integrated with coursework in thesciences. The courses in this new curriculum utilize active and cooperative learning techniquesto engage students in the learning process.Beginning first semester freshman year, engineering students are enrolled in a Project-basedIntroduction to Engineering course. This course is unlike introductory level engineering coursesoffered at other institutions in that it is part of the UNH core curriculum and as such is taken notonly by engineering majors, but also by students who are not studying engineering2. Thisprovides faculty with the opportunity to influence students’ perceptions about engineering, whichotherwise would not necessarily be exposed to engineering. The project-based course is one ofthe first courses
by continual integral use and by an increasein instructor experience in Mobile Studio implementation and an increased awareness of student Page 25.942.9expectations for learning. Student background knowledge is also important to take into accountas a facilitator for the adoption of Mobile Studio education.3.b. Supporting ResourcesAnother barrier noted during adoption of the mobile studio approach across multiple courses andsemesters was the lack of use and access to resources that support the use of the I/O boards.Students’ perceptions of supplementary materials were markedly lower than their
Paper ID #10605Exploring How Design Critique Processes Shape Fifth Graders’ Peer Inter-action in Collaborative Engineering ProjectsDr. Michelle E. Jordan , Arizona State University Michelle Jordan earned her PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, focusing her studies on learning, cognition, and motivation with an emphasis on classroom discourse. She joined the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University in 2010. Her interdisciplinary research draws on traditions in qualitative inquiry, sociolinguistics, complexity theories, and the learning sciences. Partnering with teachers
machinekinematics and dynamics courseIntroductionResearchers have recently identified past failure as an “essential prerequisite” for future success [1].Developing course structures to promote productive failure has received considerable interest inengineering education community. Failures during the undergraduate curriculum can help studentsbuild resiliency, humility and grit. However, persistence through failure is only productive if students arecapable of learning from their past failures [1, 2]. Unfortunately, the high stakes assessments typicallyused in traditional courses do not give students the opportunity to practice productive failure ordemonstrate an ability to learn from their mistakes. As a result, students prioritize earning “goodgrades
Texas at El Paso. The curriculum for this course includes engineering designconcepts and projects and subsequently a 3D design capstone project was added to the curriculum.In 2013, the department (name removed) invested in a Makerbot Replicator 2nd Generation 3Dprinter, with a build volume of 28.5 L x 15.3 W x 15.5 H cm. As a final project, the students ineach of the three classes were grouped in teams of no more than five students. Each team had tocreate a 3D design of a bridge and the final part of the assignment was to 3D print this bridge. Thedesign had to meet specific criteria such as exact dimensions on width, length and height, and hadto support an object of at least five pounds without breaking3. A total of 15 bridges were printed.The
computer science curriculum is designedsuch that students take 15-17 credits each semester throughout the four years to complete thedegree. Only twice were students not eligible to receive ASPIRE funding in a particularsemester because they registered as part-time student or had a leave of absence (militarycommitment).Data collected for NSF on the scholarship recipients indicated that the overall GPAs of studentsreceiving the scholarship did not significantly change during the time they received ASPIREfunding. Many of the students who received the scholarship were academically strong students asevidenced by an average GPA of the cohorts of 3.0 or above for all five years of the program.Graduation rate of ASPIRE recipients was quite high. To date
request anonymous feedback on the course at the end of each quarter to provide an alternate forum for their voice to be heard.c) In addition to teamwork and communication, we also embed diversity content in the curriculum. A highlight of the year is when we invite guest speakers to talk about their experiences as women in the engineering workplace. Hearing about how women have been and continue to be treated as engineers is an eye-opening discussion for the students. We also include practical applications for the students. For example, we discuss what they should do if they see someone disrespecting someone from an underrepresented group in the workplace. Another major theme in the course is ethics, where we study ethical dilemmas
produced by five sections of a seventh-grade Language Arts class at the beginning of an integrated AI, language and philosophy unit.The students in these classes included all academic levels and interests. To begin the unit, theteacher asked students to draw a picture of what they think AI is, accompanied by a one-pageessay explaining their picture and their connotative definition of the field. These drawings andexplanations were examined by the authors to identify patterns and gender differences in theirresponses.SSEP Data SetThe second data set was collected from students participating in the 2006 Smith Summer Scienceand Engineering Program (SSEP). This four-week program, held at Smith College for highschool girls, is designed to enhance the
enhance student creativityand involvement in solving problems, mainly through team-work under a mentor [2].A problem-based teaching methodology is used by the author in the Creative Decisions andDesign sophomore class he teaches as part of the Georgia Tech Regional Engineering Program(GTREP) and Regents Engineering Transfer Program (RETP) for Mechanical Engineeringmajors in Georgia Southern University. The different problem-solving techniques integrate inteam-work design projects. The class meets twice a week for 50-minute lectures, and once a Page 10.1386.1week for three-hour studio-lab in an appropriate classroom for hands-on work, as well in
, microelectronics, electromagnetics, quantum theory and magnetic technology. As the associate chair for undergraduate education, he helped strengthen the ECE curriculum in communications, embedded systems, cyber security, and power. He is the architect of a novel freshman course that introduces fundamental principles of ECE using hands-on pedagogy and a science course for non-STEM majors. Dr. Gomez is also a researcher in the broad areas of micromagnetism and biosensing. He has co-authored over 90 peer-reviewed publications, several book chapters and has three U.S. Patents. He earned his PhD from the University of Maryland, MS from Wayne State in University and BS from the University of the Philippines all in Physics. Among his
. In the construction industry, architects typically use two-dimensional plans and writtenspecifications to communicate what is to be built to construction managers. Thus, being able tounderstand plans and working drawings is a critical skill for all areas of construction. Studentsmust learn how to read plans throughout the CEM curriculum since strong visual-spatial abilityis required to understand details of the finished structure and perform construction work.Mental reconstruction of three-dimensional models from a set of drawings and specifications isnot an easy task for novices. As shown in Figure 1, there have been efforts at teaching studentshow to systematically relate multiple orthographic two-dimensional views to a correspondingthree
. Projects requiring teamwork are nowregularly integrated into class curriculums in order to teach teamwork skills. Developing suchprojects, while time consuming, is well documented. The difficulty occurs when trying to assessthe team’s actual performance in the light of their teamwork skills. Page 9.226.1 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationTeamwork includes in-class and out-of-class effort of team members, making it difficult for aninstructor to evaluate each team-member’s performance. Teamwork
AC 2010-67: INDUSTRY INSTRUCTORS FOR A SPECIALIZED ELECTIVECOURSECharles Baukal, John Zink InstituteJoseph Colannino, John Zink Co. LLCWes Bussman, John Zink InstituteGeoffrey Price, University of Tulsa Page 15.731.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Industry Instructors for a Specialized Elective CourseAbstractThe University of Tulsa (TU) offered an elective course entitled “CombustionEngineering” for its chemical engineering students in the area of combustion technologytaught by John Zink Co. LLC (JZ) which is a world-renowned supplier of industrialcombustion equipment, such as burners and flares, to the process industries. Thisarrangement had many
research. One of the majorassessment processes to come under scrutiny is the traditional course evaluation survey and therole it can play in this outcome-based environment. New directions in course evaluation haveplaced this method in the forefront of outcome-based assessment activities. As validatedassessment methods begin to appear, there is a strong need to integrate them into acomprehensive, adaptable and accessible system that can be an important component of alearning environment.Information technology makes such a task feasible. However, while many activities haveattempted to use technology for knowledge transfer, increased communication, andadministrative productivity [4], there are only a few systems available that provideadministrators
developing and teaching the Introduction to Engineering course. He also teaches Thermo-Fluids, Advanced Math Methods, High Speed Aerodynamics, and other courses for the Mechan- ical and Aerospace Engineering Department at ASU. His interests include student pathways and moti- vations into engineering and developing lab-based curriculum. Recently, he has developed an interest in non-traditional modes of content delivery including online classes and flipped classrooms. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work In Progress: Incorporation of the Entrepreneurial Mindset into the Introduction to Engineering CourseAbstractThis Work In Progress paper will describe changes made
. Prior to joining QUEST, Jessica was the Graduate Assistant in Columbia University’s Office of Student Engagement.Ms. Amanda Yard, University of Maryland, College Park Amanda Yard is a graduating senior from the University of Maryland, Robert H. Smith School of Busi- ness. She is receiving a major in Supply Chain Management and a minor in Spanish Language and Cultures. She will be working for PepsiCo as an Integrated Supply Chain Associate in Schaumburg, IL. Amanda has been a member of the QUEST Honors Program since Spring 2013 where she has served as a mentor, as well as on the capstone project scoping team. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Impact of
nature of theenvironment and train to solve problems under real constraints in a specific context and with scarceresources. These professionals face the challenge of designing solutions for the basic needs ofcommunities in situations of social, environmental or economic vulnerability.All this is possible because of our will to create an engineering curriculum that will teachengineering students how to bring their systemic thinking knowledge and skills, as well as theircultural sensitivity, to bear on real-world problems, which means that it is aimed so that studentscan consider the stakeholders, variables and relations within a system. Some of the systemicmethodologies and topics that contributed with this are Soft Systems Methodologies [7
example dialogfor an error in the translation of the truth table is shown in Fig. 8. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 8: Example dialog box describing a student errorResultsThe K-Mapplet was first integrated into our digital logic course in Fall 2003. From then on, thestudents were given roughly three hours of laboratory time during the semester to practice K-map problems using the applet. During this structured time, the professor and a teachingassistant were present to answer questions. Grades for this activity were based on the level ofparticipation, not
OBJECTIVESI. ElectronicsThe Electronics course deals with an introduction to electrical circuits involving activecomponents such as integrated circuits, diodes, transistors, and their applications. The coursestarts with a basic introduction to circuit theory. This includes a quick review of current andvoltage divider rule, source transformation, Thevenin’s and Norton’s theorems, transfer function,and circuit models for amplifiers. The course covers an introduction to the physical operation ofelectronic semiconductor devices such as the diode, the field-effect transistor, and the bipolarjunction transistor. Device models are developed to aid in circuit analysis and design. Biasing,large-signal and small-signal analysis and the principles used in the
AC 2011-1196: EET PROJECT SESSION IN A PROJECT LEAD THE WAYCONFERENCE FOR LOCAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTSGene L. Harding, Purdue University, Statewide Technology GENE L. HARDING is an associate professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University, where he has taught for eight years. He has three years of industrial experience with Agilent Technologies and over 25 years of combined active and reserve service in the United States Air Force.Danny H Cole Page 22.530.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 EET Project Session in a
the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Destigmatizing Confusion – A Path Towards Professional PracticeIntroductionThis research paper investigates a student team’s approach to a task designed to elicit conceptsand practices used in professional engineering
interplay between the material affordances of Mindstorms, schoolschedules and spaces, curriculum demands, and structural inequities. Mindstorms could be usedfor free-form play that is based on students’ interests and desires, or structured in such a way thatsupports multiple builds. But, in the cases above, the interplay between these material andstructural forces constructed them as uniform, fitting in with the teachers’ expectations, goals,and time constraints. Regardless, the connections to these larger technocultures offeropportunities that are often missed; opportunities to encourage students’ critical reflection onwhat they—or perhaps their communities—want from robotics research and development. Whatmight an ethics of robotics for elementary
classes and a job or family orboth. Most of our education system is not built to cater to their needs, and its results areextremely wasteful –30% failure rate year in and year out in fundamental engineering coursescannot simply be tolerated as an unfortunate reality. Active learning should no longer be anoption –it must be treated as the key ingredient in attempting to start solving this failurecatastrophe. The frame of active learning should contain many interactive elements, includingweekly lectures, in-class activities, online activities71, and hands-on lab exercises –all doneduring the 75-minute class time in each lecture, thus not changing any curriculum structure.Each element of the new paradigm is described below –mechanics of materials
.Bibliography (note URLs and CD-ROM section follows normal reference section)1. Abbanat, R., Gramoll, K., Craig, J., “Use of Multimedia Development Software for Engineering Courseware,” Proceeding of the ASEE Annual Conference, pp. 1217-1222, 1994.2. ABET accreditation document for ABET 2000, www.abet.org/eac/eac2000.htm3. Aglan, H.A., Ali, S.F., “Hands-on Experiences: An Integral Part of Engineering Curriculum Reform,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 327-330, Oct., 1996.4. Armacost, R. L., Mullens, M. A., “Teaching Concurrent Engineering at the University of Central Florida,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 389-394, Oct., 1995.5. Behr, Richard A., “Computer Simulations Versus Real Experiments in a Portable
Kanazawa Technical College and Future Faculty Fellow teaching First-Year Engineering at Purdue University. She focused on integrated STEM curriculum development as part of an NSF STEM+C grant as a Postdoctoral Research Assistant through INSPIRE in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her current research interests focus on pathways into engineering and identity development.Dr. Christina A. Pantoja, Campbell University Christina Pantoja is a postdoctoral researcher in the School of Engineering at Campbell University. Her research interests include career choices, pathways, and retention of women and underrepresented minorities in engineering. Her other interests include the topics of mentoring, job
engineeringapplications.It is the authors’ belief that one of the most common areas between EE and CS encompassesdigital data acquisition, signal processing, communication and control. Coincidentally, these turnout to be some of industry's major needs as well. At the same time, students need to be exposedto a reasonable amount of high-level software engineering practices that are engineering based.However, there is no way that an undergraduate CE program can accommodate each of thesecourses in an already crowded curriculum. The solution to this problem, that has beenimplemented at Western Michigan University (WMU), is to create a junior level course thatteaches high-level software engineering best practices using Visual Basic that is applied to dataacquisition
constituents (students and faculty). Theevaluation process and the subsequent revisions of these materials have created a new type ofresource analogous to an e-book but including a rich environment of video clips, audio clips,text, and graphics. Another shift is in the sharing of expertise. In the twice yearly meetingsfocused on course development, input from faculty content experts is integrated into themultimedia modules for the subsequent revision.IntroductionIn university settings, the field of technology has been expanded in the last ten years with coursesthat focus on the interactions of technology and society. These courses are presented in variousways; some focus on the ethics of technology while others take an artifact-based approach. Inmany
environment for research learning to occur. The learners’ knowledgeconstruction process is aided by an environment of distributed cognition in which participants atall levels—experts, mentors, accomplished novices, and novices—teach and learn from eachother.4 The RCS addresses the development of communications abilities in a system ofdistributed cognition.Survey results of RCS participants are presented to provide an example of a way to incorporatecomplex systems study into the existing undergraduate engineering curriculum. Complexsystems study is defined as a new field of science that studies the collective behavior of a systemand how this system interacts with its environment. Complex systems study is laying thefoundation for a revolution of all
science curriculum for the grade that your child is entering so they will get a good review & head start on the science lessons they will see in the next year. Summer 2015 and Summer 2016 – Energy Engineering Let’s amp up the energy this summer! Immerse yourself in learning about Alberta’s rich natural resources. Invent and build energy efficient mechanisms through an investigation of different forms of renewable energy such as, hydro, wind, thermal and solar power. Delve deep into the physical sciences through cleaning up an oil spill and exploring geological finds. Campers will also have the opportunity to experiment with LEGO Mindstorm Robotics, GPS and GIS mapping systems
for only the two online sections. This wasdone for two reasons. enrollment for the online sections (30 and 20 students) is considerably much largerthan that of the live section (13 students), and because the instructor felt that the micro-lessons wouldhave a larger impact on online students since they have less opportunities to interact with the instructor.Over the seven-week period in which the study was conducted, the instructor integrated five micro-lessons within the existing curriculum. The topics of these micro-lessons were: • Micro-lesson 1: chain corrections • Micro-lesson 2: profile leveling using Excel • Micro-lesson 3: bearing computations • Micro-lesson 4: balancing latitudes and departures • Micro-lesson