and Design from Arizona State University (ASU), an M.S. in User Experience from ASU, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025A Scoping Literature Review on Disabled Student Experiences in EngineeringUndergraduate Programs (WIP)Abstract This work-in-progress details the methods from a scoping literature review (ScLR)conducted to elucidate the current landscape, trends, and potential gaps in the literaturesurrounding the experiences of disabled students in engineering undergraduate programs. Thestudy was grounded in four central inclusion criteria: (1) disabled student, (2) engineeringeducation, (3) lived experience
of the civil engineering degree program at an undergraduate-focused engineering school.The material presented draws on the EOP framework and is designed for courses at the first-year,sophomore, and junior level. Student feedback to assess learning outcomes and student interest ispresented. In addition, the authors discuss an ongoing effort to coordinate the development ofclimate change-related curriculum and undergraduate research opportunities across multipledegree programs within the school of engineering at the authors’ institution.1. BackgroundMeaningfully addressing the climate crisis will require the transformation of civil infrastructure,including the development of utility-scale wind and solar farms to supply clean energy and
integratescritical consciousness and Freire’s [1] dialogic principles into the teaching of the engineeringdesign process. This approach addresses two significant gaps in engineering education: (1) theshortage of mid-level design courses, and (2) the need for a contextualized engineeringcurriculum.Since spring 2023, both institutions have offered this course at least twice, attracting studentsfrom their respective engineering colleges. The course has been offered and open to all studentsthat meet the course pre-requisites, which is a standard practice in engineering. While theinstitutions serve slightly different student populations and implement the course with somevariations, the outcomes have been consistent. These include increased student understanding
recovery monitoring and prediction in patients implanted with a ventricular assist device before moving into the current role. His research interests are in developing new teaching methods, understanding the inter-personal dynamics among engineering students, gasme theory, and control engineering.Prof. Jonathan T. Butcher, Cornell University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Work in Progress - Understanding the Biomedical Engineering Student: Using Maslow’s Hierarchy of NeedsModern engineering classes have struggled to engage students since the pandemic began[1-5].Changes in teaching methods during this time have burdened students. Online classes, a lack
engineers’ empathic and ethical formation.Dr. Robert P. Loweth, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte Robert P. Loweth (he/him) is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Office of Student Development and Success at The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. His research explores how engineering students and practitioners approach early-stage engineering design activities such as problem definition, idea generation, and impact assessment. He also examines how engineering educational systems, ranging from classroom-level pedagogical practices to societal-level cultural norms, impact engineering students’ academic success and professional development. The goals of his research are 1) to develop tools and
students having an increased risk of attrition when compared to undecidedstudents[1]. A major decision is often a multifaceted and intricate process that is heavilyinfluenced by different behavioral, sociological, and economic factors such as personal interests,familial background, and financial considerations [1,2]. Despite these findings, a gap remains toexplore the reasons behind undergraduate engineering students’ choice of a particularengineering major.To address this topic, this NSF IUSE Level 1 funded project aims to better understand thedecision-making process of engineering students when selecting their academic major across twolarge public land-grant universities. The study utilizes an intervention of an online majorexploration tool
implementation. As a leader, he is interested in how we develop systems and supports for science educators to continuously improve and innovate as equity designers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A NSF ITEST Program: Integrating Music and Flow-Based Programming Builds Teachers’ Confidence in Computer Science1 IntroductionIn recent years, computer science (CS) education has become a critical component of K-12curricula, aimed at equipping students with essential 21st-century skills such as problem-solving,critical thinking, and creativity [1]. As this field evolves, educators are increasingly exploringapproaches to make CS education more engaging and relevant by incorporating the arts [2
science in high school. Teacher outcomes (N=68) include improved QISTknowledge and pedagogical self-efficacy. This project is a replicable model of university-basedQIST outreach to inspire the next generation quantum workforce in industry, research, andacademia.Introduction and BackgroundRecent reports have called for increased teaching, learning, and awareness of quantuminformation science and technology (QIST) principles and skills in precollege educationalsettings. Federal initiatives including the National Strategic Overview for Quantum InformationScience have emphasized the need to develop the future quantum workforce through K-12partnerships between academia and government agencies [1]. The Quantum Information Scienceand Technology
presents preliminary results from our NSF-funded grant exploring affect inundergraduate engineering students and its interactions with engineering identity formation.Affect consists of both the individual emotions that a student experiences during disciplinarywork (local affect), as well as the more stable and long-lasting emotions, attitudes, values, andbeliefs the student holds about a subject (global affect) [1]. In their work, DeBellis and Goldinsuggested that affect is not simply a physiological side effect of cognition, but that it plays a rolein students’ problem-solving, carrying meaning and encoding information [1]. In engineeringwork, this might look like a student feeling frustrated after the failure of a particularproblem-solving
[7]. This issue arises from the early stages of primaryand secondary education, being influenced by gender stereotypes and sociocultural factors thataffect students’ academic decisions [1].Previous studies have shown that educational experiences during secondary school are keydeterminants in students’ academic decisions of a university degree [1], where behavioralvariables such as self-efficacy, interests, outcome expectations, and goals play a fundamentalrole in their decision [4]. Furthermore, research suggests that students’ math achievement in theirfinal years of high school, the exposure to math and science courses, and math self-efficacy, allplay a crucial part in determining their intent to pursue a STEM major [8]. External factors
increased due to the introduction of copperpowder. The copper interlayer also resulted in better corrosion resistance at various temperatures.Keywords: Resistance Spot Welding, Copper Interlayer, Tensile Strength, Mechanical PropertiesIntroduction Resistance Spot Welding (RSW) is a process used to join metal plates by applying heatand pressure at localized points. As shown in Figure 1, two copper alloy electrodes press againstthe metal plates with controlled force to ensure proper electrical contact while preventingexcessive deformation. A high electrical current (denoted by “A” in Figure 1) flows through theelectrodes and the plates, generating localized heat at the interface due to the electrical resistanceof the materials [1],[2]. This
Design ChallengeAbstractThis evidence-based practice paper details a hands-on design challenge for first-year engineeringstudents aimed at fostering creativity, problem-solving, and iterative design thinking. Studentswere tasked with designing and 3D printing miniature boats capable of supporting maximumweight before sinking.Motivation: The project integrates theoretical concepts of buoyancy with a practical application,allowing students to experience engineering constraints and iterative design.Objectives: 1. Enhance understanding of buoyancy principles through hands-on learning. 2. Develop skills in computer-aided design (CAD) and additive manufacturing. 3. Cultivate iterative problem-solving and adaptability through multiple design
hardware engineers [1]. This engineer shortage isattributed to several issues including declining interest among undergraduate students forpursuing careers in hardware engineering or the educational gaps condition where structuralopportunities for students to develop practical skills in hardware engineering are limited.Trevelyan [2] highlighted that there has been a severe lack of curricula in higher education toimprove employability and prepare engineers for sustainable development goals.To address this social and educational problem, this study focuses on a particular curriculuminnovation for first-year engineering students’ career choice. According to Trafford et al. [3],first year students’ course experience is closely associated with the
, 2025 WIP: What Does It Look Like: How Early College Students Describe What Engineers DoIntroductionThis is a Work-in-Progress study that was initiated to explore the impressions that early collegestudents have about what engineers do through the examination of student-generated shortnarratives. We also wanted to learn more about how engineering curricula have influenced theirimpressions, such as why many of them seem to have an abstract understanding of whatengineers actually do when they describe engineering work as “problem solving.” To complicatematters further, it has been argued that problem solving in an engineering course is a lot differentfrom problem solving in the engineering workplace [1
brains.One obstacle in moving to better study practices is that students may believe they are learningbased on the sheer magnitude of their efforts and the homework points in their teacher’s gradebook. The goal of this work in progress is to incentivize more frequent touches with the coursecontent and to raise the students' awareness of what they are learning. Short, frequent digitalquizzes is the solution explored in this work.Students in a statics section submit a mix of digital or written homework each day that the classmeets. On the days that digital homework is due, the class class period begins with a five-minutedigital Progress Check Quiz (PCQ). PCQs consist of 1-2 simple conceptual questions orcalculations related to their assignment. The
instrument using Rasch/Guttman Scenarios Kelsey Scalaro, Allison Godwin, Justin Hess, Nicholas Fila, Corey SchimpfIntroductionThis work-in-progress method paper presents initial efforts toward developing a scenario-basedinstrument to measure empathy in engineering design. Empathy is a multifaceted phenomenonthat involves seeking to understand another’s thoughts and relating to another’s emotions [1],[2], [3] and has been conceptualized as a learnable skill that can be developed and embedded indesign pedagogy [4], [5]. Empathy is increasingly recognized as an important part of engineeringeducation, particularly in design, as it can enable one to effectively meet user needs and canprovide the “spark of human concern” for users [6], [7], [8
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Exploring Qualifying Exam Experiences in Engineering Doctoral Students using Well-Being ConstructsIntroductionThis work-in-progress research paper outlines the pilot testing of interview protocols aimed atexamining the qualifying exam (QE) experiences of engineering doctoral students (EDS) usingthe PERMA-V framework for well-being. The QE is a crucial milestone towards earning adoctoral degree and serves as the entry point to both candidacy status and increasing researchindependence [1], [2]. Despite their importance, QEs are an understudied element in doctoralprograms especially for underrepresented populations [3]. However, the gatekeeping nature ofQEs [4], [5] carries
connection, students gained valuable networkingopportunities and access to industry professionals, enabling discussions on career pathways, jobexpectations, and strategies for success in the field.Piloted in Fall 2024, the program was open to all undergraduate students. It followed a mentorcircle format, with groups of two to four students paired with two industry mentors. Thesegroups met monthly for 1 to 1.5 hours, either in person or remotely, based on the preferences ofeach circle. Mentor circle assignments were made based on availability, facilitated by BENGfaculty and representatives from the Arkansas Academy of Biological and AgriculturalEngineering.Participant demographics, program engagement, mentor-mentee relationship quality, andprogram
Formation in Engineering EducationMotivationsEngineering education has a critical task of preparing future professionals with technicalknowledge and skills in multiple domains that are necessary to solve society’s complex, ill-defined problems [1]. In response to these needs, interdisciplinary engineering education hasbeen expanding both at the undergraduate [2], [3] and (more recently) at the graduate level [4],[5]. However, faculty and higher education leaders are often charged with creatinginterdisciplinary structures for their work and their students’ work on an ad hoc basis. This taskis made more difficult by having an incomplete understanding of how interdisciplinary identitiesare developed and sustained. As we consider how to transform
i iii (b) (a) (b) Figure 1. SolidWorks rendering of the Figure 2. SolidWorks rendering of the handheld tool (a), and exposed internal internal structure with dowel pin (a) features of manufactured parts (b). and manufactured internal structure (b). Table 1. Outline of components and design updates for the handheld tool. Component Label Qty Design Updates Handle housing i 4 Updated to match the redesigned internal structure
project solution.IntroductionA recent pilot study by Jensen [1] indicated the effectiveness of a collaborative educationalstrategy introducing first year students to systems thinking, social responsibility andsustainability in civil and architectural engineering projects. The first-year term project wasmotivated by program faculty concern that upper level students lacked confidence during theideation phase of their projects. This was noted when students acted as development teams oncomprehensive, collaborative projects such as the culminating major design experience. Inparticular, the steps involving gathering community-based information and prioritizing goals waschallenging for the students. This paper expands on the pilot study in assessing the
analyzed the data using Spearman'scorrelation and XGBoost's feature importance values. Correlational analysis showed that threeaspects of FossilSketch's activities showed a significant relationship with students' sentimentstoward learning more about micropaleontology: 1) Morphotype Matching Mini-Game AttemptCount (p=0.001), 2) Ostracod Orientation Mini-Game Average Score (p=0.041), and 3) OstracodOutline Mini-Game Average Score (p=0.035). The Total Average Score per Attempt of anActivity had the highest value in XGBoost's list of feature importance values while negativelycorrelated with students' sentiments. Our analysis showed that students participating in activitiesmore frequently had more positive sentiments towards learning more about
increasing autonomy in projects ifincluded in the third year. The methods utilized in this project need adjustment to better fit studentexpectations and engage a broader subset of students. Future research could build on this work to explorethe long-term effects on student outcomes and the broader impact on participation in the I&E ecosystem.1. IntroductionThe integration of entrepreneurial thinking into engineering education has long been employed as a meansof fostering innovation, enhancing career readiness, and equipping students with the interdisciplinaryskills needed to address complex industrial challenges (Yu et al., 2024). The Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) echoes the need for such skills by including teamwork
positionsus to pursue additional funding for long-term program sustainability. Our overarching goal is tocreate a strong talent pipeline of skilled professionals ready to meet the dynamic demands of theoffshore wind industry. This integrated approach not only increases student awareness andinterest but also improves the overall quality of education and training, supporting sustainablegrowth and expertise in renewable energy.IntroductionThe Offshore Wind Training Institute (OWTI) [1] awarded a grant to the Principal Investigators(PIs) at Farmingdale State College to address the emerging workforce needs in the offshore windindustry. This initiative builds upon prior foundational efforts to establish wind energy educationand training programs on campus
: Naval Engineer degree - Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), MS in Mechanical Engineering - MIT, and MS in Ocean Systems Management - MIT. Energy Engineering and Mechanical Engineering Technology BS from Rochester Institute of Technology. Career: 1. Commander, United States Navy, Submarine and Engineering Duty Officer (Retired 2008). 2. Manufacturing Operations Manager and Continuous Improvement (Through 2017) Engineer. 3. Mechanical Engineering Technology Professor (2018 to Present). Licenses: Six-Sigma Blackbelt License from the American Society for Quality, PE in Mechanical Engineering, Department of Energy (DOE) Certified Nuclear Engineer. North American Board of Certified Energy Professionals (NABCEP
practices assessment. Comparing the types of teachingpractice assessments, we identified that self-reporting teaching inventories offer a low-resource(personnel and time) alternative to assess teaching practices through the lens of the instructor.Ultimately, this study leveraged existing research on STEM teaching practice assessment tools todevelop one that furthers the integration of EM in engineering education.Introduction In today’s world, the continuous advancement of society’s needs and technology has ledto calls for engineers to possess more than just technical engineering skills. They must haveskills that better prepare them for serving society, such as cultural competency [1] andcommunication skills [2] along with an understanding
profession. Previous research has explored the use of artifact elicitation as a qualitative researchmethod in engineering education, building on the principles of photo elicitation, where visualprompts are used to evoke more profound, reflective responses [1]. This method allows for morecomprehensive insights than traditional semi-structured interviews, connecting participants'creations to their personal experiences. Artifact elicitation, similar to informational interviews,enables students to connect their theoretical knowledge to real-world contexts. This approachcould provide a framework for understanding how student interactions, such as informationalinterviews, might elicit more profound reflections and personal insights. Biases
, hardware security, and energy-efficient computing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 RET: Acquisition and Retainment of Semiconductor Knowledge among K-12 STEM TeachersIntroductionThe semiconductor industry has played a vital role in driving economic growth and technologicaladvancement. As an essential component of electronic devices, semiconductors power a widerange of applications, including computers, cellphones, communication systems, healthcare,transportation, and countless other sectors [1], [2]. Developing a skilled semiconductor workforceis essential, and K-14 educators are pivotal in motivating and preparing students for careers inmicroelectronics [3]. However
, administers a Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) site focused onComputational Sciences and Engineering. This program provides research opportunities to eightundergraduate students annually, spanning a three-year period. The positive impact of suchundergraduate research on student development and academic growth has been pointed out byseveral studies[1]-[3].The Houston-Galveston-Gulf Coast region, a hub for major industries such as petrochemicals,healthcare, and aerospace, offers a unique context for students to engage in research thataddresses significant societal challenges, while exploring cutting-edge methodologies incomputational sciences and engineering.The REU program consists of an intensive 8-week summer research experience, during
are now accessible to those withoutadvanced programming and data science skills. While these new technologies expand the pool ofdata science users, they also create new risks related to a lack of understanding of thefundamentals of these systems. A direct analogue for the current dilemma can be found in theearly implementations of finite element analysis (FEA). Misuse and misunderstanding of FEAmethods led to engineering failures across a variety of domains. For example, misunderstandingof FEA modeling concepts likely played a central role in the collapse of the Hartford CivicCenter and the sinking of the Sleipner A offshore platform [1], [2].Data science education for civil engineering students poses several unique challenges. The first