, 2012.[16] A. Calabrese Barton, H. Kang, E. Tan, T. B. O’Neill, J. Bautista-Guerra, and C. Brecklin, “Crafting a future in science: tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 37–75, Feb. 2013.[17] H. B. Carlone, C. M. Scott, and C. Lowder, “Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 836–869, 2014.[18] K. L. Tonso, “Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, pp. 273–307, Sep. 2006.[19] S. Rodriguez, K. Cunningham, and A. Jordan, “STEM identity development for
inclusion. The reasoned action model was identified asthe theoretical framework, and the second cycle themes were integrated into a final thematic map(Figure 3) and corresponding written analysis around the three main factors for intention. Table 1: First cycle coding categories Category (Prefix) Description Example Codes Sentiments (S) Feelings about their job S-Rewarding to help others grow S-Resentment regarding conflicting responsibilities Motivations (M) Motivations to pursue and continue M-Career progression and money
] H. S. Truman, "Statement by the President making public a report of the commission on higher education," December, vol. 15, p. 1947, 1947.[5] J. McFarland et al., "The Condition of Education 2019. NCES 2019-144," National Center for Education Statistics, 2019.[6] L. Berkner, C. C. Wei, S. He, S. Lew, M. Cominole, and P. Siegel, "National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS: 04), 2003-04: Undergraduate Financial Aid Estimates for 2003-04 by Type of Institution. ED TAB. NCES 2005-163," National Center for Education Statistics, 2005.[7] D. J. Boyd, "Public research universities: Changes in state funding," in American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2015.[8] U. S. D. o. L. Bureau of Labor
strategic decision made by the Central Commit-tee of CPC and the State Council of PRC. Over the past four years, it has shown unique characteris-tics different from previous higher educational policies. The Diffusion of Innovation Theory, tosome extent, can be introduced.2.2 Analysis model of the diffusion of “Double First-rate” InitiativeFrances S. Berry and William D. Berry (1990) integrated the internal decision-making model andexternal diffusion model, and proposed an integrated diffusion of innovation model. The modelhas become a mainstream model of diffusion of innovation in the West for a long time. This re-search revises the Berry’s diffusion of innovation model, expands the connotation of influencingfactors and mechanism factors, and tries
educationbegan to become accepted in the U.S. in the 1990’s when the idea of combining action incommunity and structured learning began to be institutionalized as a pedagogy and as a field[1],[2]. The idea was called service-learning. Bringle and Hatcher [3] defined service learning as“a credit-bearing educational experience in which students participate in an organized serviceactivity that meets identified community needs and reflection on the service activity in such away as to gain further understanding of the course content, a broader appreciation of thediscipline and an enhanced sense of civic responsibility” (p. 222).Community service and civic engagement has been ingrained in the Indian culture from a verylong time. A modern example of such a
[Divergingemployment outcomes of higher education], Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education andPsychology, University of Jyväskylä, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-7529-6.[6] I. Tanhua, Teorioita sukupuolenmukaisen segregaation syistä [Theories of gendersegregation], Research report by SEGLI project, 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.kaikkienduuni.fi/teorioita-segregaation-syist/ [English translation of graphprovided by Tanhua to the Authors].[7] R. Hutt, “These 10 countries are closest to achieving gender equality,” World EconomicForum, 17 Dec 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/12/gender-gap-equality-women-parity-countries/.[8] S. Singh and S. Peers, “Where are the Women in the Engineering
, “Stereotyping and its threat are real.,” American Psychologist, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 680–681, 1998. 6. C. L. Walker and S. J. Rakow, “The Status of Hispanic American Students in Science: Attitudes,” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 225–245, 1985. 7. A. Meador, “Examining Recruitment and Retention Factors for Minority STEM Majors Through a Stereotype Threat Lens,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 61–69, 2018. 8. D. Sadegh, S. Perkins-Hall and K. Abeysekera, “Tested Strategies for Recruiting and Retention of STEM Majors” in International Association for Development of the Information Society: Proceeding of the 5th International Association for Development of the
writing,” Coll. English, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 610–617, 1979.[20] J. Colwell, J. Whittington, and C. F. Jenks, “Writing Challenges for Graduate Students in Engineering and Technology,” 2011, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18722.[21] A. Selzer King, K. R. Moore, S. Frankel, and A. Hardage Edlin, “Drawing Strategies for Communication Planning: A Rationale and Exemplar of the Geometric Page Form (GPF) Approach,” ACM'S Spec. Inte. Group on the Des. of Info., 2017.[22] A. S. King and A. H. Edlin, “Structured drawing tasks support research ideation : A mentor-mentee report on iteration, invention, and collaboration,” ACM'S Spec. Inte
Rapid Transit district’s 1990’s expansions in the East Bay and SFO Airport at three billion to the New Starts program for the Federal Transit Administration with over a hundred projects and $85 billion in construction value. At the latter, he also acted as source selection board chairman and program COTR for $200 plus million in task order con- tracts for engineering services. Working for the third-largest transit agency in the United States, the Los Angeles County MTA, Michael managed bus vehicle engineering for $1 billion in new acquisitions and post-delivery maintenance support for 2300 vehicles with some of the most complex technology (natural gas engines and embedded systems) in the US transit industry in the
ofpractices described above in which participants are asked to look through the deck (or virtualdisplay) of practices to identify the three to six practices they feel are most emphasized or valuedand an additional three to six they perceived to be emphasized or valued in a given engineeringcontext. Participants are asked a series of follow up questions after these card sorts. Afterdiscussing the practices emphasized in the engineering context(s) in which they engaged,participants are asked to sort through the deck once again to identify the top practices theypersonally deem to be most important in addressing a complex problem in their field. In addition,participants are asked to reflect on the extent to which the valued aspects of engineering work
,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2020, vol. 2020-June, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34617.[7] L. Torres, M. W. Driscoll, and A. L. Burrow, “Racial microaggressions and psychological functioning among highly achieving African-Americans: A mixed-methods approach,” J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1074–1099, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.10.1074.[8] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282–284, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/nbt.4089.[9] J. K. Hyun, B. C. Quinn, T. Madon, and S. Lustig, “Graduate student mental health
Doing L Listening to instructor/taking notes, etc. AnQ Student answering a question posed by the instructor with the rest of the class listening SQ Student asks a question WC Engaged in whole class discussion by offering explanations, opinion, judgment, etc Ind Individual thinking/problem solving. CG Discuss clicker question in groups of 2 or more students WG Working in groups on worksheet activity OG Other assigned group activity, such as responding to instructor question Prd Making a prediction about the outcome of demo or experiment SP Presentation by student(s) TQ Test or quiz W Waiting O Other – explain in comments Instructor is Doing Lec Lecturing RtW Real-time writing on board, doc. projector, etc
. This opens the door to thinking more broadly aboutoffering remote lab opportunities to students who may not have access to an in-person lab at theirinstitution. It’s possible to learn everything you need to without the brick and mortar type of labsthat we have grown accustomed to.References[1] Shivam, S., Wagoner, K., 2020, “How Well do Remote Labs Work? A Case study atPrinceton University” Physics Education arXiv:2008.04499 [physics.ed-ph][2] Sabancu, A., Sullivan, J., 2020, “A Project Based Online Experimentation Course,” 2020ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID 30635[3] Starks, J., Hendrickson, F., Hadi, F., Traum, M. 2017, “Miniaturized Inexpensive Hands-OnFluid Mechanics Laboratory Kits for Remote Online Learning,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference
educationresearch [13]. Figure 1 leverages this model to show how the engineering and labor theory ofchange fits into this study of engineering graduate students engaging in a strike. The modelconnects Mejia et al.’s critical consciousness model [17], which engages Freire’s principles ofcritical pedagogy [18], with Hassan’s model of learning-assessment interactions [19]. “Mejia etal.’s model is represented in the center of this model, showing relationships between theory,action, reflection, and concepts of scholarship, praxis, concientização, and liberation that resultfrom their overlap. Hassan’s model of learning-assessment interactions is overlaid, with theoverlap taking the form of reflection as an assessment method and action as a learning method”[13
project. The survey is included inthe appendix. This survey was given to both the traditional face-to-face section as well as the i e ec i a d a S de -test was performed to compare the results between sections.Table 2 shows the results for each question on this survey including the averages and p-valuesfrom a t-test. Question Online Mean Traditional P-value Mean 1 4.56 4.38 0.5053 2 4.56 4.08 0.1226 3 4.67 4.15 0.1032 4 4.56 4.31 0.4109
author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. The ideas we present here are part of a much larger thought process (Authors, 2021, in progress) in which we are thinking about the ways in which we use quantitative methods in engineering education, and how they might be better realigned or reformed to achieve the same diversity and equity outcomes we feel are more readily achieved by qualitative methods at the time. Our treatment and presentation of demographic data variables here represent a starting point. 1 The “doing” of engineering education is full of many delicate power
. criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/. [Accessed March 2021].[3] K. B. Demoret, ""Students Teaching Engineering- Making Products for Education" (card on Engineering Unleashed website)," May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/1489.[4] C. Kunsch, A. Jitendra and S. Sood, "The effects of peer-mediated instruction in mathematics for students with learning problems: A research synthesis," Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2007.[5] S. Briggs, "How Peer Teaching Improves Student Learning and 10 Ways to Encourage It," informED Open Colleges, 7 June 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/peer-teaching
. Didion, N. L. Fortenberry, and E. Cady, Colloquy on Minority Males in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. 2012, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[3] Y. E. Pearson, Inclusion, Diversity Now Factor Into Accreditation Standards. PE Magazine, 2019.[4] NSPE Adopts New Policy on Diversity. 2017: NSPE Today.[5] Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Phase III: Voices on Women's Participation and Retention. 2017.[6] R. Reisberg, The University Experience: Retention to Degree, in ASEE-TUEE-WIE Discussion Starter. 2015, ASEE.[7] C. Corbett, and C. Hill, Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women's Success in Engineering and Computing. 2015: AAUW[8] L. L. Long III, T. S
. Chiou, “The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 45, no. 4, p. 13, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1080/14703290802377240.[5] A. McKim and R. McKendree, “Metacognition, systems thinking, and problem-solving ability in school-based agriculture, food, and natural resources education,” Adv. Agric. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–47, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.37433/aad.v1i1.21.[6] W. Valley, H. Wittman, N. Jordan, S. Ahmed, and R. Galt, “An emerging signature pedagogy for sustainable food systems education,” Renew. Agric. Food Syst., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 467–480, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1017/S1742170517000199.[7] H. S. Dhindsa, Makarimi-Kasim, and O. Roger Anderson, “Constructivist-Visual
integration of this in the Laplace domain becomes Va/s.Omega represents Va(s) multiplied by the transfer function, and this equation can be solved to determinethe response to a step function (such as a flipped switch which allows current to flow). The graph shown in Figure 6 shows a system with a step input Va and a DC motor’s resultingoutput (omega). Eventually, omega becomes a constant as steady state operation is reached, but intransient responses it is a first order system. Figure 6: Voltage represents a step function, while omega is a DC Motor’s response to that step.Stove Types Figure 7: Gas (left) and electric (right) stoves Consider two different stove types – gas and electric – as shown in
advertising”. This might require a weekly email to the team managersto remind them of their specific duties and encourage them to guide the team in their roleswithout micromanaging specific roles.On the whole, the METE format has met and exceeded initial expectations for creating astructured environment where students can practice and improve their teamworking skills.References[1] ABET (2020). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020-2021,https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/#GC3, accessed Sept. 9, 2020.[2] S. Sangelkar, B. Mertz, A. Bernal, and P. Cunningham. “Benchmarking Teaming InstructionAcross a Curriculum”, in Proceedings of the ASEE 2019 Annual Conference