tested a 6061 aluminum alloy link. The students were able to directly see the results of theirdesign and the difficulties in translating an idea to a finished product.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the following students in MEEN 360, fall 2008 at Texas A&MUniversity at Qatar. The students were: OMAR ABDALLAH, SOHA HISHAM AABDELSATTAR, ZUHAIB SYED ABDIN, MOHAMMED A AL-KHORI, OMARMOHAMMAD J M AL-QATAMI, AHMAD MOHAMMED S A ALMANSOOR, COLLIN CDAVIS, ALI MOHAMAD FAYAD, MISAM ALI MEHMOOD JAFFER TIMOTHYRAYMOND, TAYLOR, DANI JAAFAR WANNOUS, and Ric Carusi the machinist. Page 14.882.6Page 14.882.7 Table
; - product specifications; - concept divergence using creativity tools; - an introduction to technical drawing and sketching techniques; - the fabrication of a prototype; Page 1.119.3 ““s% {~~~ 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘S>+pyy’j Example of a SEEHIGHS Design ProjectIn order to provide the reader with an appreciation for the scope of a typical design project assigned to thestudents, we will briefly describe the first project of the program. As you will notice, the problem
Session 2360 International Culture in Industry Training: A Corporate Myth or a Necessity? S. Y. Eidgahy Jefferson Community CollegeIntroduction Many changes throughout the corporate arena, both in the immediate and recent past, are bringing tolight an increased need for cultural cognition in the “new world”. A post-industrial society, or more accuratelyan information generation is only the beginning. The new “world-order”, economic powerhouses, ethnicconflicts and a daily
Laboratory Experiments Simulator”, CACHE News, 37, 6-12.4. Felder, R, M. and L. K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education”, Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681, April, 1988.5. Fogler, H. S., S.M. Montgomery, and R.P. Zipp, “Interactive Computer Modules for Chemical Engineering Instruction”, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 1(1), 11-24, 1992.6. Kolb, D. A., “Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development”, Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1984.7. Montgomery, Susan and H. Scott Fogler, “Selecting Computer-Aided Instructional Software”, Journal of Engineering Education, 85(l), January, 1996.8. Pimentel, Ken and Teixeira, Kevin, “Virtual Reality
are placed on thedrawing area using the ftiliar drop and drag placement method. This method is illustrated below. Thepurpose of including these steps is so that one can see the actual programming procedure. These stepsindicate the ease in which programming is accomplished. To insert an inductor on the drawing requires the following keystrokes. Press (g) for Get Parts, thenpress (s) for Spice Library, press (p) for Passive Components, and press (i) for Inductor. The symbol is now(in green) on the screen. Use the mouse to position the inductor and press the leil mouse button. Theproperties list for the inductor will appear on the scree~ move the cursor over the word (value) in the linethat says (-DN value:) to make the (-DN) turn red
) to software and computers to philosophies such as JIT (Just In Time), TQM (Total QualityManagement), and CIE (Computer Integrated Enterprises). Each innovation places new demands on theexisting system into which they are introduced. The engineering manager is often asked to provide the needed leadership in these innovation-basedprojects because of this individual's technical expertise and training. Technical expertise in (1) the specificinnovation and (2) project management in general is not enough. The successful selection, planning, andimplementation of innovation within an organization requires that someone in the organization sell the change.The classic marketing process of identifying the target market(s) and selecting the
~ 1TTo ensure that no noise terms are generated, we eliminate them by using the following ifstatement technique. (I I AN :=if AN SIO-2,0, A~ ) 41 I B~ =i B~ SIO-5,0, B~ ) il A. =i A. S 1 0- 2, 0 , A0 I ) Page 1.393.3 #g& :4 } 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘O,+,plll’.:For this example, we wish to expand to 30 terms of the series. Thus, we arbitrarily set k.= 3CThe Fourier Series Expansion is given as
Session 3260 CQI IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERS: Dynamics, Obligations and Myths S. Y. Eidgahy, Ph.D Jefferson Community College ABSTRACT: Professional development or continuing education of practicing engineers hasbecome paramount to our international competitiveness. Whether such educational efforts aredirected at learning new technologies and processes; simply updating existing skills andknowledge, or even completely retraining engineers for new careers; training is now an integralengineering activity. That is why this issue must be under constant
conceptual gains and usingthose gains to motivate development of the math skills needed for application.Bibliography1.Olds, Moskal, and Miller, “Assessment in Engineering Education:Evolution, Approaches, and FutureCollaborations”, Journal of Engineering Education, January 20052. David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, and Gregg Swackhamer, “Force Concept Inventory”, The Physics Teacher, Vol. Page 14.15.630, March 1992.3. Evans, D.L. Gray, G.L. Krause, S. Martin, J. Midkiff, C. Notaros, B.M. Pavelich, M. Rancour, D. Reed-Rhoads, T. Steif, P. Streveler, R. Wage, K. “Progress on concept inventory assessment tools”, Proceedings ofthe 2003 Frontiers in
the overall pedagogy involved. 4) Publishing all of the exercises on the website http://eet.cecs.pdx.edu.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE 0633754. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 14.37.11 References:1. G. Recktenwald, R.C. Edwards, “Using Simple Experiments to Teach Core Concepts in the Thermal and Fluid Sciences,” Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference
e, S S CS CS S S S g PC PC C C
Recognition, Article Published by HTG Systems.[3] Joyce, R. and G. Gupta, “Identity Authentication Based on keystroke Latencies,” Communications of ACM,Volume 33, Issue 2, ( February 1990). Retrieved on 8th March 2005.[4] Kung, S., Biometric Authentication: A Machine Learning Approach, First Edition , Published by Prentice Hall,PTR.[5] Obaidat, S. and B. Sadoun, Verification of Computer users using Keystroke Dynamics,” IEEE, Volume 27,Issue 2, (April 1997). Retrieved from IEEE on 16th February 2005.[6] Peacock, A., Learning User Keystroke Latency Patterns, acquired fromhttp://pel.cs.byu.edu/~alen/personal/CourseWork/cs572/KeystrokePaper/index.html [7] Umphress, D., and G. Williams, Identity Verification Through keyboard Characteristics
butalso for the team to let the judges know when to start timing. 2006 TULSA ENGINEERING CHALLENGE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION CHEMICAL SWITCH COMPETITION PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY AND LEGIBLY Name of school: ___________________________________________________________ School address, city, zip: ____________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Sponsoring teacher: _________________________________________________________ Phone number: _____________________________________________________________ Name(s) of entrant(s): (1
. Page 11.62.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Look at the Programs in Multidisciplinary Engineering Areas for which ASEE Is Now the Lead Society for ABET Accreditation ReviewAbstractAs the result of ABET Board action in spring 2005, ASEE is now the lead society for theaccreditation of multidisciplinary engineering programs for accreditation visits beginning in thefall of 2006. In this context, the terminology “multidisciplinary engineering programs” isdefined as the set of engineering programs with one of the following program titles (with a fewslight variations): Engineering, General Engineering, Engineering Physics, or EngineeringScience(s). ASEE also has lead society role
0 0 students’ annotated bibliographies, y is s x c s
27 *One of these courses must be a writing course to satisfy the Gordon Rule (W). Total Hours = 129 Engineering common core - engineering courses Engineering courses unique to B. S. in Bioengineering Page 11.279.8Engineering topics Table 3: B.S. in Civil Engineering
through photosynthesis by future biomass crops.In 2011, it was discovered that bioenergy was used as an energy source more than oil in Sweden.The Swedish Energy Agency found that 31.7% of the energy used was generated from biomasswhile 30.8% of the energy originated from oil. One of the principal reasons for this increase inbioenergy is the fact that biomass is the primary energy source in the district heating sector, asector that demands more than half of the overall heat demand in residential areas. 7 Figure 5shows the different sources of energy in Sweden in 2011 (Sweden Energy Use 2010, May 10). Figure 5: Source of Energy in Sweden 2011References 1. Abolhosseini, S., Heshmati, A., & Altmann, J. (2014, April). A
two data sets and with a focus on factorsthat have resulted in changes in teaching approach in the years separating the studies. Thefinal section contains our conclusions and outlines areas for future exploration.BackgroundThe approaches to teaching inventory (ATI) has been developed and refined over the lastdecade.1 It has its origins in phenomenographic studies of teachers’ attitudes to teachingand learning in the mid 1990’s. Prosser and Trigwell advance the view that there is afundamental qualitative difference between a student-centric and teacher-centric view of thelearning process [4, page 408]. They argue that a student centered approach to facilitatinglearning focuses on the nature of the learning itself, placing the main emphasis on
presentation of such an equation must necessarily beaccompanied by a definition of the terms along with their units: RMR is the metal removal rate inmm3/s or in3/min, I is the current in amps, and Tm is the melting temperature of the work metal inC or F.Perhaps the most rigorous treatment of units is in the thermal sciences. Most thermodynamics,fluid mechanics, and heat transfer texts use unit conversion factors to demonstrate a rigorouscancellation process in example problems. Students are left with no doubts as to where numberscome from. In spite of the rigor with which units are treated, there is no common non-SI systemused in thermal science texts. Fluid mechanics texts by Gerhardt [5] and Pritchard [12] use theBG system, with the derived mass
was to see if adding a debate format to case study usage, an inductivelearning technique, could motivate students to research topics (read the text book and articles) inaddition to increasing student engagement and learning. Inductive teaching techniques may alsobe called learner-centered or student-centered since they require students take more responsibilityfor their own learning compared to traditional lecture based or deductive teaching methods, can bemore interactive and have been found to promote student engagement.1Debate has been researched as a pedagogical method used to improve critical thinking skills andoral communication skills since the 1990’s.3,4 Learner-centered education programs such asnursing and pharmacy, marketing
theinitial pre-surveys of students enrolled in the 11 of the 13 HBCUs where research was completed atthe beginning of the fall 2015 and spring 2016 semesters and the final post-surveys assessing theirunderstanding of the project and electrical engineering concepts at the end of fall 2015 and spring2016 semesters. The goal of the N S F - f u n d e d project was to increase the number ofhighly qualified and prepared engineering students, particularly African American engineers, aswell as to ensure electrical engineering students and graduates have a better understanding oftechnology and its role in STEM education and the policy associated with it. Another key goal ofthe project was to promote wide spread dissemination and usage of portable hands-on
# Strongly Agree Agree Unsure/ Disagree Strongly Avg Check the best answer Neutral Disagree1 I plan to go to college when I 25 2 4.93 finish high school.2 My parents/guardians are 23 4 4.85 encouraging me to go to college.3 My friends plan on going to 18 6 2 4.80 college.4 I enjoy school. 18 6 2 4.805 My teacher(s)/counselor(s) care if 23 2 1
: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. [cited March 15] Available from http://www.hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf.6. Sclater N. 2010. The Organizational impact of open educational resources. In: Ehler U-D, Schneckenberg D, editors. Changing cultures in higher education. Springer. p. 485-497.7. Smith MS. 2009. Opening education. Science. 323(5910):89-93.8. SPARC. List of North American OER policies and projects. 2017. [cited 2017 February 10] Available from https://sparcopen.org/our-work/list-of-oer-policies-projects/.9. OpenStax. We measure our success in access. 2014. [cited 2017 February 5] Available from https://openstax.org/impact.10. Bell S. 2015. Start a textbook
23% 82% 59% Join a STEM club 68% 100% 32% Apply for internships (in addition to the ASPIRES Scholars 50% 95% 45% Program) Join LinkedIn or other online professional network 50% 86% 36% Ask a professor if s/he had a project I can work on 27% 68% 41%In evaluating student perception of the program, students were asked to rate how useful they foundeach of the program activities to be in terms of helping them develop skills, confidence, andinterest in conducting research. Table 6 gives the results of the student evaluation of the 2017program. Note that the highest item rated as most useful
actualassignments.Introductory ProjectFollowing a class visit by a cancer-surviving individual who provided an in-depth, personaloverview of his cancer experience, the students were tasked with exploring distinctly the diseasepathway, intervention/ device treatment pathway, and the patient pathway for either breast orprostate cancer. Each student selected which of the two types of cancer s/he would explore.Overall, this introductory project had several underlying goals that aimed to lay a foundation forthe entire course. First, this introductory project was to provide opportunities for the students tobuild skills in examining the disease, device, and patient pathways of cancer. In subsequentprojects, students would further refine their skills and apply them to other
explore laminar, transitional and fully turbulentconditions.To determine the volumetric flow rate through the pipe test section, water flowing out ofthe pipe was caught in a measuring cup, and the time required to fill 500 mL measuredwith a stopwatch. The pressure drop along the pipe was determined using the fourmanometers integrated with the pipe and positioned 3.0 inches apart. The uncertainty involumetric flow measurements that ranged between Q = +/- 1 ml/s at low flow rates (10ml/s) to Q = +/- 2 ml/s at high flow rates (30 ml/s). The uncertainty in the pressuremeasurements using the integrated manometers was +/- 2 mm H2O or +/- 20 Pa.The pipe flow/head loss experiment shown in Fig. 3 was characterized by measuring thepressure drop along the
-class activities helpedthem balance different aspects of well-being and remain engaged with their work. Furtherresearch can explore how these activities help students build the capacity to "bounce-back" fromhigh-stress work environments.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for theirsupport of this work under the CAREER grant #EE-1351156. Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this poster are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors also wish toacknowledge Alison W. Bowers for her contributions made to this study. References1. Olson, S., &
, evaluating, and selecting credible evidence or relevant examples; ● organizing ideas and information consistent with the purpose; ● demonstrating a nuanced understanding of audience(s) and word choice; ● adhering to acceptable mechanical, structural, and format style guidelines appropriate to the discipline and purpose; and ● using effective visual representations to enhance, focus, and amplify written communication and text.SLO 2 measures the voluntary student engagement in the process of writing through the use ofthe following practices and articulating the impacts of engaging in this process: ● Researching ● Drafting ● Reflecting ● Collaborating ● Revising ● EditingAs each program joins as a WEP, the QEP
. A., Phillips, L. D., & Barkdoll, B. (2009). Field Guide to Environmental Engineering for Development Workers: Water, Sanitation, and Indoor Air. ASCE Press.13. Boyer, E.L., (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.14. Solis, F., Coso, A. S., Adams, R., Turns, J. A., Crismond, D. P. (2016). Towards a Scholarship of Integration: Lessons from Four Cases. Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA.15. Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738-79816. Fleming, E. S., & Pritchett, A. (2015