). Page 25.682.2This is still the basic format we use today; however, over time, we noticed some faculty neededmore than this basic information to successfully navigate the proposal development process.Faculty are experts in their technical disciplines, but not necessarily experts in grant writing, sodetails of proposal parts and how to write them effectively were added to the workshop agenda,including proposal templates and more sample proposals. We also added a guest speakerfocusing on an aspect of Broader Impacts2, to alert the faculty to opportunities available whendeveloping the Education Plans of their CAREER proposals3. Unfortunately the broader impactscriterion required of all NSF proposals presents a significant stumbling block to many
event and the responses were analyzed and compared against acontrol group consisting of 66 students. The theory of planned behavior was used to predictstudents‟ plans for future STEM education. The results of this study suggest that the roboticsprogram based on the guided discovery approach is successful. The success of this program ledto a follow-up study to measure students‟ perceived math and engineering ability, difficulty,STEM attitudes, and intentions to obtain good math grades. The second study indicated thatmany of the positive outcomes of this program persisted six months later.BackgroundScience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education in the United Statescontinues to garner national concern.1 A National Academies
efforts on over 145 research projects that have addressed and responded to local, statewide, regional and national issues in transportation and information systems management related to policy analysis, management, planning, infrastructure development, safety, and operations.Ida van Schalkwyk , Oregon State University IDA VAN SCHALKWYK is a Senior Assistant Research Professor in the School of Civil and Construction Engineering at Oregon State University, where she teaches courses related to transportation engineering and conducts research in the area of transportation safety. Dr. van Schalkwyk received her Ph.D. from Arizona State University and her M.Eng. in Transportation
entrepreneurship,information technology management, intellectual property protection, organizationaldevelopment, negotiation and conflict management, internet law, and internet marketing.Experiential learning opportunities include internships for credit, a business plan competition, astudent-managed investment portfolio, a student business society, a Wall Street trip (includingresume critiques and mock interviews), and an intersession course with alumni entrepreneurspeakers. Currently in its sixth year, the program has had many successes and encounteredsubstantial obstacles and setbacks. This article describes the difficulties of starting anentrepreneurship program in a mathematics department at a university which does not have abusiness school, and
working on a student-run newspaper. The course integrates thetraditional capstone design experience with hands-on experience in volume production andmanufacturing; students must consider all aspects of manufacturing – including processplanning, tooling, assembly, outsourcing, and final costs – so that they can produceapproximately 100 units using the new Factory for Advanced Manufacturing Education. Thecourse also focuses on creating an environment that promotes self-directed learning, problemsolving, teamwork, project planning, communication, and presentation skills. Assessmentstrategies for evaluating team performance and the impact on students’ learning readiness arediscussed. In particular, design notebooks and frequent design reviews are
endeavor, but finding efficient ways for K-12 teachersto effectively convey these concepts and for students to retain their knowledge has been achallenge. To meet this need, Northeastern University’s NSF-funded CAPSULEprogram was developed as a professional development program that guides STEMteachers to learn how to use and implement engineering-based learning (EBL) in highschool classes. Content included are the engineering design process, CAD modeling,capstone projects, and action plans for the academic year. Two JQUS teachers (math andtechnology) attended the summer 2010 CAPSULE program and implemented actionplans during the 2010-2011 school year.This paper covers the details of the JQUS math and technology CAPSULE curriculumand implementation
ProgramEntrepreneur Scholars (E-Scholars) is a select group of undergraduate students who create newbusiness ventures or develop and implement strategies to improve existing enterprises. Studentsin the E-Scholars program develop their entrepreneurial mindset. They learn how to come upwith innovative ideas and develop realistic business plans around them. Through requireddomestic and international travel they also learn how to do business anywhere in the world.E-Scholars commit to an academic curricular program, taking three three-credit entrepreneurshipcourses during their junior year. Students apply during the fall semester of their sophomore yearthrough a process that requires references, interviews and an essay describing the mutual benefitof their
-Alone Community Microgrid in the United States.” After she graduates from her Electrical Engineering program at NJIT, she plans to pursue a Ph.D. in the field of Renewable energy solutions as an extension of her research during the Ronald E. McNair research program. She hopes to apply her research in providing clean and accessible energy solutions in different parts of the world, and advocate for the transition from conventional energy sources to clean and sustainable renewable energy solutions.Ruby W. Burgess, Wheaton College, IL American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022
able to meetthe socio-technical challenges of 21st century society. Together, student veterans and servicemembers (SVSM) are a unique yet understudied student group that comprises substantial numbersof those historically underrepresented in engineering (i.e., due to race, ethnicity, gender, ability,orientation, etc.). That, in combination with technical interests and skills, maturity, life experience,and self-discipline, makes SVSM ideal candidates for helping engineering education meet thesedemands [1,2]. This NSF CAREER project aims to advance full participation of SVSMs withinhigher engineering education and the engineering workforce by 1) Research Plan: developingdeeper understandings about how SVSM participate, persist, and produce
acohort for structured professional development workshops that are relevant to both early andlate-career students. Workshop topics were selected from student focus groups and representativetopics include time management, LinkedIn, resumes, negotiation, career fairs, interviewing, andalumna panels. Each mentor/mentee pair also meets one-on-one three times a semester forunstructured mentoring. LEAP hosts social events where both current and past LEAP studentsare invited to encourage networking and community building across cohorts. We believe thatmentoring is one approach to cost-effective professional development; therefore, we plan toexpand our program to all first-year students in the Honors Engineering Program.
engineering design process (Define)765-496-0196 and are introduced to their engineering project. Lesson 2: Power Grid Energy TransformationMaeve Drummond Oakes (Define- Students learn about power grid and define the criteriaAssistant Director for Learn) and constraints of their project.Education Fossil-Fuel Power Plants and Chemical Energymaeve@purdue.edu Lesson 3: Students perform experiments to learn about physical (Learn -765-491-6428 and chemical changes and use that to propose an EPG Plan -Try
these research areas? 3) Do students plan to complete the undergraduate EBS Major requirements? Do they plan to transfer to another major? What aspects of the EBS major do they find motivating? What aspects of the EBS major are they concerned about?The final survey included 14 items to address the questions (above) along with two items for generaldemographic information (i.e., gender, graduation year). The anonymous survey was delivered on-linestarting in fall 2017, following IRB exemption. Students enrolled in three undergraduate EBS courses,including EBS 1, were invited, but not required, to participate in the survey. Instructors informedstudents about the survey in an end of quarter lecture where they provided a link to
new course entitled “Solar PV Planning and Installation”, (ii) summer workshopsfor K-12 students through Center for Pre-College Programs (CPCP) at NJIT, (iii) facultydevelopment workshops for the instructors of other 2- and 4-year institutions, (iv) undergraduateresearch and senior design projects, and (v) development of a dedicated public website to includeall the lecture notes, laboratory experiments, video recordings, publications, guidelines todevelop similar courses, and other instructional materials. This paper summarizes and presentsthe comments and feedback from external advisory committee (EAC), external evaluator, facultydevelopment workshop participants, K-12 workshop participants, and the students enrolled in thenew course. It
-efficacy as educators, empowering them to contribute moreeffectively to learning environments. We have offered the course in the Spring quarters of 2021,2022, and 2023. In each iteration, we sought to actively demonstrate evidence-based inclusivepedagogical techniques through our course design and instruction. In the future, we plan to 1)evaluate the effectiveness of our course design on participant accomplishment of learning goals,and 2) examine the impact of course participants as TAs on the broader bioengineeringcommunity.Course Design: Enabling effective learning of pedagogical skillsCourse Learning Goals: We designed a course to address a critical need in the training ofgraduate TAs by allowing them to build pedagogical skills before their
build on this research by extending mechanistic reasoningas a lens to understand how non-science major undergraduates in a teacher education programexplain machine learning examples––including sociopolitical impacts of those systems. We alsoexamine how the teacher candidates (TCs) construe preliminary lesson plans for how they mightintegrate machine learning in their teaching with young adolescents.MethodWe conducted a design-based research study [10], [11], [12] within a science education methodscourse at a large land grant university in the northeastern United States. The course is a requiredcourse for TCs who will teach middle level grades (grades 4 – 8). Twenty-three of the 25 TCsenrolled in the course consented to provide their assignments
successful as well, as the components functioneddata collected from the extended timeline, the condi- properly. There are also plans to test both qualities attions under which algae is produced should become once by placing the buoy inside of an ice bath some-clearer and a solution for this problem can be created to Buoy Images
was not correlated to instructional format. While a majority of the students noted thatthey had a project plan change due to COVID-19, most still felt that they were able to completetheir project. There was no significant difference in self-efficacy of those that noted a projectchange and those that did not. The Fall 2020 survey data was then compared to a previous non-COVID-19 semester’s data. There was no statistically significant difference in engineeringdesign self-efficacy or effort put forth on the project between the two groups. Surprisingly, theFall 2020 COVID-19-affected group had a marginal increase in overall senior design projectsatisfaction.IntroductionIn the Spring 2020 semester, significant educational changes were made
year 3Background and Context• STEM Teaching Fellowship: – Teachers apply in school teams of 3-4; typical composition includes both science and mathematics teachers, mostly middle school – Three main strands: STEM Integration, Core Teaching Practices, Schoolwide STEM Strategic Plan 4Background and Context• Approach to STEM Integration Strand – Experience STEM integration as learners – Reflect and unpack as educators – Introduce tools, strategies, and templates to empower teaching fellows to engage their students in STEM Integration• Summer 1: Platform Design• Summer 2: Flint Experience
. • Sponsor 70%; State 15%; OR/college/dept 5%/5%/5%• Other Cost Share: • Most c/s is in-kind e.g. % time of faculty and key staff • Up to 10% cash matched 1:1 College/Dept• We require 2-4 weeks to develop cost share plans • It is rarely formulaic, and often requires 1-1 negotiation. Some offices require 2 weeks lead time
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)FHWA Vision Our agency and our transportation system are the best in the world.FHWA Mission To improve mobility on our Nation's highways through national leadership, innovation, and program delivery. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center FHWA Research, Development and Technology Infrastructure Operations Safety Planning and Environment Policy Exploratory Advanced Research (EAR) Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center Transportation Infrastructure Transportation system is a vital part of the nation’s economic engine Transportation system is aging and deteriorating ~30% of the nation’s bridges are
model; little attention to incorporating entrepreneurial focus explicitly into PhD THAYER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AT DARTMOUTHDartmouth “Engineering PhD Innovation Program” - 2008 Designed to be SMALL, SELECTIVE, FOCUSED Goal: LIMIT to 5 new students per year Separate criteria beyond PhD - extra COURSEWORK, write and present BUSINESS PLAN, conduct late-stage 6 mo. INTERNSHIP REVERSE FELLOWSHIPS - funded yrs 3-5 of PhD PROJECT SEED FUNDING also provided Luce Foundation grant 12/08 THAYER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AT DARTMOUTHPhD Innovation Program – Fall 2013, 5 year status updateComplements ugrad and MEM offerings, enabling representation of full
10Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center• 9/11 Day of Service• Heroism Day• English 101 assignment• Veteran’s Day• Weekly Rotations (ER, Chemotherapy, Prosthetics)• Psychology Interns (Mental Health Ward)• Graduate Student oral Histories Issues in Assessing Impact• Output vs. Impact• What can we EXPECT to accomplish with the amount of intervention we offer?• Qualitative vs. Quantitative• Cost-effectiveness: What is measurable & Grand plans vs. actual completion• Who will collect & summarize the data so they can inform our practice?• Program Evaluation vs. Research Companies BenefitYear:Deloitte Volunteer IMPACT Survey, 2013 Companies BenefitYear:Deloitte Volunteer IMPACT Survey, 2011
earmarks withoutspecifically naming beneficiaries. Defense BudgetDefense Secretary LeonPanetta plans to cut $489billion over the next decade.$263 billion in cuts will come inthe next five years.A sequester would impose anadditional $500 billion in cutsin the period 2013-23.For FY 2012, Congress cut 4percent from FY 2011 R&D butincreased basic research (6.1-6.3) by $82 million. DARPA and NDEPCongress cut $160million from DARPA. Theagency has been taggedas seeking more moneythan it can spend.The National DefenseEducation Programreceived $15 million lessthan the administrationsought. Bill languageprotects SMARTscholarships. Science Space and Technology CommitteeChairman Ralph Hall (R, Tex.) Obama
from industry. All senior design projects at NSU are project-basedand done in collaboration with industry. This presentation will focus on the implementation ofQuality Enhancement Plan (QEP) which has been recently adopted by the NSU and focuses onexperiential learning in all disciplines. The Experiential learning in the ET department has setan excellent example at NSU. Examples from different aspects of experiential learning will bepresented and discussed in detail.PresenterDr. Jafar Farhan Al-Sharab is the Head of Engineering Technology Department at Northwestern State University.He received BS In Industrial Engineering from the University of Jordan, and PhD from VanderbiltUniversity/Nashville, TN. Prior joining NSU, Dr. Al-Sharab was an
asked the 35 students in thesophomore class the following question, “Based on the books discussed in class, are thereany you plan on reading in the next few months?” 40% replied “yes” and another 40%replied “no”. The remaining 20% answered “maybe.” The students were asked to listspecifics books they plan to read. 13 of the 35 students listed specific titles they plan toread based on the book reports in the class.Conclusion While the self-reported improvement in outside reading by the underclass studentswas significant it represents less than half showing an interested in self directed life-longlearning while still students. The percentage of seniors reading without any specific effortat encourage lifelong learning was higher at 55%. This
workshop will provide strategies to plan and manage OEPs, especially those that include aphysical-build component and require interdisciplinary skills. Presenters will share theirexperiences and results in running these projects for the past few years, in both online andin-person “Introduction to Engineering” courses.Open-ended Projects - SignificanceIn an OEP, the central theme is that the teams of students define their own design challenge,usually within a focus area (e.g. automation, IoT, biomedical applications etc.). This choice isheavily linked to their motivation and creativity. Consequently, the students take a lead innavigating the design process, learning and applying engineering tools (e.g. 3D modeling,prototyping, Arduino) to develop a
community basedorganizations, performing presentations with high school juniors and seniors; and workshops atcommunity colleges. Once these students are in the program, a department must work hard to keepthe students in the program; activities include: special advisement of the students, retentionworkshops, motivation seminars and workshops with a focus on academic excellence. Recruitmentin these areas is dynamic and transient with some efforts being more successful with oneunderrepresented group at one time than with another group at another time.Results include a summary of recruitment efforts, economics of recruitment and plans for the future.A discussion of industry’s needs in hiring employees from underrepresented areas to fill openingswill be
, generallyacknowledged as being one of the glories of Europe, technical universities set their face todevelop their internal quality assurance systems according not only to the European standardsand the guidelines, focusing more on what should be done than how they should be achieved, butalso to different factors and sources.This paper identifies and explains all the sources that should be taken into account to provide thequality policies adequate to the technical teachings, including engineering accreditationprograms, funding programs or improvement plans. It is showed with a practical case developedin the Quality Manual start up of a Spanish Engineering school.Current role of the Quality in the Higher EducationUniversities are becoming due to the new changes
prominence and the line thatseparates the different roles in the construction industry has already become blurred. Thetwo professions are so interrelated that the industry values a background in both fields.Increasingly more universities across the country and the world have an ArchitecturalEngineering curriculum. However, most existing programs emphasize training inArchitectural Engineering with significantly less emphasis placed on structuralengineering. In this report, I devised an undergraduate curriculum(s) at NC StateUniversity to build a professional career in building/bridge design with strong emphasisin both the structural as well as the architectural aspects. This plan may serve as a modelfor programs interested in a similar training path
Paper ID #27512Integrating Shelter Design and Disaster Education in Architectural Curricu-lumDr. Sudarshan Krishnan, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Sudarshan Krishnan specializes in the area of lightweight structures. His current research focuses on the structural design and behavior of cable-strut systems and transformable structures. His accompanying interests include the study of elastic and geometric structural stability. He teaches courses on the planning, analysis and design of structural systems. He has also developed a new course on deployable structures and transformable architecture. As an architect