportunity to learn alongside astrategically matched mentor. This program was successfully piloted and initial activity from bothmentors and mentees has been positive. This paper introduces the structure of the Industry ScholarsMentorship Program, shares initial output and lessons learned, and offers up a model for industry partnersseeking to prepare and secure students equipped with both professional and technical skills.IntroductionCurrent industry demands of engineering graduates are changing, and higher education is not producingstudents prepared for these careers in industry. This challenge for higher education has been present nowfor quite some time, as indicated by a 2014 Gallup Poll, where 96% of college provosts believe theirgraduates are
Paper ID #26300Negotiating Identity as a Response to Shame: A Study of Shame within anExperience as a Woman in EngineeringMs. Mackenzie Claire Beckmon, Harding University I am an undergraduate psychology major anticipating graduation in December of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in psychology through attending a graduate program for school or child psychology. It is my hope that these processes can lead to a career as both a researcher and practitioner.Dr. James L. Huff, Harding University Dr
. He received his PhD in biomedical engineering from Drexel University and was an NSF Graduate STEM Fellow in K-12 Education (GK-12).Dr. Diane C. Bates, The College of New Jersey Dr. Diane C. Bates is a Professor of Sociology, with research interest and expertise in education in quantitative methods and retention in higher education in STEM disciplines.J. Lynn Gazley, The College of New Jersey J. Lynn Gazley is Associate Professor of Sociology at TCNJ. Her research interests focus on diversity and inclusion in the sciences, and how these processes shape scientific knowledge-making. She has served as a Research Associate and Visiting Scholar with Northwestern University’s Scientific Careers Research and Development
Bangladesh). She also works on better understanding undergraduate engineering student interests, behaviors, development, and career choices related to innovation and entrepreneurship. Harris earned her Ph.D. (2015) and M.S. (2010) in Environmental Engineering from Stanford Univer- sity. She also received her B.S. in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology (2009).Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied
to grow at a faster rate than the demand for qualified graduates inother occupations. Despite the value and increasing necessity of STEM skills within today’ssociety and the 21st century workforce, substantial numbers of Americans still do not have equalaccess to postsecondary STEM education and, thus, have limited opportunities for STEM-relatedemployment and careers [4].Along with unequal access to STEM degree programs, researchers report stark differencesbetween traditional and nontraditional undergraduate enrollment and degree attainment in STEM,wherein nontraditional students consistently fare worse. Chen and Weko [5] found it was atypicalfor students who were older, financially self-supporting, or from low socio-economicbackgrounds to
an Emeritus Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of North Dakota. He received a PhD from the University of Illinois and BS and MS degrees from the University of North Dakota. During a forty year career as an educator, he served on the faculties of the University of North Dakota, the University of Illinois, and Ohio Northern University, as well as devoting time to private practice as a design consultant and forensic engineer. He is a registered professional engineer in North Dakota. Dr. Phillips is a Distinguished Member of ASCE, past two-term North Dakota Section president, and has chaired the ASCE Experience Committee and the ASCE BOK Experiential Fulfillment Committee both constituent committees
. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Cynthia Hampton