ability to conductindependent research is an essential pillar of the doctoral process. Rigorous independent researchat the undergraduate level is still relatively uncommon in the U.S.; is typically limited to thestrongest students or students in specifically targeted populations 1, 2, 3; is most common in fieldsinvolving laboratory science; and is least common in non-laboratory social sciences andhumanities, with engineering fields somewhere in between 2. Ultimately, this means that studentsentering graduate engineering or construction-related programs of study typically do not havesignificant prior exposure to or experience with the means and methods for designing andimplementing independent research.In response to this knowledge gap, faculty
the Department of Mechanical Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro. For the past twenty five years he has been working in the area of performance evaluation and modeling of poly- meric composites and ceramic matrix composites. He has worked with several federal laboratories in the area of fatigue, impact and finite element modeling of woven composites including US Army, US Air force, NASA-Langley Research Center, National science Foundation, Office of Naval Research, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. In addition he has collaborated with Rice University, Texas A&M University, Tuskegee University, Air Force Institute of Technology, University of Dayton, Florida State University
a short project evaluationwhich is summarized below.1. Overall ENG1101 ProjectAs shown in Table 2, the components used from ENG1001, were the initial research and projectmanagement, design construction, design pre-testing and testing, and the final report. Two of thethree instructors did require students complete an integrated design project ethical analysis. Theremaining instructor included engineering ethics via traditional case study analysis. The ethicsanalysis identified cultural and environmental concerns when utilizing wind energy based on a Page 25.129.7University of Massachusetts-Amherst Renewable Energy Resource Laboratory fact
for our students, work iscurrently under way to optimize the entry of transfer students into our program by encouragingour local community colleges to develop articulated versions of our lower division designcourses.References 1. R.Ryan and N. Ho, “A Sophomore Design Sequence for Mechanical Engineering Students”, presented at the 2006 ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Conference, Pomona, California, April 20, 2006 2. www.cdio.org 3. N. Ho and R. Ryan, “Designing a Sequence of Design Courses to Improve Student Performance and Retention at a Minority Institution”, presented at the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference 4. E. Cooney, “Laboratory Report Grading Rubrics: What High School Teachers are Doing”, presented at the
2008, he was a Postdoc- toral Associate at the Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He visited the Centre Automatique et Systemes at the Ecole de Mines de Paris for four months. He is the recipient of the National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER award, the Air Force Young Investigator Research Award (YIP), and the 2010 IEEE Control Systems Magazine Outstanding Paper Award. He was an Air Force Summer Faculty Fellow in 2010 and 2011. His research interests are in modeling, stability, robust control, observer design, and simulation of nonlinear and hybrid systems with applications to power systems, aerospace, and biology.Dr. Giampiero Campa, MathWorks
Systems and Control, Qualityand Continuous Improvement, and Manufacturing Management. The roof structure emphasizesthat laboratory experiences, quality, continuous improvement, and problem analysis pervade themanufacturing engineering field and integrate its various facets. Below the building foundation are more detailed lists of the Four Pillars subjects. Thesemake up the content of the programs. This list constitutes the basis for SME certification examsfor Certified Manufacturing Engineer and Certified Manufacturing Technologist.2. The Four Pillars and the SME Center for Education The Four Pillars of Manufacturing Engineering is a tool for promoting greaterunderstanding of the breadth and depth of the field of manufacturing
101 covers some of the scientific andmathematical principles that underlie the operation of information technologies, and theengineering processes by which the technologies are created. In particular, ECE 101 showsstudents how engineers negotiate tradeoffs as they design devices to meet social needs. Intendedfor students outside the College of Engineering, ECE 101 meets the campus’s general educationrequirements in physical sciences and in quantitative reasoning.In each semester, the enrollment in ECE 101 ranges from forty to sixty students, mostlyfreshmen and sophomores. Each week, students in ECE 101 attend two 50-minute lectures taughtby the instructor and one two-hour laboratory session led by a graduate teaching assistant. In
Class (IPD) - Architectural Engineering, Architecture, Construction Management and Landscape Architecture completed end- of-quarter surveys. C. ARCE and BRAE Department Graduates with typically one year of industry experience were surveyed as a one-time effort.A. ARCE DESIGN LAB SURVEYS - In ARCE senior level design labs; ARCE 451 Timberand Masonry Design and Constructability Laboratory and ARCE 372 Steel Design andConstructability Laboratory students, six classes of approximately 16 students each were askedthe following questions over a period of three years 6: Do you think you are a better team member because of what you learned on the team projects? The majority of the students
brief history of how undergraduate research in FPGA design was initiated.The FPGA Design class introduces the student to the concepts of reconfigurable logic design,including how to write VHDL code to synthesize basic digital logic designs, such as countersand adders, as well as how to use the tools for simulation and debug. Our laboratory is equippedwith FPGA development boards from Xilinx. The students learn how to use the associateddesign software from Xilinx, which includes the ChipScope virtual logic analyzer, thePlanAhead tool, and the ISIM simulator4. Some unique features of this course include adiscussion of the relevant VLSI design issues, testing FPGAs using high speed logic analyzers,and design with soft processor cores. An
Harvester Using Magnetic Material Lung Imaging Using Optical Coherence TomographyMechanical & Industrial Engineering Mechanical Engineering Design in the Laminar Flame Laboratory: Design of a Combustion Vessel Retracting System Load-Bearing Capabilities of Ambulation Aids Development of Wood-Plastic CompositesSchool of Pharmacy Cellular Delivery Using Nano-EmulsionsLab mentors are required to submit a full abstract of the proposed research assignment inaddition to detailing specific research activities, required background knowledge andexpectations of participants during the course of the summer program. Each year, new facultyinterested in participating meet with program staff in addition to being encouraged
course content as theylearn. The projects have been carefully selected and designed to support the program learningobjectives. The careful selection and integration of projects to meet specific learning objectivesis an aspect of an effective inductive learning pedagogy called Challenge Based Instruction. A positive and supportive learning environment is essential to effectively accomplishing thelearning objectives that the curriculum and pedagogy is intended to support. The ultimateobjective of the PREP program is to prepare students for and motivate them toward highereducation particularly in STEM fields. The university setting is an ideal environment for theprogram. Exposure to college students, STEM faculty, campus laboratory and research
these interactions.IntroductionThe Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University has recentlyrevised its curriculum. In particular, the Department reduced the number of credits in thecurriculum by consolidating several related topics into a few key courses. One of these courses,Civil Engineering Fundamentals, is taught in the fall semester of the sophomore year and servesas an introduction to the engineering program. The course includes three 50-minute lectures andone 3-hour laboratory session per week over a 14-week semester. There are two sections of thecourse, each of which has between 20 and 30 students. Fundamentals is designed to helpsophomores develop many analytical, interpretive and field-based skills and
emerging trend. Computing projects that are usedto control physical hardware were added to the Engineering Problem Solving and Computation course inorder to make strong connections to the many embedded computing applications used in students’everyday experience and in society in general. Moreover, witnessing computer instructions produce light,sound, and motion engages the students’ senses and provides the sort of immediate feedback essential forconstructive and memorable learning.In order to accomplish the goal of introducing hands-on laboratory experiences to over 600 students,Northeastern University teamed with the not-for-profit company Machine Science Incorporated toconduct a pilot study using a custom kit of electronic components in the
Engineering Kimberly Cook-Chennault is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering De- partment at Rutgers University and Associate Director for the Center for Advanced Energy Systems (CAES). She holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Michigan and Stanford University, respectively, and a Ph.D. in biomedical engineering from the University of Michi- gan. Prior to receiving her doctorate, Cook-Chennault worked at Ford Motor Company, Cummins Engine, Visteon, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories as a summer intern and Project Engineer. As a product engineer with Ford and Visteon, she designed seat and washer bottle assemblies, and established design
complicated systems spanningboth fields, and to explore new research boundaries.The Sensor Networks for Infrastructure Systems course provided a combination of depth andbreadth to both undergraduates and graduates. The course consisted of two hours of lecture andthree hours of laboratory time each week with content divided into three topic areas eachincorporating a multi-week lab project. The final weeks of the course were devoted to large-scalefinal projects where student teams monitored actual structures on the university campus.The course was assessed in comparison to two other courses offered concurrently: a graduatecourse in networking for ECPE/CS students and a mixed course in water resource engineeringfor civil engineering students. Assessment
an explicitor implicit security policy and classified incidents into the probe, scan, account compromise, rootcompromise, packet sniffer, denial of service, exploitation of trust, malicious code, and Internetinfrastructure attacks in 1997. In 1999, Lincoln Laboratory at MIT created the KDD99 data set,which is known as “DARPA Intrusion Detection Evaluation Data Set”7. The data set includesthirty-nine types of attacks that are classified into four main categories: denial of service (DoS)attacks, probe attacks, user to root (U2R) attacks, and remote to local (R2L) attacks.The goal of this paper is to provide a detailed analysis of those four categories of attacks. Theexperiments simulate attacks that are conducted by attackers in the real world
same time, but more meetings arerequired. The most successful teams seem to be the ones whose meetings are the mostproductive. The team that did the kitting cell video claimed never to have all night sessions;rather, they had an open meeting time every day from 5-11pm in our computer laboratory. Teammembers came and went as they could and did other homework when their presence was notrequired. Team meetings came together dynamically and on demand. We currently have pre-reserved five rooms for 3 hours each evening Monday through Thursday. In addition, thefacilities manager now keeps the computer laboratory open round the clock all weekend duringthe weeks of the team project.One of the challenges that we face with our course redesign approach is
Session 2326 A Simple Beam Test: Motivating High School Teachers to Develop Pre-Engineering Curricula Eric E. Matsumoto, John R. Johnston, E. Edward Dammel, S.K. Ramesh California State University, SacramentoAbstractThe College of Engineering and Computer Science at California State University, Sacramentohas developed a daylong workshop for high school teachers interested in developing andteaching pre-engineering curricula. Recent workshop participants from nine high schoolsperformed “hands-on” laboratory experiments that can be implemented at the high school levelto introduce basic
and speaking.It is necessary, therefore, that those who are most able to help their students learn to think likeengineers should also play an important role in helping them learn to write and speak likeengineers. This places the responsibility back on engineering professors. Of course, the challengehas always been about finding time in engineering courses for teaching communication skills.One response to that challenge is to take advantage of the opportunities for teachingcommunication skills that already exist in the curriculum. While Wheeler 6 lists a number ofpossible venues for writing in the engineering curriculum, the most ubiquitous and yet the mostoverlooked is the lab report.Practically all engineering students take laboratory
aframework for describing effective engineering design studio courses, particularly at theintroductory level. The basic elements of such a framework consist of four basic areas: physicalspace, pedagogy, student exercises, and assessment.Physical space can have a profound effect on how students react in any active learning situation.In conversations with educators from Stanford regarding their success in visual thinking andengineering design, one of the most important elements reported was the need for “great views”and good lighting. Unfortunately, the physical space typically used to teach engineering designis markedly different than that for any of the visual arts. Often a conventional classroom is used,or a laboratory space equipped for physics or
Lane, Dallas Texas. Instruments, software, and laboratory spacewas provided by Texas Instruments. LabView® software was used for instrument control, dataacquisition, and calculation of linearity data. Linearity data is expressed as differentialnonlinearity (DNL) and integral nonlinearity (INL). Analysis of the data found theTHS5651IDW DAC to be monotonic since the magnitude of the DNL were less than ± 1 LSBand the INL were less than ± 0.5 LSB.I. IntroductionThe Electronics Engineering Technology program at the University of North Texas has a limitedbudget and facilities to provide research projects for graduate students. These limitations can beovercome by using services of Industrial Advisory Committees (IAC). These committees cancontribute
. Page 6.723.3 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education-Tutorials: Does the software have any tutorials available? Built-in tutorials tend to be easier(and cheaper) for the students but may not be as comprehensive. Do the tutorials merely teachpoint-n-click methods or do they attempt to impart creation theory?-Computer Requirements: Does the software require “bleeding edge” technology? Will thecurrent lab machines be able to handle large assemblies? Ensure that a large assembly is run ontypical laboratory and student machines to check display performance. Many mid-level CADpackages require certain
markets. Such grants offer faculty and their students theopportunity for a more traditional, extended research experience, with adequate time to reflect on alternativeapproaches, design of experiments, interpretation of data and the technical and societal significance of findings.While undergraduate faculty are at some disadvantage in proposing such research unless their laboratories areparticularly well-equipped by virtue of ongoing graduate research activity, faculty who are willing to pursueresearch on industrially-significant topics that "fall in the cracks" among higher-priority R&D goals can use thesesources to develop a program of specialized, frequently methodological research work as a means of steadysupport for undergraduate
in institutes and laboratories a little from distant of the really amount of the undergraduating, through this up-to-date version of internal and external seminars to the institution.I. IntroductionThe scientific-technological revolution that we live propitiated, among many other things, a newsense for the words “out of use”. Yes, the word sense “out of use” was always intimately linkedto the old, something that lost its usefulness in more appropriate substitutes' face and adapted tothe present context. However, the elapsed time so that it happened the out of date is notablyinferior to the one of some years ago. Page 6.88.1
/TET) students at TexasA&M University take a series of technical courses each of which includes an integratedlaboratory experience. After receiving feedback and recommendations from industries that hireEET/TET graduates, more emphasis is being placed on laboratories where teams of students arerequired to design, implement, test, and analyze a project. The experience is concluded with thedocumentation of the results of each project in both written and oral format. This approachbegins in selected sophomore-level courses and continues through the capstone senior designproject with less and less faculty intervention and control as the students progress in theircurriculum. One of the courses that utilize this approach is a junior-level Computer
decentralized wastewater Page 6.857.5systems, including individual and cumulative effects, on local watershed supply wells and“Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education” Session 1392downstream receiving waters. The project will include field and laboratory work, modeling, andstakeholder involvement. Field and laboratory work will enhance the understanding of thetransport/fate of chemicals in soil-based
issomewhat surprising that this approach is not used more commonly. Page 5.617.6Computer-Aided Design and PrototypingAlong with an understanding of the design process and sketching skills, one of the pri-mary goals of WWU’s engineering design graphics sequence is help students developthree-dimensional visualization and CAD modeling skills. This goal recently receivedadditional support through a five year partnership between WWU and The Boeing Com-pany [11]. During the first phase of this partnership, Boeing supplied funds for a moderncomputer-aided design facility. This laboratory is utilized to teach design, modeling,prototyping, and concurrent
work ofDeming5,6,7,8,9. The authors do not wish to diminish the contribution of others, but the UMR presen-tation of Total Quality Management is essentially the Deming Way, and follows closely the ap-proach used by Ragsdell in his industrial and government short courses, as well as in his course atUMR entitled EMgt-375: Total Quality Management.6.1 BEST TQMThe laboratory portion of EMgt-375 is supported by a multimedia learning environment calledBEST TQM. This is a self-contained, information intensive and stimulating learning environmentcontaining many topics covered in the course. BEST TQM is not designed to be a stand-alonecourse, but is useful as a convenient reference library of relevant material for a course in TQM.BEST TQM is a rich
Session: 2330 Graduate Engineering Student Performance Assessment: How learning pattern affects test scores Timothy Chang, New Jersey Institute of Technology, NJ and Daphne Chang, Bloomfield College, NJAbstractIn this paper, the findings based on a graduate electrical engineering course titled “Real-Time Control Systems Design” are analyzed and reported. This course comprises of alecture and laboratory component where the students are expected to transform theirtheoretical knowledge into a viable team laboratory design and present the results to theentire class. Upon
challenge and an opportunity. The authors share the view that engineering educationhas evolved to become more inclusive and responsive to stakeholders i.e. their constituency.As such engineering programs are becoming less isolated and not restricted to engineeringschools boundaries.A systems perspective brings a sense of inclusiveness into the design process. That is thesystem is composed of functional groups or subsystems that when brought together, all of theparts,(laboratories/classrooms infrastructure, human resources, teaching methods, constituenciesneeds, university mission and a business plan), interact /perform in a way that the outcomessought for the system, are achieved.The systems approach seems consistent with the accreditation criteria