resulted in identifying the need for combining course offerings ofa 4-year university and a nearby technical college. For the 4-year university, an associate ofscience degree requires a minimum of 60 credit hours (of which about half is university corecourses such as Composition, Algebra, and Social Science). A technical certificate requires aminimum of 18 hours. The number of hours for each program was determined by therequirements established by the institute’s governing body. Based on these constraints, thefollowing 2-year program was developed and approved by each institution’s curriculumcommittee, see Table 1.Table 1. Advanced Manufacturing Technician Curriculum (Sessions I and II refer to the two six seeks summersessions at the 4-year
the courseand the students’ projects and presentations that have resulted from its offering.I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUNDAlmost two decades ago, the US National Academy of Engineering developed a list of the 20most significant and greatest engineering achievements of the 20th century which have had themost impact on the lives of people. Electrification, as supported by the electrical power grid, wasfirst on the list (compared to the Airplane, Telephone, and Internet which ranked 3rd, 9th, and13th respectively) [1]. Our century-old power grid is the largest interconnected machine onEarth, so massively complex and inextricably linked to human involvement and endeavor that it 1has alternatively
the Challenger launchdecision, the Alaska Airlines flight 261 crash, and the Piper Alpha oilrig fire. We received 47responses in the Fall 2016 semester and 101 responses in the Spring 2017 semester fromundergraduate and graduate students enrolled in Purdue’s Aeronautics and Astronauticsdepartment. Our initial statistical analysis indicates that there may be a correlation between astudent’s performance in and exposure to systems engineering-related classes and the student’sperformance on our survey.1 IntroductionAs the complexity of the systems we build increases, so does the demand for systems engineers[Hutchison et al., 2016; SERC, 2013; Chaput & Mark, 2013]. 23% of all engineers in the U.S. areover the age of 55, which means there
actuating arm and 27.5 inch upper actuating arm. Pairs of thisconfiguration were then aligned along each side of an equilateral triangle, such that there are sixpairs total. A visual of the isolated subsystem can be observed below in Figure 1. Figure 1: Dual Actuating Arms Isolated in Heave (observing maximum and minimum position)After using graphical and mathematical analyses to develop the dimensional basis of thestructure, components and assemblies were drafted within SolidWorks. The rods and lever armswere first designed, and additional assemblies, such as the lower and upper platforms, followed.To test and visualize the system geometry, multiple prototype models were manufacturedthrough 3D printing scaled down by a factor of ten. These models
in Table 1 [1], [2]. Table 1. List of Institutions Surveyed Institutions with Doctorate in Engineering Institutions with no Doctorate in Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Harvey Mudd College Stanford University Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology University of California - Berkeley Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering California Institute of Technology United States Military Academy Georgia Institute of Technology United States Air Force Academy University of Illinois
techniques.IntroductionRecent reports have highlighted the need for Australian businesses to be able to innovate andthink creatively in order to be able to effectively compete in the global market into the future[1, 2]. Nominally, the Australian engineering sector should be able to effectively meet thisneed for creativity and innovation. Having a creative and innovative demeanor is one of theexpected traits of a professional engineer within Australia, as set out by the Australianengineering accreditation body, Engineers Australia [3]. It is therefore important to assess ina global context, whether Australian engineering graduates do effectively possess therequired skills to be able to be creative.Despite the need for creativity, inclusion of material that is
) while the remaining one is in energy engineering. After getting permission from theMiddle States Association of Colleges and Schools through the Substantive Change forAdditional Location Request, a multifunctional 1440 square foot educational space wasdesignated to the department by the Innovation Center. The project is supported by a grant worthmore than $400K and additional grants are considered to improve the physical facility andexpand the square footage.The educational space is designed to serve simultaneously as a classroom and a physical andcomputing laboratory as illustrated in Figure 1. This laboratory is modeled after themultifunctional educational space in the Department’s main campus location serving since 2014. Figure 1. Furniture
, GlobalizationIntroductionIn today’s global marketplace, it is critical for engineering students to have an appreciation andunderstanding of different cultures. This is recognized by the National Academy of Engineeringwho state the 21st century engineer should have a sound understanding of globalization [1] andABET, who state in both the current and revised student outcomes that by the time of graduation,students should have an understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context [2]. Additionally, if our graduates are to becomeleaders in the profession, they need to understand and appreciate the diversity of cultures in theworld [3].Higher education has addressed intercultural development through multiple
survey. Ananalysis of the data collected from surveying the literature is conducted and the results are testedfor significance. Finally, recommendations based on the analysis are summarized to aid otherinterested universities in developing new programs.1. IntroductionCybersecurity is a major concern in today's world. According to Juniper research, the cost of databreaches in 2019 is expected to be $2.1 trillion globally showing an increase of almost four timesthe cost of breaches in 2015 [1]. This tremendous increase in cybercrimes requires an adequatepreparation for future students to acquire the skills needed to deal with these future risks.The importance of cybersecurity comprises on the information secured. Its’ well known thatinformation is
Aug. 2002 –Dec.2005: Instructor & Research Assistant, Mechanical Engr., Louisiana State University, USA Oct. 1997 – Aug.2000: Assistant Professor, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Bangladesh Nov. 1994 – Oct.1997: Naval Architect, Chittagong Dry Dock Ltd, Bangladesh. REGISTRATION Registered Professional Engineer in Texas (TBPE No. 113655) SELECTED HONORS AND AWARDS (1) Louisiana State Economic Development Award (2002-2004), Louisiana State Uni- versity (LSU). (2) Teaching and Research Fellowship/Assistantships: South Dakota School of Mines & Tech and LSU. (3) Dissertation Fellowship Award (2005), LSU. (4) Nominee for Best Research Assistant Award (2004), LSU. (5) Nominee for Distinguished
crowded venues, and not necessitate the alteration of the user’s typical behavior. Example Student SolutionsFigure 1. First-Year Engineering Design Challenge Overview and Sample Student GeneratedSolutions. Once all 29 of the group presentations were collected, these video presentations wereuploaded to an ACJ system called CompareAssess for evaluation in three separate judgmentsessions—one session (N=104) for the students to serve as judges/assessors, one session (N=7)for the instructors to serve as judges/assessors, and one session (N=8) for the practicingengineers to serve as judges/assessors. The instructors for these students were all recruited forthis study (n = 6) and invitations were sent to three
MicrowaveEngineering I (passive RF circuits), Microwave Engineering II (active circuits), Antennas,Advanced EM Theory, and Electrical Packaging Principles. There are several degree options,BSEE, an accelerated MSEE (BS +1 year), on campus MSEE, on-line MSEE, and the Ph.D.The University of Arizona (UA) is consistently rated high in the area of student engagement. TheUA’s mission is to have 100% student engagement, which involves experiences beyond regularclassroom instruction to help prepare students for industry. The Keysight Industry-ReadyProgram is one such activity the RF engineering program uses to foster student engagement. Webelieve that exposing students to typical EDA tools used in industry to enhance the in-classactivities is an important part to
usually framed as a problem ofrepresentation with solutions and interventions aimed at increasing the numbers ofunderrepresented groups. Historically, and in the present moment, the field of engineering hasnot been the most diverse in terms of race and gender. As of 2014, only 19.8% of all engineeringundergraduate students in the United States identified as female, down 0.7% from 2004 [1].Compared to this percentage, the University of Virginia’s engineering school had a 31% femaleundergraduate enrollment in 2017 [2]. Yet, nationally females represent greater than 50% of allcollege students. Recent efforts have initiated means to strengthen an atmosphere of inclusion,but there is more work to be done to bridge the identified gaps.Reasons for the
in the S/W V&Vtopics being covered in the class. The student outcomes assessment data and pedagogicalassessment data are presented and discussed in this paper. The class management strategies fordelivering ALTs are presented in a separate accompanying paper in this conference.1. Introduction and RationaleTraditionally in engineering education, student-centered lectures have been the predominantmodel of teaching. However, it has been suggested [1] that this may not be the most effectivemethod for imparting knowledge in all disciplines, as students may not be able to retain andapply knowledge they have gained to the extent that is required in their professional careers.Therefore the current push is towards flipped class rooms [2] and
diverse teams lead to better conclusions for complex problems. Therehave been numerous studies, from a variety of contexts, which have studied this premise.Recently, an article described using a linearized maximally diverse grouping problemformulation to create diverse teams within University of Michigan’s Engineering GlobalLeadership Honors Program. Their results were implemented with minimal changes [1].Work in homogeneous teams (“Group of Same”) versus heterogeneous teams (“Group ofDifferent”) has shown that heterogeneous teams encounter more challenges as the diverseteammates learn how to work together; however, they often overcome their homogeneous teamcounterparts with better results [2, 3]. Extensive research by Ned Herrmann has evaluated
students understand diversity and inclusion within theirengineering programs, and how these understandings are shaped by aspects of the environmentin which they are situated.Our study is a component of a broader research project that is examining the seeminglyintractable problems of diversity and inclusion that emerge through the converging threads offormation of professional identity and culture of engineering disciplines. In this study we utilizeda qualitative analysis of interview data to explore the undergraduate students’ perceptions ofdiversity and inclusion within the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) atPurdue University [1]. Our interview draws upon cultural dimensions of engineering disciplinesthat encourage student to
, educators and policy makers have expressed growing concerns over thelevels of math and science achievement among American students and the gradual decline in thenumbers of young people moving into science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)careers [1], [2], [3]. These concerns have led to the development of new standards for scienceand technology education [4], [5], [6], policy initiatives aimed at promoting science andtechnology education [7], [8],[9], and to a growing body of research on math and sciencelearning and the pathways leading to STEM-related careers [10], [11]. While the picture oflooming shortages of scientists and engineers has been challenged and recent studies haveindicated that American students are taking more science and
race or gender, into account. Taken together, these documents constructthe department’s image of an ‘ideal engineer.’ Undergraduate students’ engineering identities have emerged as a prominent researchtopic among engineering educators. Identity—both in terms of social identities (i.e.,race/ethnicity, gender, etc.) and as engineers (i.e., viewing oneself as an engineering person)—has been found to play a role in undergraduate persistence [1], [2], retention [3], [4], [5], andeven teamwork [6], [7]. Recent research extends beyond assessing impact to understanding theconcept itself—for example, recent work has identified recognition and interest as key players inwhether or not a student will develop an engineering identity [8], [9], [10
) into theircurriculum. Although Wing describes CT as a problem-solving approach that utilizesfundamental computing concepts, which is applicable not only for scientists but everyone, mostof the computational thinking instructional approaches are related to computer programming.Unfortunately, it is also unclear whether people use CT when solving non-programmingproblems. This study aims to answer two research questions: (1) In what ways do students usecomputational thinking skills when solving non-programming problems if any?; and (2) Ifstudents use CT when solving non-programming problems, in what ways do their approachesdiffer from computer science students? We conducted a qualitative multiple within-site casestudy research with three units of
wildlife. In some projects, we assume that the wildlife is somehow taggedor collared while in other projects, we create the animal collar. These projects create aneed to develop environmentally rugged yet technologically flexible communicationlinks. For example, in one project, the animals (the American marten, see Figure 1) wearsmall collars with an RF transmitter that serves as a locating signal. Traditionally, smallaircraft with antennas mounted on the plane (or hand held) fly low in tight routes,scanning the ground. Instead, our students developed an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle(UAV) drone that flies above the tree line and scans the surrounding area for a signal.This UAV employs a Software Defined Radio (SDR) system to directionally locate
for- profit or nonprofit institution.Higher Education Tuition-Based On-Campus Enrollments are DownIn the Distance Education Learning Report, Allen and Seaman [1] report higher educationenrollments, overall, for academic years spanning 2012-2015, are down across public and privatefor-profit institutions, while enrollments are slightly higher in private non-profit institutions.Figure 1 below depicts this relationship. Figure 1 – Enrollments by Type of Institution [1]The Allen and Seaman data reflects nearly a one million student decrease of -931,317 in studentsstudying on campus. Figure 2 below depicts both the percent change from 2012 – 2015 as wellas the equivalent student population. Worth noting is that public
work and engineering work moregenerally compare?Based on qualitative in-depth semi-structured interviews, this paper analyzes the workexperiences of 13 young engineers in their first years of work after graduating fromuniversities in the United States. Interviewee-reported critical incidents of top and bottommoments, as well as experiences in creating, advancing and implementing new ideas in work,were coded into different dimensions of learning experiences according to Mezirow’s [1]transformative learning theory in order to understand better what these experiences comprise.Many positively experienced innovation efforts were related to implementing new features orcomponents to products or process improvements, and collaboration and feedback
Education, 2018 Early Career Plans in Engineering: Insights from the Theory of Planned BehaviorIntroductionCalls to address labor market demands in engineering industry often cite the need to increaseengineering degree attainment at postsecondary institutions. However, prior research onengineering students’ career decision making indicates that degree attainment in engineeringdoes not guarantee students’ plans to pursue engineering careers after graduation [1]. While thereare numerous studies of engineering career decision making processes, most researchers studycareer decisions as students exit college or enter the workforce. In this paper, we suggestengineering students’ career plans are a set of evolving
education and the rising costs of college. The model was based upon alternativestructures of credentialing and financing as a response to these potential pressures. Thecurricular model proposes restructuring engineering degree program towards: 1) shorterundergraduate programs that focus on developing horizontal transfer of knowledge ratherthan in-depth disciplinary knowledge and 2) periodic in-depth “educational renewal”throughout an individual’s career. This structure is grounded by, and emerges from,established models of liberal arts degree programs and is supported by decades of evidenceon the aspects of college which most impact long-term student development. From a policyperspective in order for such a disruptive model to have a chance of
Advantagesexperimentation due to the continued integration of technology.The objective is to design an experiment to be used in laboratory Fan Input Velocity 1. Practical, hands on approachthat enhances the student understanding of convection process 2. Allows for design, build, and test opportunities for studentsand principles. A cost-effective design is generated with three coreprinciples: 1) Low Cost, 2) Low Maintenance, and 3) Concept 3. Can be incorporated into multiple laboratory
often below theirexpectations.For many students, instead of using effective study strategies to fully understand key concepts andto master problem solving techniques, the goal of their current study and test taking strategy is to“maximize partial credit.” The most common version of this strategy looks essentially like this. 1. Memorize problems from the homework, in-class examples, or previous exams. 2. Match each problem on the exam to one of the memorized problems that most closely resembles it. 3. Write down the memorized solution, making adjustments along the way so that the solution looks more relevant to the exam problem.This strategy is often very effective at getting a passing grade or better, in large part because
mismatch of talentavailability in STEM fields 1. Innovation capacity is a national concern for U.S.competitiveness2. Innovative thinking should be an expectation of the university community andall students should be exposed to it early in their university experience, through a variety ofeducational formats and delivery methods 3. Previous investments in STEM education have notresulted in desired level of innovativeness 4. Prompted by such concerns, the American Societyfor Engineering Education (ASEE) partnered with the federally funded National ScienceFoundation (NSF) to evaluate the effectiveness of lean startup approach in enacting educationaltransformation. With a goal to improve innovativeness in STEM education, ASEE launchedInnovation Corps
) present a true integration of science, engineering and technology [1]. This is anew approach to teaching science that will require new curriculum materials, professionaldevelopment and other supports for teachers, and new assessments [2]. Assessments aligned tothe NGSS are expected to require students to draw upon an understanding of core ideas inscience and cross-cutting concepts while engaging in engineering and science practices. Currentassessments were not designed to accomplish these goals and cannot easily be modified to meetthis expectation [3]. These new assessment requirements present challenges on many levelsincluding the development of complex tasks that integrate the three dimensions and that are bothequitable for a wide range of
interventionsin authentic settings [1-3]. The four key principles of DBIR are that: 1. The focus of the work is on persistent problems of practice from multiple stake-holders’ perspectives; 2. There is a commitment to iterative, collaborative design that is informed by implementation evidence; 3. There is a focus on developing theory and knowledge related to both classroom learning and implementation through systematic inquiry; and 4. There is a concern with developing capacity for sustaining change in systems.Overall, DBIR projects seek to advance and refine educational theories and toexplore the contextual constraints, moderating factors, and mediating variables thatconstrain or shape how the intervention is implemented
synthesize all the high-qualityresearch evidence in order to answer a specific research question [1].” They differ fromtraditional reviews, where authors aim to summarize the literature of a particular topic withoutnecessarily sharing the details of their processes or assessing the quality of the studies, in thatthey are a research method in themselves, designed to test hypotheses and answer researchquestions [2].Librarians regularly participate in SLRs, whether as consultants, searchers, or co-authors [3], [4].A recent emphasis on SLRs in engineering education led to the ASEE Engineering LibrariesDivision (ELD) co-sponsorship of a workshop on the topic at the 2017 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition in Columbus, OH [5].The authors, four STEM