Paper ID #34922Creating a Peer Review of Teaching Process to Enhance InstructorFeedback in Engineering EducationDr. Jennifer L. Herman, Ohio State University Dr. Jennifer Herman is a senior lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University, where she teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in technical and research commu- nication. Dr. Hermanˆa C™s research interests includeDr. Ann D. Christy P.E., Ohio State University Ann D. Christy, PE, is a professor of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering and a professor of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University (OSU). She
. Table 10. Responses to End-of-Course Survey Question(s) Average Survey Prompt Score (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree) (n = 12)1. I enjoyed the Three Levels course project this semester. 4.582. Whether I liked the project or not, it was valuable for my learning. 4.833. Whether I liked the project or not, it was academically rigorous. 4.334. I believe that I gained skills from this project that I can apply later in my life and
what has happened in the past when it hasn’t been sufficiently accounted for.” (8 Nov 2019). “I’m struggling with how to set-up these lectures…as I am writing this, I am going through [Professor D]'s [faculty reflection log] and learning a lot about what worked and what didn’t work in the classroom. I am hoping that the students gain knowledge from this assignment but I am already predicting that there will be pushback from the students…I can’t emphasize enough what great timing this interview assignment was with regards to reviewing [Professor D]’s [faculty reflection log] and also working on the ASEE paper focusing on the interview assignment. Although I am sure I can do better with preparing
don’t know what those systems will be because they’re going to becreated, they’re going to be new. But what is clear is that they’re going to rely on fundamentals,because that is how the design process is done.”2. Deep Structure: Teaching for BreadthIn contrast to the mixed reports on teaching for depth, teaching for breadth was observed as apositive outcome for the majority of alumni interviewed. For example, one alumnus mentionedthat the breadth of knowledge in engineering science has provided “metaphors to draw on whenI’m trying to understand a new domain”, while another mentioned that the breadth of knowledge“broaden(s) your scope of knowledge” and gives cross disciplinary perspectives which is usefulas “somebody needs to be the person that
- assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of knowledge in medical surgical nursing students," Nurse education today, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 866-871, 2011.[14] R. V. Lindsey, J. D. Shroyer, H. Pashler and M. C. Mozer, "Improving students’ long-term knowledge retention through personalized review," Psychological science, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 639-647, 2014.[15] R. F. Hopkins, K. B. Lyle, J. L. Hieb and P. A. S. Ralston, "Spaced retrieval practice increases college students’ short-and long-term retention of mathematics knowledge," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 853-873, 2016.[16] J. Direnga, M. B. Presentati, M. D. Timmermann, A. Brose and C. H. Kautz, "Does it
camp along with some discussion guides on the topics and on theengineering design principles underlying artificial kidneys and aerosol medications targeted toregions of the lungs.IntroductionThe Oklahoma State University Alumni Association has hosted Grandparent University as anannual 3-day residential summer camp offered as two sessions each summer since 2003, exceptin 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Grandparent University is for children ages 7 to 13 whohave a parent or grandparent who is an active member of the Alumni Association and areaccompanied by their grandparent(s) or adult chaperone of their grandparents’ generation. Thecamp is intended to be a fun-filled experience that actively engages kids in academics on campuswhile creating
collection [18]. Through GORP, the observer can select codes for observedclassroom activity for both the instructor(s) and students. Observations are coded in 2-minuteintervals until the class session is over. If the observer makes a mistake, they can note it duringthe next interval, and adjust the data accordingly by hand, after class. Data is automaticallyanalyzed in GORP and can be exported to excel for further analysis. COPUS observations arelimited by the fact that a trained individual must label an in-class interaction/behavior in real-time. Multiple behaviors can occur at the same time and some may be missed. This can createsome issues with missed labeling or mislabeling during active learning class activities.Additionally, data are collected
-Couetil, N., Dyrenfurth, M., Teaching students to be technology innovators:Examininng approaches and identifying competencies. ASEE 2012, San Antonio, TX.[3] Steuer-Dankert, L., Gilmartin, S., Muller, C., Dungs, C., Sheppard, S., Leicht-Scholten, Ca.,“Expanding Engineering Limits—A Concept for Socially Responsible Education of Engineers,”International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 1–16, 2019.[4] Brunhaver, SR, RF Korte, SR Barley, and SD Sheppard. April 13, 2018. Bridging the Gapsbetween Engineering Education and Practice. In R. Freeman, and H. Salzman (eds.), U.S.Engineering in the Global Economy, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.[5] Gilmartin, SK, AA Antonio, HL Chen, SR Brunhaver, and SD Sheppard. April 13
computational thinking outcome. These tangible artifacts werealso coupled with qualitative assessment of the students’ responses.After the students mastered their “Camp Intro”, near-peer mentors introduced pitching theirvery first idea. This idea did not necessarily make it into implementation for their finalprojects. Pitching their idea included communicating the societal need(s) for the technologyand how the team is addressing the need through creation of the technology. Students wererequired to give presentations about any background information surrounding an idea.Students had to identify other applications and how their technology would be different.Students were also encouraged to ask insightful questions to other campers about how theirpotential
technical coursework, as Watters et al. [17] also pointed out. As an across-the-curriculummodel, Davis [22] suggested a micro-insertion approach, which introduces small units of ethicsinto technical courses. We will discuss this approach and how this paper’s work might beintegrated into this approach in more detail in the discussion section.Insights from the industry for ethics educationThe workplace provides engineers with opportunities to encounter and experience ethical issues.McGinn [23]’s survey with practicing engineers indicated that most (80.2% in 2001 survey, 89.2%in 1999 survey, and 84.4% in 1997 survey) practicing engineers think engineering students arelikely to encounter ethical issues in their future engineering practice, and
consider identifying this outcome as an optional outcome in E-CURE’s assessments Organization and Project Management ABET Criterion 5, Curriculum, with Evaluate UR-CURE Outcome Components respect to IEEE program-specific criterion E “The ability to apply project management techniques to electrical/electronic(s) systems” 1. Identify discrete work tasks and 1a. Displays ability to share distribution of budgets for a portion of a project Tasks 2. Direct the project work of one or more 2a. Displays ability to share distribution of tasks team members 2b. Shows ability to work
, 2012.[16] A. Calabrese Barton, H. Kang, E. Tan, T. B. O’Neill, J. Bautista-Guerra, and C. Brecklin, “Crafting a future in science: tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 37–75, Feb. 2013.[17] H. B. Carlone, C. M. Scott, and C. Lowder, “Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 836–869, 2014.[18] K. L. Tonso, “Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 273–307, Sep. 2006.[19] S. Rodriguez, K. Cunningham, and A. Jordan, “STEM identity development for
inclusion. The reasoned action model was identified asthe theoretical framework, and the second cycle themes were integrated into a final thematic map(Figure 3) and corresponding written analysis around the three main factors for intention. Table 1: First cycle coding categories Category (Prefix) Description Example Codes Sentiments (S) Feelings about their job S-Rewarding to help others grow S-Resentment regarding conflicting responsibilities Motivations (M) Motivations to pursue and continue M-Career progression and money
] H. S. Truman, "Statement by the President making public a report of the commission on higher education," December, vol. 15, p. 1947, 1947.[5] J. McFarland et al., "The Condition of Education 2019. NCES 2019-144," National Center for Education Statistics, 2019.[6] L. Berkner, C. C. Wei, S. He, S. Lew, M. Cominole, and P. Siegel, "National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS: 04), 2003-04: Undergraduate Financial Aid Estimates for 2003-04 by Type of Institution. ED TAB. NCES 2005-163," National Center for Education Statistics, 2005.[7] D. J. Boyd, "Public research universities: Changes in state funding," in American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2015.[8] U. S. D. o. L. Bureau of Labor
strategic decision made by the Central Commit-tee of CPC and the State Council of PRC. Over the past four years, it has shown unique characteris-tics different from previous higher educational policies. The Diffusion of Innovation Theory, tosome extent, can be introduced.2.2 Analysis model of the diffusion of “Double First-rate” InitiativeFrances S. Berry and William D. Berry (1990) integrated the internal decision-making model andexternal diffusion model, and proposed an integrated diffusion of innovation model. The modelhas become a mainstream model of diffusion of innovation in the West for a long time. This re-search revises the Berry’s diffusion of innovation model, expands the connotation of influencingfactors and mechanism factors, and tries
educationbegan to become accepted in the U.S. in the 1990’s when the idea of combining action incommunity and structured learning began to be institutionalized as a pedagogy and as a field[1],[2]. The idea was called service-learning. Bringle and Hatcher [3] defined service learning as“a credit-bearing educational experience in which students participate in an organized serviceactivity that meets identified community needs and reflection on the service activity in such away as to gain further understanding of the course content, a broader appreciation of thediscipline and an enhanced sense of civic responsibility” (p. 222).Community service and civic engagement has been ingrained in the Indian culture from a verylong time. A modern example of such a
[Divergingemployment outcomes of higher education], Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education andPsychology, University of Jyväskylä, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-7529-6.[6] I. Tanhua, Teorioita sukupuolenmukaisen segregaation syistä [Theories of gendersegregation], Research report by SEGLI project, 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.kaikkienduuni.fi/teorioita-segregaation-syist/ [English translation of graphprovided by Tanhua to the Authors].[7] R. Hutt, “These 10 countries are closest to achieving gender equality,” World EconomicForum, 17 Dec 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/12/gender-gap-equality-women-parity-countries/.[8] S. Singh and S. Peers, “Where are the Women in the Engineering
, “Stereotyping and its threat are real.,” American Psychologist, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 680–681, 1998. 6. C. L. Walker and S. J. Rakow, “The Status of Hispanic American Students in Science: Attitudes,” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 225–245, 1985. 7. A. Meador, “Examining Recruitment and Retention Factors for Minority STEM Majors Through a Stereotype Threat Lens,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 61–69, 2018. 8. D. Sadegh, S. Perkins-Hall and K. Abeysekera, “Tested Strategies for Recruiting and Retention of STEM Majors” in International Association for Development of the Information Society: Proceeding of the 5th International Association for Development of the
writing,” Coll. English, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 610–617, 1979.[20] J. Colwell, J. Whittington, and C. F. Jenks, “Writing Challenges for Graduate Students in Engineering and Technology,” 2011, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18722.[21] A. Selzer King, K. R. Moore, S. Frankel, and A. Hardage Edlin, “Drawing Strategies for Communication Planning: A Rationale and Exemplar of the Geometric Page Form (GPF) Approach,” ACM'S Spec. Inte. Group on the Des. of Info., 2017.[22] A. S. King and A. H. Edlin, “Structured drawing tasks support research ideation : A mentor-mentee report on iteration, invention, and collaboration,” ACM'S Spec. Inte
Rapid Transit district’s 1990’s expansions in the East Bay and SFO Airport at three billion to the New Starts program for the Federal Transit Administration with over a hundred projects and $85 billion in construction value. At the latter, he also acted as source selection board chairman and program COTR for $200 plus million in task order con- tracts for engineering services. Working for the third-largest transit agency in the United States, the Los Angeles County MTA, Michael managed bus vehicle engineering for $1 billion in new acquisitions and post-delivery maintenance support for 2300 vehicles with some of the most complex technology (natural gas engines and embedded systems) in the US transit industry in the
ofpractices described above in which participants are asked to look through the deck (or virtualdisplay) of practices to identify the three to six practices they feel are most emphasized or valuedand an additional three to six they perceived to be emphasized or valued in a given engineeringcontext. Participants are asked a series of follow up questions after these card sorts. Afterdiscussing the practices emphasized in the engineering context(s) in which they engaged,participants are asked to sort through the deck once again to identify the top practices theypersonally deem to be most important in addressing a complex problem in their field. In addition,participants are asked to reflect on the extent to which the valued aspects of engineering work
,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2020, vol. 2020-June, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34617.[7] L. Torres, M. W. Driscoll, and A. L. Burrow, “Racial microaggressions and psychological functioning among highly achieving African-Americans: A mixed-methods approach,” J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1074–1099, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.10.1074.[8] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282–284, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/nbt.4089.[9] J. K. Hyun, B. C. Quinn, T. Madon, and S. Lustig, “Graduate student mental health
Doing L Listening to instructor/taking notes, etc. AnQ Student answering a question posed by the instructor with the rest of the class listening SQ Student asks a question WC Engaged in whole class discussion by offering explanations, opinion, judgment, etc Ind Individual thinking/problem solving. CG Discuss clicker question in groups of 2 or more students WG Working in groups on worksheet activity OG Other assigned group activity, such as responding to instructor question Prd Making a prediction about the outcome of demo or experiment SP Presentation by student(s) TQ Test or quiz W Waiting O Other – explain in comments Instructor is Doing Lec Lecturing RtW Real-time writing on board, doc. projector, etc