, creativity and interest in thepursuit of engineering careers. The two academies used mini-lectures and team-oriented hands-on projects to engage 43 student participants in different engineering disciplines and their designprocesses. College staff placed student participants in either the Batmen Academy or WonderWomen Academy based on their gender. Researchers gave each student participant a LikertScale survey to test their expectations and experience. The surveys provided insight intostudents’ knowledge of various engineering disciplines, their interests to pursue engineeringcareers, their interests to take more math and science high school courses post completion of theacademies, and their perception of the college environment. Further research
Florida I am a second-year graduate student at the University of South Florida (USF) pursuing my Masters of Education in Curriculum and Instruction within the College Student Affairs program. As the Graduate Assistant for the Office of Internships and Career Readiness at USF, I hired, trained, and supervised the Career Readiness Badging Peers who are our Federal Work Study students within the office. I trained the students to grade, through the use of success rubrics and the ARISE model which was adapted from the RISE model created by Emily Wray from Full Sail University in conjunction with the COACH feedback method, student submissions within the Career Readiness Badging Program (CRBP). The CRBP is a platform on
has co-authored over 100 referred conferences and jour- nals, five book chapters and two patents. She received the National Science Foundation’s Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and En- gineers and the 3M Untenured Faculty Award. She is active in the IEEE MTT-S (e.g. associate editor of MWCL, chaired IMS TPRC sub-committees, student paper competitions and scholarship committee) and is a co-founder of IMS Project Connect and Chair of MTT-S Technical Coordinating Committee for Integration and Packaging. She is the 2014 Sara Evans Faculty Scholar Leader Award, 2017 John Tate Advising Award, and 2018 Willie Hobbs Moore Distinguished Alumni Lecture Award and the 2019 IEEE N. Walter Cox Service Award
serves as a reviewer for several international conferences and peer-reviewed journals.Mahesh Kumar Pallikonda, Austin Peay State University Dr. Mahesh Kumar Pallikonda is a faculty member in the Department of Engineering technology at Austin Peay State University (APSU). Prior to his academic career, he gained valuable industry experience in roles ranging from New Product Development to Process Control. He holds a Ph.D. and a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Cleveland State University, as well as a Bachelor’s degree in Manufacturing Engineering from the National Institute of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Prior to joining APSU, he served as a faculty member at Ohio Northern University, where he
three semesters, starting from the initialoffering of the courses in Fall 2022, indicate that students’ perception of the course is largelypositive. Students in both courses found the courses very valuable in multiple ways. In the paper,detailed survey results will be presented and discussed. Areas for future work will also be shared.Introduction and MotivationAt Arizona State University (ASU), the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) is a multi-year co-curricular program that typically spans the entirety of a student’s undergraduatecollegiate career. The majority of GCSP students start their journey in the program as incomingfirst year students or during their first year and continue in the program until they graduate fromtheir
Shuayto, DBA, MBA, BSBA, is an academician and business leader with a rich tapestry of experiences spanning education, entrepreneurship, and international collaboration. With a Doctorate of Business Administration in Marketing from Nova Southeastern University and a Master of Business Administration from Lawrence Technological University, Dr. Shuayto has cultivated a profound understanding of business dynamics and marketing strategies over the course of her career. Currently serving as an Assistant Professor of Marketing at Ohio Northern University’s James F. Dicke College of Business Administration, Dr. Shuayto imparts her extensive knowledge to students through courses such as Principles of Marketing, Marketing
, What’s Next?” Thishigh impact practice (HIP) is used to help students process their experiences, gain perspective onthem, and use them as a basis for future action. The benefits to students as a whole are growth intheir ability to craft reflections and in their feelings of inclusion (as measured by the LongitudinalAssessment in Engineering Self-Efficacy (LAESE) survey instrument). Students find the programhelpful in envisioning their future development, citing conversations with faculty and peers asessential in helping them consider their career options. Students in the “hands-on” fields ofengineering technology see the benefits to reflective practices. Introducing regular reflection intotheir curricula can help their personal and professional
Engineering at Al Balqa Applied University in Jordan and Construction Science and Management at The University of Texas at San Antonio. Throughout her academic career, she has been involved in research and teaching. She is working as a Graduate Research Assistant and Graduate Teacher Assistant at UTSA.Dr. Tulio Sulbaran, The University of Texas at San Antonio He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineer from Georgia Institute of Technology with concentration in Construction Management with a minor in Computer Engineering and strong statistical background. He has over 8 years of work experience in the A/E/C (Archite ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Transforming Science, Technology
reorganization, transitioninginto a “threaded” model requiring students to select two concentrations to guide course selectionand encourage focus within specific technical interest areas. Electrical and computer engineeringare broad disciplines, providing students with opportunities for interdisciplinary collaborationand a variety of careers pathways. However, the School of Electrical and ComputerEngineering’s (ECE) undergraduate curriculum mirrored this expansiveness of real-worldopportunities, presenting a challenge as students navigated the program towards the ultimate goalof a fulfilling engineering career. Responding to student, alumni, and industry feedback, theSchool decided to harness the program’s breadth and flexibility to empower its students
recruitment, retention, and progression is presentedalong with their positive or negative impact. Finally, the model was revised once more toincorporate the results of an ADVANCE program carried out at a minority-serving institution.I. IntroductionWhile females around the world continue to advance to leadership roles, they still facediscrimination and are treated unfairly in many different settings; particularly, the ones inScience, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) education. Females in STEM are mostlyunderrepresented and constantly face recruitment and retention issues. This phenomenon isaddressed as the “leak in the pipeline” [1] – fewer females over time advance to careers inacademia. Females in academia and many other engineering work
design different mentoring activities for the freshman vs. sophomore course? 2. Is there any difference in students' perceptions towards mentoring between the freshman and sophomore courses?We conducted literature and pre-course surveys to answer our first research question. Based onour survey outputs, we designed course-specific mentoring objectives. For the Freshman course,our main objectives were assisting students to i) explore computing career opportunities, ii) builda sense of belongingness, self-efficacy, and computing identity, and iii) transition to computing.On the other hand, for our sophomore course, our main objectives were assisting students to i)strengthen belongingness, self-efficacy, and computing identity, ii
Professional Development Course Series for all engineering graduate students. Assanah’s research focuses on synthesizing hydrogels to mimic the mechanical behavior of the brain matter and investigate the cellular response to injury. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Cultivating Scientific Communication Skills through Professional Development Course Series for the Graduate CurriculumBritney Russell, University of ConnecticutBritney Russell is a doctoral student in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the Universityof Connecticut. She was a teaching assistant for the First Year Experience, ScientificCommunication, and Engineering Internships and Careers in Industry courses that
University (FIU), College of Engineering and Computing and teaches at the Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustain- ability. Dr. ElZomor completed his doctorate at Arizona ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Investigating the Need for Forensic Engineering Graduate Program to Meet the Growing Workforce Demand AbstractForensic engineering is a growing career choice in the civil engineering discipline for theevaluation of structural failures and poor structural performance of houses damaged in a naturaldisaster, deteriorating infrastructure, and maintenance of the built
Delaware Shawna Vican is an Assistant Professor of Sociology and Criminal Justice at the University of Delaware. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology from Harvard University. An organizational sociologist, Dr. Vican in- vestigates the adoption and implementation of new employment practices and corporate social behaviors. Across her research, Dr. Vican explores how organizational policies and practices, managerial behavior, and workplace culture shape individual career outcomes as well as broader patterns of labor market in- equality. Her current research includes a qualitative study of corporate diversity management strategies and a series of mixed-methods projects on diversity in the academic workforce.Dr. Robin
challenges in being an engineering student shapingtheir identities. Fleming and colleagues’ results are consistent with those reported by Prybutok etal. who surveyed 563 engineering students to study the development of engineering identity asstudents progressed from lower-division to upper-division students [7]. Lower- division studentsscored higher on three aspects of engineering identity: math interest, engineering personalagency related to authority, and engineering global identity. They expressed a life-long interestin science and/or excitement in beginning their college engineering careers. Upper-divisionstudents scored higher on the physics recognition by others aspect of engineering identity incomparison to lower-division students. They felt
AbstractThis paper explores what elements and concepts should be included in a pre-college, widelyavailable digital course designed to better guide, inform, and prepare high school studentsinterested in pursuing a career in engineering. The purpose of the course is to provide a digitaltool for exploration by high school students and their advising network as they seek to gain abetter understanding of what an engineering education and career entails. As the investigationhas progressed, the potential benefit of developing separate courses for “guide and inform” and“prepare” is appearing. This paper will focus on the development of the comprehensive coursewith the understanding that there is potential for a separation by themes tuned to
Paper ID #18645STEM grown Master’sLisa Naderman, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Lisa Naderman graduated from the University of Wisconsin-Platteville in 2014 with a Masters of Science in Project Management through distance learning. She began her career at UW-Platteville working in Prospective Student Services as a recruiter, while taking on the roles of assistant women’s basketball coach and associate lecturer for the Health and Human Performance Department. Naderman is currently working in the Distance Learning center as an advisor for the undergraduate programs and student services coordinator. Naderman’s
the high schoolstudents attending the institutes. Discussion on the selection process and the group dynamicsduring the workshops will be discussed as well. Given current trends in enrollments at ourinstitutions and the fact that most of the budget for these activities is coming from state agencies,the eventual effect of these activities as recruitment activities will be discussed as well.IntroductionThe United States of America is a country that thrives on technological advancement. We havean insatiable appetite for the latest technology and do not mind spending billions of dollars eachyear to satisfy our yearnings. Unfortunately, we are not as passionate about encouraging ouryouth to pursue careers in engineering and technology. The gap
-Riddle Aeronautical University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Lessons Learned: Student Perceptions of Successes and Struggles in One-year Master’s Programs in EngineeringIntroduction:In recent years, more condensed graduate programs (such as one-year Master’s programs) haveemerged to better enable students to expand their understanding beyond the undergraduate levelto aid in potential career advancement. However, limited research has been conducted tounderstand how the student experience in these programs compares to more traditional graduateprograms and the motivators that influence students to enroll in these new programs.One of the few studies exploring one-year Master’s
of Technology (RIT) are raising the bar for universities nationwide. One move, which isthe focus of this article, is RIT’s Annual “Future Faculty Career Exploration Program.” Thisunique program furthers RIT’s diversity efforts by bringing students nearing the end of theirdoctoral studies and postdoctoral assignments to Rochester to receive the “RIT treatment.” Sincethe program’s inception in October of 2003, more than 150 scholars have been invited to attendthe annual program. The program has become so widely acclaimed that 185 and 235 applicationswere received in the past two years, respectively, to fill 27-30 allocated slots. This level ofresponse clearly demonstrates the interest of young scholars and their desire to visit the academyfor
also to retain women andgirls in these disciplines. Young women entering colleges and universities in the areas ofscience, engineering, and technology are disadvantaged by their lack of computer experienceand, we hypothesize, other technology experience as well.4 They appear to have career goals thatare not as well defined as those of their male counterparts, and often lack confidence in theirabilities.5,6 They may also encounter college and university classes that are unfriendly to them,impeding their learning. The absence of women faculty and mentors both within the classroomand outside of it, few women peers in their classes, and the lack of supportive networks cancreate a “chilly climate” for women in non-traditional fields. It is during
through Social Cognitive Career Theory(SCCT) which argues career aspirations, and the steps taken to attain them (e.g., earninggraduate degrees), are primarily due to the dynamic interaction of personal factors (i.e., personal Page 24.228.2self-efficacy, outcome beliefs, and personal goals) and the person’s environment7. Student socialintegration and involvement in on-campus organizations have a significant impact on collegestudent aspirations and persistence. Studies indicate minority STEM majors who successfullygraduate are twice as likely to have had high levels of social integration at their institution1.Similarly, minority students attending
Session 2347 Partners in Recruitment and Retention Leah M. Akins, Ph.D. Dutchess Community CollegeAbstractIn the past, recruitment was often left to admissions offices and attrition was an accepted aspectof technical curricula. However, due to the dwindling or perhaps stable but low enrollment intechnical fields nationwide, new attitudes towards these issues are necessary. In the Mid-HudsonValley of New York State, the Technology Career Paths – Hudson Valley partnership wascreated for the recruitment and retention of students in the community college
(Guice, 2001). Add to thesepressures the "usual" pressures of acquiring research and funding, publishing scientific articles,service, and acquiring tenure. A graduate student finishing work on an engineering doctorate maynot find that academia is a very attractive career choice. In 1997, 12% of the science andengineering doctorates were awarded to women. Blacks earned 3% and Hispanics earned almost4% of all science and engineering doctorates. Accordingly, the pool of potential female andminority engineering educators is very small. Should it be important to the profession that thesefemale and minority doctoral students be retained in academia as engineering educators? Why?How?This paper will first explore one reason why it is important to have a
AC 2011-1478: EXPLORING THE MOTIVATIONS FOR MIGRATION AMONGENGINEERING STUDENTSIda B Ngambeki, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ida Ngambeki is pursuing a doctorate in Engineering Education with a concentration in Ecological Sci- ences and Engineering at Purdue University. She has a B.S. in Engineering from Smith College. Her research interests include motivation, interest, career choice, engineering thinking, engineering and pub- lic policy and sustainability.Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Demetra Evangelou is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She has a PhD in Early Childhood Education from the University of
STEM Education (EDU) todevelop a model promoting the equitable advancement of early career tenure-stream engineering facultyfrom historically underrepresented groups, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, American Indians,Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Native Pacific Islanders (AGEP) faculty. The goal of this FacultyCareer Pathways Alliance Model (FCPAM) project is to develop, implement, self-study, andinstitutionalize a career pathway model that can be adapted for use at similar institutions, for advancingearly career engineering faculty from these groups. The Alliance interventions for this project focus onthree major pillars of activity: 1) equity-focused institutional change designed to make structural changesthat support the
to these programs is needed to create and foster existing interest thatcould lead to STEM careers. Additionally, it has been shown that student’s interest in STEMbegins decreasing in middle school, thus hindering the pathway to a STEM career. Through thisprogram, we aim to increase access to STEM fields by exposing elementary and middle schoolstudents from low-income and underrepresented (UR) communities to STEM career pathwaysthrough hands-on activities and continued mentorship. The activities will be offered incollaboration with community partners (e.g., YMCA, Big Brothers Big Sisters) to facilitatestudents’ engagement in STEM beyond the classroom. By offering this program, we aim to (1)inspire continued interest in STEM and (2) strengthen
career in higher education has included roles in financial aid, admissions, and academic advising. She currently advises Mechanical Engineering students in their first three years, and provides leadership for the administration of UNIV E101 across the college. She also coordinates the Engineering Leader- ship Scholars program, which is a peer mentorship and leadership development program for College of Engineering students.Ms. Dionne Gordon-Starks, College of Engineering, Drexel University Dionne is a Senior Academic Advisor with the College of Engineering at Drexel University. A proven leader with a passion for providing quality academic and career advising for both traditional and non- traditional learners, she
Education, 2018 The Effect of Engineering Summer Camps on Middle School Students Interest and IdentityIntroductionA persistent problem in engineering is an insufficient number of students interested in pursuingengineering as a college major and career. Under enrollment in engineering is highest forunderrepresented groups [1]. Student interest in engineering at the K-12 level has been shown topredict whether students of all backgrounds pursue engineering as a college major and career [2,3]. Middle school is a critical time where student interest, identity, and career choices begin tosolidify [4, 5]. Social cognitive scientists [6, p. 79] have developed a framework based on socialcognitive theory [7] for understanding
Photo Processes Sumanta AcharyaNew Emphases In CBET Advanced Manufacturing: Bio Manufacturing, Processing & Devices (Burka, Chang, Hamilton, Olbricht, Sambanis) Metabolic Engineering & Synthetic Biology for advanced manufacturing (Srienc) Brain and Neural Engineering (Esterowitz, Sambanis) Water-Food-Energy Nexus (Cooper, Hamilton) Strengthening CAREER program (all PDs) 6Faculty Early Career Development(CAREER) Program Supports junior faculty who exemplify the role of teacher-scholars through outstanding research excellent education integration of education and research ~$220M NSF investment